Dean Clifford - The Two Sides of the Legal Name

T4TT Exclusive - Video # 1 1. The legal name, although there is only one, exists in two different jurisdictions. The purpose here is to use a two-sided chart to outline the details of each jurisdiction. The left side is your side, and the right side is the state side. 2. You are the administrator/beneficiary in your jurisdiction, and the state administrates and is the beneficiary on their side. So, there are two jurisdictions, or two areas of managing control. 3. When you are born, the first gift your parents give you is a name, a given name and a family name (the state likes to call it a sur name). A name is a title, and you need a title to do anything. They fill out a registration form with the state. To register simply means to record publicly; it does not infer or mean any transfer of power. To register is basically to protect your rights. You are not the name; the name is merely a title to enable others to recognize you. (The two columns below, in addition to pointing out the two identities, will be referred to frequently in later text.)

Man and State-a Dual Jurisdiction Chart

Live Birth Record. (Can be called the Certificate/ Statement of Live Birth, etc); it was signed/created by a parent to give us a title of recognition. (We were not born a sovereign because we were dependent on our parents. Sovereignty rights come when we become of age- usually eighteen. You are the beneficiary of the trust; you are entitled to birth rights, the resources of the land that are granted by the evidence of this certificate, and basically, inherent rights (common law rights), can conduct business and commerce, freedoms Non-taxable Certificate of Birth (not a receipt for the Live Birth document-it doesnt even mention Live Birth. Never mind higher case, lower case- it does not really matter-its just a title of recognition-the upper case business is not an argument to be made in court; signed by the state (the creator/owner) This document will be the basis to set up a trust. - created the Certificate of Birth and sent it to you? -they are the beneficiary of this - they created it, and its a split title situation, so you keep that in trust. - no birth rights, only benefits and privileges to bestow. Statutory/legal rights are their bag. - can conduct business and commerce Taxes paid on this title

(see paragraph 38) 4. People must understand the purpose of the title. In addition to enabling recognition, it enables the creation of a trust. Your title relates to your status in society, and everything is done with a title. But a title to what? Well- the most convenient classification to place the new born in is property. The parents are the owner of this new landed property, and this property must be looked after because it is unable to look after itself until it becomes of age, usually. Page 1 of 9

5. There are two titles to property; one is legal title and the other is equitable title. (15:22) A trust is created when those titles are split. One party is sent one title and the other party retains the other title. When legal title is sent to one party, they become a trustee of that legal title. 6. Whoever holds the equitable title to the property is the beneficiary. Thats how trust law works. 7. When your parents/hospital sent in the signed Statement of Live Birth document, it is the legal title to the name you were given. That was sent to the government and it made them a legal trustee of this legal title and created a trust, and the Certificate of Live Birth is the evidence of that trust. So the state is the legal title holder of that trust. 8. From birth you have been the equitable title holder of that trust, and that is why you are the beneficiary on the left side of the chart. Because the title was split and the state had the legal title, they had use of that title. This gives the state usufruct rights, and makes them the usufructiary. (17:01) (This makes the mindset of the creatures were dealing with more obvious; they are said to be quite sensitive to being called usufructiaries.) 9. The Certificate of Live Birth comes with certain birth rights, such as the right of being born in this land, and having access to the land resources, and we granted legal title of our claim to the state to use (When did we do that??) to administrate everything for our benefit. Inherent rights go with the package, and the courts are responsible for inherent law, so One of those rights is the right to conduct commerce. (21:23) Contrary to the belief of some, government does not have jurisdiction over deciding who is entitled to conduct commerce. It is a right to be able to conduct your own business, unless you get a business license, of course, which changes things a bit. 10. Because the government gives only benefits and privileges, they may say, You know, Mr. Clifford, its a privilege to be driving on these highways! Is it?? We have and always did have an inherent right to drive on the Queens highways. The problem is that it is the same name, but different jurisdictions. This is where title becomes so important. 11. (26:31) It does little good to enter the court and say youre a man in the image of God, and statutes dont apply; it makes more sense to clarify that you are representing a title, and that laws apply only to the title that youre acting through. You are always liable when you are acting through a title if you do something that is not granted to you. 12. Remember in Braveheart when, before the battle, the English leader gave Robert the Bruce the chance to ride away, and all he would have to do is agree to go home, and the king will create you titles and estates, from which you will pay an annual tax! This was seen through immediately as the English King retaining jurisdiction, and imposing fees/taxes as a result of you being allowed the use of that title. Was Mel Gibson trying to tell us something about jurisdiction and title rights? In another

Page 2 of 9

part of the movie, someone is saying that we have this birthright. For heavens sake, take your birthright, and you owe nothing to anybody (31:14) Your birthright is a title. 13. You have to pay a tax for the use of that title because it was granted to you by somebody else. (30:08) There is always liability attached to a title. 14. If you build your own car from scratch, you dont need permission to use what is totally yours. But if you borrow your friends car, you must expect to pay for the privilege to use it. Your friend dictates the terms of your use of his property. 15. So, we wee that the government/state appears to be the creature that represents a jurisdiction that is really foreign to our jurisdiction. The government is a business- a foreign corporation. (35:15) The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) is the short form of the Constitution Act, which is Schedule D of the Canada Act-passed in the United Kingdom in 1982. (How sensible is that, speaking of titles?) It was not an act of the legislature of the government of Canada. It was a charter that created Canada, the vessel of Canada. The purpose of the 1982 act was simply to rename the BNA act of 1867; it tells you that right in the charter. But, the original BNA is still the superior document. 16. We must start using government like it should be used, for actually, its system of registration is a good thing because it affords you the chance to have legal procedures recorded for public record. That is a good thing, because it is proof of action. These results, supposedly, in due process of law being followed before someone can take your property. 17. If someone buys your farm, the records will show that. The records show that equity is not being forfeited in the deal. They might be forfeiting legal title, but that is fine. If somebody else is holding legal title in trust for my benefit, thats great because theyre now libel if something happens and I lose that property. 18. If you walk into court and say that Canada is a ship a sail on the sea of commerce, and there is no land, youll probably just end up in jail. So throwing unrelated facts at them in a belligerent way is useless, even though it might be true, as that one is. 19. The state, and agents of the state has certain rules it has to charter; thats the point of all the statutes and regulations. They also dont want to harm us, and theyre very picky about that because they know they are libel if they cause harm to us. This is very evident from case law, such as, R. v. Dell (Byron Matthew), 2005 ABCA 246, (CanLII), which says:

the charter does not to apply to interactions between private citizens except where the private citizen acts as an agent of the state or is performing a government function.

20. Among one of our many birth rights we, being born here, have the right to work for the government if we want to because we allow them to be here on our land; to be an agent to the government. They will create a government agent identity file for you if you want to become an
Page 3 of 9

agent of the government. They will Certify you! They will give you a title that you can act through. You have that right just because youre born on this land. A school diploma is a certification of sorts. (41:39) A title might be the Minister of Finance, if you are an agent of the government, or the minister of this or the minister of that. 21. When they, the agents, are acting through that title they can do certain things, and other things they cannot do, depending on their title. So that is all that is going on. There are two titles. There is one title on the left column that is recorded with the government (See above) here (he underscores Live Birth Record in the left column) and through that title we have all these rights (indicating the left hand column). Inherent birth rights given to us by our creator. That is simply the document that is a record of you being born here, and because the government is the trustee of that document, they are obligated to honor the rights and they are the ones that are supposed to be protecting that birthright. That is the whole point of them being here. 22. But, shortly after our parents filed that document for us, we disappeared! They never heard from you again! So, its just an abandoned claim. They have legal title to you, and can use all the value attached to that title, for profit, for gain, control of resources, --everything. And we never showed up again! Its like being born into a family where you are the heir to a billionaires fortune, and you just leave and go away and never come back. That doesnt mean that theres an account somewhere that is worth millions. There is no account in your name with billions of dollars in it. That myth could have been started by government agents so people would go off chasing that gold at the end of the rainbow. You are owed and there are accounts, but theyre not your accounts, you cant access them, and they are required to pay you something, but its not billions, not even millions. So, we disappeared and never came back. 23. What we are still in possession of is this over here (indicating the capitalized name in the right hand column) We have been running around all over the place doing all sorts of stuff with that guy. We have been operating through that title (the one on the right column) 44:39 It even said dont use this as ID and thats exactly what we did with it. Why use it as ID- to get benefits and privileges. Ohgoody-I want benefits and privileges! I want $5 instead of the $100 that I was owed. Just like they did to the Originals- we took your land, and instead of giving it back and paying you all of that money we were supposed to pay you 400 years ago- how about a welfare check? OK they said. 24. So they gave us this (name in caps on the right) title. Whether it is fraudulent or not, it is-its security, sent to us by regular mail, which is fraudulent use of a security instrument. But, we accept it, so its not fraud, because we started using it; we did exactly what they told us not to. When you start using a name that is not yours, you accept all liabilities attached to it. And what would those liabilities be- taxes! Because were using somebody elses card. And they tell you how much its going to cost you for using it; theyre called statutes. 25. But the problem is, even though you go out and use the government (right column) ID, which more accurately could be called a record of an event rather than an ID; you have the legal title to it
Page 4 of 9

so you can go and use that legal title 47:00 to get things and do things, the same way the government is using our legal title to go and allow the corporations to go and rape all the resources off the planet. So it would appear that we are just doing what they are doing. Government is almost a reflection of the people; as above so below. We get the government we deserve. 26. All the people are down at wall street bitching because the government has given us what we asked for. 47:37 They are demanding what it is that they have gotten the last hundred years. What do they want? We look stupid, but the fault is not ours; were just ignorant. 27. So we go and get a drivers license, which you can only get by producing the title (right column) that the government gave you, because on the left-hand column, you wouldnt need one. You get a SIN # and then start working for somebody, and the SIN # you can only get by having one of the Government produced birth certificates (from the right-hand column) As soon as you put that SIN (SSN-US) number on a document you just identified whos working- the governments (straw man) identity- right-hand column. 28. Its not the social insurance number that results in you paying income tax, it just makes it evident that you are that (straw man) identity which they can tax. You are paying for a title. 29. Thats all theyre doing-theyre taxing the name-when people think they are paying property tax on the land- NO! Theyre not The government is taxing the name. You are paying for this title (right hand column) and through it the use of the land. The fees are always attached to the titleJOHN DOE. 30. So you get pulled over and you produce a drivers license- License and Registration, Please!. YES, SIR - So the drivers license is attached to this title (the right hand title) which is statutory, and it must pay taxes. 31. So the sad fact is we left and became an agent of the government. That wasnt very smart. 50:00 because the government doesnt pay well; in fact, it doesnt pay at all! This begs the question can you be forced to work for free. Well no- (not constituently or ethically). But actually you can if its consensual, and that is the way it has been! 32. Have you ever sent the government notice of what you are going to charge to work, because you have the right to charge what you want. Tell them if they dont like the rate- well thats it. The point is that the government can never prove that you acted as an agent of the government, or that they paid you to do that. 33. When you are called to court because you are being charged with something by the crown, demand specific answers to specific questions. Send a letter asking when you performed a function of government, what you were being paid, what function of government you were performing, If they cant answer just those three questions, then they cant prove that you were an agent (using their title) acting for the government.
Page 5 of 9

34. If they cant prove that you were acting through that title (right column) then they cant tax you, because then youre left column, non-titled, and non-taxable! You are only taxable when they can prove that you are acting through the state (right-hand) title. They need to prove you are an agent to tax you, or you can rebut their claim. 35. There is a case law surrounding Sect. 21 of the Canada Evidence Act stating that that the burden of proof rests with the crown. 36. So, at the time of the complaint when this officer says I was speeding, Was I acting as an agent of the crown-I dont remember getting paid??? So if youre claiming that I was working for the crown that day, I need to know how many hours I worked, because unless you can provide a contract where I agreed to work for $7 an hour, my going rate is $1 million an hour. Now of course if you cant prove this, you are still left with the option of agreeing, I wasnt working for the government that day. (Showing your license only creates a presumption-not proof youre an agent, and their case is built on presumption.) 37. So keep in mind now that there are all sorts of arguments that you can bring up with the crown before you go to court. 53:00 So thats the idea of whats going on. 38. So, you have this birthright over here (the left hand side) that says you have the right to conduct business and commerce. When you were born, your parents were master craftsmen who built you a battleship; a battleship so powerful that it is the greatest ship to ever sail the seas. The battleship will transport your rights. 39. So, the government said that they will let you work for them because they need workers, and they will pay you to do it. And we have even given you an identity (the title) to act through when you work for us. Employment is your right (left side), but if you are acting through the title (of the right side) you have to follow all the rules, which of course makes sense. If you dont follow the rules you get taxed. Now the wonderful thing about taxes, as awful as they seem, is that taxes are owed to you, the you on the left side. 40. The government is supposed to be collecting taxes to pay the people who own an equitable title to the land. They owe it to the beneficiaries, which is comical-they are taxing us to pay us, and they are taking an administration fee for doing it. So, for sailing the Sea of Commerce they also have a vessel. (see right column-page 1) Now because you have a battleship, the chances of some other vessel announcing that they are coming aboard to steal all your property is not in the picture. 41. So-whats with the vessels-well the whole system is based on commercial Maritime Admiralty Law. Do we need to know any commercial Admiralty Law to understand any of this? No, we dont! 42. As long as we show up and claim what is ours, we dont have to know that law. The problem is that nobody does show up; the masses are wallowing in ignorance. That stuff is trustee law; we

Page 6 of 9

dont have to know it. All we have to do is protect our rights and interests by claiming what is rightfully ours. 43. They are squandering all our resources, and the use of our land. It is ours by birthright and we are letting them use it. The problem is that they are supposed to be paying us for it, but they havent been because we disappeared and never came back. And instead of moving around in our battleship, we are going in circles in a canoe without a paddle. And, the government is not about to tell you; theyre making millions. 59:44 44. So is your car a government vehicle? No! The car has a title because you registered it, and sent them legal title, so they have legal title of your car and you have equitable title, and this is a trust arrangement and they are the trustee. They are supposed to protect your interest in that property. You have the right to use your property all you want; that is your right. 45. When you license your car you give it the ability to perform and carry out a function of government-to carry out commerce through the agent name, but- the question is-are you carrying out commerce at the time of the complaint? If the judge doesnt agree with your non-commerce status, you dont give a shit because the onus of proof lies with the crown, and they have to prove that you are operating a vehicle for commercial purposes. Your claim stands and it doesnt matter what the Black-robed Devil (the judge) says. Judges cant make decisions on their opinion-there has to be a law to back it up. If there is no factual evidence that you were carrying out a function of government, it is Case dismissed. 46. Everybody considers the Birth Certificate to be the instrument of ID. Actually it is more of a record of something to be recognized through. The Live Birth Record serves as a better ID than the Birth Certificate. 47. Although you carry your drivers license with you it is not yours. Your drivers license belongs to the government, as it has created it. It would be acceptable to say to the cop when he asks for your license and you are giving it to him that you carry it around but your understanding is that it is the property of the province. Would you like it back? You can put the drivers license away in the cupboard and never use it again; its just a tool. 48. The drivers license is just legal title to something so can you surrender it or give it back? When you split title and a trust is created where one has legal title and one has equitable title, how do you collapse the trust? 1:06:12 To collapse a trust you put the titles back together. You return the legal title to the beneficiary title holder. Theres no more trust- thats what collapses it. So when you surrender the title you collapse the trust. If you reach the point where you feel you have no need of any more split trust, that is what you do. 49. In R v. Big M Drug Comp. Ltd -1985-1-SCR 295 of the Constitution Act of Canada. As written:

Page 7 of 9

Section 52 sets out the fundamental principle of Constitutional Law that the Constitution is supreme. The undoubted corollary to be drawn from this principle is that no one can be convicted of an offence under an unconstitutional lawAny accused, whether corporate or individual, may defend a criminal charge by arguing that the law under which the charge is brought is constitutionally invalidboth the purpose and effect-of legislation are relevant in assessing the constitutionality, and either an unconstitutional purpose or an unconstitutional effect can invalidate the legislation. A court not only has the power, but the duty to regard legislation found to be inconsistent with the charter to the extent of the inconsistency as being no longer of force or effect. 50. They will pass laws that will violate it, but that means there is no force and effect; that doesnt mean they have to strike the law. 1:08:28 It just means that there are laws with which they cant actually prosecute you. Theyll leave it on the law books, but theyll change names or theyll reword it a little bit 51. Now, to R. v. Dell (Byron Matthew), 2005 ABCA 246, (CanLII), as written: The court also stated that the mere fact a private person or entity performs what may loosely be termed a public function or an activity public in nature will not suffice to bring it within the purview of government for the purposes of Section 32 charter purposes. For the charter to apply to a private entity (not specifying person, corporation, or man-any kind of an entity) it must be found to be implementing a specific government policy or program. An entity may also be government not because of the nature of the entity, but because of the nature of the activity 52. So it doesnt matter who you are, no matter what entity it is, it must be found to be implementing a specific part of the government to be included in what they call government. 1:10:00 53. R. v. Dell (Byron Matthew), 2005 ABCA 246, (CanLII), as written: The charter does not apply to interaction between private individuals when a private person can be categorized as part of government because he or she is performing a specific government function. You never need to leave those two pieces of case law-that is all that is required-because Section 52 just said that this charter is supreme and anything that is inconsistence with the charter has no force or effect. They have the duty to make sure they cant prosecute you with that. 54. If the charter does not apply to interactions between private individuals and it is the supreme law of Canada, how could any other law that they pass apply to the private citizen, or person, or entityman-woman-anything; this is even just saying citizen so even a citizen cannot have things done to iteven that- and thats where we get into the Bill of Rights thing someone brought up earlier: What about the Bill of Rights? It still all applies because they still cant do the things that they do against you even when youre that (indicating an agent of the right side) But theyre doing it over here (indicating the left side) to you as well. 1:11:27 This is pretty cut and dried; its from the Supreme Court and no other law can be above it - is there another way to interpret that so that the
Page 8 of 9

government can say, No-I think we can still come into your home and take your kids. No absolutely not, so thats it. 55. Case laws and statutes are below the legislation described, so why bother with them? They have to prove that you are implementing a specific government policy or program to prosecute you. Section 52 of The Constitution Act of 1982 is the supreme law of Canada. (See 1:12:56 to see The Constitution Act of Canada-1982 and 1:13:04 to see that it is Section 52, and 1:14:23 to see Section 32) 56. So when you read this Section 52 from the Constitution Act of 1982, you cannot have doubt when you read in Section 52 that this is the Supreme Law of Canada. Anything which is inconsistent with any provision in this act is of no force or effect. 57. So does that mean that the government is not going to pass laws that conflict with that? It doesnt say they cant pass laws that conflict with it; they say that whatever laws they do pass are of no force or effect because of that (Section 52 of the Constitutional Act of 1982.), but only if you mention that. They pass all kinds of shit. These bullshit bills have no force or effect; they serve to pollute the issue, and cloud the truth. Section 32 then says that this charter applies to the government. If it only applies to the government, how can any acts be passed underneath it that do not apply to the government? They are of no force or effect. Therefore it cant only apply to the government. They will pass anything to influence the right column, but they cant for the left; they have no jurisdiction. ~Shamrock

Page 9 of 9