Variables Entered/Removed Variables Model 1 Entered level of supervision you face during the work, expectation of your superior

according to the reality, number of opportunity for promotion you get, your confidence in senior's managers ability to lead the company, task assigned helps you to grow professionally
a

Variables Removed Method

. Enter

a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: your immediate superior

Model Summary Adjusted R Model 1 R .266

a

Std. Error of the Estimate

R Square .071

Square .032

.552

a. Predictors: (Constant), level of supervision you face during the work, expectation of your superior according to the reality, number of opportunity for promotion you get, your confidence in senior's managers ability to lead the company, task assigned helps you to grow professionally

The model summary contains one model where five independent variables are added and results have been generated. In this way all independent variables have been end up being used as a predictor.

 In the column labeled R are the values of multiple correlation coefficient between predictors and the outcome i.e. immediate superior. When all the independent variables are used as a predictor then it will be a simple correlation between immediate superior & and other independent variables i.e. 0.266 so it can be said the when other variables are improved by 1, there will be an improvement in management (immediate superior) by 0.266. The next column gives us the value of R square which measures that how much of the variability in the outcome (immediate superior) is accounted for by the predictors. For this model its value is 0.071, which means that all the independent variables accounts for 7.1 percent variability in management (immediate superior). The third column i.e. adjusted R2 gives some idea about how well this model generalizes and ideally we would like our value to be same or very close to R2. If we see the analysis the difference is minor i.e. 0.036 (0.071-0.32) between R2 and adjusted R2. This shrinkage means that if the model were derived from a sample rather than the population it would account for approximately 0.036% less variance in the outcome.

ANOVA Model 1 Regression Residual Total Sum of Squares 2.789 36.512 39.302 df

Mean Square 5 120 125 .558 .304

F 1.834

Sig. .111
a

a. Predictors: (Constant), level of supervision you face during the work, expectation of your superior according to the reality, number of opportunity for promotion you get, your confidence in senior's managers ability to lead the company, task assigned helps you to grow professionally b. Dependent Variable: your immediate superior

Interpretation: The next part of the outcome contains an analysis of variance (ANOVA) that tests whether the model is significantly better at predicting the outcome. Specifically, the F-ratio represents the ratio of the improvement in the prediction that results from fitting the model (labeled as regression in the table), relative to the inaccuracy that still exists in the model (labeled as residual in the table). If the improvement due to fitting the regression model is much greater than the accuracy within the model then the value of F will be greater than 1 and SPSS calculates the exact probability of obtaining F value by chance.

For the model, the F-ratio is 1.1834 which is also highly significant (P<0.01) so it can be interpreted here that the model significantly improves ability to predict the outcome which means level of supervision, expectation of superior according to the reality, number of opportunity for promotion, confidence in senior's managers ability to lead the company, task assigned helps to grow professionally have a relation with the management. There is a significant improvement in the management due to this independent variables.
Coefficients
a

Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1 (Constant) expectation of your superior according to the reality task assigned helps you to grow professionally your confidence in senior managers ability to lead the company number of opportunity for promotion you get level of supervision you face during the work a. Dependent Variable: your immediate superior -.046 .057 -.075 -.812 .418 .127 .070 .188 1.830 .070 B 1.722 .095 Std. Error .329 .088 .105 Coefficients Beta t 5.227 1.075 Sig. .000 .285

.029

.072

.046

.396

.693

.019

.085

.022

.219

.827

Interpretation: In multiple regressions the model takes a form of an equation that contains a coefficient (b) for each independent variable. The first part of the model gives these b values and these values indicate the individual contribution of each predictor to the model. The b values tell about the relationship between management (immediate superior) and each independent variable. If this value is positive than there is a positive relationship between management (immediate superior) and independent variable while negative value shows negative relationship between management (immediate superior) and independent variable. So, as expectation of the workers superior according to the reality increases, management (immediate superior) will improve; if there will be a professional growth of the worker due to task assigned, management will improve; confidence in senors mangers ability will increase , management will also improve, number of opportunities for promotion will increase , management will decrease ;and when the level of supervision will increase, management improve . The b values also tell us to

what degree each predictor affects the outcome if the effects of all other independent variables are held constant.

Each of these beta values has an associated standard error indicating to what extent these values would vary across different samples; these standard errors are used to determine whether or not the b value differs significantly from zero. Therefore if the T-stat associated with a b value is significant (if the value in the column labeled sig. Is less than 0.05) then the independent variable is making a significant contribution to the model. The smaller the value of sig. (but larger the value of t), the greater the contribution of that independent variable (predictor). For this model, expectation of the workers superior according to the reality (t=1.075), task assigned helps workers to grow professionally ( t=.396), workers confidence in senior's managers ability to lead the company ( t=1.830), number of opportunity for promotion workers get ( t=-.812), level of supervision workers face during the work ( t=.219)) are significant predictors of management (immediate superior). From the magnitude of the t-statistics it can be seen that the workers confidence in senior managers ability to lead the company has more impact than other variables. The standardized versions of the b values are easier to interpret as they are not dependent on the unit of measurement of the variables. The standardized beta values are provided by SPSS and they tell us the number of standard deviations that the outcome will change as a result of one standard deviation change in the independent variable. The standardized beta values are all measured in standard deviation units and so are directly comparable; therefore, they provide better insight into the importance of independent variable in the model. Workers confidence in senior managers ability to lead the company has slightly more impact than other variables.