Amalie Nielsen 2.A Immigration, national identity and multiculturalism Afleveringsdato: 07/09/2012 Off course, there are both pros and cons for having a multicultural country as well as there are costs and benefits, and therefor arguments supporting each of the two points of view. There is no doubt that the ultimate society is not only build on values and experiences from one culture alone, but is a unification of the positive fundamental ideas from each of all the cultures existing. Multiculturalism cannot only work as a source for inspiration but help us achieve a far more nuanced outlook on matters, than if we were only under influence by people with the same mind-set as ourselves. When taking a look at multiculturalism from another view, there is as made clear in the introduction, one particular counterargument for preferring a more or less mainstream society. Greater diversity equals greater potential for conflicts. As seen all over the world, through all history, the main ingredient in obstinacy leading to war is cultural differences. This is something our country must prevent, no matter the affection on the conscience of our nation. In the end, I can be convinced that a successful integration particularly depends on the mind of the population, in great contrast to the contemporary way off integrating immigrants. By having an open mind, immigrants will feel welcome and not just fed with money, because it is the easiest way for the government. The population must be convinced, that progress is impossible if things will be done, and if people think, the way they always have.