_
2p
0
do
_
p
pa2
sin o cos j dj
_
z0a cos j
0
_
T
0
r cos
jT
0
r
2
2
cos
2
jT
0
_
e
ral
dr
_
X
Noting r=mn, and wall temperature
T
w
=T
0
z
0
T'
0
+z
2
0
T0
0
/2, with integration, we have
q =
1
3
rc
v
" slT
0
rc
v
" s
4pl
_
2p
0
do
_
p
pa2
l
2
T
0
e
z0al cos j
sin j cos
2
j dj
rc
v
" s
4pl
_
2p
0
do
_
p
pa2
lT
w
e
z0al cos j
sin j cos o djX (5)
On the right side of Eq. (5), the third term means the
energy carrying by the molecular ow from the wall
without colliding with the other molecules. Because of
the impermeability of the solid wall, there is no such
molecular ow from the wall, so that this term should
be neglected. The second term can be approximated by
means of the trapezoidal method as
rc
v
" s
4pl
_
2p
0
do
_
p
pa2
l
2
T
0
e
_
p
pa2
l
2
T
0
e
z0al cos j
sin j cos
2
j dj =
1
6
rc
v
" sl
_
z
z
0
l
f (z)
_
(6)
where, z = e
z0al
, f(z )=0.1z+0.16z
5/4
+0.12z
5/3
+0.08z
5/2
+0.04z
5
. Substituting Eq. (6) into Eq. (5),
we have
q =
1
3
rc
v
" sl
_
1
1
2
_
z
z
0
l
f (z)
__
dT
dz
z=0
X (7)
According to the denition, q=dT/dzv
z = 0
, the ther-
mal conductivity in the wall adjacent layer would be
k =
1
3
rc
v
" sl
_
1 0X5z 0X5
z
0
l
f (z)
_
X (8)
When z
0
4o, z 40, f(z ) 40, Eq. (8) takes its sim-
pler form as
Fig. 2. Variation of gas thermal conductivity in wall-adjacent
layer.
J.-M. Li et al. / Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 43 (2000) 839847 841
k
b
=
1
3
rc
v
" sl (9)
k
b
is just the thermal conductivity in the bulk region
apart from the wall, i.e. the same as that in the case of
no wall eect to be accounted [12].
Comparing Eq. (8) with Eq. (9), leads to
k
k
b
= 1 0X5
_
z
z
0
l
f (z)
_
X (10)
We nd that Eq. (10) can be correlated with good ac-
curacy as
kak
b
= 1 0X5e
1X35z0al
(11)
The thermal conductivity of the gas calculated from
Eqs. (10) and (11) are plotted in Fig. 2, from which, k/
k
b
has a minimum value 0.5 on wall surface, and
increases with increasing distance apart from the wall.
When z
0
/l equal to 5 approximately, k approaches to
k
b
. It is just the same as that of the viscosity variation
m/m
b
we derived in [10], i.e. the viscosity of the gas in
the wall-adjacent layer taking the same form of Eq. (8)
as
m =
1
3
r" sl
_
1 0X5z 0X5
z
0
l
f (z)
_
(12)
Comparing it with Eq. (8), leads to
k = mc
v
X (13)
It is similar to the relation between the viscosity and
the thermal conductivity of the gas in the case of no
wall eect being accounted [12].
3. Laminar-ow heat transfer in microtubes
For the case gas being in developed laminar ow,
incompressible, and constant heat ux through the
wall of the circular microtube, the governing equations
can be built according to the coordinate system shown
in Fig. 3 as
_
_
1
r
d
dr
_
rk
dT
dr
_
= rc
p
u
dT
b
dx
r = 0,
dT
dr
= 0
r = R, T = T
w
X (14)
Eq. (11) can be rewritten as
k = k
b
(1 AE ) (11
/
)
where
E = e
B(Rr)al
, A = 0X50, B = 1X35X
From the energy equilibrium relation within an in-
crement of the tube length, dx, 2pRq dx=pR
2
rc
p
u
m
dT
b
, we can obtain
dT
b
dx
=
2q
Rrc
p
u
m
(15)
where, c
p
is the specic heat of the gas, u is the vel-
ocity, u
m
is the mean velocity across the section area,
and T
b
is the mixture-mean temperature across the sec-
tion.
Let Z=r/R, y=(TT
w
)/(qR/k
b
), substitute Eq. (15)
into Eq. (14), a dimensionless governing equation can
be built as following:
1
Z
d
dZ
_
Z(1 AE )
dy
dZ
_
= 2
u
u
m
(16)
with corresponding dimensionless boundary conditions
Z = 0
dy
dZ
= 0; Z = 1 y = 0X (17)
We have obtained the velocity distributions of devel-
oped laminar ow of the gases through the microtube
as following [10]:
u
u
m
=
2
1 8a
_
(1 4a) Z
2
4
B
KnZ
o
n=1
A
n
n
E
n
_
(18)
where, Kn=l/d, is the Knudsen number, l is the mean
free path, and d is the diameter of the microtube; the
constant a and the function E were expressed, respect-
ively, as
a =
Kn
B
o
n=1
A
n
n
=
Kn
B
(1 A) (19)
Fig. 3. Coordinate system for heat transfer of laminar gas
ow in a microtube.
J.-M. Li et al. / Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 43 (2000) 839847 842
E = exp
_
B
2Kn
(1 Z)
_
X (20)
Substituting Eq. (18) into Eq. (16), and integrating it
with the boundary condition (17), gives the dimension-
less temperature distributions as
y =
1
1 8a
_
(1 4a)(1 Z
2
)
1
4
(1 Z
4
) 2a
4Kn
B
_
Z
1
2
Z
3
_
o
n=1
A
n
n
E
n
_
(21)
Only the case for Kn 0.1, i.e. l/d 0.1 or r/l 5
were analyzed here, and so, the terms with the second
and higher power of Kn in Eq. (21) could be neglected.
Then, if Kn 40, Eq. (21) would be simplied to
y =
3
4
Z
2
1
4
Z
4
(22)
which is just the familiar result for the tubes of com-
mon size. According to the denition, the mixed tem-
perature, T
b
, would be
T
b
T
w
qRak
b
=
2
u
m
_
1
0
yuZ dZX (23)
Substituting Eqs. (18) and (21) into Eq. (23), by inte-
grating, gives the following equation after neglected
the terms with second and higher power of the Kn:
T
b
T
w
qRak
b
=
2
(1 8a)
2
_
11
48
14
3
a 16a
2
_
X (24)
According to the Newton's cooling law, it is easy to
derive
Nu =
48(1 8a)
2
11(1 224aa11 768a
2
a11)
(25)
where, the Nusselt number Nu=hd/k
b
, and h is the
heat transfer coecient. Substituting A = 0.5 and
B = 1.35 into Eq. (25), we obtain
Nu =
4X3636(1 4X1075Kn)
2
1 10X4556Kn 18X4057Kn
2
X (26)
As Kn 40, Eq. (26) reduces to the conventional ex-
pression, that is, Nu = 4.364 for fully-developed lami-
nar ow through a macro-sized circular tube with
constant wall heat ux.
4. Heat transfer for laminar gas ow in microchannels
between two parallel plates with one plate insulated
thermally
Considering a coordinate system shown as Fig. 4,
the heat ux through the wall q
1
=0, and q
2
=q = con-
stant, for incompressible, developed laminar ow of
gas, the governing equation can be established as
d
dZ
_
(1 AE
1
)
dy
dZ
_
=
u
2u
m
(27)
where A = 0.5; y=(T
w2
T)/(qH/k
b
) is the dimension-
less temperature; u and u
m
are the velocity and the
mean velocity, respectively, Z=y/H, with y and H
shown in Fig. 4; the function E
1
was dened as
E
1
=exp[B(1vZv)/(2Kn )], with B = 1.35 and Kn=l/
(2H). The corresponding boundary conditions are
Z = 1,
dy
dZ
= 0; Z = 1, y = 0X (28)
The velocity distribution we derived in [11] will be
u
u
m
=
3
2(1 6a)
_
(1 4a) Z
2
4Kn
B
[ Z [
o
n=1
A
n
n
E
n
1
_
X
(29)
Substituting Eq. (29) into Eq. (27), and solving with
the boundary conditions, we have the temperature dis-
tribution as
y =
1
1 6a
_
_
1
2
3a
_
(1 Z)
_
3
8
3
2
a
_
(1 Z
2
)
1
16
(1 Z
4
) 2a F(Z)
_
X(30)
Fig. 4. Coordinate system for heat transfer of laminar gas
ow in a two-dimensional microchannel.
J.-M. Li et al. / Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 43 (2000) 839847 843
The terms with second and higher power of Kn can be
also neglected as Kn 0.1, and the function F(Z ) was
established as:
for Zr0,
F(Z) =
Kn
B
_
1
3
2
Z
1
2
Z
3
_
o
n=1
A
n
n
exp
_
nB
2Kn
(1 Z)
_
(31)
for Z < 0,
F(Z) =
Kn
B
_
1
3
2
Z
1
2
Z
3
_
o
n=1
A
n
n
exp
_
nB
2Kn
(1 Z)
_
X
(32)
When Kn 40, Eq. (30) reduces to
y =
1
2
(1 Z)
3
8
(1 Z
2
)
1
16
(1 Z
4
) (33)
which is just the familiar result for developed laminar-
ow heat transfer of gas through macro-sized passage
between two parallel plates with one plate insulated
thermally.
Based on the denition of the mixed temperature,
we obtain
y
b
=
1
2
_
_
1
0
u
u
m
y dZ
_
0
1
u
u
m
y dZ
_
X (34)
Substituting Eqs. (29) and (30) into Eq. (34), by inte-
grating, the mixture temperature was derived as:
y
b
=
26
35(1 6a)
2
_
1 14a
630
13
a
2
_
X (35)
Hence the corresponding Nusselt number for the plate
2, Nu
2
can be obtained as
Nu
2
=
4
y
b
=
70(1 6a)
2
13(1 14a 630a
2
a13)
(36)
where, the Nusselt number, Nu
2
=4h
2
H/k
b
, and h
2
is
the heat transfer coecient of the plate 2. Because the
plate 1 was heat insulated, the heat transfer coecient
is zero obviously, that is Nu
1
=0. Substituting A = 0.5
and B = 1.35 into Eq. (36), Nu
2
was reduced to
Nu
2
=
5X3846(1 3X0807Kn)
2
1 7X1882Kn 12X7756Kn
2
X (37)
When Kn 40, Eqs. (36) and (37) would reduce to the
results from the conventional theory, or Nu
2
=5.3846.
5. Heat transfer for laminar gas ow in microchannels
between two parallel plates with equal constant wall heat
ux
When q
1
=q
2
=q, because of the symmetrical tem-
perature, a dimensionless energy equation can be set
up for Zr0 as
d
dZ
_
(1 AE )
dy
dZ
_
=
u
u
m
X (38)
The corresponding boundary conditions would be
Z = 0,
dy
dZ
= 0; Z = 1, y = 0 (39)
The dimensionless temperature, y=(T
w
T)/(qH/k
0
),
can be derived similarly as
y =
1
1 6a
_
_
3
4
3a
_
(1 Z
2
)
1
8
(1 Z
4
) 2a
3Kn
B
_
Z
1
3
Z
3
_
o
n=1
A
n
n
E
n
_
(40)
where, A = 0.5, B = 1.35; and the constant a take the
same form like Eq. (19), except Kn=l/(2H).The dimen-
sionless mixed temperature would be
y
b
=
_
1
0
u
u
m
y dZX (41)
Substituting Eqs. (29) and (40) into Eq. (41) and inte-
grating, we can obtain
y
b
=
17
35(1 6a)
2
_
1 14a
840
17
a
2
_
X (42)
The Nusselt number for either plate, Nu
1
=Nu
2
=Nu,
would be
Nu =
4
y
b
=
140(1 6a)
2
17(1 14a 840a
2
a17)
X (43)
Since A = 0.5 and B = 1.35, Eq. (43) would be
Nu =
8X2353(1 3X0807Kn)
2
1 7X1882Kn 13X0260Kn
2
X (44)
When Kn 40 Eqs. (43) and (44) would reduce to
Nu = 8.2353, which is just the same value for conven-
tional-sized passage.
J.-M. Li et al. / Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 43 (2000) 839847 844
6. Results and discussion
Figs. 5 and 6 show the dimensionless temperature
proles and the Nusselts number from Eqs. (21) and
(26) for gas laminar ow in circular microtubes, re-
spectively.
Figs. 7 and 8 are the dimensionless temperature pro-
les calculated from Eqs. (30) and (40) for gas laminar
ow through microchannels between two parallel
plates, while Figs. 9 and 10 show the Nusselts number
calculated from Eqs. (37) and (44), respectively. These
calculating results show the extraordinary heat transfer
characteristics for developed laminar ow of gas under
microscale conditions.
The temperature proles of microtubes (Fig. 5) and
of the plain microchannels (Fig. 8) indicate that the
dimensionless temperature increases with decreasing
passage size, or with increasing Kn. The temperature
prole in microtube (Fig. 5) has two common values,
the same as that in macrotube: one being zero at tube
center; and the other one being nearly a constant value
at the tube wall surface. A little dierence may be
caused by the curvature of the tube wall surface. The
temperature prole in plain microchannels has only
one common value, at the wall surface.
In macroscale conditions, Nu will be constant for
developed laminar ow of gas both in a circular tube
or between two-parallel plates, respectively. In micro-
scale conditions, Nu depends on the size of the pass-
ages, the `wall -adjacent layer' aects the ow and heat
transfer, such that Nu decreases with decreasing pas-
sage size, or decreases with increasing Kn.
The heat transfer analysis from `wall-adjacent layer'
model is comparative to those from slip-ow and jump
temperature model. For example, the results shown in
Fig. 6 have the similar tendency with that presented by
Fig. 5. Temperature distributions for laminar ow of gas in
microtubes.
Fig. 6. Heat transfer for laminar ow of gas in microtubes.
Fig. 7. Temperature distributions for laminar ow of gas in
two-dimensional plain microchannels with one plate surface
insulated thermally.
Fig. 8. Temperature distributions for laminar ow of gas in
two-dimensional plain microchannels.
J.-M. Li et al. / Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 43 (2000) 839847 845
Sparrow and Lin [13] for gas laminar heat transfer in
tubes under slip-ow condition, but the value for a
dened Kn is larger slightly than that predicted by
Sparrow and Lin [13]. The important dierence
between those two models may lie in the dierence of
the temperature and velocity proles. According to the
slip-ow model, a sharp variation of both velocity and
temperature exist in so-called slip layer, while those
from `wall-adjacent layer' model these prole are
smooth, without such a sharp-variable region.
The present calculation show that, the error caused
by taking the passages as conventional macroscale
ones for gas laminar ow and heat transfer less than
0.1% when Kn = 10
4
, and increases to 1.0% when
Kn = 10
3
, then to about 9% if Kn=0.1. So, the criti-
cal Knudsen number from macrochannels to micro-
channels may be taken as 10
3
.
7. Conclusions
The wall-adjacent layer eect on convective heat
transfer for developed laminar ow of gas in micro-
passages was analyzed theoretically. In a extremely
tiny region adjacent to the surface of passage wall, we
called as `wall-adjacent layer', the transport properties
of the gases would dier from those in bulk region
and vary with the distance apart from the wall surface.
Because this eect could not be neglected, the gas
laminar ow and heat transfer in micropassages are
dierent from that in macropassages.
The thickness of the wall-adjacent layer is about 3
to 5 times of the mean free path of gas molecules. If
the thickness of the wall-adjacent layer could not be
neglected comparing with the size of the passage, this
size eect should be taken into consideration.
According to this analysis, the criterion from micro-
scale to macroscale may be taken as Kn = 10
3
.
Acknowledgements
The research project is nancially supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China with
grant number 9598025.
References
[1] D.B. Tuckermann, R.F. Pease, Optimized convective
cooling using micro-machined structure, J.
Electrochemical Society 129 (3) (1982) 98c.
[2] P. Wu, W.A. Little, Measurement of friction factor for
the ow of gases in very ne channel used for micromi-
niature JouleThomson refrigerators, Cryogenics 23 (5)
(1983) 273277.
[3] P. Wu, W.A. Little, Measurement of the heat transfer
characteristics of gas ow in ne channel heat exchanger
used for microminiature refrigerators, Cryogenics 24 (8)
(1984) 415420.
[4] B. Choi, R.F. Barron, R.O. Warrington, Fluid ow and
heat transfer in microtubes, ASME DSC 32 (1991) 123
133.
[5] A. Beskok, G. Karniadakis, Simulation of slip-ow in
complex micro-geometries, ASME DSC 40 (1992) 355
370.
[6] G. Mohiuddin Mala, D. Li, J.D. Dale, Heat transfer
and uid ow in microchannels, Int. J. Heat Mass
Transfer 40 (13) (1997) 30793088.
[7] J.N. Israelachvili, Measurement of the viscosity of
liquids in very thin lms, J. Colloid and Interface
Science 110 (1) (1986) 263271.
[8] M.L. Gee, et al., Liquid to solidlike transition of mol-
ecular thin lms under shear, J. Chem. Phys. 93 (3)
(1990) 18951906.
[9] J. Pfahler, J. Harley, H. Bua, J.N. Zemel, Gas and
Fig. 9. Heat transfer for laminar ow of gas in two-dimen-
sional plain microchannels with one plate surface insulated
thermally.
Fig. 10. Heat transfer in two-dimensional plain microchan-
nels, with constant equal heat ux, q
1
=q
2
=q.
J.-M. Li et al. / Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 43 (2000) 839847 846
liquid ow in small channels, ASME DSC 32 (1991) 49
60.
[10] J.-M. Li, B.-X. Wang, X.-F. Peng, The wall eect for
laminar ow through microtube, in: International
Centre for Heat and Mass Transfer (ICHMT)
Symposium on Molecular and Microscale Heat Transfer
in Material Processing and other Applications,
Yokohama, Japan, 15 December, 1996, pp. 5565.
[11] J.-M. Li, B.-X. Wang, X.-F. Peng, A model for predict-
ing gas ow through micropassages, J. Thermal Science,
Beijing 6 (4) (1997) 279285 (in English).
[12] J.O. Hischfelder, C.F. Curtiss, R.B. Bird, Molecular
Theory of Gases and Liquids, Wiley, 1964.
[13] E.M. Sparrow, S.H. Lin, Laminar heat transfer in tubes
under slip-ow condition, ASME J. Heat Transfer 84
(4) (1962) 363369.
J.-M. Li et al. / Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 43 (2000) 839847 847