Repairing casing In most cases, the same fishing tools used in conventional wellbores can be used successfully in horizontal and extended-reach wells. For example, overshots continue to be effective for catching outer diameters of fished tools or equipment, and spears continue to be used to catch inner diameters. The main differences are in the design of the drilling or fishing strings used to convey the tools to the fish, and in jar placement. Friction is high in horizontal and extended-reach wells. This greatly affects axial and torsional loads along the drillstring. Additionally, in high-angle holes, the beneficial effect of gravity to push the drillstring to bottom is partially or totally negated. To compensate for these factors, inverted drillstrings are often used. In the inverted drillstring, weight members, such as drill collars and heavyweight drillpipe, are kept in the vertical sections of the hole, far from their conventional position, immediately above the bit. In the vertical position, weight members are effective in pushing the lower drillpipe sections to bottom. This is allowed because drillpipe in the curved and high-angle portions of the well can withstand large compressive loads without buckling (Figure1) schematically depicts an inverted drillstring.
The combined effect of impact load and duration is called impulse (Figure2) shows impact and impulse). Optimum jar placement occurs with the largest impulse for an impact load greater than the sticking force. The effectiveness of fishing jars, then, depends not only on their design, but also on their placement in the drillstring relative to the attachment to the fish and to the other components of the string.
To account for all of the factors, the Bowen placement program uses stress wave analysis techniques to track all stress waves. It also allows for an unlimited number of section changes, which enables modeling of virtually any drillstring and bottomhole assembly.
In hole curvatures of 15/100 ft or greater, it is usually best to avoid operating the jar in the curve because bending stresses due to the curvature, combined with axial stresses, can severely shorten the life of the jar. If jars are located below the curve in a medium-radius hole, consideration must be given to whether adequate pull (or push) loads can be transmitted to the jar. As much as 50% of axial loads can be lost to friction in the curve. When jars are located above the curve, the magnitude of the stress waves are reduced by friction as they travel to the stuck point. However, good impact loads can be achieved, even with very long horizontal extensions below the curve. It has been found that in an inverted drillstring jars are more effective when located in the heavyweight drillpipe rather than in the drill collars. The reason for this is that the stress waves are reflected to a higher degree when going through a cross section change of large to small than when going from small to large. When placing drilling jars, it is important to anticipate where the string is likely to become stuck. In some cases, it is optimum to have the jar at one location for jarring up and another location for jarring down. A jar that can allow separation of its up and down sections is ideal.
Case study
An operator with a horizontal well with a kickoff point at approximately 8,000 ft, built angle at 1012/100 ft to 90 of hole angle. Casing was run to the bottom of the curve. Drilling of the horizontal section proceeded only 300 ft before becoming stuck at the mud motor. Initial thinking was to back off in the drillpipe in the vertical portion of the well and begin jarring with drill collars located between the jars and jar intensifiers. However, the jar placement program showed that results for delivering impact at the stuck mud motor with the planned scheme would be poor (impact loads only slightly greater than the pull load at the jar.) An alternate scheme was run by computer simulation, placing the fishing assembly in the casing near the bottom of the curve. Heavyweight drillpipe was placed between the jar and the jar intensifier. The results showed that the impact loads increased by a factor of four. The operator chose to follow this alternate scheme. After backoff, with two joints of drillpipe inside the casing, the fishing assembly was run in the hole, and the fish was engaged. Jarring operations began with 50,000-60,000 lb jarring loads, which was later increased to 80,000-90,000 lb, just before the fish came free.