Composite Structures 25 (1993) 21-35

An evaluation of equivalent-single-layer and layerwise theories of composite laminates

J. N. Reddy Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A &M University, College Station, TX 77843-3123, USA
A review of equivalent-single-layer and layerwise laminate theories is presented and their computational models are discussed. The layerwise theory advanced by the author is reviewed and a variable displacement finite element model and the mesh superposition techniques are described. The variable displacement finite elements contain several different types of assumed displacement fields. By choosing appropriate terms from the multiple displacement field, an entire array of elements with different orders of kinematic refinement can be formed. The variable kinematic finite elements can be conveniently connected together in a single domain for global-local analyses, where the local regions are modeled with refined kinematic elements. In the finite element mesh superposition technique an independent overlay mesh is superimposed on a global mesh to provide localized refinement for regions of interest regardless of the original global mesh topology. Integration of these two ideas yields a very robust and economical computational tool for global-local analysis to determine three-dimensional effects (e.g. stresses) within localized regions of interest in practical laminated composite structures.

I INTRODUCTION Numerous laminate theories have been proposed to date to describe the kinematics and stress states of composite laminates. Most of these theories are extensions of the conventional, single-layer plate theories, which are based on assumed variation of either stresses or displacements through the plate thickness:

~i(x, y, z, t)= (x, y, t)+ z~k~(x, y, t) +(z)22(x,y,t)+ ...

N

The governing equations of motion associated with the assumed displacement or stress field can be obtained using an appropriate principle of virtual work. 16 For example, when i, (i= 1, 2, 3) is a displacement component, the dynamic version of the principle of virtual displacements is used to derive 3 ( N + l ) equations of motion, which are usually expressed in terms of stress resultants through the thickness: f h/2 R~ =(z)/oi dz, ( j = 0 , 1, 2,..., N ) ( 2 )
. / - h/2

= E (zy~(x, y, t)
]=0

(1)

where o i denotes the ith stress component (i = 1, 2, ..., 6),

Oxx = 0-1, 0-yy = 0"2, Ozz = (13, Oyz = 0-4,

where fki(x, y, z, t) denotes either a stress or a displacement component in the plate, (x, y) are the inplane coordinates, z is the thickness coordinate, t denotes time, and ~ , ( j = 0, 1, 2, ..., N) are functions of x, y, and t. The series in eqn (1) can be terminated at a desired degree of the thickness coordinate, i.e. select the value of N (N-- 1, 2, and so on). The spirit of these theories is to reduce a three-dimensional problem to a twodimensional one; see Refs 1-13 for pioneering works in the field. A review of refined theories of plates can be found in an article by Noor and Burton 14 and the author) 5
21

axz = as, 0"xy= a6

(3)

The stress components are assumed to be known in terms of the displacement functions #~ through the strain-displacement relations and the stress-strain relations. When #i, (i = 1, 2, ..., 6) is a stress component, the dynamic version of the principle of virtual forces is used to derive 6 ( N + I ) equations of motion. Of course, mixed variational principles can be used to derive the governing equations associated with assumed independent expansions of displacements and

Composite Structures 0263-8223/93/S06.00 1993 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, England. Printed in Great Britain

22

J. N. Reddy
The classical plate theory is also based on the displacement field in eqn (4), but with the additional assumption concerning the slopes 4~ and 42:

stresses. Stress-based theories 6-~ are seldom used in practice because of the difficulty in developing reliable finite element models. The displacementbased theories ~H3 have received the most attention from the computational mechanics community. In the rest of this paper only the displacement-based theories are discussed.

4~ -

Ou~ Ox '

42 -

Ou~ Oy

(7)

2 DISPLACEMENT-BASED SINGLE-LAYER THEORIES The displacement-based theory of order 1 (i.e. N = 1 ) is derived using the displacement field:

ul(x, y, z, t) = u]'(x, y, t) +z4,(x, y, t)

ll2(X, y, Z, t) = blO(X, y, t) + z42(x, y, t)

u3(x, y, z, t)=ulx3~ , Y," t)+z43(x,y, t)

(4)

where u i is the displacement component along the xi-coordinate direction (x~ = x, x 2 = y, x 3 = z). The displacement field in eqn (4) implies that straight lines normal to the x - y plane before deformation remain straight after deformation. Comparing eqns ( 1 ) and (4), we have the following: 41'=u~ ', 4i=4,,
1

(i=1,2,3)

(5)

i.e. transverse normals before deformation remain normal to the deformed surface at z = 0. In summary, the classical plate theory is based on the hypothesis, known as the L o v e - K i r c h h o f f hypothesis, that straight lines normal to the x - y plane before deformation, (i) remain straight, (ii) inextensible, and (iii) normal to the z = 0 plane after deformation. The classical plate theory is governed by three equations of motion in terms of (.I', . "2, /33)" '1 The second_order ~ ~9 and ~. third-order theories 2-3 introduce additional unknowns that are difficult to interpret in physical terms. All theories in which the normality condition in eqn (7) is not invoked account for transverse shear and normal strains. If inextensibility of transverse normals is assumed, the transverse normal strain becomes zero. For example, the third-order theory of Reddy 27,28 is based on the displacement
field, 2-26

It is clear from the displacement field in eqn (4) that (u, v, w) are the displacements of a point on the z = 0 plane in the three coordinate directions:
Hi = ui(x, y, z, t)Iz =0 o

ul(x, y, Z, t) =u,(x, y, t) +Z41(x, y, t) o

(6a)

Also, we note that

+z

4 Ir x,

,t + ox j

~i

:Iu,1: : LOzj

16bt

u2(x, y, z, t) = u2(x, y, t) + z42(x, y, t) ~t + z 3 -~-~5

Geometrically, 41 and - 2 denote rotations about the y and x axes, respectively, and 43 denotes the elongation of a transverse normal at the point (x, y). There will be six equations of motion in the six generalized displacements (u , 4i). The most commonly used first-order plate theory, 16'17 is based on the displacement field of eqn (4) with 43 = 0 (i.e. transverse normals are inextensible); the number of equations of motion reduce to five in terms of (Ul u , u 3, 42, 42). Since the trans, verse shear strains are constant through the thickness, the transverse stresses would also be constant through the thickness -- a contradiction with the elasticity solution. This discrepancy is remedied in the energy sense by introducing the shear correction factors.

( 4)[

42(x, Y, t)+0u~ 0y J (8)

u3(x, y, z, t)=u(x, y, t)

The displacement field accommodates quadratic variation of transverse shear strains (and hence stresses) and vanishing of transverse shear stresses on the top and bottom of a general laminate composed of orthotropic layers. Thus, there is no need to use shear correction factors in a thirdorder theory. The theory was generalized in Ref. 31. Theories higher than third order are not used because the accuracy gained is so little that the effort required to solve the equations is not justified. In all conventional displacement-based

An evaluation of composite laminates

theories, one single expansion for each displacement component is used through the entire thickness, and therefore, the transverse strains are continuous through the thickness -- a strain state appropriate for homogeneous plates. 3 EQUIVALENT-SINGLE-LAYER LAMINATE THEORIES Extension of the single-layer theories of homogeneous plates to laminated composite plates is straightforward.~6,17.20-42 The only difference is in accounting for the varying layer thicknesses and material properties in the evaluation of the integrals in eqn (2). In carrying out the integration it is tacitly assumed that the layers are perfectly bonded. For laminated composite plates, this amounts to replacing the heterogeneous laminate with a statically equivalent (in the integral sense) single layer whose stiffnesses are a weighted average of the layer stiffnesses through the thickness. Therefore, such laminate theories are termed equivalent single layer (ESL) theories. For many applications, the ESL theories provide a sufficiently accurate description of the global laminate response (e.g. transverse deflection, fundamental vibration frequency, critical buckling load, force and moment resultants). The main advantages of the ESL models are their inherent simplicity and low computational cost due to the relatively small number of dependent variables that must be solved for. However, the ESL models are often inadequate for determining the three-dimensional stress field at the ply level. The major deficiency of the ESL models in modeling composite laminates is that the transverse strain components are continuous across interfaces between dissimilar materials; thus, the transverse stress components ( 6~z, 6yz, 6zz) are discontinuous at the layer interfaces. To see this, consider the linear strain-displacement relations for the first-order shear deformation laminated plate theory, 16,17

23

6~0) OUl 1_ Oy Ox ' 6(30)= 0, e~l)= 0

_-Oy e? ) = ~u0 + 2 , Oy

Ox

E(1)= 0
(9b)

e~~l=Ou3 + fk~, e~')=0

0x

We note from eqn (9a) that the strains vary linearly through the laminate thickness, and they are independent of the lamination scheme, as noted earlier. For a fixed value of z, the strains vary only with respect to the x and y coordinates. The transverse stresses according to the stress-strain relations of the kth lamina are given by

{O'41k [ O51
or
where

044 Q45]klg41k [ Q 4 5 Q55] [651

(10a)

{o}k=[Q]k{6} k

(10b)

e3= ezz, e4= 2eyz, e5 = 2exz (11) and [Q]k represents the matrix of material stiffnesses of the kth layer referred to the global coordinates of the laminate. Thus, the stresses at the interface of the kth and (k + 1 )st layer, called interlaminar stresses, are not continuous because [0]k[(~] k+l and {6}k={e} k+l. This deficiency is most evident in relatively thick laminates, in localized regions of complex loading, or near geometric and material discontinuities. While the inplane stresses (Oxx, Oyy, axy) C a n be computed only through stress-strain relations, the transverse stresses ( Oxz, Cryz,Ozz) can be computed through either the constitutive equations or the equilibrium equations of three-dimensional elasticity. As shown above, the constitutive equations give discontinuous interlaminar stresses. Alternatively, the equations of stress equilibrium

6i = 61)+ ze111 (i = 1, 2, 6, 4, 5)
where

(9a)

Ox 0o~ 0Oxz= O~xX+-~y + Oz 0

0YY+0-~ = 0 ~ - ~ + 0y 0z

(12a) (12b) (12c)

Ox' Oy'

Ox Oy

Oaxz +O--~+Oz---~Z=o
0x 0y 0z

24

J. N. Reddy

can be used to compute the interlaminar stresses, when the inplane stresses (axx, ayy, axy) are known. Integration of eqns (1 2a, b) with respect to z gives (Oxz, Oyz), which then can be used in eqn (12c) to determine azz. It is found that even this approach gives inaccurate, but continuous, stress fields at the layer interfaces for thick composites. This inaccuracy is attributed to inaccurate representation of the inplane stress components in ESL theories.
Fig. 1.

,'- uiV N-I~

_U ~_UI~ t

"1

It 1

Schematic of a laminate and layerwise discretization.

4 LAYERWISE LAMINATE THEORIES

Unlike the ESL theories, the layerwise theories assume separate displacement field expansions within each material layer, thus providing a kinematically correct representation of the strain field in discrete layer laminates, and allowing accurate determination of ply level stresses. Numerous displacement-based, layerwise laminate theories have appeared in the literature.43-5 In most of these layerwise theories, displacement continuity across layer interfaces is enforced via constraint equations that allow some of the dependent variables to be eliminated during the model development. However, in the layerwise theory of Reddy, 48-5 the transverse variation of the displacement field is defined in terms of a onedimensional, Lagrangian, finite element representation that automatically enforces C continuity of the displacement components through the thickness, resulting in transverse strains that are layerwise continuous through the thickness. The variation of the displacements through the thickness can be represented to any desired level of accuracy by simply increasing the number of one-dimensional finite elements (i.e. numerical layers) or increasing the order of the transverse interpolation polynomials. Thus, the layerwise theory of Reddy provides a generalization of the layerwise displacement field concept. The layerwise theory of Reddy is based on the following displacement expansion through the laminate thickness. The ith displacement component is expressed as (see Fig. 1 ),
N

theory will have 3N variables and as many differential equations in two dimensions. An advantage of this layerwise theory is that it requires only two-dimensional finite elements while incorporating the kinematics of three-dimensional elasticity. While the same interpolation functions are used in eqn (13) for all three displacements for simplicity, independent interpolation of the displacements (especialy u3) can be used. The functions j are piecewise continuous functions, defined only on two adjacent layers, and can be viewed as the global Lagrange interpolation functions associated with the Jth interface of the layers through the laminate thickness, and U[ denotes the nodal values of ui at the nodes through the thickness. Because of this local nature of ~j, the displacements are continuous through the thickness but their derivatives with respect to z are not continuous. This implies that the transverse strains can be discontinuous at a point P on the discrete layer interfaces, {e}~#{e}~+1, leaving the possibility that the interlaminar stresses computed from the layer constitutive equations at the point from the two layers can be continuous: O]{e}p=[Q]
k k k+l

{e}p

k+l

ui(x,Y,Z,t) = Z U[(x,y,t)dPj(z)
J=l

(13)

where (i = 1, 2, 3), N is the number of subdivisions (e.g. finite-element discretization) through the thickness of the laminate, and ~ j are known functions of the thickness coordinate, z. The resulting

The inplane strains ei will be continuous and therefore the inplane stresses oi will be discontinuous at layer interfaces, as they should, because of the difference in material properties of adjacent layers. The choice of N in eqn (13) provides the analyst with many options and flexibility in modeling. When N is chosen such that at least one element per layer is used, the interlaminar stress distributions can be determined accurately. The sublaminate concept can be used to model several identical layers of the laminate as one equivalent layer by choosing one element through the layers.

An evaluation of composite laminates

On the other hand, a layer can be modeled with more than one element to represent matrix splits or to capture local effects. In addition, the layerwise theory of Reddy can be used to model imbedded delaminations between layers 5~ and study their growth. The linear strain-displacement relations associated with the layerwise displacement field of eqn (13)are
() U ~ i~ j, eyy =

25

Fiber-reinforced composite laminates are constructed of orthotropic layers, with the material principal axes (xl, x2) of each layer oriented at an angle with respect to the global coordinate system (x, y) while the material principal coordinate x 3 of all layers coincide with the global z axis. In the layerwise theory, the stress-strain relations of three-dimensional elasticity are used. For a typical lamina, we have, 17 / axx l k aye
tTzz

Ox

OU ~ C J, Oy

~.zz = U 3

j de~g , dz

dtPg+ OU~ ~g, 2eyz=U~ d----z Oy

d dP___2 0 U_~3 + __J 2exz = U~ dz Ox J'

%
%
(Txy

2exy----k Oy

(14)

-Cll C12 C13 0 C22 C23 0 C33 0 644

sym.

c,: k

xx]
gyy

0 C26 0 C360 C45 C55 0

C6,

iEy / zC'z 2exz [

2exyJ

where summation on repeated indices is assumed. The governing equations for the nodal variJ J J . ables (U1, U2, U3) can be derived using the principle of virtual displacements. The equations of motion of the layerwise theory are

(17)

OM ~ + OMxy_Q~=Mu~)[, I ' Ox Ox
0x

Oy Oy
0y
t -- Q y = " g

The stresses can be written in terms of the displacements by means of eqns (14) and (17), and the resultants in (16) can be written in terms of the displacements (Uj, Vs, Wj) by substituting for stresses into eqn (16). Thus, the governing differential equations can be ultimately written in J J J terms of the displacements, (U l, U2, U3) and their derivatives with respect to x and y.

Omlxy + O M y l y

MuU2,

5 VARIABLEKINETIC FINITE ELEMENTS

OK~x-----z+OK~yy-o~=MuU ~
(15) While layerwise finite elements allow accurate determination of three-dimensional stress fields, they are computationally expensive to use due to the large number of degrees of freedom per element, comparable to stacks of three-dimensional finite elements. Thus, it is often impractical to discretize an entire laminate with layerwise finite elements. Further, for many laminate applications, the indiscriminate use of layerwise elements is a waste of computational resources since significant three-dimensional stress states are usually present only in localized regions of complex loading or geometric and material discontinuities. A logical idea is to subdivide the laminate into regions that can be adequately described by ESL models and other regions that require some type of layerwise model (i.e. a simultaneous global-local strategy). In this way, the most appropriate model is chosen for each region, thereby increasing solution

for I = 1, 2, .... , N, where the resultants are defined by

( hie

(ML, Myy, '

Mly) =

J -hi2 (Gxx , Oyy, Oxy)lff~l(Z)dZ,

d~l

(Qx~, Q~, Qz~)=

h/2

3 - t,/2

(O~z, Oyz,Ozz)

~Z

dz

'J (KIx, Kyy)=

r h/2
Mls =

hi2

-h/2

(O z,

dz,
(16)

~] -h/2

p ~ l ~ s dz

where h is the total thickness of the laminate and p is the material density.

26

J. N. Reddy

economy without compromising solution accuracy. Such global-local schemes can be developed using established finite element technology; 52 however, currently available methods make implementation extremely cumbersome. The primary source of difficulty is the enforcement of displacement continuity across boundaries that separate incompatible subdomains. Currently established methods of achieving displacement continuity between incompatible regions include (i) multi-point constraint equations via Lagrange multipliers, (ii) penalty function methods, and (iii) special transition elements. Each of these methods is too cumbersome for extensive use under a wide variety of operating conditions. Thus, there is a need for the development of a global-local analysis procedure that provides greater robustness, simpler computer implementation, and wider applicability to practical composite structures. To overcome the limitations of the current procedures used in the global-local finite element analysis, a variable displacement field concept was proposed by the author and his colleagues. 5-~-56 The variable displacement field is a sum of all admissible displacement fields, single layer as well as layerwise, so that appropriate part of the displacement field can be invoked in a given region of the domain. The finite elements based on different displacement fields can be connected together in a single domain for global-local analysis. To further reduce the computational effort the mesh superposition is employed. In the mesh superposition technique, an independent overlay mesh is superimposed on a global mesh to provide localized refinement for regions of interest regardless of the original global mesh topology. Integration of variable kinematic elements and mesh superposition technique yields a very robust, economical analysis for global-local analysis of practical laminated composite structures. The variable kinematic, finite element is developed by superimposing several types of assumed displacement fields within the finite element domain. In general, the multiple assumed displacement field can be expressed as ui(x, y, z) =UiESL, y,z)+ uLW(x, Y, Z), Ix, (i=1,2,3) (18)

represent the inplane coordinates and z is the transverse coordinate. The underlying foundation ESI. of the displacement field is provided by u i which represents the assumed displacement field for any desired equivalent-single-layer theory (e.g. the first-order shear deformation theory). The second term u Lwrepresents the assumed displacement field for any desired layerwise theory (e.g. the layerwise theory of Reddy). The layerwise displacement field is included as an incremental enhancement to the basic ESL displacement field, so that the element can have full three-dimensional modeling capability when needed. Depending on the desired level of accuracy, the element can use all, part, or none of the layerwise field to create a series of different elements having a wide range of kinematic complexity. For example, discrete layer transverse shear effects can be added to the element by including u~w and u!x~',resulting in a layerwise element, which we denote as the LW1 element. Further, discrete layer transverse normal effects can be added to the element by also including u3LW,resulting in another layerwise element which we denote as the LW2 element. Displacement continuity is maintained between these different types of elements by simply enforcing certain homogeneous essential boundary conditions (see Fig. 2), thus eliminating the need for multi-point constraints, penalty function methods, or special transition elements. Such variable kinematic plate elements have been developed by Robbins and Reddy s4-57 and show much potential for a wide variety of global-local analysis of composite plate problems.

6 MESH SUPERPOSITION TECHNIQUE The use of hierarchical, variable kinematic, finite element concept provides a convenient means of

I 2
1 _ Translation = A u0

U~

=0

where u 1 and u2 are the local inplane displacement components, and u3 is the local transverse displacement component. The coordinates (x, y)

Fig. 2. Superposition of the first-ordershear deformation theory displacement field and layerwise displacement field. Deformation of the transverse normal AB in the xz plane.

An evaluation of composite laminates

27

simultaneously discretizing subregions of a single computational domain with different theories. Thus, the analyst can use the most appropriate theory for each subregion of the domain. However, the efficiency of a global-local analysis based solely on variable kinematic elements is still strongly dependent on a priori knowledge of the locations of subregions that require the more powerful layerwise elements. This limitation is due to the requirement that the inplane discretizations of adjacent subregions must be compatible across subregion boundaries. The removal of this restriction would result in a very general, robust global-local computational model. In keeping with the hierarchical modeling philosophy of the previous section, the finite element mesh superposition technique (see, for example, the recent paper by Fish 58) is chosen as the means to remove the strong dependence of initial mesh topology upon global-local solution efficiency. The mesh superposition method is an adaptive refinement technique that creates refined areas within a chosen crude finite element mesh by superimposing independent, refined meshes (overlay meshes) on the original mesh. No changes are made to the original mesh during the superposition process. The mesh superposition method is adaptive in the sense that the size, shape and ultimate location of the overlay mesh is based on the solution provided by the original mesh alone. The overlay mesh and the original mesh need not have a compatible discretization; the overlay mesh can be used to provide enhanced interpolation capability precisely where it is most needed, regardless of the original mesh. To illustrate the mesh superposition idea, 57 consider the two-dimensional, displacement-based, finite element model of an elastic solid shown in Fig. 3. The original coarse mesh occupies a region

R 0 with boundary So (i.e. the rectangle ABCD). Assume that a solution obtained with the original 4 x 3 mesh indicates high displacement gradients in a subregion R 1 enclosed by boundary $1 (i.e. the quadrilateral region EFGD). An independent overlay mesh is then constructed corresponding to the subregion R1 and this overlay mesh is superimposed on the original mesh to form a composite mesh. The total displacement field u for the resulting composite mesh is then defined as follows:
u=u+u 1 inRl (19a)

and
u=u in R o - R 1 (19b)

where u is the total displacement field, u is the displacement field interpolated on the original 4 x 3 mesh, and u 1 is the additional displacement field interpolated on the 5 5 overlay mesh. Note that u I serves as an incremental enhancement to the global solution within region R1. A new solution is then computed based on the multiple displacement field, which permits an enhanced representation of the solution within subregion R 1. Note that the process of forming a composite mesh does not require altering the original mesh. An important consequence of the multiple displacement fields is that the original mesh and the overlay mesh need not have compatible discretizations along the boundary S1, since Co continuity of the displacements across S~ is imposed by prescribing homogeneous essential boundary conditions on the additional displacement field u l: ul=0 on S I ~ S 0 (20)

(i.e. along EFG). Homogeneous essential boundary conditions on u I are not required along the boundary $1~ So (i.e. along EDG) unless EDG happens to be part of a Dirichlet boundary (i.e. boundary where the solution u is specified) for the problem as a whole. By circumventing the mesh compatibility requirement along $1, a tremendous amount of flexibility is provided for the construction of the overlay mesh, and the adaptive refinement process can proceed in an optimal manner regardless of the original mesh topology. The assembled finite element equations of the global-local analysis with mesh superposition technique are of the form,

,~

~:

Fig. 3. Finite element mesh superposition showing a coarse 4 x 3 global mesh and an independent, refined, 5 x 5 overlay mesh (shaded).

IK,11 IK,211IId,/l I , l
[K2,] [K22]J [{d2}J [{FE}J

(21)

28

J. N. Reddy
stiffnesses ([Kt2] and [K21]) destroys the banded nature of the composite stiffness matrix, thus a conventional direct banded equation solver is inefficient. Due to the incremental additive nature of the variables interpolated on the overlay mesh, {d2} = {0} provides a reasonable starting estimate for {d2}. Thus, the following iterative method is used to solve the composite system of equations: Step 1. Set {d2}= {0} Step 2. Solve[K~t]{d~}={Ft}-[Ktz]{d2} for {dl} Step 3. Solve[Kz2]{d2}={Fz}-[Kzt]{d,} for {d2} Step 4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 until convergence is achieved.

where [Ku] and [K22 ] represent the independent stiffness matrices for the global mesh and local overlay mesh respectively, the submatrices [K~2] and [K21] represent the stiffness matrices associated with the coupling between the global and overlay meshes, and {d l} and {d2} denote the nodal degrees of freedom associated with the global and local meshes respectively. Thus, the process of creating a composite mesh by adding an overlay mesh to an original global mesh destroys the banded nature of the composite system of equations. This process is illustrated in Figs 4 and 5. In Fig. 4, one quadrant of a 2 2 global mesh is superposed by an independent 2 2 local mesh to form a composite mesh. The local elements can be different from the global elements, both in terms of the degree of interpolation as well as the theory (or mathematical model) on which they are based. In the composite stiffness matrix, Fig. 5 shows the composite stiffness matrix in terms of zero and nonzero entries for the composite mesh of Fig. 4. While both [Kn] and [K22] retain the usual banded form, the presence of the coupling

7 NUMERICAL RESULTS

7.1 Accuracy of the layerwise theory

Numerical results are presented here to illustrate the accuracy of the layerwise theory. The numerical results were obtained using a displacement finite element model of the layerwise theory described above. The reader is referred to the paper by Robbins and Reddy 5 for a description of the finite element model and additional numerical results. Consider a cross-ply laminate (0/90/0) subjected to sinusoidal transverse load at the top surface of the plate. This problem has the threedimensional elasticity solution. 36 The plies are of equal thickness (h/3), and the material properties of each ply are Ej = 25 msi, E2 = 1 msi, E 3 = E2, Gl2 = 0"5 msi, Gl3 = G23 = 0"2 msi, v12 = v13 = v23 = 0-25 (22)

Global Mesh

OvedayMesh

CompositeMesh

CompositeSystemof Equations

Fig. 4.

Finite element mesh superposition showing the structure of the composite system of equations.

K,,] tK,2]] [{d,}] = [{ F1

K-i-i] [K,2]-]

[K22]_J

The intensity of the sinusoidally distributed load is denoted q0. Two different finite element meshes are used. The two meshes differ from each other only in the mesh refinements through the thickness. A 2 2 mesh of eight-node quadratic elements is used in a quadrant of the laminate. The mesh used through the thickness are as follows (see Fig. 6): Mesh 1 -- three quadratic elements through the thickness (441 dof). Mesh 2 -- six quadratic elements through the thickness (969 dof).

Fig. 5. Form of the stiffness matrix for the composite mesh.

Nonzero entries are indicated by dark areas. Banded nature is lost due to extensive coupling between global and overlay meshes.

An evaluation of composite laminates

z

29

Figures 7 and 8 contain plots of nondimensional stresses (axx, trxz) through the thickness of the square, thick, laminate (b/h = 4). The stresses are nondimensionalized as follows:

6xx = Oxx(ac, ac, z)h2 /( b2qo)

2-D

1-D
7 ~

6xz = axz(bc, a~, z)h/( bqo)

(23)

Fig. 6. Finite element meshes of layerwise elements used for a three-layer (0/90/0), simply-supported square laminate under sinusoidal transverse load. Mesh 1 is shown in the figure; mesh 2 differs only in doubling the number of layerwise elements through the thickness.

1.00

' Exact'3-D Eiasticity

'

"

Layer-wise Mesh 1 j..~. / o Layer-wise Mesh2~..ef ,/~,/

---CLT
"r" 0.67 FSDT

f
" ~

,4,"
--'J

0.33

/,'

0.00

,~

,.

-0.8 -0.6

- 0 . 4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 In-plane Normal Stress (~1

0.6

0.8

Fig. 7. Distribution of inplane normal stress Oxx through the thickness of a three-layer (0/90/0), simply-supported square laminate under sinusoidal transverse load.

1.00

-0.67 w" ,-" L.2h~

=: t
. . . . . .

=o3.o

Mesh1

! - - -0.,

c. u,,i

0.33

" " , "~'~-~-~-

__/_

.....

_i ..... FSOTt,~-~,~
- - - -FSDT

000

. . . .

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.I

0.0

Transverse Shear Stress (~5

Fig. 8. Distribution of transverse shear stress Oxz through the thickness of a three-layer (0/90/0), simply-supported square laminate under sinusoidal transverse load.

where ac=O.lO5662(b/2 ), bc=O'894338(b/2) are the (reduced order) Gauss points closest to the points of maximum stresses. The coordinate system is taken in the midplane of the laminate, with the origin of the coordinate system being at the center of the laminate. In Figs 6 and 7, the solid line represents the three-dimensional elasticity solution of Pagano, 36 the solid circles represent the finite element stresses at the Gauss points for mesh 1, the open circles represent the finite element solution at the Gauss points for mesh 2 (refined), and broken lines correspond to the classical and first-order theories. Excellent agreement is found between the three-dimensional elasticity results and the finite element results based on the layerwise laminate theory. The deflection u3(x, y) coincides with the exact three-dimensional elasticity solution and is not shown here. All stresses in the layerwise theory were computed in the post-computation using the displacement field, linear strain-displacement relations, and linear constitutive relations. The inplane normal stress (Oxx) in the classical laminate theory (CLT) and the first-order shear deformation (FSD) theory were post-computed at the Gauss points using the constitutive equations. The transverse shear stress Oxz in the CLT was postcomputed from the first two equilibrium equations of the three-dimensional elasticity, whereas they were post-computed in the FSD both from constitutive and three-dimensional elasticity equations. From the plot of the inplane normal stress Oxx, it is seen that both CLT and FSD predict wrong sign of the stress at the layer interfaces. This is due to the fact that the stress is approximated in the classical and first-order theories by a linear expansion. In trying to best approximate the nonlinear stress distribution by a linear variation, both CLT and FSDT yield wrong interface stress values. This can lead to inaccurate prediction of failure load and failure mode. The equilibriumbased stress 05 from the single-layer theories is in considerable error compared to the three-dimensional elasticity solution; in fact, they predict maximum value of Oxz in the middle layer while

30

J. N. Reddy
The variable kinematic finite elements are used in a global-local analysis to determine interlaminar free edge stresses near the middle of one of the two free edges (see Figs 9 and 10). The global region is modeled using first order shear deformable elements; the local region is modeled with LW2 elements in order to capture the threedimensional stress state near the free edge. Five different finite element meshes are used. The inplane discretization for all five meshes is exactly the same, consisting of a 5 x 11 mesh of eightnode quadratic two-dimensional finite elements. All elements have the same length (2L/5). However, the width of the elements decreases as the free edge at (x, W,, z) is approached. The widths of the eleven rows of elements, as one moves away from the refined free edge are h/16, h/16, h/8, hi4, hi2, h, h, 2h, 3h, 3h, 5h, where h is the ply thickness. The five meshes differ only in the size of the local region that is discretized with LW2 elements. The LW2 elements used in the local region employ eight quadratic layers through the

the three-dimensional elasticity gives in the outer layers. Note that the error introduced in the computation of the inplane stresses (Oxx, ayy, ox;.) through constitutive equations will influence the accuracy of the transverse stresses computed using the equilibrium equations. The transverse shear stress computed in the FSD by constitutive equations is in qualitative agreement with the three-dimensional elasticity results. For all stresses, the layerwise theory yields accurate results.
7.2 Global-local analysis with variable kinematic elements

To demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the variable kinematic finite elements, a global-local analysis is performed to determine the nature of the free edge stress field of the free edge effect in a thick, symmetric angle-ply laminate under imposed axial extension. 55 Consider a thick, symmetric, angle-ply laminate (45/-45)~ subjected to axial displacements on the ends. The laminate has a length of 2L, width 2W, and thickness 4h, with L = 1 0 W and W=8h (see Figs 9 and 10). Each of the four material layers is of equal thickness h, and is idealized as a homogeneous, orthotropic material with the following properties expressed in the material coordinate system: EL= 20 106 psi, ET=Ez=2.1xl0~psi,

L/W=~O W/h --- 8

~ Y ~ !.

Loc~Reglon (LW2) ! Global Region (FSD)

GLT=GLz=

2W 0"85 X 106

psi, (24)
2L

~ULT ktcz = ~tTz= 0"21 =

where subscript L denotes the direction parallel to the fibers, subscript T denotes the inplane direction perpendicular to the fibers, and subscript z denotes the out-of-plane direction. The origin of the global coordinate system coincides with the centroid of the three-dimensional composite laminate. The x-coordinate is taken along the length of the laminate; the y-coordinate is taken along the width of laminate; and the zcoordinate is taken through the thickness of the laminate. Since the laminate is symmetric about the xy-plane, only the upper half of the laminate is modeled. Thus the computational domain is defined by (-L<x<_L, -W<_y<_W, 0<z-<2h). The displacement boundary conditions for this problem are:

Fig. 9.

Inplane discretization of a ( + 4 5 / - 4 5 ) , laminate under axial extension.

2h

48
2w

LW'2Bomonm

1 / I -fh
h

Ul(L, y, z)

Uo,

ul( - L , y, z) =0, u2(L , 0, 0) =0,

(25)
Fig. 10. Layerwise discretization of the local region (through the thickness) near the free edge of a ( + 4 5 / - 4 5 ) 5 laminate under axial extension.

u2( -L, 0, 0) =0,

u3(x, y, 0) =0

An evaluation of composite laminates

31

laminate thickness (four per material layer). The thickness of the numerical layers decreases as the ( + 4 5 / - 4 5 ) interface is approached. From bottom to top, the layer thicknesses are 0.533h, 0.267h, 0.133h, 0-083h, 0.083h, 0.133h, 0.267h, 0-533h (see Fig. 9). The five meshes used in this problem are summarized below (see Table 1).
Mesh 1 - - 3 x 4 local mesh of L W 2 elements, centered about the point (0, W, 0). The L W 2 elements extend a distance of hi2 away from the free edge (2354 active global dof). Mesh 2 - - 3 x 5 local mesh of L W 2 elements, centered about the point (0, W,, 0). The L W 2 elements extend a distance of h away from the free edge (2740 active global dof). Mesh 3 - - 3 x 6 local mesh of L W 2 elements, centered about the point (0, W,, 0). The LW2 elements extend a distance of 2h away from the free edge (3226 active global dof). Mesh 4 - - 3 x 7 local mesh of L W 2 elements, centered about the point (0, W,, 0). The L W 2 elements extend a distance of 3h away from the free edge (3512 active global dof). Mesh 5 5 x 11 mesh of L W 2 elements in the entire domain. This mesh is used as a control mesh for comparison (9116 active global dof).
-

at the reduced Gauss points nearest the middle of the refined free edge, i.e. along the line ( - 0.115 L, 0.998W, z). In Fig. 11, all four global-local meshes compare very well with the control mesh. In Fig. 12, meshes 1 and 2 show some error, indicating that Ozz is more sensitive to the mesh and the boundary layer thickness is larger than that of Uxz. Meshes 3 and 4 are practically indistinguishable from the control mesh. Figures 13 and 14 show the distribution of the interlaminar stresses axz and Ozz, respectively, across the width of the laminate near the (+45/ -45) interface. The stresses are computed at the reduced Gauss points closest to the line (0, y, h), i.e. along the line (-0.115L, y, 1.014h). In both Figs 13 and 14, the interlaminar stresses computed with meshes 3 and 4 are very close to the stresses obtained with the control mesh. Once again, the stresses computed with meshes 1 and 2 show a slight error; however, the distributions are qualitatively similar to the other meshes.

1.5

Mesh 1 0 Mesh 2 Mesh 3, Mesh 4

7 "
/

0.5
0 , , , , I , , , , I

~
,

Figures 11 and 12 show the distribution of the interlaminar stress Oxz and azz, respectively, through the laminate thickness. All stresses are nondimensionalized by multiplying them by the factor (20eo/Ec), where e0 is the nominal applied axial strain of(uo/2L). The stresses are computed

- 2

-1.5

- 1

-0.5

Transverse Shear Stress

(~

Fig. 11. lnterlaminar shear stress oxz distribution near the free edge of a symmetric ( + 4 5 / - 4 5 ) s laminate under axial extension.

'

'

'

"

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Mesh 1
o Mesh2

--~u~
~o

Table 1. Global-local finite element meshes used in the study of the free edge problem a

1.5

Mesh3, Mesh4

Number of elements in local region

Width of local region

Total active dof

0.5
o
. . . . . . . . . . ~'

Mesh 1 Mesh 2 Mesh 3 Mesh4 Mesh 5

3x4 3x5 3x 6 3x 7 5 x 11

hi2
h 2h 3h 16h

2354 2740 3226 3512 9116

'?P
0.2

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

Transverse Normal Stress

0 (~zz

aThe total inplane discretization for all five global-local meshes is 5 x 11.

Fig. 12. Interlaminar normal stess azz distribution near the free edge of a symmetric ( + 4 5 / - 4 5 ) s laminate under axial extension.

32

J. N. Reddy

,-

Local Region of Interest

Mesh3.

Mesh 4 L I 4in. Aluminum 1 10 I. z

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1 Piezoelectrfc thickness = 02 I.. Actuation strain = 0.001 Adhesive thickness = 0.01 in.

YM Fig. 13. Interlaminar shear stress a,, distribution across the width of a ( + 45/- 4.5), laminate under axial extension.

Fig. 15. Cylindrical bending of a cantilever plate with a surface bonded piezoelectric actuator (strain induced in the actuator = - 10 - 3).

Mesh
j Global Region, 8 FSD elements Local Region,
4 13 LW2

Mesh Mesh

Br_ :

elements

layers through piezoelectric 3 layers through adhesive 4 layers through aluminum 0.7 0.75 0.6 0.85 YMf 0.9 0.95 1

Fig. 14. Interlaminar normal stress a,,( - 0.115 L , y, 1.014/z) distribution across the width of a (+45/-45), laminate under axial extension.

Fig. 16. Finite element mesh used to model the cylindrical bending of a cantilever plate with a surface bonded piezoelectric actuator. Variable kinematic elements are used to permit the simultaneous use of two different mathematical models (or theories).

7.3 Variable kinematic elements and mesh superposition To illustrate the utility of combining the variable kinematic element concept with the mesh superposition technique, consider the cylindrical bending of a cantilever plate by a surface bonded piezoelectric actuator shown in Fig. 15. The objective of the analysis is to determine the transverse stresses in the thin adhesive layer near the end of the actuator. The local region of interest, where significant three-dimensional stresses are expected, is shown in Fig. 15. If this problem is to be solved by variable kinematic finite elements, in order to capture these local three-dimensional stresses while maintaining an overall economical solution, the majority of the plate should be discretized using FSD elements while the local region of interest be discretized using the LW2 elements (see Fig. 16). Figure 17 shows the computed transverse stresses in the center of the adhesive layer verses

SOW

-5000 -

-1oOW

3.2

3.4

3.6

3.8

W-0

Fig. 17. Distribution of transverse stresses along the center of the adhesive layer near the free edge of the actuator, as determined using a mesh of variable kinematic finite elements.

y. Several points of interest should be noted. First, both of the transverse stresses approach zero as the global-local boundary AA is approached (i.e. as y decreases toward 3.0); this suggests that the size of the local region is sufficient to capture all

An evaluation of composite laminates

33
lOfir=order~,mr a~ormab~Comma
63 degrees of fresdom

of the free edge stresses near the end of the actuator. Secondly, the transverse shear stress appears to satisfy the traction free boundary conditions at the free edge of the actuator and adhesive. Third, a significant transverse normal stress exists in the adhesive layer near the free edge of the actuator. This transverse normal stress is of particular concern since many adhesives are relatively weak in tension. It is also interesting to note that if this problem is solved using FSDT elements only, then both the transverse shear stress and transverse normal stress are predicted to be zero over the entire domain. To illustrate the utility of combining the variable kinematic element concept with the mesh superposition technique, consider once again the example problem shown in Fig. 15. Figure 18 shows the global mesh, the local overlay mesh and the resulting composite mesh used to solve this problem. The global mesh is a coarse uniform mesh of ten FSD elements. To capture the local three-dimensional stress field in the adhesive layer near the end of the actuator, an independent local overlay mesh of 13 LW 2 layerwise elements are used. The LW2 elements used to form the overlay mesh contain four layers through the aluminum substrate, three layers through the adhesive, and four layers through the piezoelectric actuator. The local overlay mesh is superimposed over the fourth and fifth global elements to achieve the composite mesh. The composite mesh shown in Fig. 18 has the exact same interpolating capability as the mesh shown in Fig. 16. Thus, it is not surprising that the solution obtained from the composite mesh of Fig. 18 is exactly the same as the previous solution obtained using variable kinematic elements only; therefore the results are not repeated here. The advantage of the present model over the previous model is that the same global mesh can be used in the investigation of many different local regions of interest. For each new local region of interest, an independent local overlay.mesh of variable kinematic elements is formed and superimposed on the global mesh. Since the global and overlay meshes need not be compatible, the effectiveness of the global-local analysis is not strongly tied to the global mesh topology. 8 CONCLUSIONS A review of the single-layer theories of composite laminates is presented, and the layerwise theory

Global M e s h

~ / [~ / [__J/' ,~

13 layenNisefin~eelements 4 layemthroughpiezoelectric 4 layem~roug~aluminum Layerehk:jh~refined near adheswe,

and coarse elewhere. 648degrees of freedom.

Composite Mesh

Fig. 18. Finite element mesh superposition showing the coarse global mesh of FSD elements, the independent overlay mesh of L W 2 elements, and resulting composite mesh.

proposed by the author is described. A finite element modeling methodology is presented for the hierarchical, global-local analysis of laminated composite plates. The method incorporates a new variable kinematic, displacement-based, finite element that is based on a multiple assumed displacement field approach. The variable kinematic elements provide a great degree of flexibility in defining the transverse (through thickness) variation of the assumed displacement field. The resulting finite element model permits different subregions of the computational domain to be described by different mathematical models. Enforcing displacement continuity along subregion boundaries requires only the specification of certain homogeneous essential boundary conditions, thus avoiding multi-point constraints, penalty function methods, or special transition elements. To increase the utility of the variable finite elements, an integration of the variable kinematic element concept with the finite element mesh superposition technique is developed. The resulting global-local model permits selected local subregions in a composite plate to be conveniently discretized with an independent refined overlay mesh composed of FSDT, LW 1, and/or LW2 elements. Due to the independent nature of the local overlay mesh, the present integrated method allows several different local regions of interest to be accurately and conveniently investigated regardless of the original global mesh topology. The computational procedure described

34

J. N. Reddy
plates. J. Appl. Mech., Tram. ASME, 44 (4) (1977) 663-8. Lo, K. H., Christensen, R. M. & Wu, E. M., A higherorder theory of plate deformation. Part 2: Laminated plates. J. Appl. Mech., 44 (4)(1977) 669-76. Librescu, L., Elastostatics and Kinetics of Anisotropic and Heterogeneous Shell-type Structures. Noordhoff, Leyden, Netherlands, 1975. Jemeilita, G., Techniczna teoria plyt S'redniej Grubosci (Technical theory of plates with moderate thickness), Rozprawy Inzynierskie (Engrg. Trans.), Polska Akad. Nauk, 23 (3)(1975) 483-99. Schmidt, R., A refined nonlinear theory of plates with transverse shear deformation. J. Ind. Math. Soc., 27 (1) (1977) 23-38. Krishna Murty, A. V., Higher order theory for vibration of thick plates. AIAA J., 15 (12)(1977) 1823-4. Levinson, M., An accurate, simple theory of the statics and dynamics of elastic plates. Mech. Res. Comm., 7 (6) (1980) 343-50. Seide, P., An improved approximate theory for the bending of laminated plates. Mech. Today, 5 (1980) 451-66. Murthy, M. V. V., An improved transverse shear deformation theory for laminated anisotropic plates. NASA Tech. Paper 1903, 1981, pp. 1-37. Reddy, J. N., A simple higher-order theory for laminated composite plates. J. Appl. Mech., 51 (1984) 745-52. Reddy, J. N., A refined nonlinear theory of plates with transverse shear deformation. Int. J. Solids and Structures, 20 (9/10) (1984) 881-96. Bhimaraddi, A. & Stevens, L. K., A higher order theory for free vibration of orthotropic, homogeneous, and laminated rectangular plates. J. Appl. Mech., 51 (1984) 195-8. Di Sciuva, M., A refined transverse shear deformation theory for multilayered anisotropic plates. Atti Accad Sci. Torino, 118 (1984) 279-95. Reddy, J. N., A general non-linear third-order theory of plates with transverse shear deformation. J. Non-Linear Mech., 25 (6)(1990) 677-86. Stavsky, Y.. On the theory of symmetrically heterogeneous plates having the same thickness variation of the elastic moduli. In Topics in Applied Mechanics, E. Schwerin Memorial Volume. ed. D. Abir, F. Ollendorff & M. Reiner. Elsevier, New York, USA, 1965, pp. 105-66. Yang, P. C., Norris, C. H. & Stavsky, Y., Elastic wave propagation in heterogeneous plates. Int. J. Solids and Structures, 2 (1966)665-84. Whitney, J. M., The effect of transverse shear deformaton in the bending of laminated plates. J. Comp. Mater., 3 (1969) 534-47. Whitney, J. M. & Pagano, N. J., Shear deformation in heterogeneous anisotropic plates. J. Appl. Mech., 37 (4) (1970) 1031-6. Pagano, N. J., Exact solutions for rectangular bidirectional composites and sandwich plates. J. Comp. Mater., 4 (1970)20-34. Whitney, J. M., Shear correction factors for orthotropic laminates under static load. J. Appl. Mech., 40 (1) (1973) 302-4. Reissner, E., A consistent treatment of transverse shear deformations in laminated anisotropic plates. AIAA J., 10 (5)(1972) 716-18. Reissner, E., Note on the effect of transverse shear deformation in laminated anisotropic plates. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng, 20 (3)(1979) 203-9. Librescu, L. & Reddy, J. N., A critical review and generalization of transverse shear deformable aniso-

herein offers greater flexibility in modeling and it can be used in a variety of applications.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT It is a pleasure to acknowledge the help of Mr Donald Robbins, a research assistant of the author, in computing the numerical results reported herein. REFERENCES
1. Cauchy, A. L., Sur requilibre et le mouvement d'une plaque solide. Exercises de Mathematique, 3 (1828) 328-55. 2. Poisson, S. D., Memoire sur l'equilibre et le mouvement des corps elastique. Mem. Acad. Sci., 8 (1829) 357. 3. Kirchhoff, G., Uber das Gleichgwich und die Bewegung einer Elastischen Scheibe, J. Angew. Math., 40 (1850) 51-88. 4. Basset, A. B., On the extension and flexure of cylindrical and spherical thin elastic shells. Phil, Trans. Royal Soc. (London) Ser. A, 181 (6) (1890) 433-80. 5. Goodier, J. N., On the problem of the beam and the plate in the theory of elasticity. Tram. Royal Soc. Canada, 32 (1938)65. 6. Reissner, E., On the theory of bending of elastic plates. J. Math. Physics, 23 (1944) 184-91. 7. Reissner, E., The effect of transverse shear deformation on the bending of elastic plates. J. Appl. Mech., 12 (1945) 69-77. 8. Reissner, E., Reflections on the theory of elastic plates, Appl. Mech. Rev., 38 ( 11 )(1985) 1453-64. 9. Boll6, E., Contribution au probleme lineare de flexion d'une plaque elastique. Bull. Tech. Suisse. Romande., 73 (1947) 281-5 and 293-8. 10. Hencky, H., Uber die Berucksichtigung der Schubverzerrung in ebenen Platten. Ing.-Arch., 16 (1947) 72-766. 11. Hildebrand, E B., Reissner, E. & Thomas, G. B., Notes on the Foundations of the Theory of Small Displacements of Orthotropic Shells. NASA TN-1833, Washington, DC, USA, 1949. 12. Mindlin, R. D., Influence of rotatory inertia and shear on flexural motions of isotropic, elastic plates. J. Appl, Mech., Trans. ASME, 18 (1951) 31-8. 13. Viasov, B. E, Ob uravneniyakh teovii isgiba plastinok (on the equations of the theory of bending of plates), Izv. Akd. NaukSSR, OTN, 4 (1958) 102-9. 14. Noor, A. K. & Burton, W. S., Assessment of shear deformation theories for multilayered composite plates. Appl. Mech. Rev., 42 (1)(1989) 1-13. 15. Reddy, J. N., A review of refined theories of laminated composite plates. Shock & Vibration Digest, 22 (7) (1990) 3-17. 16. Reddy, J. N., Energy and Variational Methods in Applied Mechanics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 1984. 17. Ochoa, O. O. & Reddy, J. N., Finite Element Analysis of Composite Laminates. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1992. 18. Lo, K. H., Christensen, R. M. & Wu, E. M., A higherorder theory plate deformation. Part 1: Homogeneous

19. 20. 21.

22. 23. 24. 25 26. 27. 28. 29.

30. 31. 32.

33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40.

A n evaluation of composite laminates tropic plates theories. In Euromech Colloquium 219, Refined Dynamical Theories 'of Beams, Plates and Shells and their Applications. ed. I. Ehshakoff & H. Irretier. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1987, pp. 32-43. Di Sciuva, M., Bending, vibration and buckling of simply supported thick multilayered orthotropic plates: an evaluation of a new displacement model. J. Sound & Vibration, 105 (3)(1986) 425-42. Di Sciuva, M., An improved shear deformation theory for moderately thick multilayered anisotropic shells and plates. J. Appl. Mech., 54 (3)(1987) 589-96. Sreenivas, S., A refined analysis of composite laminates. J. Sound & Vibration, 30 (4) (1973) 495-507. Mau, S. T., A refined laminated plate theory. J. Appl. Mech., 40 (2)(1973) 606-7. Epstein, M. & Glockner, P. G., Nonlinear analysis of multilayered shells, Int. J. Solids and Structures, 13 (1977) 1081-9. Murakami, H., Laminated composite plate theory with improved in-plane responses. J. Appl. Mech., 53 (3) (1986) 661-6. Hinrichsen, R. L. & Palazotto, A. N., Nonlinear finite element analysis of thick composite plates using cubic spline functions. AIAA J., 24 (11 ) (1986) 1836-42. Reddy, J. N., A generalization of two-dimensional theories of laminated composite plates. Comm. Appl. NumericalMethods, 3 (1987) 173-80. Reddy, J. N., On the generalization of displacementbased laminate theories. Appl. Mech. Rev., 42 (11)(2) (1989) $213-22. Robbins, D. H. & Reddy, J. N., On the modeling of freeedge stress fields and delaminations in thick composite laminates. In Composites Structures for Aerospace Applications, ed. J. N. Reddy & A. V. Krishna Murty. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, India, 1992, pp. 33-74.

35

41.

42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50.

51. Barbero, E. J. & Reddy, J. N., Modeling of delamination in composite laminates using a layer-wise plate theory. Int. J. Solids and Structures, 28 (3) ( 1991) 373-88. 52. Reddy, J. N., On computational schemes for global-local stress analysis. Workshop on Computational Methods for Structural Mechanics and Dynamics. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA, 1985, pp. 29-31. 53. Robbins, D. H. & Reddy, J. N., Modeling of thick composites using a layerwise laminate theory. Int. J. NumericalMethods Engng, 36 (1993) 655-77. 54. Robbins, D. H. & Reddy, J. N., Global/local analysis of laminated composite plates using variable kinematic finite elements. Paper presented at AIAA/ASME/ ASCE/AHS/ASC 33rd Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials (SDM) Conference, Dallas, TX, USA, 13-15 April 1992. 55. Reddy, J. N., Robbins, D. H. & Reddy, Y. S. N., Analysis of interlaminar stresses and failures using a layer-wise laminate theory. Local Mechanics Concepts for Composite Material Systems, ed. J. N. Reddy & K. L. Reifsnider. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 1992, pp. 307-39. 56. Reddy, J. N. & Robbins, D. H., Analysis of composite laminates using variable kinematic finite elements. In Proceedings of the 7th Brazilian Symposium on Piping and Pressure Vessels (SIBRAT), ed. C. A. C. Selke & C. S. BaeceUos. University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil, 1992, pp. 47-68. 57. Robbins, D. H. & Reddy, J. N., Modeling of actuators in laminated composite structures. Paper presented at the North American Conference on Smart Structures and Materials, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 31 Jan.-3 Feb. 1993. 58. Fish, J., The s-version of the finite element method. Computers and Structures, 43 (3) (1992) 539-47.