2010 National Defense Center of Excellence for Research in Ocean Sciences Industry Day
30 September 2010
Mr. Jimmy Smith, Director, Above Water Sensors Directorate
UNCLASSIFIED
Content
PEO IWS Background Advanced Development (PEO IWS 5A)
ACB APB Capability Gaps
155 Programs
What We Do
The PEO IWS organization is aligned to develop, procure and deliver Enterprise Warfighting Solutions for Surface Ships PEO IWS has life cycle responsibilities for analysis of combat system performance, system planning, design management, systems engineering, integration, installation, test, maintenance and disposal Navys Open Architecture (OA) Enterprise lead for Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition (ASN(RDA))
155 Programs
Schools of Fish
Water-Borne Propagation
Shipwrecks
Range Dependent Bottom Bottom Clutter
Submarine Sensors
Twin-Line Thin-Line Concept
Development Cycle
Performance Measurement
EMP
Production System Integration/Test Certification Data
LCCA
Operational System 1. 2. 3. 4. Component level open data set survey Component level closed data set independent evaluation risk mitigation step Integrated system level closed data set evaluation Integrated system build on production HW at sea evaluation Operational Environment
CAVES
- Surface ASW Synthetic Trainer - Continuous Active Sonar - Active Clutter Reduction
- Different noise characteristics - Collocated with prior ONR data collected
Relay Buoy
Active Clutter
Over-the-horizon communications
RAP VLA
SAST
DWADS
Surface Ship USW Combat Systems Legacy to Future Systems through the ACB Process
100 80
ACB-09
ACB-11
ACB-13 60 40
20 ACB-15
ACB-17
Legacy
IPS SIPS
FY04 FY08 FY12
FY06 FY10 FY14 FY16
TI09/ACB 09
Search CZ improvements Bi-Static Capability Clutter Mitigation Classify Automated Classification Engage MK54 OTS Supportability Synthetic Training Baseline
Establishes a common H/W & S/W architecture Provides improved capabilities through the APB process Reconstitutes Towed Array for DDG 51 Flight IIA Basis for USW Combat Systems on DDG 1000 and LCS
Improved detection and classification at extended ranges Reduce false alarm rate from automation and operators Reduce mutual interference between multiple active ships
Torpedo Defense
Needs:
this issue
Passive
Need improved passive detection capability against diesel submarines
Training
Need full simulation of full sensor suite and recorded data playback capability
3 4 1 2
Improved Modeling, Assessments Requirements Generation Employment Guidelines Development Tactics & Training Performance Measurement
Upgrades/ Enhancements
EMP
IWS5 AN/SQQ-89(V) PMS 401 - ARCI PMS 425 - BYG-1 PMS 435 - ISIS Production System Operational Environment
White Papers
Submitted with technical approach, experience, capabilities, past performance, and initial cost estimate Papers evaluated and if selected will be invited to submit full technical and/or cost proposal for a maximum of 5 year period including all options.
155 Programs
IA Technologies
NAVSEA afloat systems require IA and IA enabled products that
Support the establishment of a robust defense-in-depth (DiD)
security architecture to protect, detect, react, and recover information systems from inadvertent operator error, malicious attack (internal and external), and major calamity (fire, flooding, loss of power, etc.) and
Promote the availability, integrity, confidentiality, authentication,
IA Technologies
Key characteristics include:
Effective against nation state information operations
tradecraft Support real-time, tactical data exchanges Are complementary across network infrastructure, systems, applications, and hosts (within a layer of the architecture) Are complementary across levels in the shipboard architecture Automated, where possible and practical, to support decreased manning Relatively easy and inexpensive to implement, maintain, and update User friendly
Challenges
Business Area #1: Establishing an Enabling Environment, Demonstrating Life cycle Affordability, Encouraging Competition and Collaboration; Business Area #2: Designating Key Interfaces;
Technical Area #1: Achieving Interoperability between Joint Warfighting Applications, Providing Secure Information Exchange, using Selected Open Standards; Technical Area #2: Architecting Modular Designs and Generating Design Disclosures, Employing Modular Designs; Technical Area #3: Using Reusable Applications Software; Technical Area #4: Certifying Conformance.
The Fleet Synthetic Training goal is to provide a system that can produce a higher level of operational proficiency and readiness in a measurably shorter period of time reducing the cost of preparing for operations. This will be achieved by taking advantage of advances in advanced and distributed training applications: Focus Area Crew Performance Definition, Assessment, and Debrief
Cognitive Theory Analysis Decompose surface ship crew functions into a set of metrics based competencies Competency based training metrics tracking to achieve a higher level of proficiency, reduce incidents & minimize training cost Develop a Measurement Model of Performance in Multi-tasking Environments Competency Based Metrics Automated Analysis Automate decomposition of metrics for analyses and feedback of complex training events Adaptability for specific levels of training (individual, team, unit, Strike Group, Coalition) Scenario Generation & Control (SGC) Competency based training requires a cognitive theory based SGC system Adaptive Scenario Generation and Control Data Collection Based Upon Competencies Schema that recognizes exercise competencies & collects appropriate data Verbal Command Data Collection Capture & understand verbal commands utilized by an automated assessment tool/system Debriefs Capability to diagnose crew performance deficiencies Provide relevant sample best practice guidance and examples Evaluate training scenario effectiveness Systematically track trends in performance and establish performance distributions and performance benchmarks
Injections
Agent-based modeling to provide Mission level doctrinally correct behaviors Realistic and automated team simulation supporting training with low overhead while providing high fidelity representations of crew, own ship, Strike Group and opposing forces Reactive entities and environment (e.g., shifting radar ducts, water column temps, etc.)
Optimization
Overcome communications s/ bandwidth limitations Near real-time Intelligence insertion Rapid injection of Objective Area Phenomenon Schema to approach Real World fidelity Higher, High Level Architecture replacement / adaptation Robust replication of C4ISR entities and organizations with integrated exercise capability Determine Strike Group Effectiveness
Enterprise Sensing
155 Programs
Product Service Code (PSC) Descriptions Administrative and Management Support Services Ammunitions and Explosives Ships, Small Craft, Pontoons, and Floating Docks Electrical and Electronic Equipment Components Engineering and Technical Services Fire Control Equipment Guided Missiles Weapons Radar Equipment, Except Airborne Research and Development Other
Veteran Owned SDVOSB Woman Owned Minority Owned Asian Pacific Black Hispanic Disadvantaged Small Disadvantaged 8(a)
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Small Business Dollars Only Large Business Prime Contract Dollars Excluded
N01-077 N01-103 N02-029 N03-065 N03-219 N04-161 N04-162 N04-163 N04-168 N06-049 N07-214 N08-053 N08-167 N08-172 N08-213 N08-215 N08-217 N03-048 N04-068 N04-166 N04-169 N05-125 N05-127 N08-171 N05-124 N05-125 N05-148 N06-050 N07-213 N08-055 N08-056 N08-165 N08-173 N10-152
N02-130 N96-076
N10-153
N09-193
N99-083 N99-118 N00-062 N00-067 N00-123 N01-039 N01-059 N01-092 N04-138 N10-145
2.17
60 50 40
37.62
$M
30 20 10 0
Questions?