KNOWLEDGE 17
WILLIAM J. BROAD ERHAPS we can save the whalesor at least their hearing. Scientists have long known that man-made, underwater noisesfrom engines, sonars, weapons testing, and such industrial tools as air guns used in oil and gas explorationare deafening whales and other sea mammals. The U.S. Navy estimates that loud booms from just its underwater listening devices, mainly sonar, result in temporary or permanent hearing loss for more than a quarter-million sea creatures every year, a number that is rising. Now, scientists have discovered that whales can decrease the sensitivity of their hearing to protect their ears from loud noise. Humans tend to do this with index fingers; scientists havent pinpointed how whales do it, but they have seen the first evidence of the behaviour. Its equivalent to plugging your ears when a jet flies over, said Paul E. Nachtigall, a marine biologist at the
University of Hawaii who led the discovery team. Its like a volume control. The finding, while preliminary, is already raising hopes for the development of warning signals that would alert whales, dolphins and other sea mammals to auditory danger. Peter Madsen, a professor of marine biology at Aarhus University in Denmark, cautioned against letting the discovery slow global efforts to reduce the oceanic roar, which would aid the beleaguered sea mammals more directly. The noise threat arises because of the basic properties of seawater. Typically, light can travel for hundreds of feet through ocean water before diminishing to nothingness. But sound can travel for hundreds of miles. The worlds oceans have been getting noisier as companies and govern-
hearing of sea mammals evolved to compensate for poor visibility beneath the waves and to take advantage of the unique qualities of seawater. Sound travels five times faster than in air and undergoes far less diminishment. The heads of whales and dolphins are mazes of resonant chambers and acoustic lenses that give the animals not only extraordinary hearing but complex voices. The distinctive songs of humpback whales appear to be sung exclusively by males seeking mates. In recent decades, scientists have linked the human cacophony to reductions in mammalian vocalisation, which suggests declines in foraging and breeding. And the problem is poised to get worse: In May, the U.S.Navy disclosed draft environmental impact statements (Atlantic and Pacific operations) that said planned expansions could raise the annual hearing losses among sea mammals to more than one million. Nachtigall said the research was costly because sea mammals need high levels of care. Im pulling in money where I can, he remarked. But he called it revealing and rewarding. When it comes to whales and sound, Nachtigall said, were just starting to understand. In September 2002, more than a dozen beaked whales beached themselves in the Canary Islands. Rescuers tried to water down the stranded ani-
mals and keep them cool. But all of them eventually died. Nearby, NATO naval forces were testing sonar devices meant to detect enemy submarines, and public knowledge of the deaths eventually came to strengthen suspicions of a link between whale distress and loud ocean noises. For decades, environmentalists have worked to reduce the undersea dinusually with little success, given the growing industrialisation and militarisation of the oceans. They have filed lawsuits and waged letter-writing campaigns, including a recent petition that asks the Navy to drop its testing of underwater sound equipment. The discovery by biologists in Hawaii that whales can decrease the sensitivity of their hearing to protect their ears from loud noise adds another dimension to the debate. A lot more work needs to be done, said Michael Jasny, a senior policy analyst with the Natural Resources Defense Council, in an interview. Could it be replicated in the wild? Its a huge question. Its important to understand that its limited, he said of the proposed method. It wont be a silver bullet.
NYT
Illstration: C R SASIKUMAR
drip on people on the sidewalk below (or fall out and cause injuries). And there would be brownouts in the summer as airconditioners put a strain on power plants. But in 1902, there was a printing plant, and a problem. The plant, on Metropolitan Avenue in East Williamsburg, had just been completed, Nagengast said. It was built for a company that printed the humour magazine Judge, which carried fanciful illustrations. The printing company had to run each page of the magazine through the press once for each colour on the page. Sometimes one colour was printed one day, and another colour the next.
The problem was that paper would absorb moisture from the sticky Brooklyn air and expand by a fraction of an inch, enough so that the colours would not line up properly. Worse, he said, the ink refused to dry fast enough. And the printer could not wait. There was a schedule. There were subscribers who expected the next issue to land in their mailboxes, no matter what. They were doing an issue a week, Nagengast said. The junior engineer who tackled the problem was Willis Carrier, who went on to start Carrier Corp. The solution he devised involved fans, ducts, heaters and perforated pipes. Eric
B. Schultz, a former Carrier Corp. executive and author of a recently published company history, said the equipment, installed later in the summer of 1902, controlled the humidity on the second floor of a short building at Metropolitan Avenue and Morgan Avenue. That structure backs up to a taller building that the printing company, Sackett & Wilhelms, also used. Carriers plan was to force air across pipes filled with cool water from a well between the two buildings, but in 1903, he added a refrigerating machine to cool the pipes faster. American Heritage magazine called Carrier a Johnny Icicle planting the seeds of climate con-
of drink consumed made no difference in the risk. The authors, writing last week in the journal BMJ, acknowledged that they had no information on family history of rheumatoid arthritis and that self-reports of alcohol consumption may not always be accurate.
NYT