WPMC 12
1 / 19
Outline
Outline
1
Introduction Problem denition Our solution Analytical Model IRUWB signaling strategies The chirp pulse waveform Chirp Pulse Compression Detection methods Numerical Analysis System parameters Performance in noise. Multiuser interference performance Conclusions
Dotli and Miura (NICT) c Chirp Pulse Compression WPMC 12 2 / 19
Introduction
Outline
1
Introduction Problem denition Our solution Analytical Model IRUWB signaling strategies The chirp pulse waveform Chirp Pulse Compression Detection methods Numerical Analysis System parameters Performance in noise. Multiuser interference performance Conclusions
Dotli and Miura (NICT) c Chirp Pulse Compression WPMC 12 3 / 19
Introduction
Problem denition
Problem denition
Low data rate ImpulseRadio UltraWideband (IRUWB) is gaining attention of the industry
IEEE 802.15.62012 Body Area Network (BAN) standard. IEEE 802.15.4f2012 standard for active RadioFrequency Identication (RFID).
PHY Specications made having in mind receivers that are in most cases suboptimal.
Noncoherent. Little of channel information. Without channel equalization.
Performance of these receivers deteriorates with an increase of the dimension, i.e. timebandwidth product of a signal in detection. Dimension of the transmitted symbol waveform typically increases with the decrease of the symbol rate.
Larger dimension of the received waveform poorer detection performance.
Dotli and Miura (NICT) c Chirp Pulse Compression WPMC 12 4 / 19
Introduction
Our solution
Our solution
A classic remedy for this is the matchltering pulse compression technique usually done in SAW technology.
IRUWB SAW lter implementation is technologically challenging.
As we shown before chirp pulse compression does reduce the number of samples in the digital domain of the DPSK IRUWB receivers without performance loss. It is also applicable to the noncoherent detection techniques without symbol signature estimation. Such performance analysis is the subject of this paper.
WPMC 12
5 / 19
Analytical Model
Outline
1
Introduction Problem denition Our solution Analytical Model IRUWB signaling strategies The chirp pulse waveform Chirp Pulse Compression Detection methods Numerical Analysis System parameters Performance in noise. Multiuser interference performance Conclusions
Dotli and Miura (NICT) c Chirp Pulse Compression WPMC 12 6 / 19
Analytical Model
on time
o time t
t Tsym Tw
Figure: Classic IRUWB signaling (upper). IRUWB signaling strategy employed by IEEE 802.15 standards (lower).
Tw = Tsym DC . For all parts of the packet at all data rates DC = 1/32. For low data rates Tw becomes high, producing high signal dimension M = Tw fc .
WPMC 12
7 / 19
Analytical Model
Kc 2 t 2
(1)
In this work we will use fc = 520 MHz, as prescribed by the IEEE 802.15.6 standard. Signal c(t) (1) is DBPSK or binary PPM modulated.
WPMC 12
8 / 19
Analytical Model
rk (t)
vk (t)
hBP (t)
sk (t)
Detection
rk (t)
vk (t)
hBP (t)
sk (t)
Detection
f0R
f0R
f (t)
Tw Tw t
Analytical Model
v0 (t, R ) =
w (t, max{, R } Tp /2, min{, R } + Tp /2) d, where hc (, R ) is a chirpmodulated version of the channel impulse response Kc 2 2 hc (, R ) = hc ( )e2j [f0 (R ) 2 (R )] . Assume Tp , in (2) w (t, max{, R } Tp /2, min{, R } + Tp /2) w (t, R Tp /2, R + Tp /2).
(3)
v0 (t, R ) exp (2jKc R t) Hc (Kc t, R ) w (t, R Tp /2, R + Tp /2) , (4) where Hc (f , R ) represents a Fourier transform of hc (, R ).
Dotli and Miura (NICT) c Chirp Pulse Compression WPMC 12 10 / 19
Analytical Model
Signal after mixing is compressed approximately Tp / times compared to the received signal.
Dotli and Miura (NICT) c Chirp Pulse Compression WPMC 12 11 / 19
Analytical Model
Detection methods
Detection methods
Detection methods that do not include symbol signature estimation DBPSK modulation SDPSK detection BPPM modulation EDPPM detection. S-DPSK detection dk = sH sk . k1 EDPPM detection dk = s1 k Probability of error: 1 1 Pe = + 2M1 2 2
M m=1 2
(9) (10)
s0 k
M signal dimension, t = (Eb /N0 )s , Qm (, ) generalized Marcum Qfunction of mth order. b = 1 for EDPPM; b = 2 for SDPSK.
Dotli and Miura (NICT) c Chirp Pulse Compression WPMC 12 12 / 19
Numerical Analysis
Outline
1
Introduction Problem denition Our solution Analytical Model IRUWB signaling strategies The chirp pulse waveform Chirp Pulse Compression Detection methods Numerical Analysis System parameters Performance in noise. Multiuser interference performance Conclusions
Dotli and Miura (NICT) c Chirp Pulse Compression WPMC 12 13 / 19
Numerical Analysis
System parameters
System parameters
The value of Tp chosen is high enough for the chirp pulse compression to have a signicant impact on M. All simulations done on IEEE 802.15.4a CM2 at f0 = 8 GHz. In the receiver without pulse compression signal dimension is M = 136. In the chirp receiver signal dimension is M = 16.
WPMC 12
14 / 19
Numerical Analysis
Performance in noise.
Performance in noise
100 ED-PPM, sim. 10
1
ED-PPM, theory ED-PPM & chirp comp., sim. ED-PPM & chirp comp., theory S-DPSK, sim. S-DPSK, theory S-DPSK & chirp comp., sim. S-DPSK & chirp comp., theory DPSK, sim. DPSK, theory DPSK & chirp comp., sim. DPSK & chirp comp., theory
10
10 Pe 10
10
15
20
25
Numerical Analysis
no compression and EDBPPM, burst interf. chirp compression and EDBPPM, chirp interf. chirp compression and EDBPPM, burst interf. no compression and SDBPSK, chirp interf. no compression and SDBPSK, burst interf. chirp compression and SDBPSK, chirp interf. chirp compression and SDBPSK, burst interf.
10
10
20
30
40
Conclusions
Outline
1
Introduction Problem denition Our solution Analytical Model IRUWB signaling strategies The chirp pulse waveform Chirp Pulse Compression Detection methods Numerical Analysis System parameters Performance in noise. Multiuser interference performance Conclusions
Dotli and Miura (NICT) c Chirp Pulse Compression WPMC 12 17 / 19
Conclusions
Conclusions
SDBPSK performs better than EDBPPM in all scenarios considered. If good performance in Multisystem scenarios is essential, SDBPSK should be used. The chirp pulse compression is useful technique in lowdata rate detection.
In digital detection implementations (SDBPSK) of example system it reduces implementation complexity from M = 136 to M = 16 complex samples. For both SDPSK and EDPPM there is signicant performance gain. For these reasons the chirp pulse IRUWB waveform is included in IEEE 802.15.6 BAN standard.
WPMC 12
18 / 19
Conclusions
http:\igor-dotlic.appspot.com
I. Dotli and R. Kohno. c Low Complexity Chirp Pulsed Ultra-Wideband System with Near-Optimum Multipath Performance. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(1):208 218, January 2011. I. Dotli and R. Miura. c IEEE 802.15.6 DPSK Impulse-Radio Ultra-Wideband Physical Layer: Receiver Architectures and Interference Performance. Springer International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 185 192, 2012. I. Dotli and R. Kohno. c Application of IEEE 802.15.6 IR-UWB physical layer for medical BAN. International Journal of Ultra Wideband Communications and Systems (IJUWBCS) - Special Issue on Applications of Ultra WideBand Technology in Healthcare, 2011.
Dotli and Miura (NICT) c Chirp Pulse Compression WPMC 12 19 / 19