The original document at http://freeassemblage.blogspot.

com contains live links to

references.

>When there are Muslims in America who have publicly spoken out against Jihad, why
was Ingrid Mattson chosen for this interfaith prayer service?<

Today, Ingrid Mattson, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA),
will deliver a prayer at the National Prayer Service, invited by President Obama.
It is sufficiently problematic that ISNA, the organization of which Ingrid Mattson
is president, was designated an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land
Foundation terrorism financing trial (which produced guilty verdicts on 108
counts). Mattson’s words and views beg the question: When there are Muslims in
America who have publicly spoken out against Jihad, against shariah law, and
against ISNA, why was Ingrid Mattson chosen for this interfaith prayer service?

In her own words:

"[C]onsider the role of American Muslims in the [specific] context of world events
following the terrorist attacks of September 11th. I will acknowledge that since
Muslim leadership must be responsive to events, this question cannot be answered
completely in isolation of specific circumstances. The appropriate response will
necessarily depend on the nature of the threat. At the same time, I will stress
that any truly appropriate response must be firmly rooted in faith. [ ] People of
faith have a certain kind of solidarity with others of their faith community that
transcends the basic rights and duties of citizenship."

She did not author this in an article titled "Stopping Our Muslim Extremist
Brothers." Instead, it was titled Stopping Oppression: an Islamic Obligation.
Guess what "oppression" she meant.

In a reasoned "translation" of Mattson's words:

the "role" of American Muslims must be judged in a "context" of events that
happened after 9/11;
cannot be judged "in isolation of specific circumstances;
and must be rooted in faith with other Muslims, a faith that takes no note of the
rights and duties of being Americans first.
Instead, American Muslims "role" must be in solidarity with others of their "faith
community."

Forget that American Jews, Catholics, Coptics, Hindus, atheists, Southern Babtists
and others came together in a solidarity that specifically transcended their own
congregational communities. Instead, they came together in the brotherhood and
spirit that comes with having our rights and citizenship guaranteed.

"The true values of America are those which we decide to embrace as our own
[because] the American Constitution, like foundational religious texts, can be
read in many different ways."

Again, to translate: Muslims can pick and choose which American values to call
"true" and then may decided to embrace only those, because they can read anything
into the Constitution they wish.

She is wrong when she says the Constitution can be read in many different ways.
There are only two ways: Originalism, and non-Originalism which covers everything
the Founding Fathers wrote were not the intentions of that document and does not
cover most of the things they wrote were the specific intentions of that document.
Justifications for following non-Originalism are usually for the purposes of
pragmatism, which obviously would serve the Muslim community as it picked-and-
chose only the parts of the law they found served the ideas of Sharia, of Shura,
of takaful insurance, or of anything else associated with Islam; but specifically
nothing that does not serve Allah.

Mattson denies the existence of terrorist cells in the United States: "There's a
prejudgment, a collective judgment of Muslims, and a suspicion that well 'you may
appear nice, but we know there are sleeper cells of Americans,' which of course is
not true. There aren't any sleeper cells. [emphasis added]

Mattson defends Wahhabism. All unbelievers (i.e. Muslims who do not accept the
teachings of 'Abd ul-Wahhab, as well as Christians, &c.) were to be put to death.
Immediate entrance into Paradise was promised to his soldiers who fell in battle,
and it is said that each soldier was provided with a written order from Wahhab to
the gate-keeper of heaven to admit him forthwith. Wahhabi

"This is not a sect. It is the name of a reform movement that began 200 years ago
to rid Islamic societies of cultural practices and rigid interpretation that had
acquired over the centuries. It really was analogous to the European protestant
reformation." Center for Security Policy (Research Brief)

Forget that shura is cultural practices and sharia is a rigid and merciless
practice of Muslim justice.

When there are Muslims in America who have publicly spoken out against Jihad,
against shariah law, and against ISNA, why was Ingrid Mattson chosen for this
interfaith prayer service?

The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists is the SM of

The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists LLC.
The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism TM,
The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger TM, and
Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger Extra TM are the educational arms of
the LLC and are:
© 2008-2009 by Curtis Edward Clark and Naturalist Academy Publishing ®

mailto:freeassemblage@gmail.com

http://freeassemblage.blogspot.com/