(Fields)
Hello!
1
Learning Objectives The Four Fundamental Forces
D
Describe the Millikan experiment
Historical Setting
Einstein
Millikan
Early 1900s
Rutherford had reported his
alpha scattering
experiments. Structure of
atom known but not
accepted by everyone.
Charge on an alpha particle
known.
Experiments with cathode
rays known including fact
that negatively charged.
Starter… My Results:
Problem: Number Mass Subtract smallest value
2
Change in Mass Histogram The Electron
3
N um be r
2
1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Mass
In essence;
Blue plates charged – charge can be Design of the Experiment
varied.
Describe the Millikan experiment
3
Acceleration: gravitational and electrical
+
gravitational electric
potential potential
g∆h
field g field
height h
mass m charge q
+
+
potential
difference V
∆Ep=m
gains gains
kinetic kinetic –
energy energy
ends at low ends at low
∆W = Q ∆V
gravitational electrical
potential energy potential energy
+
gravitational electric
potential potential
4
Draw the forces acting on the drop
E∆d
∆W = Q ∆V
E
E = ∆V/∆d
q = mg
E
Can you come up with an expression
Answers;
Worksheet
400 V +
3.2 × 10Š2 m 600 V
200 V Š
3) E = V/d = 600 / 3.2 x 10-2 = 18,750 V m-1 = 1.9 x 104 V m-1 (2sf)
5
Cargo Cult Science…
-1.591 × 10-19 C A term used by Richard Feynman to
describe work that has the
semblance of being scientific, but is
missing…
−1.6021764874 × 10-19 C "a kind of scientific
integrity, a principle of
?
scientific thought that
corresponds to a kind of
utter honesty"
Mohr, Peter J.; Taylor, Barry N.; Newell, David B. (2006-06-06). "CODATA
recommended values of the fundamental physical constants". Reviews of Modern Compare and contrast Millikan’s methods with scientific
Physics 80: 633–730 practice
Compare and contrast Millikan’s methods with scientific Compare and contrast Millikan’s methods with scientific
practice practice
6
Was Millikan Dishonest? Was Millikan Dishonest?
Millikan's exclusions of data did not affect the final
Millikan did not use all his data points in value of e that Millikan obtained
his published articles.
That there was substantial "cosmetic surgery" that
Millikan performed which had the effect of
reducing the statistical error on e.
Millikan said in his articles that he did use
all points. This enabled Millikan to quote the figure that he had
calculated e to better than 0.5%; in fact, it was to
within 2%.
How can both be true? The slightly larger uncertainty might have allowed
more disagreement with his results within the physics
community.
Compare and contrast Millikan’s methods with scientific Compare and contrast Millikan’s methods with scientific
practice practice
And Finally
Would we have been more Write down:
likely to get a correct value
with all the info? One key thing you’ve learnt today