ML421.S614F54 2012
782.42166092'2— dc23
[B] 2012024784
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
First Edition
T W E LV E
19 2
19 3
to do things and never did,” Marr could not be entirely sure that the
call would come. But as it turned out, Morrissey’s primary gripe with
prospective partners was much the same as Marr’s: “So many people
seem to enjoy talking about things and so few people seem to enjoy
doing them,” as Morrissey put it upon release of the debut Smiths LP.
(“And that’s really been the history of the group, that we’ve got on with
things,” he elaborated.) These mutual frustrations turned out to be one
of many shared strengths, and when Morrissey duly made the call to
X-Clothes the following day, both of them knew that the partnership
was on.
A few days later, Morrissey came over to Bowdon to work on
songs. Stepping into Marr’s abode, he could not have been anything
but impressed. Morrissey, after all, had long dreamed of writing for
Coronation Street, of finding some way into the entertainment world
of Granada TV, and yet the teenage Marr was living inside that dream;
his landlady was the great Shelley Rohde, and her living room walls
were decorated with vast framed pictures of the Corrie stars. Upstairs,
Marr’s attic room offered, at least, a similar sense of obsession to that
of Morrissey’s bedroom back in Stretford: walls (and floors) of vinyl
to match Morrissey’s collection of books, guitars (and accompanying
recording paraphernalia) for his typewriter and pens. But the pair had
not met this second time to spin each other’s 45s as much as to write
them, to get to work and see if the initial spark of a few days earlier
could light a fire.
The prospective lyricist and singer had already supplied the com-
poser and guitarist with a cassette of himself singing a song entitled
“Don’t Blow Your Own Horn,” but despite having a few days to live
with it, Marr had not been able to come up with a viable chord sequence,
as evidenced by Morrissey’s disappointed reaction. The musical part-
194
nership only took off when they moved on to work from a metaphori-
cal blank sheet of paper: two sets of Morrissey’s words unconstrained
by an existing melody. One of them was “The Hand That Rocks the
Cradle,” and Marr saw something in its phrasing that reminded him
of Patti Smith’s “Kimberly.” (Given Patti Smith’s iconic influence on
both Morrissey and Marr, and the fact that they had met so briefly at
one of her concerts four years earlier, the use of the “Kimberly” riff was
as much an act of homage and tribute as theft. The similarities in the
finished songs are minuscule.) The other was “Suffer Little Children”
and, in this case, not seeing a reference point from which he could simi-
larly crib a riff, Marr came up with an arpeggio chord sequence on
the spot. Morrissey expressed his enthusiasm in both cases, and the
pair set about completing the songs there and then. Within a couple
of hours, working in the same manner as the great 1960s songwriting
partnerships that they so admired and to which they both aspired, the
pair came up with the songs that would close out the two sides of their
debut album. As auspicious starts go, this was one for the record books.
While much can and has been made of the music Marr composed
that day, what was truly astonishing was that Morrissey turned up in
Bowdon carrying a pair of poems of such emotional and literary depth.
In comparison to his cut-and-paste biographies for Babylon, his hack
gig reviews for Record Mirror . . . well there simply was no compari-
son. Neither “The Hand That Rocks the Cradle” nor “Suffer Little
Children” had any obvious reference points in the popular culture of
the time, not even on the post-punk independent scene where, for the
last three or four years, anything had been possible—including the rec-
itation of poetry to whatever meter (or lack thereof) took the author’s
fancy. Morrissey, to his credit, knew as much. “I was a bookworm,” he
admitted readily in 1985. “I was also an avid record collector and the
19 5
two of them didn’t seem to go together. But I always felt that they could,
because the way I wrote, when I wrote words, it wasn’t the traditional
pop nonsense. It was quite literary.”
Indeed. “The Hand That Rocks the Cradle” was anything but tra-
ditional pop nonsense. It appeared, on the surface of its title, to express
the love of a parent for his or her infant child—an uncommon enough
subject for a young working-class lyricist, but one that turned out to be
merely the bait before the switch. Reference to “blood on the cleaver
tonight” intimated something much more sinister, leading toward a
gradual elaboration in the later verses: a veiled admittance by what
was now clearly a male protagonist, of some form of unstated abuse
on a male child, a child that may not even have been his own. And
yet, as taboo subject matter goes, it was instantly outdone by “Suffer
Little Children,” which dared detail that which was not discussable in
Manchester: the Moors Murders. “Fresh lilaced moorland fields can-
not hide the stolid stench of death,” Morrissey stated of the crimes and,
in accordance with this couplet, he made no attempt to sugar coat his
own lyrics. References were made to victims Lesley Ann [Downey],
John [Kilbride], and Edward [Evans] by name; and Morrissey quoted
Myra Hindley directly, and thereby Ian Brady by association, as saying
“Whatever he has done, I have done,” and used poetic license else-
where to lightly alter Hindley’s phrase. The fact that both the song title
“Suffer Little Children” and the lyrical couplet “Hindley wakes” were
chapter titles from Beyond Belief, Emlyn Williams’s dramatically en-
hanced account of the Moors Murders (Marr recalled seeing a poster
for the book on Morrissey’s wall the day that they met) or that indi-
vidual lines had similarities to specific expressions elsewhere in the
book really mattered very little. If only for having the courage to write
the line “Oh Manchester, so much to answer for,” a refrain that would
inspire greater soul-searching among Mancunians than any number
196
Over those years, Morrissey and Marr would frequently try and
define the chemistry that lay at the heart of their partnership while
simultaneously acknowledging that it was ultimately intangible. (Or,
as the Buzzcocks put it in one of their finest recordings, presumably
discussing love, “Why Can’t I Touch It?”) Morrissey tended to the
19 7
19 8
clearly the more musical, but, of course, that was merely the differ-
ence in their parts that added up to the sum of the Smiths; and the fact
that both instantly recognized the abilities of the other was surpassed
only by the fact that they tended not to interfere with or second-guess
each other’s contributions when writing and recording music together.
Rather, they set to work on making the partnership visible. Or, as Marr
told Sounds at the end of 1983, “The whole idea of two people getting
together with lots of common ground but with separate influences to
bring out something we believe to be the best we’ve ever heard is some-
thing we feel has been missing since the Sixties. It’s joyous the way we
work together and if that’s reminiscent of the Sixties that’s fine.”
Almost thirty years later, Marr was able to elaborate upon the “joy-
ous” nature of that collaboration. “One thing that was never in doubt
was my time and my dedication and the songs. But I met someone who
was equally dedicated.” In the early days, Morrissey appeared no less
driven to succeed than Marr; it was only after success hit in such a big
way that the singer would develop a reputation for cancellations and
disappearances. And so, said Marr, “It was a fantastic thing to happen.
If it was possible for me to be an even happier guy, it happened. Because
I’ve got the most perfect relationship with the girl of my dreams. And
then I met this guy I admire. And I’m able to share a side of me that he
innately understands. Which is separate to ‘let’s form a group.’ There’s
a thing inside him of what you can be. Without trying to sound too eso-
teric, it takes up half of your being. This desire to fulfill this . . . know-
ing about yourself as an artist. There’s an unusual aspect to both our
personalities that we both understand. It’s about having a knowing of
this vision of something that you can do and something that you can
be, which is really a big part of you. I’m not just talking about success:
it’s about being Johnny Marr, or being Morrissey.”
Morrissey himself would frequently elaborate upon this sense of
19 9
200
this massive energy boost. I could feel Johnny’s energy just seething
inside me.”
“From when we first met, we loved with each other,” said Johnny
Marr. “We didn’t fall in love with each other, because we respected that
we both enjoyed having our own space and our own lives and we knew
that was important. There was a very strong bond all the way through
until the last couple of weeks of the band. And it was very very impor-
tant. But we didn’t fall in love with each other.”
“There was a love and it was mutual and equal,” confirmed Mor-
rissey, “but it wasn’t physical or sexual.” From the singer’s perspective,
it would have been foolish to even dream of it being otherwise. The
day that he went over to write songs with Marr for the first time, he was
introduced to Angie Brown, who ferried him to the Altrincham train
station in her VW Beetle. It was not a deliberate test of the prospective
singer, not even a warning, but a mere confirmation of fact: “You didn’t
get Johnny without Angie,” as Marr put it. Fortunately, Morrissey and
Brown instantly warmed to each other, becoming close friends them-
selves, creating one of the many personality dynamics that would prove
integral to the Smiths’ ability to succeed as much—and to survive as
long—as they did. So while it was true that Morrissey and Marr would
spend considerable time traveling together and talking together, it was
likely that Brown would be in the driver’s seat much of the time—and
that Morrissey would often be the only other passenger.
Besides, for all of Morrissey’s reputation as a loner, we already know
that he was far from the suicidal figure he liked to paint himself as at the
point that Marr arrived in his life. “I think he was developing his own
aesthetic,” said Marr of Morrissey up until that moment. “And there’s a
lot to be said for cocooning oneself and doing research to make yourself
who you want to be, intellectually and existentially.” Ultimately, “I just
2 01
went along with his explanation of it, really: just sitting in his room.
And I never saw any evidence that he was crushed by that activity.”
In fact, given Morrissey’s intellect and his wit—in short, his way
with words—Marr was not surprised to find that his new writing part-
ner kept select but quality company. “I didn’t see him as someone who
had zero friends,” said Marr, “and the friends I met of his at that time,”
citing James Maker, Richard Boon, and Linder, “I really liked, and I got
along with. I had a tremendous amount of respect for all these people.
His friends were cool. He never introduced me to anyone I didn’t like.”
In turn, Marr took to introducing Morrissey to his own friends.
Andrew Berry observed, as did so many at this point, before Morrissey
truly found his voice (in the Smiths) that “he was really quiet and pri-
vate, especially when you were in the same room with him.” But Berry
nonetheless sought to become Morrissey’s friend “because if Johnny
says he’s cool then he obviously is.” And in this, Berry and his friends
quickly grasped the great reality of the partnership: “Johnny was very
protective over him.”
“It’s something I’ll never regret, that relationship,” said Marr, “be-
cause one day you get old—and hopefully very old—and you say, ‘Wow,
I didn’t see that relationship coming.’ Because it brought out something
in me that maybe I didn’t know I had, which was a very kind of protec-
tive aspect. I just thought I was looking for a guy who was going to be
a great lead singer.”
On Friday, May 21, 1982, toward the end of the same month, if
not even the very same week, that Johnny Marr and Morrissey met
for the first time, the Haçienda nightclub opened its doors on Whit-
202
203
culture; when Andrew Berry and John Kennedy organized a bus trip
to the gay London nightclub Heaven (to see Animal Nightlife), in July
1982, he went along for the ride. And when Berry and Kennedy moved
on to open a weekend night called Berlin, in a King Street basement
club, Marr could be found there as well. So could Rob Gretton and
Mike Pickering; despite the fact that the Haçienda was already book-
ing the best of touring bands, it was struggling to pull people in for its
dance nights, perhaps because the kind of kids they were looking for
were over at Berlin instead. Berry was invited in for a meeting at the
Haçienda and offered a role as a DJ. He agreed—on condition he could
use the club as a hair salon during the day. He was duly given the use of
a dressing room, and his new salon, Swing, assigned the catalog num-
ber FAC 98, was soon cutting hair for New Order as well as Morrissey
and Marr and every visiting band that took advantage of the Haçienda’s
unlikely fashion opportunity. With Berry ensconced in the club six
days and several nights a week, Marr, as his best friend, became an
additional part of the Haçienda’s inner circle, and though he never
made a habit of spinning records there, he was frequently to be found
hanging in the booth. In fact, when The Face commissioned a report on
the Haçienda’s progress at the end of 1982, amid the references to its
“bleak” landscape and half-filled dance floor was a quote from “flat-top
Johnny Marr” defending the Saturday night music policy: “I schlepp
to funk.”1
Contrary to his own subsequent dismissal of the place, Steven
Morrissey could also be found hanging regularly at the Haçienda dur-
ing its early days. That’s where Cath Carroll and Liz Naylor first came
across him, wearing his customary heavy overcoat on a typically quiet
Saturday night shortly after the club opened; they had gotten into a
conversation with Linder there, and “Steven came with Linder,” said
Naylor. “He was Linder’s shadow.”
204
205
206
207
Ironically, at City Fun, she and Naylor had cast aside some of his con-
tributions under the pen name Sheridan Whiteside (a character in The
Man Who Came to Dinner) because they almost always promoted the
New York Dolls, a band for whom the Crones had little time. Once they
befriended him, they were more supportive of his literary endeavors,
publishing a glowing retrospective of his on Sandie Shaw.
In the meantime, Naylor, Carroll, and Morrissey alike remained
unyielding in their support for Linder’s musical career. On paper,
things appeared to be going well for Ludus, who released three albums
in 1982 and recorded a John Peel session replete with the wonderfully
titled “Vagina Gratitude.” (The title of a compilation released that
year, Riding the Rag, a slang term for a woman’s period, was equally
inspired.) But New Hormones could not do much more for a band that
was determined to operate in the margins. In stepping up as Linder’s
unofficial PR person, Steven Morrissey acknowledged as much. “Being
the only sensible recipe for the culturally damaged,” he wrote in a press
release for New Hormones that summer, “Ludus are out to at least
stretch their patience with the world to the very elastic limit.”
Of that he was not exaggerating. On November 5, 1982, Ludus
headlined the Haçienda. Prior to the show, the Crones laid a red-
stained tampon on every table. Linder then took to the stage wearing
a dress made of meat, removing it for the last song to reveal a lengthy
dildo strapped around her waist.2 As the members of the audience
recoiled—even in the experimental world of post-punk England,
Linder’s act was extreme—Naylor and Carroll wandered among them,
distributing meat entrails wrapped in pornography.
The act infuriated the Haçienda’s owners—and that was largely its
intent. During its first six months, the club had been showing pornog-
raphy, “and they thought it was really cool,” recalled Linder. (It would
have to have been “soft” porn, given Britain’s draconian indecency
208
209