University Teaching Development

Portfolio Presentation Checklist (30%)

PRESENTER:

I. PRESENTATION
YES ABSTRACT 1) The presenter submitted an abstract according to the guidelines (presenter name, title, focus, biographical sketch, length) TIME 2) The presenter adhered to the time limits for the presentation (20 minutes per presentation plus dialogue) CONTENT 3) The presenter made portfolio accessible to the general public 4) The presenter provided personal trajectory of teaching and learning 5) The presenter adequately described their portfolio goal statement 6) The presenter shared artifacts related to one standard per domain 7) The presenter highlighted key components of teaching philosophy 8) The presenter addressed pedagogical strengths and areas for development 9) A creative component was included that captivated the audiences attention PREPAREDNESS 10) The presenters prepared all materials in advance and there were no technical dilemmas that could not have been dealt with ahead of time MATERIALS 11) All materials prepared for the presentation were relevant and prepared with care and attention to detail 12) Materials included resources that were distributed to the audience ENGAGEMENT WITH AUDIENCE 13) The presentation motivated reflection, encouraging questions and the participation of the public 14) The presentation included a verbal exchange with the audience about the research. 15) The presenters clearly conveyed their points and answered questions well PHYSICAL AND VERBAL PROJECTION 16) The presenters expressed themselves clearly and could be heard 17) The presenters used eye contact, referring to notes minimally 1|Page PARTIAL NO

STRENGTHS

LIMITATIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS

I. PORTFOLIO CONTENTS
YES GOAL STATEMENT 18) The presenter included a clear, personalized statement of goals in relation to the teaching portfolio (potentially crafted around a theme or line of inquiry) PERFORMANCE DOMAINS Each domain and standard was clearly listed The presenter included one piece of evidence per standard for each domain Artifacts included a diversity of multimodal materials A contextualizing statement was provided for each piece of evidence PARTIAL NO

19) 20) 21) 22)

SYNTHESIS 23) An insightful, well-crafted statement of teaching philosophy was included 24) A discussion of teaching strengths was addressed 25) Areas needing further pedagogical development were identified PERSONAL INFORMATION 26) A professional, updated rsum was included 27) Any other relevant documents related to teaching and teaching-based learning were included ORGANIZATION 28) Materials were organized in a professional, aesthetically pleasing manner 29) Materials were not superficial or superfluous 30) Student focused on quality of form and content rather than quantity TOTAL

/30 POSSIBLE POINTS

GRADE: 2|Page