Franais
Home
Contact us
Help
Search
canada.gc.ca Natural Resources Canada > Earth Sciences Sector > Earthquakes Canada
Earthquakes Canada
EqCan Home Recent Earthquakes Historic Events Earthquake Hazard Be Prepared! Stations and Data General Information Products / Research Resources The first recorded account of an earthquake in New Brunswick is a brief news item from the Royal Gazette published in Halifax, on December 13th, 1764, "We hear from St John's (Saint John) in this province that on the 30th of September last about 12 o'clock noon that a very severe shock of an earthquake was felt there". Since then many hundreds of earthquakes have been reported or recorded in the province. In fact, most of New Brunswick lies within the Northern Appalachian Zone (NAN), as shown on the map of earthquakes in Eastern Canada, (Earthquakes in Eastern Canada) and has experienced several earthquakes in the magnitude 5 to 6 range. The exception is the northwestern part of the province with a few smaller magnitude earthquakes, which lies within the Eastern Background Zone. New Brunswick has also felt the effects of larger events from the Charlevoix-Kamouraska Zone (CHV), Lower St. Lawrence Zone (LSL) and the Laurentian Slope Zone (LSP). A more detailed map of the Northern Appalachian Zone shows epicentres distributed throughout New England and New Brunswick. Epicentres for many of the twentieth century earthquakes have been determined from the analysis of seismograph records, but some of the lower magnitude events and the pre-1900 events have been assigned epicentres based on historical accounts in newspapers and journals. Reports of effects of the earthquakes in different communities allow Modified Mercalli intensity values to be determined and an isoseismal map can then be constructed. The epicentre is chosen to be at the place where the most severe effects are felt, or at the centre of the felt area, if only limited information is available. Magnitude values can be calculated from the felt area (Nuttli and Zollweg, 1974 and Street and Lacroix, 1979), the area contained within the IV isoseismal, (Street and Turcotte, 1977) or a combination of intensity and felt areas (Sibol et al., 1987).(See footnote). In New Brunswick, epicentres cluster in three regions (Burke, 1984); 1. Passamaquoddy Bay region, 2. Central Highlands (Miramichi) region, 3. Moncton region.
http://earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca/zones/NASZ/nbrunswick-eng.php (1 of 6) [09/04/2011 5:22:31 PM]
A summary of the historical earthquake activity in the province of New Brunswick. by Kenneth B.S. Burke Honorary Research Professor University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, E3B 5A3 kbsb@nbnet.nb.ca
Earthquake Search Hazard Calculator Seismogram Viewer Station Book Waveform Data External Links
Location map. Earthquakes have been more frequent in these regions and sometimes of a size to be potentially damaging (larger than magnitude 5).
slept in the most violent motion it appeared to rock as if it was upon rockers it lasted however but a short time ". Plots of epicentres on a geological map of the Passamaquoddy Bay region in the 1970s suggested that earthquake activity might be related to movement on the Oak Bay Fault (Rast et al.,1979). This north to northwest trending fault offsets Silurian and Devonian rock units with a regional strike direction of northeast and shows a major discontinuity in aeromagnetic and gravity contours associated with these units. However, a Triassic dyke that crosses the fault in the St Croix River is not offset by the Oak Bay Fault, showing that there has been no recent movement along the fault, (Burke and Stringer, 1993). Glacial striations checked at twenty-four locations showed no sign of postglacial displacement and no disturbances of Quaternary sediments were found along the faults examined on land. However, a marine geophysical survey, in 1988, did map pock marks and plumose structures on the bottom of Passamaquoddy Bay and the northwestern alignment of some of the pock marks is associated with northwest trending faults (Pecore and Fader, 1990). Recent movement along these faults may have allowed the release of gas that created the pock marks in the soft sediments. Other workers have related the earthquake activity to a general subsidence of Passamaquoddy Bay with accompanying minor movements on the faults in the area, (Barosh, 1981).
3) Moncton region.
A February 8th, 1855 earthquake was reported by Dawson (1868) to have occurred at "the bend of the Petitcodiak", the nineteenth name for the Moncton region in southeastern New Brunswick. An intensity map based on the paper by Leblanc and Burke (1985) is shown on the left. This earthquake was felt throughout most of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia and as far to the southwest as Boston, Massachusetts. A felt area IV magnitude of 5.2 was proposed in a reevaluation of this event by Leblanc and Burke (1985) and the epicentre proposed by Smith (1962) of 46.0oN, 64.5oW was accepted. This epicentre and a magnitude of mN are now listed in the Canadian National Seismological Database. The general location of the earthquake is confirmed by the reports of several aftershocks being felt in the Moncton area during the month of February, 1855 (Saint Andrews Standard, March 7th, 1855). Minor damage was reported for this earthquake, such as in an account from Hopewell, a village 17 km south-southwest of the epicentre, which states "At the chemical factory in this place, the shock caused the plastering of walls to crack and rend from top to bottom ....", New Brunswick Reporter, February 16, 1855. Reports of two other felt earthquakes in the Moncton region were found during the scanning of the newspaper Le Moniteur Acadien for the years 1867 to 1926. An event on August 11, 1867 was felt in a number of communities from Buctouche to Sackville, along the coast northeast of Moncton, with an estimated felt area magnitude of 3.8. A smaller event was felt only in Moncton and Shediac, 20 km northeast of Moncton, on June 19, 1899, with an estimated felt area magnitude of 3. Another 24 small magnitude events are listed for the region ((45.5oN to 46.5oN; 64oW to 65oW) in the Canadian National Seismological Database for the period 1800 to October 1, 1999. Two earthquakes of magnitudes mN =3.0 and mL =2.2 respectively in the Dorchester area in 1972, 35 km south-southeast of Moncton, and two earthquakes of magnitudes mN =3.6 in the Turtle Creek area, 10 km southwest of Moncton, in 1984 and 1988, were felt. Examining the relationship of the earthquake activity to the structural geology of the Moncton region suggests that the seismicity is associated with the reactivation of faults, first created during the pull-apart formation of the Moncton Carboniferous sedimentary sub-basin. Fault mechanism solutions obtained from the 1984 and 1984 Turtle Creek earthquakes favour faults with north to northwest trends, and this is the same orientation of thrust faulting that would be expected from the regional stress regime.
References.
Barosh, P.J. 1981: Seismicity and tectonics of the Passamaquoddy Bay area, Maine and New Brunswick, Abstracts with Programs, Geological Society of America, v. 13, p. 122. Basham, P.W., Stevens, A.E.,Anglin, F.M. and Wetmiller, R.J. 1982: Earthquake!, Geos, v. 11, Spring 1982. Basham, P.W. and Adams, J. 1984: The Miramichi New Brunswick earthquakes: near surface thrust faulting in the northern Appalachians, Geoscience Canada, v. 11, p. 115-120. Basham, P.W. and Kind, R. 1986: GRF broad-band array analysis of the 1982 Miramichi, New Brunswick earthquake sequence, Journal of Geophysics, v. 60, p. 120-128. Broster,B.E., Allen, P. and Burke, K.B.S. 1993: A multidisciplinary assessment of postglacial seismic disturbance: Miramichi area, New Brunswick, Canada, Quaternary International, v. 20, p. 153-161. Burke, K.B.S. 1984: Earthquake activity in the Maritime Provinces, Geoscience Canada, v. 11, p. 16-22.
Burke, K.B.S., Bidiscombe, P., Guimond, D and Whelen, D. 1985: Historical seismicity of northern and eastern New Brunswick 1867-1943, Contract Report 23235-4-0734 22-ST for Earth Physics Branch, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, 85 p. Burke, K.B.S., and Slauenwhite, S. 1986: Felt effects of the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake in New Brunsick, Contract Report 23233-6-3421 01-ST for Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, 53 p. Burke, K.B.S., Slauenwhite, S. and Bidiscombe, P. 1987: Historical seismicity of the Passamaquoddy Bay region of New Brunswick for the period 1811-1900, Contract Report 23222-6-3421 01-ST for Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, 93 p. Burke, K.B.S., and Comeau, R. 1988: Historical seismicity of the Passamaquoddy Bay region of New Brunswick for the period 1900-1961, Contract Report 23233-7-3720 01-SZ for Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, 80 p. Burke, K.B.S., Wetmiller, R.J., Lamontagne, M., Carr, J. and Hickey, C. 1989: Microearthquake survey of the Miramichi, New Brunswick, epicentral zone, 1985, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 26, p. 25672577. Burke, K.B.S., Andersen J and Hassan, H.H. 1990: Historical seismicity of northern and eastern New Brunswick 1826-1866 and 1944- 1961 and other listed earthquakes 1867-1943, Contract Report 23235-93253 01-FS for Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, 150 p. Burke, K.B.S., and Stringer, P. 1993: A search for neotectonic features in the Passamaquoddy Bay region, southwestern New Brunswick, in Current Research, Part D; Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 93-1D, p. 93-102. Choy, G.L., Boatwright, J., Dewey, J.W. and Sipkin, S.A. 1983: A teleseismic analysis of the New Brunswick earthquake of January 9, 1982, Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 86, p. 2199-2212. Dawson, J.W. 1868: Acadian Geology, Text, MacMillan, 981 p. Drysdale, J.A., Horner, R.B., Wetmiller, R.J., Stevens, A.E., Rogers, G.C. and Basham, P.W. 1985: Canadian Earthquakes 1982, Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, Seismological Series No. 92, 56 p. Fyffe, L.R. 1982: Geology in the vicinity of the 1982 Miramichi earthquake, Northumberland County, New Brunswick: New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources, Open File Report 82-27, 23 p. Gutenberg,B. and Richter, C.F. 1956: Earthquake magnitude, intensity, eneegy and acceleration, Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, v. 46, p. 105-145. Leblanc, G. and Burke, K.B.S. 1985: Re-evaluation of the 1817, 1855, 1869 and 1904 Maine-New Brunswick area earthquakes, Earthquake Notes, v. 56, p. 107-123. Mawer, C.K. and Williams, P.F. 1985: Crystalline rocks as possible paleoseismicity indicators, Geology, v. 13, p. 100-102 Nuttli, O.W. and Zollweg, J.E. 1974: The relation between felt area and magnitude for central United States earthquakes, Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, v. 64, p. 1189-1207. Pecore, S.S. and Fader, G.B.J. 1990: Surficial geology, pockmarks and associated neotectonic features of Passamaquoddy Bay, New Brunswick, Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 79-20, 7 p. Rast, N., Burke, K.B.S. and Rast, D. 1979: The earthquakes of Atlantic Canada and their relationship to structure, Geoscience Canada, v. 6, p. 173-180. Sibol, M.S., Bollinger, G.A. and Birch, J.B. 1987: Estimation of magnitudes in central and eastern North America using intensity and felt area, Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, v. 77, p. 1635-1654. Smith, W.E.T. 1962: Earthquakes of Eastern Canada and adjacent areas 1534-1927, Publication of the Dominion Observatory, Ottawa, Canada, v. XXVI, p. 271-301. Smith, W.E.T. 1966: Earthquakes of Eastern Canada and adjacent areas 1928-1959, Publication of the Dominion Observatory, Ottawa, Canada, v. XXXII, p. 87-121. Street, R.L. and Turcotte, F.T. 1977: A study of northeastern North America spectral moments, magnitudes and intensities, Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, v. 67, p. 599-614. Street, R.L. and Lacroix,A.V. 1979: An empirical study of New England seismicity: 1727-1927, Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, v. 69 p. 159-175. Wetmiller, R.J.,Adams, J., Anglin,F.M., Hasagawa,H.S. and Stevens, A.E. 1984: Aftershock sequence of the 1982 Mirmichi , New Brunswick, earthquake, Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, v. 74, 621653.
Because many of the earthquakes in the historical record occurred before seismographs were available to record them, it has been necessary to establish relationships between magnitude and those parameters that can be determined from the reported information. Initially, magnitude, M, was estimated from the relationship between it and the maximum intensity Io; M = 1 + 2Io/3 established empirically by Gutenberg and Richter (1956) from Californian earthquake data. This relationship was used by Smith (1962) and Smith (1966) to obtain the magnitude estimates for historically reported earthquakes listed in his catalogues.
Nuttli and Zollweg (1974) pointed out that the felt areas of instrumentally recorded earthquakes in the central United States changed significantly with small increases in magnitude. They then used 22 recently recorded earthquakes to establish the following relationship between magnitude and felt area; mb = 2.65 + 0.098f + 0.054f2 where mb is the magnitude and f is the logarithm to the base 10 of the felt area in square kilometres. The relationship was limited to f values equal to 6 or greater. In a study of earthquakes instrumentally recorded in northeastern North America, Street and Turcotte (1977) found that the regional magnitude mbLg could be related to the area, AIV, contained within the intensity IV isoseismal, which can often be more reliably estimated than the total felt area. They established the following relationship; mbLg = 1.13 log 10 AIV -0.32 The relationship was limited to AIV equal to or greater than 10,000 square kilometres. In a further study of 16 earthquakes, recorded in northeastern North America between 1925 and 1973, whose total felt areas were greater than 10, 000 square kilometres, Street and Lacroix (1979) established the relationship; mbLg = 2.77 - 0.147f + 0.1f2 where f is the logarithm to the base 10 of the felt area in square kilometres. The relationship was limited to f values equal to 6.5 or greater. In 1987, Sibol et al. examined the relationships between magnitude and intensity and felt area for over 480 earthquakes recorded in both central and eastern North America. They found that the most robust linear regression models for eastern North American earthquakes were expressed by the following relationships; mb = 2.29 + 0.0891f2 where f is the logarithm to the base 10 of the felt area in square kilometres. The relationship was limited to f values between 3.0 and 6.7. and mb = 2.05 + 0.0219 Io2 + 0.0666f2 where f is the logarithm to the base 10 of the felt area in square kilometres, and Io is the maximum intensity value. The relationship was limited to Io values between IV and VIII and f values between 3.0 and 6.5. Back to text Author: Kenneth B.S. Burke kbsb@nbnet.nb.ca
Top of Page
Important Notices