Ignorance of the Law or Corrupt County Officials, Courts, and Cops?

Whatcom County Administration, from the Council to the County Judges and Sheriffs, Declare Themselves Exempt from State and Federal Law Requirements, Constitutional Law, Rules of Standing, and Due Process. Whatcom County Sheriffs Department, Prosecutors Office, and District Court Judges/Commissioner are all detaining, charging, imprisoning, and fining people for illegally posted speed limits and actions that caused harm to no one. This amounts to Treason, Violation of Oath of Office, Denial of Rights Under Color of Law, Conspiracy to Deny Rights, Exceeding their Authority, Racketeering, Allowing of Fraudulent Debts, and Domestic Terrorism. The Revised Codes of Washington, Washington General Sessions Laws, Washington Administrative Code, state and federal laws, state and federal Constitutions, your Rights, higher case law, oaths of office, jurisdiction, or even the doctrines and requirements of law mean NOTHING to the Whatcom County Prosecutioners in Office or Judges/Commissioner here, especially Commissioner Parise. The only thing they care about is extorting money from the citizenry regardless of what the requirements of due process, standing, jurisdiction, and law say. There are principles, doctrines, and legal requirements that must be observed and met before a case can proceed the doctrine of standing, rules regarding proof of jurisdiction, elements of a valid claim or cause of action, the fact that denial of rights results in immediate loss of all court jurisdiction, the clear wording of Washington Codes and the actual Acts/Laws those codes are derived from, the state and federal constitutions, and case law are completely ignored by the sheriff/police department, prosecution, and commissioner or judge. They only care about getting your money to fill their retirement and operating fund pockets. Specific case in point: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. Jeffrey David: Searfoss, Case AI 102897, Pretrial Hearing on February 1st, 2012, and Hearing on March 28, 2012, where Discovery and all defendants papers were ignored. In the above case, the Court and Prosecutions ignoring of defendants papers put them in default. The prosecutor and Parise did not care. The Doctrine of Standing requires a valid claim or cause of action before a court has jurisdiction in criminal or civil matters. In order for a Plaintiff to have standing, there must be an injured party, an actual living man or woman who can be cross examined and file the complaint, claiming actual harm to body, property, or rights. The STATE is a fictional entity and, per the Supreme Court and multiple other state higher court decisions, is forclosed from or forbidden from raising a fictional entities rights. Elements of a valid claim or cause of action that are required to be met before a court has jurisdiction to hear the case are: (a) a right (b) an injury and (c) a petition for compensation. Whose right did you violate or who did you harm, what injury did you cause? No ones. The civil traffic court denies a jury trial, an inalienable right per the Washington Constitution, Article I section 21. In both civil and criminal traffic cases where there was no accident, your right to face your accuser, to cross examine the injured party, to have a verified complaint before you, to have both parties properly identified, and to have a fair trial are violated. W.A.C. 468-95-045 clearly states that an engineering or traffic study is required before a speed limit other than what is mentioned in R.C.W. 46.61.400 can be established and posted. Per R.C.W. 46.61.405, 46.61.410, and 46.61.415, neither local authorities nor the Secretary of Transportation may alter the speed limits set in 46.61.400 without an engineering or traffic study to scientifically establish the maximum safe speed. This is further established in the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices, a federal legal and engineering guide that is the law for the DOT local through federal. See the back of this page for more information vital to defending your rights and property from an out of control, tyrannical judiciary.

Your vehicle insurance is part of your personal effects and papers! This means that they are protected documents and are not anyones business unless you are involved in an accident that harms someone elses rights, body, or property. It is a violation of your Constitutional Right to be secure in your papers and effects and your Right to privacy for an officer or the court to demand disclosure of said insurance unless you have been involved in an accident causing more than $300 in damage. See R.C.W. 9.73.060, R.C.W. 46.30.020, R.C.W. 46.29.060, the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and Article 1 section 14 of the Washington Constitution. It is a violation of your Due Process Rights for the cops, courts, county, and prosecution to charge, fine, and/or imprison you for violating a speed limit that was not established by proper science, such as the 35 mph speed limit on Kelly Road, the 45 mph limit on Smith between Hannegan and the Guide, etc. Legislatively set speed limits are arbitrary and capricious. On an honest legal and scientific basis, there is no safe maximum speed for a vehicle to be moving where it is not capable of causing damage. Their posting and prosecuting these legislatively set or set by a purposely skewed study (such as placing the engineering device too close to a stop sign or light to insure a ridiculously slow 80th percentile) is fraud, entrapment, and a violation of your rights! You also have a Constitutional Right to the free use and enjoyment of your private conveyance (car), which is a motorized vehicle that is not self but engine propelled, on the public roads and highways that YOU own and pay for through your gas taxes. This right cannot be fettered, impeded, or infringed upon by the State unless and until you have proven reckless and harmed another living being. Your right to use the roads, your car, and enjoy your private car are just that, RIGHTS not privileges. Per the Inclusio-Exclusio Rule of Law, you are not required to license and register your car nor are you required to be licensed to drive as these requirements are only for COMMERCIAL drivers who are using the roads in commerce for private or corporate gain (truck drivers, taxis). The inclusion-exclusio rule means that if it isnt specifically written in the law, it is not subject to the law. You have a RIGHT to the use of the roads for your private, personal comings and goings. Washington General Laws, the Motor Vehicle Act and relatives, as found in the law library and the Revised Code of Washington, Title 46, only mention various commercial licenses and requirements. Blacks and Bouviers Law Dictionaries original and thus immutable definition of license is permission from ones lord or master to do that which would otherwise be forbidden. When did we allow the State to become our master and when did we become its slaves? Besides, you are not involved in traffic, driving, travelling, or commerce as defined in federal or state law. Do your research here and get the government out of your life. On a final note, it is an election year. Whatcom County Judge David Grant is running for Superior Court. If we want a solution to the cessation of the continuing violation of our rights by our elected servants, DONT VOTE THEM INTO ANY OFFICE! IMPEACH THEIR ASSES AND IMPRISON THEM IN GENERAL POPULATION FOR TREASON! For more information, please either do your research on your Right to Travel, your Right to Property, famguardian.org, constitutional drivers license, Google: Defeating Corruption by Law and Traffic Tickets Punish Motorists and Richly Reward State, look into Marc Stevens on Beating Civil Traffic Tickets, and so forth. For more information, contact ph0t0jourenying@gmail.com. Please note that I am not offering legal advice or practicing law and thus am not responsible for what you do with this information.