Anda di halaman 1dari 4

FIRST THINGS

November 2012

Miraculous Witness
by Leroy Huizenga Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts
BY CRAIG S. KEENER BAKER ACADEMIC, I I 7 2 PAGES,

$59.99

n October 13, 1917, seventy thousand Portuguese witnessed the sun dancing in the sky at Etima, the conclusion of a series of visitations of the Virgin Mary to three shepherd children. In 1964, a teenage woman evangelizing in the Dominican Republic fainted from shock when she healed an elderly man's shriveled hand through prayer. In 1994, a friend recounted to me the healing of her shattered knee through the laying on of hands. Having inherited the Enlightenment's a priori rejection of the supernatural, many people would reject these claims outright. But would they be justified in doing so? In Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts, Craig S. Keener demonstrates that those who take their cues from David Hume and say miracles cannot happen are wrong, and then in a second step proceeds to show why they are wrong. And as Keener, a professor of New Testament at Asbury Theological Seminary, shows in great detail, the reasons are not pretty. The rise of critical biblical studies is bound up with the rise of modernity, as the Reformation reliance on the sensus literalis became the modern historicalcritical method performed according to the canons of secular academia. It was thus an enterprise divorced from the faith and life of the Church, even while it demanded the Church accept its so-called "assured results." Leroy Huizenga is director of the Christian Leadership Center at the University of Mary.

But, as often observed, the method became more of an ideology with the advent and dominance of "scientific history," which operates within a closed universe of material cause and effect. The high-water mark of the historical-critical method is the approach of the early-nineteenth-century scholar H. E. G. Paulus, who sought purely natural explanations for biblical miracles. To this day, major denominations' Sunday School curricula teach that the miracle of the fish and the loaves is best explained to children by telling them that Jesus' example in sharing what little he had inspired the five thousand to share the fish and loaves hidden under their tunics. Even conservative, believing scholars often operate according to the canons of the historical-critical method. Believing exegetes who would interpret the gospels theologically, for instance, usually seek what the evangelist was thinking or, using a narrative hermeneutic, what the story suggests about God and the work of the Church. Rarely do they engage head-on the possibility that the miracles happened. Either the miraculous dimension is dismissed as legend (by those who

don't believe in miracles) or treated in terms of story outside normative late-modern reality (by those who do). It was this dearth of belief in the reality of the miraculous that precipitated Keener's work. What became a two-volume, 1,172-page book began a decade ago as a footnote in a commentary on Acts. "Because some scholars have treated miracle claims in the Gospels and Acts as purely legendary on the premise that such events do not happen, I intended to challenge their instinctive dismissal of the possibility of such claims by referring to a few works that catalogued modern eyewitness claims of miracles." He found precious few works of value, and a book was conceived. Keener's primary thesis is thus modest: "that eyewitnesses do offer miracle claims, a thesis simple enough but one sometimes neglected when some scholars approach accounts in the Gospels." He supports this with extensive documentation and discussion of miracle claimswell over five hundred pages' worth, covering antiquity to the present. Keener is correct. The majority of New Testament scholars now readily

NOTRE DAME VITA INSTITUTE JUNE 9-21, 2013


The Notre Dame Vita Institute is an intensive two-week summer academic program dedicated to educating participants about fundamentai human life issues from the perspectives of bioiogy, philosophy, theology, iaw, and social science. Participants are instructed by world-renowned scholars while being immersed in Notre Dame's rich Catholic spirituality and strong community fellowship. This integration of scholarship, spirituality, and community is the basis for Notre Dame's initiative. Project Guadalupe, to form the next generation of pro-life leaders. Through rigorous coursework, ongoing dialogue, and introduction to community outreach programs, participants are challenged intellectually and equipped to transform our culture's attitudes toward life issues. Applications are due by February 1,2013.
NOTREDAMEFUNDTO PROTECTHUMANLIFE

424 Geddes Hall Notre Dame, Indiana 46556


p. 574.631.9656 f. 574.631.6290

llfefund.nd.edu lifefund@nd.edu

59

REVIEWS

concede that Jesus was a thaumaturge, preached and healed," while the cheeras his working of miracles is woven ful apostate and self-described "happy into the Jesus tradition. agnostic" Bart Ehrman believes scholMany of them do not merely say ars of any persuasion can affirm that Jesus was perceived to work miracles Jesus performed healings and exorbut speak of his wonder-working cisms without evaluating the claim that as a positive fact. Eor instance, E. P. Jesus did so with supernatural power. Sanders says it is "almost indisputOn the other hand, commenable" that "Jesus was a Galilean who taries on the gospels written in the

NEW FROM IVP ACADEMIC


SitENlflH J. COtllNS

Power, Politics and the Fragmentation of Evangelicalism

'POWERIDLITICS
RNDTHE

From the Scopes Trial to the Obama Administration Kenneth J. Collins narrates the turbulent history of American evangelical political engagement since the 1920s, and the fragmentation of the movement's public voice since the 1970s. He concludes with a proposal for an evangelical political identity that avoids the pitfalls of both fundamentalism and liberalism.
299 pages, paperback, 978-0-8308-3979-7, $22.00

FRflGMEN|flTION
OFEVHNGIICHLISM

Incarnational Humanism
A Philosophy of Culture for the Church ir) the World "A timely and insightful analysis of how human beings . . . have come to dominate a world and yet have lost their sense of what it means to be human. Jens Zimmermann demonstrates with depth and clarity the way that our common humanity was recovered. . . . Truly a book for our times. "
Barry Harvey, Baylor University 357 pages, paperback, 978-0-8308-3903-2, $30.00

Health, Healing and the Church's Mission


Biblical Perspectives and Moral Priorities Does the Christian community have the resources to develop a coherent response to health care challenges today? In a survey covering the full scope of the Bible and three millennia of Christian belief and practice, Willard Swartley fleshes out the central place of health care in the church's mission and its growing relevance today.
268 pages, paperback, 978-0-8308-3974-2, $24.00

;h arch's Mission

80.843.9487

ivpacademic.com

last several decades offer a curious distinction between the respective treatments of parables and miracle stories. The former are evaluated for their historicity and interpreted for their meaning. The latter are often presented "as straightforward narratives of events," as modern interpreters often find "exclusively non-physical spiritual significance in these accounts" and even engage in allegory while leaving historical questions of facticity at the margins. Keener's secondary thesis is even more ambitious and will prove much more controversial in biblical studies and the wider culture, given the recent outbreak of jejune New Atheism. He posits "that supernatural explanations, while not suitable in every case, should be welcome on the scholarly table along with other explanations often discussed," for "antisupernaturalism has reigned as an inflexible Western academic premise long enough." (Keener mentions in passing that he himself is a former atheist.) This second thesis necessitates dethroning David Hume. Now, there's nothing much new about that, as believers have endeavored to refute Hume and his disciples since the publication of his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding in 1748. Not a philosopher himself. Keener offers little that is novel or groundbreaking in the way of refutation, but he nevertheless marshals an impressive host of thinkers as he painstakingly shows how Hume's argument must assume atheism or deism to work and how Hume's metaphysics fails in light of modern physics. In short, like many others. Keener demonstrates that Hume is merely operating in a "deductive circle." The extensive documentation of miracle claims is impressive, but what's really new and useful is Keener's claim that rejection of the miraculous is ethnocentric, particularly Eurocentric. One might even say Teutonocentric.

60

EIRST THINGS

November2012

Rudolf Bultmann famously declared that we could not use electric light and the wireless and modern medicine and still believe in "the New Testament world of spirits and miracles." His "modern world" is a white, male, technocratic world, and the global phenomenon of nonwhite Pentecostalism had barely begun when Bultmann was writing. As far as German scholars of that era go, though, he was one of the good guys, a member of the Confessing Church who spoke out against the mistreatment of Jews, whatever negative Marcionite opinions he had regarding the relevance of the Old Testament. Hume, however, not so much. Keener notes that Hume possessed an expressly and virulently ethnocentric outlook. In his essay "Of National Characters," Hume writes: "I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation [of any other complexion than white], nor even any individual eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences." ot only did Hume's racism affect his argument, as it was those outside of his white, genteel world who made miracle claims, it left a lasting legacy, as Keener notes that it was explicitly adopted by none other than Kant. Here one may observe that the "four horsemen" of New Atheism, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens, are white Anglo-American males. Perhaps their truth claims concerning a certain species of reason function (unwittingly) in the service of white male power over women and people of color in the majority world. Western skepticism may in fact be a terminal patient rallying one final time before expiring. Craig Keener's work should prove a compelling witness to those who doubt miraculous claims both ancient and modern. 13 1

Childish Adults
by David L. Tubbs Childism: Confronting Prejudice Against Children
BY ELISABETH YOUNG-BRUEHL YALE, 368 PAGES, $28

ith three preschoolers in her home at the time of her death last December, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl had good reason to reflect on the welfare of children in the United States. Was she correct in arguing that most Americans are prejudiced against children as a group? A practicing psychoanalyst who earned a doctorate in philosophy (Hannah Arendt supervised her dissertation), Young-Bruehl often wrote on topics of interest to political theorists and is the author of a critically acclaimed biography of Arendt. In her final book, she develops the idea of "childism" as a heuristic or umbrella concept for understanding the social position of children and evaluating different policies affecting them, and she argues that certain policies that harm children result from widespread and ingrained prejudices against them. The argument is provocative but untenable. Broadly likening prejudice against children to racism, sexism, and antiSemitism, she defines childism as "a prejudice against children on the ground of a belief that they are property and can (or even should) be controlled, enslaved, or removed to serve adult needs." Childism is the conditio David L. Tubbs is associate professor of politics at the King's College in New York City and author of Freedom's Orphans: Contemporary Liberalism and the Eate of American Children.

Inheriting Abraham
The Legacy of the Patriarch in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam Jon D. Levenson "One of the world's leading Bible scholars, Jon D. Levenson, has given us an incisive and deeply challenging account of the three Abrahams of Jewish, Christian, and Islamic theology. It may be, he suggests, that we are divided by a comtnon ancestry and that we need to understand our differences no less than our commonalities." Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks, ChiefRabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth "A masterful reading of Jewish, Christian, and Islamic thinking." Sidney H. Criffith, author of
T/?e Church in t/ie S/jadow of t/je Mosque
Library of Jewish ideas Cloth $29.95 978-0-69MS569-2 Cosponsored by theTikvah Fund

PRINCETON
UNIVERSITY

PRESS press.princeton.edu

61

Copyright of First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life is the property of Institute of Religion & Public Life and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai