Anda di halaman 1dari 37

Optical Imaging Chapter 6 Interferometry

Gabriel Popescu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Beckman Institute Quantitative Light Imaging Laboratory http://light.ece.uiuc.edu
Principles of Optical Imaging Electrical and Computer Engineering, UIUC

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.1 Superposition of Fields


Interference is the phenomenon by which electromagnetic fields interact with one another. Interferometry has various applications from the movement of charge to spectroscopy and material characterization. Interference is the result of the superposition principle

E[ r , t ] = E j [ r , t ]
j

(6.1)

Intensity is the measurable quantity

I [r , t ] = E[r , t ]
Where
Chapter 6: Interferometry

(6.2)

stands for time (or ensemble) average


2

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.1 Superposition of Fields


Consider 2 fields E1 and E2 2 2 I [r , t ] = E1 + E2 + E1 E2* + E1* E2 Notes:
the dot product E1 E2* Polarization is critical Parallel polarization offers the most interference
(6.3)

E1 E2 = E1 E2 cos
Assume parallel polarization

E1 E2

=> I = I1 + I 2 + 2 E1 E2 cos[[r , ]]

(6.4)

is generally a random variable For uncorrelated (incoherent) fields cos[ ] 0 => simplest case is a monochromatic field because it is fully coherent.
3

Chapter 6: Interferometry

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.2 Monochromatic Fields


I = I1 + I 2 + 2 I1 I 2 cos[0 + ]
T = Time difference
(6.5)

I
T
(6.6)

= The phase shift 0 = Frequency


I max I min Fringe contrast (visibility): = I max + I min

I1 + I 2 + 2 I1 I 2 1 I1 I 2 2 I1 I 2 (1) 2 I1 I 2 => = = (1: 0) 2( I1 + I 2 ) I1 + I 2

I1 = I 2 => = 1
Chapter 6: Interferometry 4

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.2 Monochromatic Fields


For I1 = I 2 = I :

I
4I
(6.7)

I = 2 I (1 + cos[0 ])

2I

Practical Advantages of Interference: a) Interference term is 2 I1 I 2 cos[ ] so if I1 is too small to be measured directly then I 2 can act as an amplifier. I1 I 2 gives a higher sensitivity

Chapter 6: Interferometry

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.2 Monochromatic Fields


Practical Advantages of Interference: b) Interference I1 I 2 => if I1 is divided by 100, interference is divided by 10 => high dynamic range c) Imagine we frequency shift E1 by

= 1 2 =>

I1 I 2 cos[1t 2t ] cos[ t ]
=> can tune to high frequency ( > 1 kHz) => Low Noise

Chapter 6: Interferometry

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.3 Wavefront-Division Interferometry


Interference is obtained between different portions of the same wavefront (next: amplitude-division)

Young Interferometer
The oldest interferometer
x K y
d 2 d 2

Small Slits
Chapter 6: Interferometry

d d 1 -functions: [ y ]; [y+ ]; 2 2

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.3 Wavefront-Division Interferometry


The field at the plane x=0

d d E = E1 + E2 = E0 ( [ y ] + [y+ ]) 2 2
Assume the observation plane is in the for zone => Fraunhoffer diffraction (Fourier)
d 2 d 2

(6.8)

E[q y ] = [ E[ y ]] = E0 [e

ig y

+e

ig y

y Remember q y = (chapter 3) z

d ] = E0 2 cos[q y ] 2

(6.9)

Fringes cos[ d y]
2 z

(6.10)

Chapter 6: Interferometry

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.3 Wavefront-Division Interferometry


Similarity relationship again:

I
d1
y

I
and d 2

Note: using Fourier it is easy to generalize to arbitrary slit/particle shape; similar to scattering from ensemble of particles (chapter 5, pp 12) => use convolution to express the arbitrary shape.
Chapter 6: Interferometry 9

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.3 Wavefront-Division Interferometry


We can use convolution to express arbitrary shape:
a

y
d 2 d 2

=
d 2 d 2

S1

Other Wavefront-Division Interferometers a) Fresnel Mirrors Image S thru M1 and M2


M1

S2

M2

virtual sources S1 and S2 S1 and S2 act as Youngs pinholes same equations S1 and S2 are derived from the same sources and therefore coherent
10

Chapter 6: Interferometry

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.3 Wavefront-Division Interferometry


b) Lloyds Mirror

S
S and S

M
Young

Chapter 6: Interferometry

11

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.3 Wavefront-Division Interferometry


c) Thin films:
S P

Films of oil break the white light into colors due to interference and phase = f ( )

d) Newtons rings:
k h

Circular fringes = rings

Localized on the surface of lens

Chapter 6: Interferometry

12

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.4 Amplitude-Division Interferometry


Interference is obtained by replicating the wavefront=>less amplitude in each beam. The Michelson Interferometer: M L1
S BS

L2
electron

Very sensitive to path length differences between arms Eg. It has been used to measure pressure in rarefied gases(place cell on one arm-> produce
Chapter 6: Interferometry 13

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.4 Amplitude-Division Interferometry


BS- beam splitter assume thin for now! LetL1 , L2 be the lengths of the 2 areas => The intensity at the detector:
Note: L = L2 L1 = C (t 2 t1 ) = C = time delay cos( )
I( L)=I1 +I 2 +2 I1 I 2 cos(2 L )
(6.11)

Well come back to Michelson with low-coherence light, temporal coherence, OCT, etc

Chapter 6: Interferometry

14

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.4 Amplitude-Division Interferometry


Other amplitude-division interferometry a) Plane parallel plate reflection.
S S

point sourceinter-fringe = f (n, d ) metrology


d n S

b) Plane parallel plate- transmission. Note: With plane wave incident, fringes are localized at infinity => Need lens

L P
Chapter 6: Interferometry 15

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.4 Amplitude-Division Interferometry


c) Fizeau Interferometer:
R M Fringes Reference surface

Used to test mirrors and other surfaces.

d) Mach-Zender Interferometer Very Common Shear interferometry Tilt one mirror Fringes analysis of surfaces
Sample
Chapter 6: Interferometry 16

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.5 Multiple Beam Interference


Reflection

Lens

Transmission

F sin I( r ) 2 ; = I (i ) 1 + F sin 2 2 I (t ) = I (i ) I ( r ) 4R F= Finess coeff. 2 (1 R)

Fabny-Penot interferometry 2

(6.12)

= 2k0 d n cos one pass phase shift


17

Chapter 6: Interferometry

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.5 Multiple Beam Interference


Transmitted Intensity
I( r ) I (i )

R1
R2
2k
2k + 2

R1 , R2 reflectivities R increases narrower lines i.e. More reflection orders participate in interference

In practice, Fabny-Perot gave accurate information about spectral lines(also called etalon)
D

Rayleigh Criterion:
1

1 2

S
is fixed etalon
Chapter 6: Interferometry

2 lines are separated if: FWHM

18

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.6 Interference with Partially Coherent Light


So far, we assumed monochromatic light = fully coherent. What happens when an arbitrary, broad-band, extended source is used for interference? a) michelson interferometry
M1

I (L)

S BS
L

The contrast of the fringe is decreasing i.e. limited temporal coherence.


Chapter 6: Interferometry 19

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.6 Interference with Partially Coherent Light


b) Young Interferometer :

OA

Ac

k
I1 + I 2
d

i.e. Limited Spatial Coherence

Chapter 6: Interferometry

20

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.7 Temporal Coherence


Coherence defines the degree of correlation between fields: Typical correlation at one point in space (typical coherence) Temporal correlation between fields at two points (spatial coherence) Given the field at one point E (r , t ) , the mutual coherence function is:

( ) =< E (t ) E *(t + ) >t

(6.13)

E (t ) E *(t + )dt = autocorrelation function

Chapter 6: Interferometry

21

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.7 Temporal Coherence


Note: (0) = E (t ) 2
(6.14)

= I irradiance
So = E E Appl y again the correlation theorem (Eq 2.30)

[] = E ( ) E *( ) = E ( ) = S ( ) = Spectrum FTIR

(6.15)

So, the autocorrelation function ( ) relates to the optical spectrum of the field:

( ) = S ( ) e iw d
0
Chapter 6: Interferometry

Wiener-Kintchin theorem.

(6.16)
22

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.7 Temporal Coherence


! Compare 6.16 with 5.28 ! It applies even when E(t) does not have a Fourier Transform Typically, spectrum is centered on0 Assume spectrum is S ( 0 ) ; apply shift theorem (Eq 2.31)
( ) = ( ) ei0 ,

(6.17a) (6.17b)

where ( ) =

S (u ) eiu du; u = 0

Complex degree of coherence ( ) ( ) = (6.18)


(0)
Chapter 6: Interferometry

( ) (0;1)

(6.19)
23

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.7 Temporal Coherence


Measuring the temporal coherence: Michelson interferometer

Etotal = E1 + E2 M2 E1 Irradiance: 2 I =< E1 (t ) + E2 (t + ) > (6.20) E2 Assume: E1 = E2 I = I1 + I '2' + E1 (t ) E2 *(t + ) + E *1 (t ) E2 (t + ) (6.21) = 2 I1 + 2 Re[( )]

M1

I1,2 can be measured separately


by moving M 2
Re[( )]

access to Re() directly,


S

0
Chapter 6: Interferometry

24

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.7 Temporal Coherence


The degree of coherence
( )
S ( )

Spectral width

c = coherence time
width of ( ) ( ) = [ S ( )] c = constant
0 = c T = c
2
(6.22)

Interference occurs only if Broad spectrum( = 100nm) => short


Chapter 6: Interferometry

; = (

2 c

) = 2 c

Coherence Length: (6.23) lc = C c Rule of thumb: 0 2 lc = (6.24)


=

L = lc

=>

lc ( 2 3 m)
25

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.8 Optical Domain Refrectometry


Low-Coherence interferometry ( inter. With broad band light). Sources: SLD, LED, white light, femtosecond laser, etc. consider a transparent, layered structure under investigation.
M
1 2 3 4 a a a

d >> lc

Chapter 6: Interferometry

26

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.8 Optical Domain Refrectometry


Scanning M, we retrieve
R

L1

L2

L3

L4 L

The interface are resolved Reflectivity give info about refractive index L1,2,3,4 determine position of interfaces.

ODR: Successful for quantifying lasers in waveguides, fiber optics, etc. 1987-HP- fiber optic reflectometer.

Chapter 6: Interferometry

27

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.9 Optical Coherence Tomography(OCT)


Optical technique capable of rendering 3D images from think biological samples. Penetrates 1-2 mm deep in tissue. => Typically implemented in optical fiber configuration. 1991, Fujimotos S 2x2 group, MIT M
D Coupler Scan beam x-y Scan M -> z

Tissue = continuous superposition of interfaces. Scanning M, a depth-resolved reflectivity signal is retrieved => can resolve regions inside tissue(e.g. Tumors).
Chapter 6: Interferometry 28

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.9 Optical Coherence Tomography(OCT)


If mirror is swept at constant speed v: z=vt Phase delay: = 2kz = 2kvt (2 means back and forth) (6.25) Frequency shift: = = 2kvt Dopler Shift The detector is recording a high-frequency signal Low-noise Dynamic range can easily reach 10 orders of magnitude! i.e. can record reflectivities from 1 to 1/10 billion!(100 dB) Various Technological Improvements: Spectral domain OCT: instead of scanning M, measure S( ) ( ) Galvo-scanning group delay- fast
Chapter 6: Interferometry 29

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.9 Optical Coherence Tomography(OCT)


Various Technological Improvements: Spectral encoding- instead of scanning on x, illuminate with (x) Spectroscopic OCT- trade z-resolution for S ( ) information Since 1991, ~1,000 OCT papers published. Currently applied in: Oftalmology, Dermathology, cardio, etc Recently combined with SHG, molecular imaging

Chapter 6: Interferometry

30

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.10 Dispersion Effects on Temporal Coherence


What happens if on one area of the Michelson interferometer, there is extra material (eg. Glass)?
M1 d S M2

Chapter 6: Interferometry

31

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.10 Dispersion Effects on Temporal Coherence


How does broad band fields propagate through dispersive materials (such as glass)? Think pulses!
n( )

k
n( )

Above resonance

S ( )
Incident spectrum Below resonance

The phase delay through a transparent material:

( ) = k ( ) d = k0 d n( )
Chapter 6: Interferometry

Taylor expansion of n( ) around the central frequency:


S ( )

(6.26)
0

32

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.10 Dispersion Effects on Temporal Coherence


dn 1 2n n( ) = n(0 ) + ( 0 ) + ( 0 ) 2 + ..... d 0 2 2

n(0 ) => 0 = n(0 ) k0 d =


dk 1 d 2k ( ) = 0 + d ( 0 ) + d ( 0 ) 2 .... d 2 d 2 Definitions: dk (6.27) = v = group velocity
d

= 2 = group velocity dispersion (GVD) Different colors have different group velocities
Chapter 6: Interferometry 33

d 2k d 2

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.10 Dispersion Effects on Temporal Coherence


E.g. Pulse:
blue red

vblue < vred


parabolic phase:
(6.28)

Riding with pulse (v=0) 1 ( ) 2 2 So 2 Cross-Spectral density:

( ) S ( )

W ( ) = E1 ( ) E2 *( )
Then, the cross-correlation function is

(6.29)

12 ( ) = W ( )e i d
0

(6.30)

Chapter 6: Interferometry

34

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.10 Dispersion Effects on Temporal Coherence

12 ( ) = W ( )e i d is the generalization of (6.31) i.e 0 generalized Wiener-Kinntilin Theorem.

For the unbalanced Michealson, the cross-spectral density is

W ( ) = E1 ( ) E2* ( ) = E1 E2* e
The cross-correlation function:

1 i 2 2 2

= S ( )e

1 i 2 2 2

(6.32)

12 ( ) = [W ( )] = [ S ( )e
1 i 2 2

1 i 2 2 2

(6.33)

Remember convolution theorem:


( ) = [ S ( )] v [e
Chapter 6: Interferometry

] = 0 ( ) v h( )

(6.34)
35

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.10 Dispersion Effects on Temporal Coherence


h( ) = [e ] Useful Fourier Transform relationship for Gauss functions:
e
b 2 F
1 i 2 2

1 2b

t2 e 4b

(6.35)

h ( ) =

( )

a ls o p a ra b o lic

( )

Chapter 6: Interferometry

lc

36

ECE 460 Optical Imaging

6.10 Dispersion Effects on Temporal Coherence


( )

The coherence time is increased Frequency is chirped So, in OCT, is important to balance the interferometer=> minimum coherence length lc gives the depth resolution
Chapter 6: Interferometry 37

Anda mungkin juga menyukai