IntroducFon
Cultural
ideas,
beliefs
and
values
shape
human
cooperaFon
(Henrich
et
al.
2003)1.
Degree
of
cultural
idenFcaFon
>
Culture
(Wayman
&
Lynch
1991)2.
Clear,
posiFve
self-concept
condent,
construcFve,
and
eecFve
behavior
(BauFsta
et
al.,
1994)3.
High
self-esteem
(Penner
&
Fritzsche,
1993)4
and
low
need
for
approval
(Carlo
et
al.,
1991)5
altruism.
Cultural
idenFty
fusion
altruism
toward
ingroup
members
in
trolley
dilemmas
(Swann,
et
al.,
2010)6.
Self-Reported
Altruism
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
Results:
Study
1
Correla:on
Between
Cultural
Iden:ca:on
and
Altruism
r
=
0.163
p
=
0.005
Results:
Study
2
N
=
46
*p
<
.05
**
p
<
.01
***p
<
.001
Cultural
IdenFcaFon
7
Self-Reported Altruism
Cultural ParFcipaFon
Discussion
Cultural
idenFcaFon
(and
frequency
of
cultural
parFcipaFon)
signicantly
predicts
self-reported
altruism
in
a
large
cross-cultural
sample
and
behavioral
altruism,
as
measured
by
donaFons
to
chariFes
Builds
upon
exisFng
literature
showing
that
group
idenFty
fusion
predicts
hypotheFcal
altruism
for
ingroup
members
These
eects
of
altruism
are
global
rather
than
strictly
for
ingroup
members
Hypothesis
Individuals
with
greater
cultural
iden:ca:on
will
report
greater
altruis:c
tendencies
and
will
donate
more
money
to
chari:es
Methods:
Study
1
300
culturally
diverse
Cornell
undergraduates
completed
a
mulF- dimensional
quesFonnaire
Hello H H H H
UNICEF
Results may be due to strong, stable self-concepts (rather than sense of community), but future empirical work is necessary
References
Acknowledgements
1) Henrich,
J.
et
al.,
(2001).
CooperaFon,
reciprocity
and
punishment
in
eeen
small-scale
socieFes.
American
Economic
Review,
91,
73-78.
2) Wayman
&
Lynch
(1991
).
Home-based
early
childhood
services:
Cultural
sensiFvity
in
a
family
systems
approach.
Topics
in
Early
Childhood
Special
Educa:on,
10,
56-75.
3) BauFstsa,
Y.B.,
Crawford,
I.,
&
Wolfe,
A.S.
(1994).
Ethnic
idenFty
and
self-concept
in
Mexican-American
adolescents:
Is
bicultural
idenFty
related
to
stress
or
beher
adjustment?
Child
and
Youth
Care
Forum,
23,
197-206.
4) Penner
&
Fritzsche,
(1995).
Measuring
the
prosocial
personality.
In
J.
Butcher
&
C.D.
Spielberger
(Eds.)
Advances
in
Personality
Assessment.
(Vol.
10).
Hillsdale,
NJ:
LEA.
5) Carlo,
G.
et
al.,
(1991).
The
altruisFc
personality:
In
what
contexts
is
it
apparent?
Journal
of
Personality
and
Social
Psychology,
61
(3),
450-458.
6) Swann,
W.B.
et
al.,
(2010).
Dying
and
killing
for
ones
group:
IdenFty
fusion
moderates
responses
to
intergroup
versions
of
the
trolley
problem.
Psychological
Science,
21,
1176-1183.
I would like to thank my thesis commihee for their support on this project: Dr. David Pizarro, Dr. James Maas, and Dean Ken Gabard