There are numerous metaphors for salvation in the bible. Given how sin is experienced in a particular context, so a particular metaphor is chosen to explain how Jesus life, death and resurrection offer salvation.
The Substitutionary theory is the most familiar to Evangelicals and runs as follows: * Christ died for our sins. * The innocent one bore our condemnation on the cross. * He suffered and was put to death for the sin of the world. (Living Faith 3.4.2) Notice that this theory embraces a range of images: * We are indebted to God, and Jesus pays the price (financial). * We are guilty of a crime, and Jesus bears the punishment (legal). * God is angry with us, and Jesus appeases divine wrath (ritual). The basic idea seems straightforward: What does Jesus save us from? From God's punishment for sin, i.e. death. How does he do it? By dying in our place, on our behalf.
For support, its proponents point to Bible passages such as 2 Corinthians 5:21 (Jesus became sin for us) and John 1:29 (Jesus is the lamb of God). There are, of course, questions. What kind of God demands the sacrifice of His son? Is this, as some have suggested, a case of "divine child abuse?" And what about the use of violence and suffering to achieve salvation? Doesn't it justify the suffering of all victims? In short, the Substitutionary theory has led some to say: "I love Jesus. But I hate God."
Theory 2:
The Christ is Victor theory dominated the church for the first 1,000 years. It depicts Jesus as the winner in a great cosmic battle between the reign of God and the reign of Satan. By sinning, human beings fell under the control of the devil. But Christ frees us by defeating Satan. Again, there is strong biblical support for this theory. On the cross, God in Christ "disarmed the rulers and authorities and made a public example of them, triumphing over them in it" (Colossians 2:15). The Book of Revelation tells this story graphically. 1
But again, there are problems. For one thing, the military imagery puts some people off. Furthermore, this theory assumes a kind of dualism in which the world is divided between a good god and a bad god. In some versions, Christ wins by tricking Satan, which raises ethical questions. Even its defenders worry that this theory seems naive, simplistic, and morally questionable.
Theory 3:
The Moral Influence theory proposes that Jesus lived a good life and died a good death. His example should inspire us to do the same--to love God and others. The faith and obedience of Jesus should influence us to confess our sins and commit ourselves to moral living. This is the WWJD (What Would Jesus Do?) theory of the atonement. 1 Peter 2:21 seems to support it: "For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you should follow in his steps." Among the problems here, the most pressing is that we are thrown back on ourselves. Think what you like about the first two theories, but they offer explanations of salvation in which Christ does for us what we cannot do for ourselves. Not so here--it's really up to us to save ourselves, with a little help from Jesus' example.
Theory 4: Jesus lived the life we were originally intended to live. The Recapitulation theory emphasizes salvation as the restoration of human existence to its original condition. Jesus re-lives life for us, in full obedience, undoing our failure and re-connecting us to God. Christ becomes what we are so that we might become what he is. It's not just about the cross, but about the whole course of Jesus' life--the incarnation. Jesus is the image of God who sums up human life in order to restore the image of God in us. Its advocates pick up Paul's theme of Christ as "last" or "second" Adam (1 Corinthians 15:45) and Peter's idea of participating in the divine nature (2 Peter 1:4). Its critics point out that it ignores a good deal of what the Bible says about the significance of the cross.
Further investigation
Those four theories represent the major explanations of how Jesus saves. However there are others which seem more understandable to the modern Christian. In his essay on Faith in search of Understanding, Anthony Freeman writes: We are bound to conclude that for the New Testament in general and the gospels in particular, the model of Jesus as saviour was much less important than it was to become in later theology. In fact Jesus only uses the term salvation once, in relation to his meeting Zacchaeus. (Lk19.9).
One reason for this is that "sin" and "saviour" are very general words. The Bible has a whole galaxy of more specific and vivid images to illustrate the human predicament. Each picture or model of sin has its own appropriate description of Jesus as the remedy. We tend to think of the "sinfulness of sin" in terms of personal wickedness and the wilful breaking of Gods commandments. But in a list of sixteen biblical metaphors there are only two where the sinners deliberately bring about their own condition, and at least six that are definitely "no fault" situations. The following chart illustrates: Biblical Metaphors for Sin and its Cure Category No fault No fault No fault No fault No fault No fault Culpable Culpable Questionable Questionable Questionable Questionable Questionable Questionable Questionable Questionable Metaphor for Sin Sickness Weakness Stain Under attack Slavery Imprisonment Law breaking Unrighteousness Character of Jesus Reference Physician Strengthener Cleanser Defender Redeemer Liberator Advocate Justifier Matthew 9.11 ff Hebrews 4.15 ff Ps 51; Ezekiel 26 1 Peter 5.8 ff Romans 6.18; Luke 4.18 Luke 4.18 1 John 2.1; 3.4 Romans 5.1 Luke 15.4; John 10.11 John 9.5; Matthew 4.16 Ephesians 4.17-21 1 Corinthians 1.20 Matthew 18.27 Ezekiel 36.26 2 Corinthians 5.19; Romans 5.10 ff Hebrews 10.10
Straying, getting lost Guide / Shepherd Blindness Ignorance Foolishness Debt Hardness Separation Unholiness Light Truth / Teacher Wisdom Canceller Softener Reconciler Sanctifier
Helplessness rather than guilt is the human plight that comes over most strongly in these metaphors. Post-biblical theologys emphasis on just one model for sin - disobedience or law-breaking, as exemplified by the substitution theory, has distorted the picture of Gods relationship with humans, and has thus also distorted the role of Jesus in relation both to God the Father and to ourselves. Marcus Borg offers his own biblical alternatives, which he believes, make the idea of salvation more meaningful to a modern mind. They are shown below in terms of the pre-salvation condition and after the intervention of God.
Bondage
Paul and NT: bondage to the Powers Cultural Spiritual Psychological
Domination system. Spirit of the Age. Cultural messages Belief systems Economic & political systems Wounds from childhood Addictions to self / own well-being
Sense of powerlessness.
Liberation
The story of exodus The central theme of Jesus To proclaim release to the captives and to let the oppressed go free
Lk 4.19.
Gal 5.1.
Eph 6.10-12.
Notes
Estrangement
Living in an alien land under an alien lord. Away from home. Life in exile Oppression Powerlessness Alienation Stranger to oneself Grief / sadness / anger / hostility
Reconciliation
Reconnected with God Return to Eden Homecoming Paradise restored. Reconciliation with one another.
Isa 40. 1-11, 26-31, 43. 1-21, 44. 1-8, 49. 8-23, 52. 1-10. Ps 130.5 2 Cor 5.19. Notes Eph 13.5
Blindness
Blind to God around us. Do not see ourselves as God sees us. Do not see others as God sees them. Fear Loneliness
Enlightenment
Jesus source of light and sight. -- the true light that enlightens everyone -- opening our eyes to Gods glory in the world, each other and ourselves. Isa 60. 1-2 Isa 9. 2 Ps 119. 105 Lk 1. 78-79 Jn 8.12, 9.25 Mark 10.51 Notes Jn 8. 12, 1.5, 1. 5+9 Job 42.5 Rev 21.23, 22.5
NOT the internal condemnation from the internal superego which constantly criticises us for not being good enough.
Forgiveness
One is forgiven and accepted, and so enabled by God to have a deeper relationship with him.
Read the hymn Amazing Grace: Amazing Grace, how sweet the sound, That saved a wretch like me. I once was lost but now am found, Was blind, but now I see. T'was Grace that taught my heart to fear. And Grace, my fears relieved. How precious did that Grace appear The hour I first believed. Through many dangers, toils and snares I have already come; 'Tis Grace that brought me safe thus far and Grace will lead me home.
The Lord has promised good to me. His word my hope secures. He will my shield and portion be, As long as life endures. Yea, when this flesh and heart shall fail, And mortal life shall cease, I shall possess within the veil, A life of joy and peace.
Notes
Isa 43.4
Notes
Death
Feeling dead in the midst of life.
Resurrection
New birth / Born again into a new life. Death to the old life resurrection to the new. A new way of being in the here and now.
Notes
10
Jesus as the Bread of Life. Jesus as the water that permanently quenches the thirst. Isa 55. 1 Prov 9. 1-6
Notes
11
Knowing God
Knowing God in a relationship Me-You. (Buber uses I-Thou to express the relationship) This is eternal life: to know God
12
Kingdom of God
A way of living together Living under the care of God Applying the Golden Rule Sermon on the Mount
Notes
13
14
Bondage:
V12. Father, give me my share of the estate. V13. and there he squandered his wealth in wild living. Son went off obsessed by cultural messages: Enjoy yourself Buy happiness Spend it while youve got it
Estrangement:
V13. ..he set off for a distant country. A stranger in a strange land: Different customs, laws, culture, beliefs. He was powerless. outcast
Blindness:
V17. When he came to his senses. He couldnt see the consequences of his actions. Could not see God in the world. He was blind to what was happening to him.
15
Worthlessness:
V19. I am no longer worthy to be called your son; make me like one of your hired servants. Felt degraded Equated himself to a servant Could not expect a warm reception
Death:
V17. And here I am starving to death. Was not able to eat even the pigs slops
Me first motivation Social and economic exploitation A lack of care and concern from others
Concluding Summary
We are saved by Gods grace. Not by anything we are Not by anything we do Not by anything we could become Not by anything we could do
Faith as faithfulness
Loving God with heart, soul, mind and strength (opposite is adultery and idolatry)
Faith as Trust
Trusting God with every aspect of our lives (opposite is anxiety)
Faith as Belief
Even though we have doubts, we believe enough to respond. (Not belief as a set of doctrines / intellectual beliefs)
Perhaps at its simplest it is the call of Jesus who says, Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Matt 11:28. Much as the father, in the parable, welcomed his lost son with an outpouring of love.
Threw his arms around him Kissed him (expressing deep love) Wouldnt listen to a long confession Had robes, a ring and sandals brought for him (showing he was reinstated as a son) Had the fattened calf killed (reserved for special occasions) Ordered a celebration Said, you were dead and now youre alive; you were lost but now youre found
18