BY
President and Professor of Theology in The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Louisville, Ky.
AUTHOR OF
Why is Christianity True? The Axioms of Religion, Freedom and Authority in Religion, The Life in Christ. Commentary on Ephesians and Colossians, Baptist Beliefs, etc.
TO THE MEMORY OF
PRESIDENT JAMES PETIGRU BOYCE,
GREAT ADMINISTRATOR AND TEACHER OF THEOLOGY, WHOSE INSPIRING VISION OF THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION FOR SOUTHERN BAPTISTS MADE POSSIBLE THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, THIS VOLUME IS AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATED BY HIS GRATEFUL PUPIL AND SUCCESSOR IN OFFICE.
Preface
SEVERAL reasons have led the writer to prepare the present work on theology. He has been a teacher of the subject during the past eighteen years. His own method and standpoint in dealing with truth have, as a natural consequence, taken definite form. Theology is like any other science in the fact that if it is alive, it grows. This does not mean that it goes beyond Christ and the New Testament. It means, rather, that these are provocative of endless growth. The object of religion does not grow, but the subject never attains a final and static stage in the present life. Truth does not change, but we apprehend truth with increasing clearness. Down to the middle of the nineteenth century, after Luthers age, theology was engaged chiefly with the issues growing out of the Reformation. The method of theology was that derived from a past age. Theologies were comprehensive, more or less philosophical and abstract treatises. There was a very commendable desire to systematize the truths of Christianity. But too often the biblical method and aim were sacrificed in the interest of a school of theology or a philosophical principle. For example, Arminianism overlooked certain essential truths about God in its strong championship of human freedom. As against it, Calvinism ran to extremes in some of its conclusions in its very earnest desire to safeguard the truth of Gods sovereignty. We are learning to discard both names and to adhere more closely than either to the Scriptures, while retaining the truth in both systems. During the nineteenth century the whole world of human thought underwent a remarkable revolution. In physical science a new method and ideal arose. In the social and economic sphere a new sociology and political economy took shape. In psychology a new method of study created an entirely new literature. In philosophy all the issues were restated in new forms, and new schools of thought arose. It was inevitable that these changes in human thought should introduce new issues and new crises in theology. Many looked upon the changes with fear and trembling lest the foundations be destroyed. Schleiermacher, at the beginning of the century, had already anticipated the need for a change in the method of dealing with religious truth. The remarkable system of Ritschl was a logical outcome of the impact of the new ways of looking at things upon the older ways of theology. As a system it had fatal weaknesses, and is now a waning force. But it is a notable landmark, indicating a particular crisis in the history of theology.
We are at length coming to see all things in a new perspective. Several things are entirely clear. One is that none of the ultimate facts of mans spiritual life have been destroyed by any development in recent times. Methods have changed. New issues have arisen. Old issues have assumed new forms. New statements of truth are required. But Christ remains the same yesterday, today, and forever. The gospel remains. The best historical and critical methods of Bible study have given us clearer views of Christ and doctrine. We appreciate better than we ever did Christs great wisdom and love in revealing himself gradually to mankind. This is made clear to us in the Scriptures of the Old and new Testaments. We have better methods of employing the Scriptures in proof of doctrines. We have learned to recognize that religion is a form of knowledge; that Christ is today the spiritual Creator in an ongoing civilization. Along with this we have learned that our religion is capable of clear and scientific exposition, and that new and stronger proofs of its truth and finality are possible. The gospel of Christ, not in an attenuated form, so reduced as to be scarcely recognizable, but with all its vital elements intact, is at home in the modern world and has nothing to fear from any form of sound learning. The author trusts that in some measure these truths may be made clear in the following pages. It has been felt that the ends of clearness and readableness could be best attained by the use of language as untechnical and simple as possible. Some phases of theology are inherently difficult. But for the most part the author believes the reader will not find the book difficult to understand. Primarily, the book has been written for use as a manual in the classroom. But the general reader has also been kept in mind. Care has been taken to avoid too many divisions and subdivisions. Overanalysis does not make a very attractive-looking page, nor add to the interest of the reader. The analytical table of contents will help those who wish a brief summary of any particular section of the discussion. It is impossible for the author to indicate, even in a general way, his indebtedness to other writers. Innumerable books on all phases of the subject have been read or consulted. Biblical Theologies, Systematic Theologies, Theologies of Christian Experience, Psychologies, Philosophies of Religion, and books on Comparative Religion and in other departments, have bene placed under tribute. Occasionally these have been referred to in a footnote. But it has been impossible to do so in all instances. The author desires to express his appreciation of valuable suggestions based on a careful reading of the manuscript from a former student who is professor of theology in the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary at Fort Worth, Texas Revelation W. T. Conner, D. D. E. Y. M.
Contents
Chapter 1. Religion And Theology.
1. TWOFOLD AIM. Necessary connections between religion and theology. Definition of theology. Reasons for definitions. Use in departments of theology. Emphasis upon experience. Not sole criterion of truth. Scriptures. Christianity as a religion. Experiential method not less biblical or systematic. Four factors: Christ, the Scriptures, Holy Spirit, existence. Combination of these. Advantages: 1. Escapes false intellectualism. 2. Gives fact basis for theology. 3. Supplies best apologetic foundation. Illustrated: (1) In proofs of Gods existence; (2) Miracles; (3) Deity of Christ. 4. Shows reality, autonomy, and freedom of Christianity. 5. Helps define nature of the authority of the Bible. Objections and replies. 2. MODERN WAYS OF REGARDING RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE. 1. Comtes view. Reply. 2. Theory of the utility of religion. Answer. 3. Mysticism. Reply. 4. Judgments of value. Goes too far. More than judgments of value needed. 5. Religion without theology. Reply: (1) Mans nature as reasonable; (2) Nature of experience; (3) We know in part; (4) Theology necessary to defend religion; (5) And to propagate it. 6. Theology merged in history. Objections. 3. CHRISTIAN EXPERIENCE AND REVELATION. Two groups of facts. Only understood in their relations. Meaning of experience. Charge of subjectivism. Antecedent probability. Religion not one-sided. Revelation, Gods answer. Three phases of revelation: 1. Jesus Christ; 2. Christ in the soul; 3. Inward conditions. Revelation based on facts. Methods of evasion. 4. NEED FOR A PERSONAL SELF-REVELATION OF GOD. Why personal? 1. Personality only adequate medium. 2. Saves from subjectivism. 3. Revelation in deed most powerful. 4. Produces necessary results in mans spirit. 5. THEOLOGY AND TRUTH. Theology a form of knowledge. 1. Scriptures show it. 2. Christian experience. 3. Theology is a science. Reality present. 4. Denial based on false theory of knowledge. 5. Religious knowledge takes the form required by religion. All higher personal life satisfied. 6. CONCLUDING TOPICS OF PRELIMINARY SURVEY. Sources of theology; material and formal principles; arrangement of doctrines; qualifications for study. 1. Sources : Christian religion; all factors; Christ; Holy Spirit; Scriptures; experience of the redeemed; other sources. 2. Material and
formal principles: statement of these. 3. Arrangement of doctrine. Proofs of Gods existence. Trinity. Scriptures. Christian and other forms of knowledge. Subjects of chapters. 4. Qualifications for the study of theology. Religious attitude. (1) Scholarship and culture. (2) Intellectual endowments generally. (3) Moral and spiritual qualities.
6. THE TRANSITION FROM THE NATURAL TO THE REGENERATE STATE. Not by natural forces. 7. OBJECTIONS. 1. Intellectual objection. Reply. 2. Moral objections. Renunciation, etc. Answer. Elements of doubt become elements of certainty. Intellectual superiority not claimed. 8. HOW KNOWLEDGE ARISES IN CHRISTIAN EXPERIENCE. Recall presuppositions. Realities given. Mind active. Ordinary principle of knowledge involved. Doctrinal system thus arises. 9. ELEMENTS OF KNOWLEDGE IN CHRISTIAN EXPERIENCE. 1. Power from without. 2. Spiritual. 3. Redemptive. 4. Personal. Recognition of another. Power not below the personal. If above, retains personal elements. Fact basis for claim as to personal object in religion. 5. Religious object is triune. Transcendent objects of faith. We know God as Father, Son, and Spirit in experience. Great creeds. Objections usually metaphysical. 10. THE CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE AND THE CHRISTIAN CERTAINTY. Nature of the certainty: 1. Negatively. Not mathematical proof. 2. Positively. Facts of consciousness. Enabling power. 3. Question of degrees of certainty. As to Christ. Elements of knowledge. Unity of experience. 11. OBJECTIONS TO THE CHRISTIAN CERTAINTY. 1. Does not compel assent. Reply. 2. Standard narrow. Reply. 3. Criterion subjective. Reply. 4. Anthropomorphic basis. Reply. 5. Unfair. Reply.
4. CHRISTIAN EXPERIENCE AND COMPARATIVE RELIGION. Results of scientific study of religion, a-e. Question of origin. Christianity fulfils the religious ideals. Object of worship determines character of a religion. Progress in religion: 1. Gods tend to become more personal. 2. More ethical. 3. Growth of idea of revelation. 4. Recognition of purposiveness and providence, a-c. 5. Advance in idea of redemption. 6. So also idea of atonement. 7. Immanence and transcendence perfectly expressed. Summary of preceding, a-f. Conclusions from the study of comparative religion. 5. CHRISTIAN EXPERIENCE IN RELATION TO PHILOSOPHY. Meaning of the word. Points of emphasis in modern philosophy: Experience. Truth. Reality. Unity. Philosophies go astray when they fail to give adequate recognition to these. 6. MODERN WORLD VIEWS. 1. Agnosticism. Statement. Objections. 2. Materialism. Statement. Objections, (1)-(3). 3. Idealism. Statement. How far tenable and untenable, (1), (2). 4. Personalism. Statement. Arguments. Fact basis. First and final causes. Knowledge. Freedom. Physical nature, (1)-(5). Gods relations to universe, (1). (4); God in history, a-f. An impersonal universe. Three evil results. General conclusion. 7. PERSONALISM AND CHRISTIAN THEISM. Relation to monism, a-f. The proofs of Gods existence: 1. Cosmological argument. Reenforced by experience, (1)-(4). 2. Teleological argument. Objections and replies. Argument restated. Evidence of design, (1)-(4). 3. Anthropological argument. 4. Ontological argument, (1)-(4). 5. Moral argument, (1)-(3). Conclusion: 1. Older proofs reenforced by Christian experience. 2. Proofs given exhaust spheres of reality. 3. Charge of subjectivism.
Chapter 5. Revelation.
Introductory statement. Fundamental facts. Biblical writers. 1. OPPOSING VIEWS. 1. Agnostic. 2. Pantheistic. 3. Natural religion. 2. CONTENTS OF REVELATION. 1. God making himself known. 2. A spiritual transaction. 3. Rooted in the peoples life and needs. 4. Evokes mans active response. 3. THE RECORD OF REVELATION. The Scriptures. Two methods of approach. Process. Results. 1. Psychological distinctions. 2. Theories of inspiration, a. Shortcomings of theories. Biblical and experiential method. b. Bible contains best answer 4. DISTINGUISHING MARKS OF BIBLICAL REVELATION. 1. Historical and experiential. 2. Regenerative and morally transforming. 3. Genetic. 4.
Gradual and progressive, a-c. 5. Unitary and purposive. 6. Congruous with mans intellectual and religious life. 7. Supernatural. 8. Sufficient, certain, and authoritative. Errors to be avoided.
7. OBJECTIONS. 1. Based on unity of God. Reply. 2. Finite and infinite. Reply. 3. Mystery. Reply. 4. Modern thought. Reply, (1)-(3). 8. RIVAL THEORIES. 1. Humanitarian Christ. 2. Man filled with divine presence, (1)-(3). 3. Ideal preexistence. Reply. 4. Sandays theory. Reply, (1)-(4). 5. The Ritschlian theory. Reply.
avoided: (1) Merging all in one. (2) Making one superior. Discussion as to righteousness and love: a. Prominence in Scriptures. b. Question as to conscience, c. Question as to option and obligation, d. Attribute of being, or of action, e. Question as to a norm. f. Relative place in the atonement. (3) Thinking of attributes in conflict. (4) Arbitrary action of will.
3. Due to creation of free beings. Genesis account. (1) Little light on sin prior to man. (2) Man created morally free. (3) Moral dignity of man in part explains sin. (4) Opportunity for God. (5) Opportunity for man. 2. CHRISTS NATURAL AND SPIRITUAL RELATIONSHIP TO THE HUMAN RACE. Source, medium, and goal of creation. 1. Explains conscience and religious instinct. 2. Danger of substituting the natural for the spiritual relation. 3. Illustrated in case of infants. 4. Natural relation the precondition of the spiritual. 3. THE BIBLICAL TEACHING AS TO SIN. Sin as selfishness, as lack of conformity to law, as moral disposition, as rupture of relations with personal God. 1. Old Testament teachings, (1)-(3). 2. New Testament teaching. Want of fellowship. Sinful motive. Christs character. (1) With Jesus all are sinners and lost. (2) Fourth Gospel. (3) Paul. Flesh. Dead in sins. Law. Deliverance through Christ. Source of sin in Adam. 4. THE CONSEQUENCES OF SIN. 1. Sin universal. Total depravity. Its true meaning. Human ability and inability. Natural and moral ability. 2. Guilt and penalty. a. Guilt defined, b. Penalty defined, c. Question as to nature and object of penalty. Divergent theories, d. Chief penalty death. Physical death. Relation to penalty, e. Spiritual death. Eternal death. 5. SOLUTION OF SIN PROBLEM THROUGH CHRISTIAN EXPERIENCE. Stages in the process. 6. OBJECTIONS TO THE BIBLICAL DOCTRINE OF SIN. Moral system arraigned. Reply. Salvation of infants, and heredity. Reply.
5. BIBLICAL DOCTRINE OF THE ATONEMENT. 1. The motive of the atonement. 2. The end, (1)-(3). 3. The atonement defined. As means to the end, it involved: (1) Christs identification with the race. (2) Life of obedience. (3) Subjection of Christ to the operation of the law of sin and death. 6. ATONEMENT AND THE DIVINE IMMANENCE. Means of becoming immanent in man. Descent of moral ideal through Christ. Gift of Holy Spirit. Mystical union. 7. VITAL AND LEGAL ELEMENTS IN ATONEMENT. Legal elements explained. Atonement expression of law. Element of law. Series of questions and answers. 1. How a satisfaction of law? Reply, (1)-(4). 2. In what sense penal? 3. Did Christ endure divine wrath? 4. In what sense a propitiation? 5. Was it substitutionary? Fact and principle of substitution: (1) Fact. Not merely question of Greek prepositions. Christs work representative or substitutionary. Various New Testament passages. Old Testament teachings. (2) The principle of substitution. In relation: a. to personality; b. to morality; c. to Christian experience; d. to Christs original relation to the race. 8. THE GODWARD AND MANWARD REFERENCE OF THE ATONEMENT. 1. The Godward. Not only law, government, honor involved, but also the divine nature as righteous love. Necessity in God. Two objections. 2. Manward reference, (1)-(3). Attributes of God in atonement. Extent of the atonement. Intercession of Christ.
4. OBJECTIONS. 1. Makes God partial. Reply. 2. Involves insincerity in gospel invitation. Reply. 3. God does not desire salvation of all. Reply. 4. Election cuts the nerve of endeavor. 5. It involves profound mystery. Necessity of proclaiming universal gospel. 6. Hardening the heart, (1)-(4).
union with Christ. (1) Identity with him in relation to God. (2) In his relations to the race. (3) To sin and death. (4) His identity with us in our earthly experiences.
3. DEATH OF THE BODY. Separation of soul and body. Christian hope includes victory over death. 4. THE INTERMEDIATE STATE. Scripture teaching meager, but clear. Hades and Sheol. 1. The righteous dead, (1)-(6). 2. The unrighteous dead. A few clear passages. 5. THE SECOND COMING OF CHRIST. Series of statements. 1. New Testament teaches an outward, visible return. 2. The time is unrevealed. 3. There are various subordinate comings. 4. Right attitude one of constant expectancy. Question: Was Paul mistaken? 5. How the expectation helped Christians. 6. THE QUESTION AS TO THE MILLENNIUM. Passage in Rev. 20: 1-6. Issue between premillennialists and postmillennialists. Premillennial view in outline. Postmillennial view in outline. Objections urged by the opposing theorists. Postmillennial objections to the opposing theory. Premillennial objections to the opposing theory. Conclusion: five points. 7. THE RESURRECTION. Teaching in the Gospels, Acts, and Epistles. Two questions: Is New Testament teaching simply a doctrine of immortality? Reply. How is the body raised? Reply. Summary as to resurrection: six points. 8. THE JUDGMENT. Topics discussed. 1. The fact. 2. The Judge. 3. The subjects. 4. The purpose. 5. The necessity. Finality in various ways: (1) For the conscience. (2) For history. (3) For theism. 9. THE FINAL STATES. HEAVEN. OUTWARD ASPECT. Various teachings. Inward aspect: 1. Heaven as relief. 2. Heaven as reward. 3. Heaven as realization. 4. Heaven as appreciation. 5. Heaven as endless growth. Hell. Four statements as to hell: 1. Absence of heavenly elements. 2. Symbolic and figurative teachings of Scripture. 3. There are degrees in punishment of wicked. 4. Doom of wicked is endless. 10. THEORIES WHICH DENY ETERNAL PUNISHMENT. Two theories, annihilationism and restorationism. Annihilationism. Soul not naturally immortal. Several forms of the theory. Biblical words relied upon. Various passages. Reply, 1-7. Restorationism. Several forms in which it is held. 1. Arguments based on Scripture passages, and replies to them. General statements in conclusion. 2. Arguments based on inferences from God and man and the moral kingdom. Reply. Detailed reply. General considerations, (1)-(3).