Philippe Cramer, MD
France Biotech Julien Martinet, D pham France Biotech Text reviewed by Dr Valrie Robert
Centre de traitement des Hmophiles, Hpital Cochin, Paris
FEBRUARY 2004
www.bioimpact.org
BIOIMPACT Impact of Biotechnology products on quality of life and longevity Factor VIII for Treatment of Haemophilia A Patients
BIOIMPACT Impact of Biotechnology products on quality of life and longevity Factor VIII for Treatment of Haemophilia A Patients
SOMMAIRE
HAEMOPHILIA .......................................................................................................... 5 TREATMENT OF HAEMOPHILIA A PATIENTS BEFORE THE ADVENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY.................................................................................................... 5
History of product development...................................................................................................... 5 Plasma concentrates, a great leap forward becomes a health disaster. .................................... 6
CURRENT METHODS OF TREATMENT FOR HAEMOPHILIACS........................... 8 FUTURE METHODS OF TREATMENT FOR HAEMOPHILIACS.............................. 9 COST-EFFECTIVENESS ........................................................................................... 9 APPENDIX GENERAL FEATURES OF FACTOR VIII................................................................ 11 PHARMACEUTICAL AND ECONOMIC DATA ....................................................... 11
Cost of treatment............................................................................................................................. 11 Market Data ...................................................................................................................................... 12
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 13
BIOIMPACT Impact of Biotechnology products on quality of life and longevity Factor VIII for Treatment of Haemophilia A Patients
HAEMOPHILIA
Haemophilia is a hereditary deficiency of coagulation which only occurs in males, since transmission is recessive and X-linked. Two blood coagulation factors are involved: factor VIII (haemophilia A) and factor IX (haemophilia B); haemophilia A represents 80 to 85% of haemophilia cases. Boys usually inherit the mutant gene from their carrier mother, but in 30% of cases there is no family history of haemophilia and the disorder is the result of spontaneous mutation. Haemophilia A is due to production of a non-functional coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII), or production in insufficient quantity, leading to dysfunction of haemostasis and therefore repeated haemorrhages within joints (haemarthroses) and muscles, and even to visceral or intracranial bleeding. In the long term, there are numerous complications, in particular blocking of joints and bone deformation (haemophilic arthropathy). Haemophilia is the most frequent disorder of coagulation. Incidence is approximately 1 in 5 000 male live births. Prevalence of haemophilia is 14 per 100 000 males. In France there are therefore just over 4 000 haemophiliacs treated at more than thirty specialist centres. The number of haemophiliacs in North America (excluding Mexico) and in the 25 European Union countries is respectively 22 000 and 28 5000. Haemophiliacs with no previous (de novo) family history of the disorder currently account for 40% of cases, probably due to the implementation of antenatal screening. Depending on the detectable level of plasma coagulation, haemophilia A occurs in three forms: severe (about half of all haemophiliacs) with less than 1% of the normal level of FVIII; moderate (10 to 20% of cases), between 1 and 5% production; and mild, 5 to 30% production. The severity of deficiency is related to the type of mutation. Preventative and curative treatments available only address the bleeding symptoms and consist in the intravenous administration of FVIII. However, despite substantial improvements over the last 20 years, in particular concerning viral safety, this treatment is not without undesirable side effects such as inhibitor formation.
for the first time severe haemorrhaging could be controlled and haemophiliacs could undergo surgical operations.
In 2000, a new generation of rFVIII was licensed. This formulation uses a sucrose in the place of human albumin and includes a purification stage with the use of a solvent-detergent mix. The risk of viral infection is even lower. The latest rFVIII, licensed by both the FDA and the EMEA in 2003, uses neither animal nor human proteins in the production process or in the final formulation.. However, this latest improvement in the production process is a precautionary measure rather than the reduction of a measured risk. The quantity of rFVIII available is not limited as was that of products using human plasma, which has enabled the development of preventive treatment.
Monoclate P Hemofilm M
Recombinate, octocog
Recombinant Kogenate, octocog products
(1) VHP = Very high purity, SD = treatment with solvent-detergent mix (2) Refacto is a rFVIII with no B domain protein (not required for coagulation), therefore easier to produce and less costly because the protein is shorter.
The techniques of biotechnology have therefore brought considerable progress as far as viral safety is concerned, both in purification of products obtained by plasma extraction and in production using genetic engineering. The treatment of haemophiliacs today offers an excellent degree of safety. One of the residual uncertainties, apart from the existence of unidentified pathogens, remains the theoretical possibility of transmission of the new variant of Creutzfeld-Jacob Disease. However no cases have been identified amongst haemophiliac populations.
BIOIMPACT Impact of Biotechnology products on quality of life and longevity Factor VIII for Treatment of Haemophilia A Patients
FVIII inhibitors
The development of FVIII inhibitors is the greatest obstacle in the treatment of haemophilia A. These inhibitors are antibodies produced in response to the introduction of foreign FVIII. They block, or decrease, activity of FVIII, thus decreasing the effectiveness of treatment. Depending on the degree of their inhibiting activity, measured using a specific blood coagulation test, haemophiliacs are classified as high responders (> 5 Bethesda units) (administration of FVIII is ineffective), or low responders. Inhibitors are to be found in approximately 30% of severe forms. They are much rarer in moderate forms. It would appear that these inhibitors appear less frequently when plasma FVIII is used.
BIOIMPACT Impact of Biotechnology products on quality of life and longevity Factor VIII for Treatment of Haemophilia A Patients
Strong responders can, if necessary, benefit from an attempt to eradicate the inhibitor through immune tolerance protocols consisting of the repeated administration of FVIII, possibly combined with an immunosuppressant, or immunoadsorption of the antibodies responsible.
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
FVIII concentrates, whether plasma-derived or recombinant, are extremely costly, but essential for haemophiliacs. A number of new practices and new drugs still need to be assessed in terms of their cost/effectiveness ratio. A number of studies have shown the interest in preventive treatment, as opposed to treatment on demand, in terms of reducing frequency of haemorrhaging and of preventing bone deformation, as well as in terms of the impact on lifestyle/welfare costs that they represent. Insofar as preventive treatment is very costly, a number of cost/effectiveness studies have been carried out to justify the use of preventive treatment. Studies have thus assessed the gain achieved by avoiding haemarthrosis which, depending on the country, is between $US 1 200 and $US 1 400. Other studies currently underway are trying to assess when preventive treatment should kick in since, insofar as severity of deficiency is equal, the frequency of haemorrhaging is not necessarily the same. Other studies have shown that, in comparison with other treatments, rFVIII was useful for severe haemophiliacs with an inhibitor in terms of reduced number of repeat treatments required, duration of painful episodes, number of days requiring the use of crutches or wheel chair, number of urgent consultations and auxiliary nursing time. Quality-of-life improvements were observed in several important areas, as perceived by both patients and their families, at an incremental cost per QALY (units of quality of life) of 51 533. In patients with severe haemophilia, and before the marketing of rFVIII, choice of treatment was limited to two options: eliminate the inhibitor by inducing immune
BIOIMPACT Impact of Biotechnology products on quality of life and longevity Factor VIII for Treatment of Haemophilia A Patients
tolerance, or use considerable quantities of FVIII. A study published in 1996 indicated that despite its high cost (nearly $1 million on average for a 5-year old child), tolerance enabled an added survival of 4.6 years, and enabled an overall economy (during the life of the patient) of around $1.7 million.
BIOIMPACT Impact of Biotechnology products on quality of life and longevity Factor VIII for Treatment of Haemophilia A Patients
10
APPENDIX
GENERAL FEATURES OF FACTOR VIII
FVIII is a plasma glycoprotein consisting of 2351 amino acids divided into three protein domains: A, B and C. The role of B domain is unknown, but it is not required for coagulation. Certain parts of FVIII are more immunogenic than others. FVIII is synthesized mainly by hepatocytes. It circulates in the plasma in liaison with noncovalent von Willebrand factor, the latter protecting it from plasma proteolysis. The half-life of endogenic FVIII is 12 hours.
The most frequent genetic anomaly, present in 45% of patients with severe haemophilia A, is an inversion of part of the FVIII gene. More than 300 other genetic anomalies have been described (sporadic mutations, deletions or insertions).
There seems to be a correlation between the type of mutation and the occurrence of an inhibitor: Patients with a mutation which suppresses, or severely affects, production of FVIII have a 35% higher frequency of development of inhibitors in comparison with other types of mutation. Recombinant FVIII is produced from mammalian cells (CHO).
11
These prices only take into account the cost of the FVIII (or VIIa) product, not the entire medical cost. The cost of FVIII varies from country to country and according to the size of the market: for instance, in Germany the price is around 0.6 to 0,7 per unit and in the United States it is even less expensive (at around $0.3 to $0.4 per unit). In developing countries, use of modern treatments for haemophilia is difficult and in the poorest countries, haemophiliacs often die before being diagnosed.
Market Data
In practice, only severe haemophilia is treated on a regular basis. almost never, and moderate forms occasionally. Milder forms
In France The total number of haemophilia A patients is estimated to be approximately 4000, but the number treated per annum is under 2000. Individual consumption varies from 15 000 to 300 000 units per annum, depending on whether the patient is treated on demand, undergoes preventive treatment, or needs to undergo surgery. It can be higher in the case of inhibitor formation. Total consumption in 2003 should be around 255 million units (compared to 220 million units in 1997) (source: LFB). This growth, in the vicinity of 2% per annum, is due to the ever more frequent use of preventive treatment and perhaps also to the improvement in the state of health of haemophiliacs with AIDS who benefit from triple combination therapy and put on weight. Consumption in Europe, America and the world. World consumption of plasma-derived FVIII in 2000 was 2.2 billion units (source: LFB). Total world demand for FVIII in 2002 was 4.3 billion international units (source ?). Sales of rFVIII reached $ x million in 2002, i.e. y billion units (source: IMS).
Breakdown of recombinant FVIII versus plasma-derived FVIII The breakdown in use of recombinant FVIII versus plasma-derived FVIII varies according to country: in France, only 20% of haemophiliacs benefit from plasmaderived FVIII; in the United States it is 35%; in the whole of Europe 60%; and in Germany 66% (source: Marketing Research Bureau, Eurodata 2001). In world terms, the breakdown is similar to that in Europe, 58% of plasma-derived FVIII.
BIOIMPACT Impact of Biotechnology products on quality of life and longevity Factor VIII for Treatment of Haemophilia A Patients
12
REFERENCES
General Reviews Bolton-Maggs PHB, Pasi KJ. Haemophilias A and B. Lancet 2003; 361: 1801-09. Manucci PM, Tuddenham EGD. The Haemophilias - From Royal Genes to Gene Therapy. N Engl J Med.; Jun 2001; 344: 1773-9. Web Sites General information about coagulation: http://tollefsen.wustl.edu/projects/coagulation/coagulation.html; http://kowid.free.fr/pharmako/hemato/hemo2.htm Haemophiliac associations: www.wfh.org; www.afh.asso.fr; www.hemophilia.org Information from pharmaceutical companies: www.wyeth-hemophilie.com; www.hemophiliabayer.com; http://novoseven.com; www.advate.com Genetics of FVIII Toole JJ; Knopf JL; Wozney JM et al: Molecular cloning of a cDNA encoding human antihaemophilic factor. Nature 312: 342-347, 1984. Lillicrap D: The molecular basis of haemophilia B Haemophilia 1998; 4: 350-57 Clinical Studies Lusher JM. First and second generation recombinant factor VIII concentrates in previously untreated patients: recovery, safety, efficacy, and inhibitor development. Semin Thromb Hemost 2002 Jun;28(3):273-6 White GC II, Courter S, Bray GL, Lee M, Gomperts ED. A multicenter study of recombinant factor VIII (Recombinate) in previously treated patients with hemophilia A. Thromb. Haemost. 1997;77:660-7 Courter SG, Bedrosian CL. Clinical evaluation of B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII in previously treated patients. Semin Hematol. 2001 Apr;38(2 Suppl 4):44-51. Suiter TM. First and next generation native rFVIII in the treatment of hemophilia A. What has been achieved? Can patients be switched safely?. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2002 Jun;28(3):277-84. Inhibitors Dimichele D. Inhibitors: resolving diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. Haemophilia. 2002;8(3):280-7. Gene Therapy Powell JS, Ragni V, White GC, Lusher JM et al. Phase I trial of FVIII gene transfer for severe haemophilia A using a retroviral construct administered by peripheral intravenous infusion. Blood, May 2003;10-1182 Tawa NE Jr,OBrien JM, Treco DA, Selden RF. Non viral Transfer of the Gene Encoding Coagulation Factor VIII in Patients with Severe Haemophilia A. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1735-1742. Pharmacoeconomic data/ Quality of Life Schramm W. and Berger K.: Linking medicine and economics: health economics and quality of life in haemophilia care Haemophilia 2002; 8: 217-20 Miners AH, Sabin CA, Tolley KH, Lee CA. Cost-utility analysis of primary prophylaxis versus treatment ondemand for individuals with severe haemophilia. Pharmacoeconomics 2002;20(11):759-74 Smith PS, Teutsch SM, Shaffer PA, Rolka H, Evatt B. Episodic versus prophylactic infusions for hemophilia A: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Pediatr 1996 Sep;129(3):424-31
BIOIMPACT Impact of Biotechnology products on quality of life and longevity Factor VIII for Treatment of Haemophilia A Patients
13
Galanaud JP, Pelletier-Fleury N, Logerot-Lebrun H, Lambert T.: Determinants of drug costs in hopitalised patients with haemophilia: impact of recombinant activated factor VII. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(10):699-707. Colowick AB, Bohn RL, Avorn J, Ewenstein BM. Immune tolerance induction in hemophilia patients with inhibitors: costly can be cheaper. Blood 2000;96(5):1698-702
BIOIMPACT Impact of Biotechnology products on quality of life and longevity Factor VIII for Treatment of Haemophilia A Patients
14