Posted May 10 2012 by Asif Eqbal in Cables, Low Voltage with 15 Comments
Translate
The following three criteria apply for the sizing of cables for circuit breaker controlled feeders: I. Short circuit current withstand capacity This criteria is applied to determine the minimum cross section area of the cable, so that cable can withstand the short circuit current. Failure to check the conductor size for short-circuit heating could result in permanent damage to the cable insulation and could also result into fire. In addition to the thermal stresses, the cable may also be subjected to significant mechanical stresses. II. Continuous current carrying capacity This criteria is applied so that cross section of the cable can carry the required load current continuously at the designed ambient temperature and laying condition. III. Starting and running voltage drops in cable This criteria is applied to make sure that the cross sectional area of the cable is sufficient to keep the voltage drop (due to impedance of cable conductor) within the specified limit so that the equipment which is being supplied power through that cable gets at least the minimum required voltage at its power supply input terminal during starting and running condition both.
A = Minimum required cross section area in mm2 t = Operating time of disconnecting device in seconds Isc = RMS Short Circuit current Value in Ampere C = Constant equal to 0.0297 for copper & 0.0125 for aluminum T2 = Final temp. C (max. short circuit temperature) T1 = Initial temp. C (max. cable operating temperature normal conditions) T0 = 234.5 C for copper and 228.1 C for aluminum Equation-1 can be simplified to obtain the expression for minimum conductor size as given below in equation-2:
Now K can be defined as a Constant whose value depends upon the conductor material, its insulation and boundary conditions of initial and final temperature because during short circuit conditions, the temperature of the conductor rises rapidly. The short circuit capacity is limited by the maximum temperature capability of the insulation. The value of K hence is as given in Table 2. Boundary conditions of initial and final temperature for different insulation is as given under in Table 1 below.
Table 1
Insulation material Final temperature T2 Initial temperature T1 PVC 160 C 70 C Butyl Rubber 220 C 85 C XLPE / EPR 250 C 90 C
Table 2
Material Copper Aluminum Insulation PVC Butyl Rubber XLPE / EPR PVC Butyl Rubber XLPE / EPR (K) 1 Second Current 115 134 143 76 89 94 Rating in Amp/mm2 (K) 3 Second Current 66 77 83 44 51 54 Rating in Amp/mm2
In the final equation-2 we have determined the value of constant K. Now the value of t is to be determined. The fault current (ISC) in the above equation varies with time. However, calculating the exact value of the fault current and sizing the power cable based on that can be complicated. To simplify the process the cable can be sized based on the interrupting capability of the circuit breakers/fuses that protect them. This approach assumes that the available fault current is the maximum capability of the breaker/fuse and also accounts for the cable impedances in reducing the fault levels. The fault clearing time (tc) of the breakers/fuses per ANSI/IEEE C37.010, C37.013, and UL 489 are:
For medium voltage system (4.16 kV) breakers, use 5-8 cycles
For starters with current limiting fuses, use cycle For low voltage breakers with intermediate/short time delay, use 10 cycles For low voltage breakers with instantaneous trips, use 1 cycle
Alternatively let us consider that feeder is for any large motor which is being fed from LV 415V or 400V switchgear having a circuit breaker with separate multifunction motor protection relay (For this calculation it is assumed to be SIEMENS made 7SJ61). The instantaneous protection feature of this relay will be turned ON as and when any fault occurs. However, the selected cable shall have the capacity to withstand the maximum fault current for a finite duration (that is fault clearing time of the circuit breaker). The minimum faults withstand duration necessary (for the instantaneous setting) for cable is calculated as under: Si. No. 1 2 3 4 5 Parameters Relay sensing/pickup time Tolerance/Delay time Breaker operating time Relay overshoot Safety Margin 120 Time in ms 20 10 40 20 30 Source/Back up SIEMENS 7SJ61 technical data SIEMENS 7SJ61 technical data L&T make C-Power breaker have typical opening time of 40 ms and closing time of 60ms) GEC handbook Network Protection & automation Guide
Therefore the cable selected for a circuit breaker controlled motor feeder in 415V or 400V switchgear shall be suitable to withstand the maximum rated fault current of 50kA for at least 120msec. However taking allowance of 40 Mili seconds in the opening time of circuit breaker due to aging, frequent number of operation, increase in contact resistance of circuit breaker and finally to cover the variation due from manufacturer to manufacturer. Hence the cable selected for a circuit breaker controlled motor feeder in 415V or 400V switchgear shall be suitable to withstand the maximum rated fault current of 50kA for at least (120+40) 160msec. Many consultants recommend for use operating time of disconnecting device as 200msec also. Value of t more than 160 seconds is a conservative design. A = (Isc x t)/K = (50000 x 0.16)/94 = 212.766mm2 Next standard cable size: = 240 mm2
Although it may appear that selection of minimum cross sectional area of cable conductor as 240 mm2 is only just large enough for the duty, the actual fault current in the motor circuit is generally less than the switchboard fault withstand rating of 50kA, hence the selection of cable of cross sectional area 240 mm2 in practice offers sufficient design margin. The minimum cross sectional area of cable required for 415V or 400V switchgear motor feeder from fault withstand point of view shall be 240mm2. We have considered for circuit breaker controlled motor feeder and analyzed the duration of short circuit/fault withstanding time in seconds for the same. Exactly the Same holds true for Circuit breaker controlled (Please see the below figure) outgoing transformer feeder. However operating time of disconnecting device is slightly different for circuit breaker controlled incomer and tie feeders. Duration of fault withstanding/operating time of disconnecting device for incomer and tie feeder is 1 and 0.5 second respectively. This is because of additional presence of inverse definite minimum time delay protection relays along with instantaneous protection. The inverse definite time delay protection has time settings greater than 0.5 for incomer feeders and about 0.5 for tie feeders. For all different type of feeders the operating time of disconnecting device is indicated in figure below:
Typical value of t (fault clearing time). All the connecting cables has to be sized for short circuit duration (t) indicated in the diagram above
The final cable size shall be selected considering the other two criteria that is continuous current carrying capacity & voltage drop criteria which would be continued in part-2 and part-3.
Continued from article Sizing of power cables for circuit breaker controlled feeders (part 1)
Tc allowable conductor temperature (C) Ta ambient temperature (either soil or air) (C) Td temperature rise of conductor due to dielectric heating (C) Tint temperature rise of the conductor due to interference heating from adjacent cables (C) Rac electrical ac resistance of conductor including skin effect, proximity and temperature effects (_/ft) Rca effective total thermal resistance of path between conductor and surrounding ambient to include the effects of load factor, shield/sheath losses, metallic conduit losses, effects of multiple conductors in the same duct etc (thermal- ft, C-cm/W).
From the above equation it is clear that the rated current carrying capacity of a conductor is dependent on the following factors: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Ambient temperature (air or ground) Grouping and proximity to other loaded cables, heatsources etc. Method of installation (aboveground or below ground) Thermal conductivity of the medium in which the cable is installed Thermal conductivity of the cable constituents
However please note that while sizing a power cable we never calculate the ampacity. The above equation is used to analyze the cable ampacities of unique installations. Standard ampacity tables
are available for a variety of cable types and cable installation methods and can be used for determining the current carrying capacity of a cable for a particular application. These standards provide tabulated ampacity data in manufacturers catalog for cables installed in air, in ductbank, directly buried or in trays for a particular set ofconditions clearly defined. It is because of this reason that we need to give the reference of manufacturers catalog from where the ampacity values are picked up. Now once the current carrying capacity of a cable is found from standard catalog; we convert that rated capacity (Ampacity) into actual laying condition. The standard current ratings for cables are modified by the application of suitable multiplying factors to account for the actual installation conditions. Hence we define one more term here called ampacity deration factor. Ampacity duration factor is defined as the product of various factors which accounts for the fraction decrease in the ampacity of the conductor. Those factors and physical condition deriving them are as follows: 1. K1= Variation in ambient air temperature for cables laid in air / ground temperature for cables laid underground. 2. K2 = Cable laying arrangement. 3. K3 = Depth of laying for cables laid direct in ground. 4. K4 = Variation in thermal resistivity of soil. Ampacity Deration factor = Product of applicable multiplying factors among 1 to 4 listed above.
K = K1 x K2 x K3 x K4
Now from where do we get these multiplying factors to find the overall ampacity deration factor? Againwe get these values from manufacturers catalog because manufacturer of the cable is in best position to conduct thepractical experiments and test on the cables and find the percentage/fractional decrease in current carrying capacity of the cable in various conditions. For better understanding of the ampacity deration factor the following pictorial representation is provided below. Table for ampacity deration factor along with pictorial representation is provided below. However readers to note that ampacity deration factor table provided in this article is to verified from the manufacturers catalog which is intended to be used for project.
No. of rocks 1 2 3 6
No of cables per rack 2 3 6 0.98 0.96 0.93 0.95 0.93 0.90 0.94 0.92 0.89 0.93 0.90 0.87
No. of rocks 1
1 1.00
9 0.73
2 3 6
Rating factors for single core cable in trefoil circuits laid on open racks in air:
No. of rocks 1 2 3 6
No of circuits per rack 1 2 3 1.00 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.95 0.93 1.00 0.94 0.92 1.00 0.93 0.90
Rating factors for groups of multicore cables laid direct in ground, in horizontal formation:
No. of cables in group Spacing Cables touching 15 cm 30 cm 45 cm 60 cm 2 0.79 0.82 0.87 0.90 0.91 3 0.69 0.75 0.79 0.83 0.86 4 0.62 0.69 0.74 0.79 0.82 6 0.54 0.61 0.69 0.75 0.78 8 0.50 0.57 0.66 0.72 0.76
Rating factors for grouping of multicore cables laid direct in ground in tier formation:
Rating factors for grouping of single core cable laid in trefoil circuits laid direct in ground in horizontal formation:
Spacing 2 Cables touching 15 cm 30 cm 45 cm 60 cm 0.78 0.81 0.85 0.88 0.90 No. of circuits in group 3 0.68 0.71 0.77 0.81 0.83 4 0.61 0.65 0.72 0.76 0.79 6 0.53 0.58 0.66 0.71 0.76 8 0.48 0.54 0.62 0.67 0.72
Rating factors for depth of laying for Cables laid direct in the ground:
* Voltage Depth of laying 75 90 105 120 150 180 and above Rating factor up to 25 sq. mm. 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.95 Rating factor above 25 sq. mm and 1.1 kV 1.00 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.94 0.93 up to 300 sq. mm Rating factor above 300 sq. mm. 1.00 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.92 0.91
50 70
1.15 1.15
1.08 1.08
1.00 1.00
0.91 0.90
0.84 0.83
0.77 0.76
Rating factors for variation in thermal resistivity of soil, three single core cables laid direct in the ground:
(three cables in trefoil touching) Nominal area of Rating factors for value of Thermal Resistivity of Soil in C cm / Watt conductor in sq. mm 100 120 150 200 250 300 25 35 50 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.74 0.74 0.74
Now let us apply the ampacity criteria for sizing the cable of a motor. The minimum required size as per criteria-1 is already determined in part-1 of this article. No. 1 2 3 4 5 Input Required Rated kW of Load (Here we assume it as 160kW Motor) Motor Data (PF and efficiency, Here we are considering PF of 0.85 and motor efficiency of 95%) Type of Cable to be used (Here we are considering Aluminium, XLPE, 3 core cable) Electrical design ambient temperature (We are considering electrical design ambient temperature of 50C) Laying condition Source of Input Mechanical/Process Load list From Motor Data sheet submitted by manufacturer Project technical specification (For insulation and conductor material) Project technical specification From Electrical cable route layout From reputed cable manufacturers catalog
Rated Load current for 160kW motor = 160 x 1000/ (1.732 x 415 x 0.85 x motor efficiency) Rated load current for motor = 275.66 Ampere Now assuming that cable is laid in open racks in air the applicable ampacity deration factor will be: K = K1 X K2 (K3 and K4 will not be applicable in this case) K1 = 0.89
K2 = 0.70 (assuming 3 Nos. of cable rack with number of cables/rack to be 6 and cables are laid touching each other)
Conclusion:
A motor rated 160kW controlled by air circuit breaker fed from main PCC of fault rating 50kA and connected through Aluminum XLPE cable requires a cable size of 3C x 240 Sq mm minimum because of short circuit rating, however selected size because of continuous current requirement is 3c x 300 Sq mm. The third and final criteria of voltage drop will be discussed in part-3 of this article
Sizing of power cables for circuit breaker controlled feeders (technical article by mr. Asif Eqbal)
Continued from article Sizing of power cables for circuit breaker controlled feeders (part 2)
dV1 is the drop from source (Transformer) to load center (PCC) which should be less than or equal to
3%. Feeder connecting source to load center is also known as primary feeder.
dV2 is the drop from load center (PCC) to individual loads which should be less than 3%.
Feeder connecting load center to individual loads is also known as secondary feeder.
dV2 = dV1 + dV2 is the total drop from source (Transformer) to load which should be less
than or equal to 5%
Even though all the electrical equipments are rated for negative tolerance of 10% in voltage, and system voltage variation allowed is also 10% on negative side than why do we design the cable from source to load for a voltage drop of 5% maximum, what is wrong if the cable is also designed for voltage drop of 10%? Well answer to this lies in the fact that there is a rule of thumb that 2 percent of voltage is lost at terminations and other points like cable joints in a circuit between the power source and the load. Such voltage loss are not indicated and accounted for in cable sizing calculation. The cable sizing calculation only considers the voltage drop in cable conductor from source to load. It is prudent to make certain that the designed voltage drop does not exceed 5% to avoid problems after installation. It is much more costly to remove and replace an existing cable or piece of equipment that is under rated versus the cost of equipment and cables designed with a degree of extra size and avoid problems due to inadequate voltage at the load. The NEC recommends or requires a maximum voltage drop of 5%, but realistically connection impedances, deterioration of terminals due to heat and age, etc; add resistance to the total circuit.
Top
Now let us come back to the original topic that is voltage drop and its calculation. As we already know about the permissible values of voltage drop so let us calculate and derive an expression for the same in terms of impedance of cable, cable length and source voltage. Let us consider a reference phasor as V. Direction of V as X axis and perpendicular to V as Y axis. Approximation OC = OF which is almost equal to OE as EF can be neglected because EF << OF
X component of voltage drop: = Vdx = AE = AD + DE = AD + BG = IRCos + IX Sin (Equation-1) Y Component of voltage drop: = Vdy = CE = CG-EG = CG-BD = IXCos IRSin (Equation-2) X component of VS: VSx = OE = (OC2 CE2)
That is we are neglecting the vertical component of both the inductive drop and resistive drop. So approximating VS-Vdy almost equal to VS the formula in equation-6 will be reduced to formula in equation-7.
Rdc = X L / A
Where: = Resistivity at 20 C L= 1 kM length A = Cross sectional area of conductor. This resistance is DC resistance at 20C. It is converted to DC resistance at 90 C by the following conversion formula:
Rt = R20 (1 + T)
Where: R20 = Resistance at 20 C = Coefficient of linier expansion of Aluminium T = Temperature at which resistance is to be calculated For sizing of cables for AC system the resistance of conductor to be selected should be AC resistance at 90 C and not DC resistance. DC resistance is selected for sizing of cables for DC system like battery, battery charger etc. A conductor offers a greater resistance to a flow of alternating current than it does to direct current. When the term ac resistance of a conductor is used, it means the DC resistance of that conductor plus an increment that reflects the increased apparent resistance in the conductor. This increment is mainly caused by:
Skin effect
This results in a decrease of current density toward the center of a conductor. A longitudinal element of the conductor near the center is surrounded by more magnetic lines of force than is an element near the rim. Thus, the counter-emf is greater in the center of the element. The net driving emf at the center element is thus reduced with consequent reduction of current density. In simple terms the current tends to crowd toward the outer surface.
Proximity Effect
In closely spaced ac conductors, there is a tendency for the current to shift to the portion of the conductor that is away from the other conductors of that cable. This is called proximity effect. The flux linking the conductor current in one conductor is distorted by the current in a nearby conductor which in turn causes a distortion of the cross-sectional current distribution. The above mentioned two factors are for increased resistance is generally expressed as the AC/DC resistance ratio. There are other magnetic effects can also cause an additional increase in
AC/DC resistance ratios. However we are not going to discuss them in this article. ac/dc ratio is determined by skin effect factor and proximity effect factor.
x = 0.027678 f/Rdc
Where: f = frequency in hertz Rdc = conductor DC resistance at operating temperature, in ohms per 1000 feet. The inductance of a multi-conductor cable mainly depends on the thickness of the insulation over the conductor.
Now, in technical articles part-2 and part-1 we had considered the sizing of cable for DOL motor feeder rated at 160kW supplied by 415V. Minimum required area was calculated as 3CX240 Sq mm Al, XLPE, however due to continuous current requirement the cable cross section required was calculated as 3CX300 Sq mm. Now let us check the running and starting voltage drop for the same using exact equation-6 as well as approximated equation-7.
Resistance of conductor of 3CX300 mm Sq Al, XLPE cable = 0.128 Ohms/kM (From manufacturers catalog) Reactance of conductor of 3CX300 mm Sq Al, XLPE cable = 0.071 Ohms/kM (From manufacturers catalog) Cable length = 150Mtr (assumed for this calculation) Running power factor of motor = 0.85 Starting power factor of Motor = 0.3 Starting current of motor = 6 times rated current
Assuming a drop of 1.5% in the cable for incomer feeder, that is from (source) to load center (PCC) which we have not calculated here for sake of simplicity and space limitation. Modifying equation-6 for proper units:
L = length of cable = 150 Mtr N = Number of parallel runs of cable = 1 Substituting the values all the values in the above equation:
Running voltage drop = 2.52% from load center (PCC) to Motor. Total running voltage drop from source to load = dV1 + dV2 = 1.5% + 2.52% = 4.02% which is < 5%. Starting voltage drop = 11.4% from load center (PCC) to Motor. Hence total starting voltage drop from source to load = dV1 + dV2 = 1.5% + 11.4% = 12.9% which is < 15%. As any motor is capable of starting properly if voltage available at its supply terminal is 85 to 80% of rated voltage, hence the selected cable size of single run of 3CX300 Sq mm Aluminum, XLPE insulated conductor is sufficient in all conditions of running and starting for motor rated at 160kW supplied by 415V and situated at 150Mtrs from the load center.
Now we can verify the above obtained result by the approximate formula so that we can analyze the amount of approximation involved in using that formula. Modifying equation-7 for proper units:
Hence we can see that even the approximate formula does give accuracy till one place of decimal and can be used. We can do a small case study by varying the cable length from 50 Mtrs to 150 Mtrs in steps of 15 Mtrs and analyze the difference in voltage drop by the use of two formulas.
Exact Formula Approximate Formula No. Cable Length Running Starting Running 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 50 65 80 95 110 125 140 150 2.35% 2.56% 2.80% 3.10% 3.30% 5.20% 6.35% 7.47% 8.60% 9.70% 2.35% 2.61% 2.86% 3.12% 3.37% 3.63% 3.88% 4.05% Starting 5.18% 6.29% 7.39% 8.50% 9.60% 10.70% 11.81% 12.55%
Hence we can observer that voltage drop only after one place of decimal as obtained by exact formula is on lesser side where as approximate formula till the route length of 100 Mtrs gives voltage drop on higher side. For route length above 100 Mtrs both the formulas almost converge to give same value of running voltage drop. Hence it is advisable to go for exact formula as far as possible however the approximate formula also gives the fairly accurate result. With the completion of third and final criteria of voltage drop we come to the end of sizing of power cables for breaker controlled motor feeders supplied by 415V supply. With this
methodology readers can develop a formulated excel sheet for sizing of power cables for circuit breaker controlled feeders.
References:
1. Electrical power cable engineering, edited by William A Thue, Publishers: MARCELD EKKER INC. NEW YORK 2. IEEE Red book 3. IEEE Grey book 4. IEEE-525 5. IEEE-835 6. Indian standard-1255 (second revision)