Mary M. Gerkovich, PhD, Victoria N. Ojo, MSB, Aaron J. Bonham, MS, Karen B. Williams, PhD, & William E. Lafferty, MD
UMKC School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical & Health Informatics
Introduction
There is increasing focus on using available data to address health issues and contribute to health care improvement. The impact of a locally-relevant health issue may best be understood if it is placed within the context of national data. This can provide a context for interpreting the health status and needs of a local patient population, and provide data important to policy issues at the local level. When the purpose of a project is to provide a comparison between local and national data at the person level, the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) dataset provides an excellent resource. This poster will present two exemplars using MEPS data to support projects that address health issues of importance to a safety-net health care system.
Exemplar 1
Goal Examine the extent to which health system services were disproportionately utilized by patients with increasing number of chronic conditions; and Compare data from a safety-net healthcare system to a nationally representative survey sample Methods Claims data from an urban, safety-net healthcare system (SNHS); records from 2008 MEPS survey; data from 2008 Measures Demographics: age, gender, ethnicity, insurance coverage Chronic Medical Conditions (CMC): asthma, COPD, diabetes, lipid disorder, hypertension, vascular disease, cancer, HIV/AIDS, sickle cell disease, mental illness Healthcare Utilization: outpatient visits, ED visits, hospital stays Results
Occurrence of CMC
100 100
Exemplar 2
Goal Use nationally representative survey dataset to compare cost and health status data of 2 genetically-determined chronic medical conditions cystic fibrosis (CF) and sickle cell disease (SCD) and a healthy population Methods MEPS survey: data from 1996-1997; 2002-2003; 2007-2008 Patients diagnosed with either SCD or CF, and individuals with no diagnoses Measures Demographics: age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, region, education level, insurance coverage Costs: direct (total health service expenditure), indirect (# days of disability or lost work/school) Health status: # of visits to various healthcare providers/sites Results
Summary of Conclusions
Nationally representative data can provide a valuable resource when addressing issues that have an impact on local health services. When doing research that incorporates national data, methods need to address the sampling structure used for the national survey, and creativity may be required to identify the common elements in disparate data sources.
# Diagnosed
90000000 80000000 70000000 60000000 50000000 40000000 40000 30000000 20000000 10000000 0 CF SCD
80 % of CMC Category
80
80000 70000
% of Total
60
60 60000 40 50000
40
20
20
CF
SCD
Claims data were compiled by the Information Technology Division of Truman Medical Centers. MEPS data made available by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; 2008 Household Survey. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2008. [http:// meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/index.jsp] For further information, please contact Mary Gerkovich: gerkovichm@umkc.edu
% of CMC Category
80 % of CMC Category
80
10000
5000
60
60
8000
4000
40
40
6000
3000
20
20
4000
2000
2000
1000
0 CF SCD
0 CF SCD