D. Brandolisio, J. Symynck, F. De Bal Department of Mechanical Engineering Laboratory of Material Testing KaHo Sint-Lieven University College, Gent Association KULeuven
2 - High cycle fatigue testing for SME (Small and Medium Enterprises) HC testing
SH (ServoHydraulic) EM (ElectroMechanical)
OK SLOW
BUT
solution:
EM + rotation
M y = y J
d y max = 2
d4 J= 64
In the paper: comparison different methods for fatigue testing - cantilever bending (two-points)
- four-points bending
weakest point (failure initiation) - RB all external section - other B tests only extreme points always may or may not
RB test
Advantages of RB test: more accuracy less scatter in results less specimens for test Disadvantages in RB test: only axialsymmetrical specimens difficulty in non-zero mean stress
10
constant moment
triangular moment
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Effect of compressive underloads and tensile overloads on fatigue damage accumulation in SAE 1045 Steel
20
idea: - application of variable and controlled load - automatic variation - dynamic switching
21
Project's choices
Zwick-Roell Z020 electromechanical actuator for loading - adjustable - controlled ( testXpert II)
22
4 points RB test - constant moment inside the specimen - easier specimen's realisation
23
24
25
26
3D Models
27
section view
28
30
31
Control scheme
32
Conclusions - RB valid test for fatigue behaviour - reliable - simple this project - support for SME - study and research possibility
33