Jri
Presidente: Orientador: Professor Doutor Joo Manuel Lage de Miranda Lemos Professor Doutor Nuno Manuel Mendes Maia
CoOrientador: Professor Doutor Fernando Jos Parracho Lau Vogais: Professor Doutor Filipe Szolnoky Ramos Pinto Cunha Professor Doutor Miguel Antnio Lopes de Matos Neves
Outubro 2011
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was the result of intense work developed in the last 6 months. The effort was turned much lighter with the cooperation carried out with my college Rafael Carvalho and the PhD student Yoann Lage, who are developing projects in this subject, and have supplied me with valuable information relevant to the content of this work. I must also leave here a word of gratitude to Professor Miguel Neves for his support and revision of the numeric methods employed during the course of this work. My thanks should also be addressed to my advisers Professor Nuno Maia and Professor Fernando Lau. The first for is revision and support in the area of the vibration theory and the second also for having reviewed this work and for his advices concerning the Propfan engine casestudy. Finally I must thank my family to whom I owe it all.
RESUMO
O estudo da dinmica de rotors essencial para a compreenso de componentes to determinantes em engenharia como bombas, compressores, turbinas e geradores. No mbito da engenharia aeronutica, a dinmica de rotors encontra ampla aplicao no contexto dos motores das aeronaves. Um dos presentes desafios nesta rea prendese com a identificao das foras que actuam em sistemas rotativos, i.e. a capacidade de caracterizar a nvel de localizao, amplitude e forma as foras que actuam em determinado ponto de uma estrutura rotativa, tendo como nica fonte as medies da sua resposta. Existem actualmente vrios mtodos disponveis na literatura que propem solues para o problema em rotors e que apresentam vrios algoritmos de identificao de foras que demonstraram bons resultados em estruturas no rotativas (e.g. vigas). So exemplos disso trs mtodos de identificao de foras no domnio do tempo designados por SWAT, ISF e DMISF. A identificao no domnio do tempo tem a vantagem de permitir a obteno quase em tempo real da amplitude e evoluo das foras que actuam sobre uma dada estrutura. Este projecto de dissertao de Mestrado apresenta a proposta de uma aplicao nmerica destas novas metodologias de identificao no domnio do tempo em rotors simples e finalmente num exemplo de aplicao aeronutica: o motor Propfan desenvolvido no mbito do projecto europeu DUPRIN.
Palavraschave:
Dinmica de Rotors, Identificao de Foras, Domnio do Tempo, Propfan, SWAT, ISF, DMISF
ii
ABSTRACT
The study of Rotordynamics is essential to understand the behavior of determinant components in Engineering such as pumps, compressors, turbines and generators. In the field of aeronautics, Rotordynamics finds wide application in the context of aircraft engines. One of the actual challenges in this area is related with the identification of the forces acting in rotary systems, i.e. the ability to characterize the forces acting in a specific point of the rotating structure in what concerns its application point, amplitude and shape, using solely the measurements taken from its response. Today there are various available methods in literature that propose solutions to the problem in rotors and that present various force identification algorithms that have shown good results in nonrotating structures (e.g. beams). Examples are three timedomain force identifications methods dubbed SWAT, ISF and DMISF. The timedomain identifications has the advantage of allowing the determination of the amplitude and evolution of the forces acting in a given structure almost in realtime. This Master thesis project presents the proposal of a numeric application of these new timedomain identification methodologies to simple rotating systems and finally to a specific casestudy of aeronautics: the Propfan engine developed in the scope of the European project DUPRIN.
Keywords:
Rotordynamics, Force Identification, Timedomain, Propfan, SWAT, ISF, DMISF
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................. vi LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. viii NOMENCLATURE .................................................................................................................................. ix 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 1.2 Addressed Problem and Intended Goals ................................................................................ 1 Brief Scientific Publications Review ........................................................................................ 1 Rotordynamics Theory ........................................................................................................ 1 The Force Reconstruction and Identification Problems....................................................... 3
1.2.1 1.2.2 2
FUNDAMENTALS ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Rotordynamics Fundamentals ................................................................................................. 6 Rotor Parts Fundamentals ................................................................................................... 7 RayleighRitz Analytical Solution Application to a Multirotor Model ............................... 12 Rotordynamics Analysis Application to the Multirotor Model ......................................... 16 Rotordynamics Modal Orbits and Sense of the Whirl........................................................ 20
Force Reconstruction Fundamentals .................................................................................... 22 FD Frequency Domain Force Reconstruction ................................................................ 22 SWAT Sum of Weighted Accelerations Technique ........................................................ 26 StateSpace Fundamentals ............................................................................................... 27 ISF Inverse Structural Filter ............................................................................................ 31 DMISF Delayed Multistep Structural Filter .................................................................... 34
NUMERICAL METHODS .............................................................................................................. 36 3.1 Numerical Aspects of the Rotordynamics Finite Elements ................................................... 36 The displacement vector ................................................................................................... 36 The finite elements of the rotor parts ................................................................................. 36 Solution of the Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem .............................................................. 40
Numerical Aspects of the Force Reconstruction Methods .................................................... 42 Structural Response Extraction ......................................................................................... 42 Frequency Domain Method ............................................................................................... 43 SWAT ................................................................................................................................ 43 ISF ..................................................................................................................................... 44 iv
3.2.5 3.3 4
DMISF ................................................................................................................................ 45
APPLICATIONS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................................ 48 4.1 Rotordynamics Analysis ........................................................................................................ 48 The Finite Element Model .................................................................................................. 49 Validation of the Finite Element Model .............................................................................. 49 Numerical Data .................................................................................................................. 50 Results and Results Discussion ........................................................................................ 51
Force Reconstruction ............................................................................................................ 63 Application to a Beam ........................................................................................................ 63 Application to a Symmetric Rotor ...................................................................................... 68
The Propfan Case Study ....................................................................................................... 73 Modal Analysis................................................................................................................... 74 Reconstruction of a Force Caused by an Unbalance in the Fan ....................................... 79
4.3.1 4.3.2 5
CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS................................................................... 82 5.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 82 Rotordynamics Analysis .................................................................................................... 82 Force Reconstruction Methods .......................................................................................... 82 The Propfan Case Study ................................................................................................... 82
REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................... 84 APPENDIXES ........................................................................................................................................ 86 Appendix 1 Determination of the Whirl Sense of an Asymmetric Multirotor ...................................... 86 Appendix 2 Energy Dissipation and SelfExcited Vibrations (Instability) ........................................... 88 Appendix 3 Deviation Between Finite Elements and RayleighRitz Results ...................................... 95 Appendix 4 Deviation Between the Natural Frequencies Obtained via Direct Method and the Pseudomodal Method .......................................................................................................................... 96 Appendix 5 Used Beam Elements Matrices ...................................................................................... 98 Appendix 6 Brief Fundaments About Rotor Transient Motion ............................................................ 99
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1 Amplitude evolution with time on an unstable structural system subject to an initial disturbance source: (7) ......................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2.2 The disk and its reference frames source: (4) ................................................................. 8 Figure 2.3 The crosssection of the shaft source: (4) ........................................................................ 9 Figure 2.4 The bearing model source: (4) ....................................................................................... 10 Figure 2.5 Rotating mass with offset length source: (4) .................................................................. 11 Figure 2.6 The Multirotor model ......................................................................................................... 12 Figure 2.7 Inertial reference frame coordinates source: (4) ............................................................ 13 Figure 2.8 Campbell Diagram example source: (4) ........................................................................ 17 Figure 2.9 Response diagram example source: (4) ........................................................................ 19 Figure 2.10 Possible orbits of a rotors shaft ...................................................................................... 20 Figure 2.11 Generic elliptical orbit with displacement vector ..................................................... 21 Figure 2.12 Position of a mass unbalance (in bold) in a disk performing Forward and Backward Whirl ............................................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 2.13 Illustration of a decomposition of a timedomain spectrum source: (7) ....................... 25 Figure 3.1 Shaft finite element source: (4) ...................................................................................... 37 Figure 3.2 Force components due to the presence of a mass unbalance in the disk of the rotor. .... 46 Figure 4.1 The Multirotor model ......................................................................................................... 48 Figure 4.2 Campbell Diagram convergence the brackets above represent: (number of elements in the inner shaft/number of elements in the outer shaft) .......................................................................... 50 Figure 4.3 Campbell diagram Symmetric rotor Example 1 ............................................................. 51 Figure 4.4 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3) .............................. 52 Figure 4.5 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3) .............................. 53 Figure 4.6 Campbell diagram Symmetric rotor Example 2 ............................................................. 54 Figure 4.7 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3) .............................. 55 Figure 4.8 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3) .............................. 56 Figure 4.9 Campbell diagram Symmetric Multirotor Example 3 ...................................................... 56 Figure 4.10 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3) ............................ 57 Figure 4.11 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3) ............................ 58 Figure 4.12 Campbell diagram Asymmetric Multirotor .................................................................... 59 Figure 4.13 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3) ............................ 60 Figure 4.14 Campbell Diagram Damped Multirotor Example 1....................................................... 61 Figure 4.15 Results make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3) .................................................. 61 Figure 4.16 Campbell Diagram Damped Multirotor Example 2....................................................... 62 Figure 4.17 Results make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3) .................................................. 63 Figure 4.18 Beam Model with Force Impulse position represented by vector F ................................ 64 Figure 4.19 Finite Element Model of the Beam .................................................................................. 64 Figure 4.20 SWAT applied to the beam ............................................................................................. 66
vi
Figure 4.21 ISF applied to the beam .................................................................................................. 67 Figure 4.22 DMISF applied to the beam ............................................................................................ 68 Figure 4.23 The Symmetric rotor model ............................................................................................. 68 Figure 4.24 Finite element model with the element numbers in black and the nodal numbers in blue ............................................................................................................................................................... 69 Figure 4.25 Error vs Force Combination Graphic .............................................................................. 71 Figure 4.26 SWAT applied to the Monorotor ...................................................................................... 72 Figure 4.27 ISF applied to the Monorotor ........................................................................................... 72 Figure 4.28 DMISF applied to the Monorotor ..................................................................................... 73 Figure 4.29 The DUPRIN Propfan in its test facility source: (6) ...................................................... 74 Figure 4.30 The Propfan revolution section ....................................................................................... 75 Figure 4.31 The Propfan finite element model ................................................................................... 76 Figure 4.32 Propfan Campbell diagram comparison .......................................................................... 77 Figure 4.33 First two modal shapes of the Propfan; Authors model above/Model in (6) below; FW (Left) and BW(Right) .............................................................................................................................. 78 Figure 4.34 ISF applied to an accelerating Propfan ........................................................................... 80 Figure A.1 Whirl sense and orbit phase with Figure A.2 Whirl sense and orbit phase with .............................................................. 87 .............................................................. 88
Figure A.3 Generic periodic orbit of a rotor relative to a inertial reference frame source: (7)  edited ............................................................................................................................................................... 90 Figure A.4 Force components of the various matrices decomposed on its symmetric and skewsymmetric terms source: (7) ............................................................................................................... 92 Figure A.5 First bending mode shape of the Multirotor ...................................................................... 96 Figure A.6 .............................................................................................................................................. 97 Figure A.7 .............................................................................................................................................. 97 Figure A.8 Beam Element and its Degrees of Freedom .................................................................... 98
vii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1 Critical speeds of each mesh and the correspondent errors computed using the FE solution as reference ............................................................................................................................. 50 Table 4.2 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram RR/FE error ............... 51 Table 4.3 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram RR/FE error ............... 55 Table 4.4 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram RR/FE error ............... 57 Table 4.5 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram RR/FE error ............... 59 Table 4.6 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram ....................................... 61 Table 4.7 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram ....................................... 62 Table 4.8 Assembly between global and local dofs of the Beam mesh ............................................. 65 Table 4.9 Numeric data of the beam .................................................................................................. 65 Table 4.10 Transient analysis and force impulse data ....................................................................... 66 Table 4.11 Assembly between global and local dofs of the Monorotor mesh .................................... 69 Table 4.12 Numeric data of the Monorotor ......................................................................................... 70 Table 4.13 Relevant data for the frequency domain force identification method ............................... 70 Table 4.14 Relevant data for the time domain force identification methods ...................................... 70 Table 4.15 List of the known and unknown nodes ............................................................................. 70 Table 4.16 Numeric data of the Propfan ............................................................................................ 76 Table 4.17 Error computed relative to the values obtained with the authors finite element model ... 77 Table 4.18 Transient analysis and mass unbalance data .................................................................. 80 Table A.1 source: (7)  edited ............................................................................................................. 94 Table A.2 Nodal displacements .......................................................................................................... 96 Table A.3 ............................................................................................................................................... 98
viii
NOMENCLATURE
Greek Letters
Modal damping Generic constant Eigenvectors of the finite element system Nodal displacement vector Virtual work Virtual work performed by external forces Virtual displacement along Error vector Modal damping ratio Modal displacements vector Euler angles and directions
Rate of nutation, rate of precession and rate of spin Modal eigenvalue Poisson ratio Constant pi Density Mode shapes matrix Mode shape vector Modal vector Constant rotating speed Angular frequency Angular speed components along and directions
Latin Letters
Crosssectional area of the beam element Residue matrix Discrete time statespace system matrices Continuous time statespace system matrices
ix
Gyroscopic term Acceleration vector Shear effect correction factor Rigid body acceleration Damping matrix of the system Damping matrix of the elastic bearing Damping matrix component at the i line and j column Distance between the mass unbalance position and the center of the shaft Young modulus Net energypercycle exchange Force vector Axial force acting on the shaft Force application point(s) selector Force vector along the i generalized coordinates Force component along the and directions
th th th
Shape function, first derivative of the shape function, second derivative of the shape function Shear modulus Receptance matrix Height of the beam crosssection RouthHurwitz matrix i Markov parameter
th th
i Markov parameter of the inverse system Area moment of inertial of the shaft crosssection about its neutral axis Identity matrix Inertia of the disk about its principal axis Generic constant Imaginary unit Stiffness matrix of the system Stiffness matrix of the elastic bearing Stiffness matrix of the shaft Disk stiffness correction matrix due to transient motion Stiffness matrix due to the application of an axial force on the shaft Shaft stiffness correction matrix due to transient motion
Stiffness of the system Sample number of the discrete statespace system Stiffness matrix component at the i line and j column Length Partial length of the shaft lead of the ISF Mass matrix of the system Mass of the disk Mass matrix of the shaft Mass of the system Mass unbalance Shape function Number of force inputs Number of measured degreesoffreedom Outer/inner shaft rotating speed ratio Number of degreesoffreedom Number of inputs Number of outputs Amplitude of the vibrations along the generalized coordinate Principal coordinate displacement amplitude Principal coordinate displacement vector DMISF Delay i generalized coordinate
th th th th
i generalized coordinate derivative Radius Roots of the characteristic equation Crosssectional area of the shaft Generic matrix Kinetic energy of the system Transmissibility matrix Kinetic energy of the disk Kinetic energy of the shaft Sampling time Kinetic energy of the mass unbalance Time
xi
Time at the k sample Strain energy of the system Strain energy of the shaft Input vector
th
Input vector derivative Stacking input vector Displacements along the State vector and directions
Output vector second derivative Stacking output vector Weighting matrix Wide of the beam crosssection Dynamic stiffness matrix
Abbreviations
BW DMISF Dof(s) DUPRIN FE FW ISF RB RR Synch SWAT
Backward whirl Delayed multistep inverse structural filter Degree(s)offreedom Ducted Propfan Investigation Finite elements Forward whirl Inverse structural filter Rigid Body RayleighRitz Synchronous Sum of weighted accelerations technique
xii
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Addressed Problem and Intended Goals
There are various applications on engineering, where rotors and rotating parts are of vital importance. They play a determinant role on pumps, compressors, turbines, generators not to mention other components. Due to its intrinsic dynamic state, vibration is especially relevant in this kind of machines. Interaction between the rotating motion and the applied forces on the structure causes some operation points to present intolerable vibration levels. Though the dynamic behavior of these machines is rather complex, is nowadays considered well documented and understood. As in any engineering applications, reliable and efficient operation is intended on the machines with such components, and to achieve this, practical diagnosis methods are needed to record and display accurately the performance that is actually being obtained, so that further improvements can be implemented. A method of achieving a realtime depiction of the forces acting on a rotor is a valuable tool for such a task, in what concerns the rotor structural performance enhancement. This work intends to provide firstly a revision of the literature regarding the subject of Rotordynamics (Chapter 2.1) and of timedomain force identification methodology (Chapter 2.2). Afterwards, a computational code developed by the author, make use of the implementation of several force identification methods both in time and frequency domains, will be presented (Chapter 3.2). The initial task of this code is to reproduce some of the examples presented in the literature, where only nonrotating structures such as beams were found (Chapter 4.2.1). Finally the code will be applied to the identification of forces in a simple rotor model (Chapter 4.2.2), and to a particular aeronautical application of a Propfan engine (Chapter 4.3).
Since the Jeffcott publication was the first most spread work on this subject, a rotor model consisting of one disk on a constant circular crosssection shaft, and with two rigid bearings at each shaft end is called a Jeffcott rotor, although (as it will be seen later) in this work one has opted to include such rotors under the designation Monorotor. Soon, the scientists and engineers who have dedicated their work to the study of the dynamics of this kind of structures, noted that the dynamics of a rotor is rather complex when we compare it for instance to a springmass system. Since then Rotordynamics has been densely studied and nowadays there are much broader applications in various rotor models of higher complexity than the FpplJeffcott rotor, and there is a more comprehensive knowledge of the dynamics involved. The complexity of this dynamics can be confusing for those who venture for the first time in the subject. Fortunately Dr. Frederick Nelson has turned it much easier with his Rotor Dynamics without Equations [1]. This work by putting the focus more on the physics of the problem than in math, becomes in my opinion an excellent introduction on the subject, and was important to clarify various complex concepts, that were introduced in the course of this work. One of the researchers who have devoted their work to the understanding of Rotordynamics was D. J. Ewins. He has published recently an article where a very good review of the dynamic problems associated with the turbomachinery of aircraft engines is included [2]. This article doesnt limit itself to the study of instability phenomena caused by the intrinsic structural nature of the rotor, rather it includes a review on instability phenomena caused by the structureaerodynamic interaction. Another application example of Rotordynamics is presented in the work of J. J. Sinou et al. [3]. It includes a numeric prediction and an experimental validation of the nonlinear dynamic behavior of a Turbofan engine. To gain physical intuition of this subject Nelsons article is a good start, but to have a more consistent work model to take proper engineering decisions, numeric methods are necessary. Maurice Lalanne and Guy Ferraris have made this with their Rotordynamics Prediction in Engineering [4]. Their models and their numerical approaches were broadly used in the chapters of this work dedicated to Rotordynamics analysis. Their work starts by defining the most common rotor models with the help of the RayleighRitz method. Methods for the computation of the natural frequencies and of the critical operation points are presented for each example. This work includes additionally numeric predictions of the rotor response due to the action of various load configurations present in typical rotor operation. Moreover the orbits described by the rotor in its vibration modes are also depicted for each example, including as well a study about how these orbits change with changing bearing properties. Everything is complemented with the application of the finite element method to the rotor examples. The book offers ultimately an application of these concepts to real casestudies where rotors are used. In particular a Propfan engine developed in the scope of an European research project was analyzed on the light of the concepts that were presented in the initial chapters of the work. The studied Propfan engine will be reused on this work, not only to reproduce the associated finite element model and resulting diagrams, but also to apply some new concepts of force reconstruction in the diagnose of a common situation in jet engines: mass unbalance on the disks.
To achieve such a degree of understanding about the Propfan engine, a proper revision on the matter was made. A short history about the Propfan research project can be found in [5]. Additional data was also found in the paper by Lalanne and Ferraris [6], where the followed models, as well as the resultant solutions for the Propfan engine are condensed. Also in Guy and Lalannes book, methods for unstable o peration prediction are presented, namely the RouthHurwitz method [4]. A more comprehensive and well documented work by Maurice Adams [7], Rotating Machinery Vibration, has also been a source of information for this thesis. It was valuable mainly because it offers additional and more complete information about rotor selfexcitation behavior, than the work of Lalanne and Ferraris. On the topic of dynamic analysis, this book has detailed many specific parameters that have influence in the dynamics of rotors, so that more realityaccurate rotor models could be programmed. They are also much more incisive in the modeling of the various bearing characteristics, such as shaft/bearing misalignment, bearing type, and influence of lubrication. It even contains correction factors used to predict fluidstructural interaction in turbo machines. It is also much more detailed in several particularities of the numerical implementation of Rotordynamics, namely in what concerns result tolerances and typical numeric errors. The book has also a dense review on the data acquisition and usual experimental procedures in the context of rotor vibration analysis and monitoring. The book ends with a series of interesting case studies where all the above mentioned aspects are applied into real rotating machinery. In what concerns Rotordynamics publication in Portuguese language, an academic book, with many examples of application of Lalanne and Ferraris models was found [8]. This book was of great importance due to the relevancy and quantity of its examples to understand the influence of the bearing properties on the whirl motion and sense, and on the instability thresholds determination of the rotors. Despite they werent use on this work, two publications about the determination of the bearing properties from experimental measures [9] and finite element method solutions [10] were referred. Their connection to Rotordynamics and force reconstruction justifies the relevancy of this inclusion. 1.2.2 The Force Reconstruction and Identification Problems In this work force identification is defined as being the capability to locate and determine the time/frequency history of a force acting in a specific point of the structure, using as input the response data of the considered structure. When the application point of the force is assumed to be known and one is only interested in determining its time/frequency history from the measurement of the structure response, then it is considered that the force is being reconstructed. The concept of force identification based on the measurement of the structure response has been one of the widest studied subjects in Mechanical Engineering, due to a myriad of reasons. Some of them are related mainly with the fact that the use of force transducers sometimes is not practical in complex system applications, and/or the dynamic loads of the considered system are too complex in number, distribution and behavior in order to be accurately predictable. Moreover the determination of the loads of a mechanic system is of unquestionable interest as an efficiency augmentation and diagnostic tool. 3
Efforts in the last few decades are being made in the sense of achieving a practical method capable of solving in a satisfactory way the inverse problem of dynamic systems [11]. The concept of inverse problem is very simple, it is just based on the inversion of the conventional determination of response from given loadings method (dubbed the forward or direct problem). The problem is, that response is not always easy to characterize nor the accuracy of the system data is sufficient to obtain a satisfactory result. In fact the inverse problem is more sensitive to inaccuracies in the models data than the direct problem [12]. The Frequency Domain method (FD) is, at the present time, one of the most known techniques in the force identification field. Hundhausens work contains a very good review in the subject [13]. It makes use of the measured response in several points of the system and of the frequency response function to compute an estimation of the applied forces. A recent submitted article developed by the IDMEC Mechanic Engineering department in Instituto Superior Tcnico, extends this method to the localization of loads in a structure [14], [15] making use of the transmissibility concept, based on the works of Maia et al [16] [17]. This will be used in this work in a practical example applied to Rotordynamics. Despite the fact of obtaining good results in many cases, the FD method is not suitable for realtime force estimation on structural systems. In fact, when there is only relatively short duration data available the FD method renders inaccurate results. Furthermore in several applications a representation of the force evolution over time is pretended. The force identification in time domain has been less studied as its frequency domain equivalent, but that is beginning to change, and there is already a broad number of published works on the subject. The inverse problem is posed differently in the time than in the frequency domain case. This means that the faced challenges come from other sources previously unknown that require solution, but it can also lead to more robust and accurate force identification if these difficulties are overcame. The sum of the weighted accelerations technique (SWAT) is one of the time domain methods present in the literature. It was first presented by Carne et al. [18], despite the fact it was first developed previously by Priddy and Smallwood [19]. This method makes use of modal filtering to estimate the applied forces on the structure. Firstly a set of multiple measures of the structure response is obtained and then the resultant rigid body modal accelerations (the accelerations on the center of gravity of the structure) are isolated through the application of a weighting matrix. If the inertial properties of the structure are known the resultant forces or moments corresponding to the translations or rotations defined by the isolated rigid body mode of the structure are determined. This method pose several difficulties for force identification, although reconstruction is possible, one can only determine the resultant inputs in the center of gravity of the structure, so in many applications is impossible to deduce the application point of the forces. Additionally, there are limitations related with the modal filtering process. This procedure requires that the used sensors are well placed and in sufficient number in order to separate the response due to rigid body modes of that related to flexible modes of the considered structure. Since a structure has an infinite number of modes, one will always obtain an approximate solution, being the frequency band at which the rigid body modes can be isolated wider, as the sensor set increases.
An extension to the SWAT method that allows the simultaneous determination of multiple forces acting on a structure has been developed by Genaro and Rade [20]. This was not whatsoever included in this work. Other technique present in the literature is based on the inversion of the equations of motion of the system. Kammer and Steltzner [21] have presented a method that uses this principle, named the inverse structural filter (ISF). In this method the discrete time equations of motion are inverted, this approach is more advantageous than the one that involves the inversion of the continuous time equations of motion, since it avoids the integration and differentiation of the measured responses. However, the signal processing should be the aim of extra careful handling. The authors begin by representing the direct problem in the discrete statespace form, and propose a possible way of representing the inverse system also in the discrete statespace form. The original formulation of the ISF uses the measured responses to reconstruct the force input in the same time instant. This procedure has therefore a causal relationship. In both the discrete and the continuous cases, the inverse system is contaminated with unstable poles that yield to erroneous solutions of the estimated forces. So, besides this algorithm, Steltzner and Kammer [21] presented an approach that creates a stable ISF directly from the measured responses to reconstruct the force input. They also introduce the concept of non causal lead, this means that the force input is reconstructed using responses from future time instants. This approach has shown good results in the sense that better ISF stability is achieved, but the force reconstruction become now only close to realtime determinable. Recently Allen and Carne [12] presented an extension to the ISF that makes use of the noncausal concept. The delayed multistep inverse structural filter (DMISF) pretends to improve the statespace representation of the original formulation of the ISF, using multiple time future response samples to reconstruct the current force input and has shown a good performance in augmenting the stability of the solution. In this work Allen and Carne used a statespace model built only from modal parameters, which makes force reconstruction application to experimental cases much easier. Other method to determine the statespace matrices from the typical mass, damping and stiffness matrices is presented in the work of Unger and De Roeck [22]. At the time this was written no direct application of the ISF method to rotating systems was found. The works found were either applied to simple springmass systems, beams, or other more complex situations, such as the simulation of the docking process of the Space Shuttle in the MIR space station [21]. Despite of this, there are already some publications on the subject of Rotordynamics force identification. Zutavern and Childs have developed a force identification algorithm using magnetic bearings [23], in its turn Verhoeven has published a work in this field making use of analytical synthetized transfer functions [24]. Spirig and Staubli [25] have presented a method that determines the forces acting in the rotors seals integrating the cir cumferential pressure distribution measured in the seal coordinate. In this work it is only performed the application of the FD, SWAT, ISF and DMISF methods to Rotordynamics examples.
2 FUNDAMENTALS
2.1 Rotordynamics Fundamentals
On this chapter, the basic notions and topics related with Rotordynamics will be presented. Before addressing some physical particularities of this kind of structures a study model will be deduced. Based on this model, several typical Rotordynamics analysis options are explored, whose obtained results are relevant for describing objectively the lateral dynamic behavior of rotors, completing therefore, a comprehensive understanding to the reader who intends a basic introduction on this topic. The effects caused by the action of a torsional moment applied on the shaft on its bending behavior will not be considered. Rotary systems such as rotors are constituted by several elementary parts that will be further analyzed in the following section. These elementary parts are: the disk, the shaft and the bearing. A common source of rotor excitation is resultant from an unbalance present on the rotor. A simple way of including the effect of this excitation will be presented. The elements that support the shaft of the rotor are the bearings. The bearings can be classified into rigid or elastic. Rigid bearings are an engineering artifice that constrains any transversal displacements of the shaft on the supporting point. In practice this is equivalent to a high stiffness bearing. Outside this range of assumption, the bearing is considered elastic and is characterized by finite stiffness properties and, if adequate, by damping properties. Rotors have different designations depending on the characteristics of their bearings. If the rotors bearings have symmetric stiffness properties it is called symmetric rotor, otherwise it would be dubbed asymmetric rotor. If damping is added to the bearings of the rotor, it is designated as damped rotor, whether its stiffness properties are symmetric or asymmetric. Many machines in engineering, like jet engines, make use of two or more coaxial shafts use to transmit power between a high or low pressure turbine and a compressor or fan. This systems characterized by two or more coaxial shafts are known as Multirotors. Rotors with only one shaft are dubbed Monorotors. Multirotors and Monorotors can have more than one disk in each shaft, what really distinguishes one from the other is the number of shafts composing the rotary system. As it will be explained later in depth on this chapter, while it rotates the rotor undergoes two basic lateral vibratory phenomena that act simultaneously and determine the rotors vibration modes: shaft bending and precessional whirling. The first, similarly to a beam, cause a lateral displacement of the shaft sections relative to its reference state and results from the transversal loads applied to the shaft, e.g. that caused by an unbalance on the rotors disk . The precessional whirling comes from the fact that besides bending the shaft is also rotating, in fact, as the bended shaft rotates it describes orbits around its initial reference state. The sense of this orbital motion depends on the sense of the impact acting on the shaft. It is called Forward Whirl (FW) if the impact acts on the sense of the shaft rotation or Backward Whirl (BW) if the impact acts on opposite sense to the rotation of the shaft. To determine the parameters that influence the shape and frequency of the rotors vibration modes will also be an aim of this chapter.
The subject of selfexcited vibrations will be treated in Appendix 2 to this work, since it is a secondary aspect to this Thesis. Selfexcited vibration is an unstable state of a structural system and is responsible for severe machine damage due to the high vibratory levels that characterize this state. Figure 2.1 shows the evolution of the amplitude of vibration of an unstable structural system subjected to an initial disturbance.
Figure 2.1 Amplitude evolution with time on an unstable structural system subject to an initial disturbance
source: [7]
The ever growing amplitude of an unstable system raises the vibratory levels to intolerable values. In the context of rotor lateral vibration, Crandall in 1983 [7], has shown that instability is caused by dynamic forces which are perpendicular to the instantaneous radial displacement vector of the rotors orbit. These aspects will be fully characterized and described on Appendix 2, and the nonconservative nature of these destabilizing forces will also be referred. Finally, also in this appendix, a method of predicting the stable boundaries in terms of the rotor rotating speed will be deduced. Let us now proceed with the presentation of each of the elementary parts that constitute rotors.
2.1.1
Rotor Parts Fundamentals The rotor model that will be used in this work is constituted by some few basic parts. These
are: the disk, the shaft, the bearings and seals, and the mass unbalance, always present in machines with rotors. To obtain the rotor model, the equation of Lagrange will be used in the form [4]:
(
the generalized loads acting on it.
Thus the disk, shaft and mass unbalance kinetic energy strain energy
In the subsequent pages is presented the detailed depiction of each rotor component and the computation of the energies associated with each of them.
1. The Disk The disk is considered rigid. This implies, since no strain energy is definable, that kinetic energy is the only energy characterizing this component.
Figure 2.2 The disk and its reference frames source: [4]
Considering the disk represented in Figure 2.2, the angular speed vector [ defined about its center of mass in the reference frame fixed to the disk, is as follows:
where and rate of spin and rate of precession respectively.
(2.1.1.2)
are the Euler angles and are its first time derivatives, dubbed rate of nutation,
Moreover, designating the displacements of the disks center of mass along the directions and of the inertial reference frame respectively by and , the kinetic energy expression for the disk
results:
(
is the disks mass, and , ,
(2.1.1.3) .
, represent the disks inertia about its principal axis very small and constant rate of spin
The expression (2.1.1.3) can be simplified, noting that achieved considering the angles and
[ ] [
] [
( )
( )
( ) )
Giving the following expression for the kinetic energy of the disk:
(
where, the last term
)
(2.1.1.4)
2. The Shaft The shaft will be considered as a flexible beam with circular uniform crosssection, thus it is characterized both by kinetic and strain energies. In the Figure 2.3, the shaft cross section is shown along with two reference frames, the inertial ones with displacements and along the and axis, and the rotating reference frame solidary with the shafts cross section center, characterized by the displacements and along the and axis.
The kinetic energy for such a shaft can be described exactly by the same course of reasoning followed for the disk, with the slightly difference this time, that it should be applied to an element of length of constant crosssection. The kinetic energy expression for the shaft is:
(
Here
(2.1.1.5)
to be constant, and is the area moment of inertial of the shaft crosssection about its neutral axis,
which is once more considered as constant. As to the physical meaning of the terms of the equation (2.1.1.5), it can be said that the second one is the secondary effect of rotary inertia, coherent with Timoshenko beam theory, and the last term represents the gyroscopic effect. Considering the strain caused by the rotation of the shaft, and the strain caused by a constant axial force applied in the shafts ends, and if additionally the shaft is considered elastic, i.e. it is of the symmetric shaft: inside the scope of validity of the Hooks Law, it results for the strain energy [4]
[(
) ]
[( )
) ]
(2.1.1.6)
The first term in the expression (2.1.1.6) accounts for the strain energy resultant from the longitudinal deformation of the spinning shaft. This longitudinal strain due to rotation of the points inside the constant crosssection of the shaft is considered approximately linear, since the displacements are small and the crosssection has symmetry relative to the rotating reference frame. The longitudinal strain caused by the presence of an axial force has only nonlinear terms and the associated strain energy is included in the second term of the equation (2.1.1.6). Constant, Youngs Modulus of the shafts material. is the
3. Bearings and Seals On this work the elastic stiffness and viscous damping properties of the bearings will be assumed as known. Notwithstanding this fact, there are several methods to estimate the bearings characteristics of rotors based both in its finite element model [10] as well as in direct measurements in a test stand [9]. Besides that, the shaft bending influence will be neglected.
The bearings will be modeled as represented in the Figure 2.4, the next step is to write the virtual work of the forces acting in the springs and dampers constituting them, in order to relate the components and of the force with the bearings characteristics.
10
(2.1.1.7) The virtual work done by the forces acting on the springs and dampers of the bearing can be written as:
(2.1.1.8) Joining (2.1.1.7) and (2.1.1.8) together and writing the resultant expression in matricial form, give us after elimination of the virtual displacements:
][ ]
][ ]
(2.1.1.9)
4. The mass unbalance The mass unbalance will be modeled as a punctual mass from the center of the shaft. situated at a given distance
With the help of Figure 2.5 let us define first the displacement vector reference frame :
, in the inertial

where is considered as constant. Knowing the displacement vector the speed
(2.1.1.10)
11
(2.1.1.11)
mass and thus can be neglected, the kinetic energy of the punctual mass yields:
(2.1.1.12)
2.1.2
RayleighRitz Analytical Solution Application to a Multirotor Model Now that each rotor component has been presented along with its energy equations, the
RayleighRitz method will be applied to obtain the shape functions of the lateral vibration of rotors. To achieve this, a birotor, i.e. a Multirotor configuration with two coaxial shafts, is employed in order to obtain a general formulation of the dynamics behavior of Multirotors. In this model, only the inner shaft is considered as flexible while the outer is considered as rigid. The studied model is shown in the Figure 2.6.
The Multirotor inner shaft is supported in two rigid supports, denominated A and D, while the outer coaxial spool, is rigidly supported in B. The displacements in C are the same in the inner and outer shafts. An external elastic support is also placed on this location. Before applying the expressions obtained in the last section in the Lagrange equation, it is necessary to write the displacements and of the rotor in terms of a shape function ( ) , that
describes properly the lateral vibration behavior of the rotor. On this work the employed shape function will be equal to the one of the first mode of vibration of a beam, and that is:
( )
In which is the rotors length. For the first rotor, which is the inner one it results:
(2.1.2.1)
12
( (
Where and
) )
( ) ( )
and
and coincides with the definition in the equation (2.1.2.1). If the angular displacements small, the following relations are valid: ( ) and of the first rotor, shown in Figure 2.7 are considered
( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
(2.1.2.4)
(2.1.2.5)
and:
( )
The needed second derivate of and to compute the strain energy, are given by: ( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
(2.1.2.6)
( )
(2.1.2.7)
and:
( )
( )
and ) are written in the following way:
The second rotor, the outer one, is assumed to be rigid, so the second rotor displacements ( and ) and angular displacements (
( )
( )
(2.1.2.8)
13
)
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
(2.1.2.9)
(2.1.2.10)
(2.1.2.11)
rigid. For this reason there is no definable strain energy for the second rotor, in conformity with the rigid rotor assumption: (2.1.2.12) Applying expressions (2.1.2.15) and (2.1.2.611) in the kinetic energy equations (2.1.1.4) and (2.1.1.5), for each of the two shafts and two rotors, it results:
(
with:
(2.1.2.13)
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
(2.1.2.14)
( )
where
( )
( )
(2.1.2.15)
(2.1.2.16)
is dubbed gyroscopic term, the index 1 and 2 concern rotor 1 and 2 respectively, and where
the constant terms of equations (2.1.1.4) and (2.1.1.5) were ignored since they will disappear anyway after application of Lagrange equation. The rotating speeds of the rotors are related by a constant ratio , which is integer, following the relation:
(2.1.2.17)
14
In what concerns on this case the strain energy, the only contribution comes from the first rotor. Recalling equation (2.1.1.6), substituting on it the expressions (2.1.2.5) and (2.1.2.6), and considering the axial force null, it yields:
(
where:
(2.1.2.18)
( )
(2.1.2.19)
Substituting expressions (2.1.2.1) and (2.1.2.2) in equation (2.1.1.9), and noting from the from the reference frame origin, the components
( )[
[ ]
][ ]
( )[
[ ]
][ ]
(2.1.2.20)
Finally, the kinetic energy due to the presence of a punctual mass in a disk and at a given distance from the axis of rotation of the Multirotor is written with the help of equation (2.1.1.12). If the is given by:
( )(
On the other hand, if it is applied to the second in
(2.1.2.21)
( )(
If and the rotor, and acting along the given by: and
(2.1.2.22) of
( )
( )
(2.1.2.23)
Which after can be rewritten in the generalized coordinates in the following way;
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
(2.1.2.24)
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
(2.1.2.25)
15
So, for the most general case of two coaxial rotors with a viscously damped bearing, rigid disk, symmetric shaft, with external transversal applied forces ( ) and ( ), Coriolis acceleration effect
and assuming no motion in the axial direction, the resulting motion equations, considering only the degreesoffreedom (Dofs) perpendicular to the axial axis are given by:
[
[ ]
]{ }
([ (
]
)
( (
[ ]
]) { }
[
[ ]
]{ }
{ ( )}
(2.1.2.26) In the equation above, respectively, is the inertial matrix, and the gyroscopic effect on rotor 1 and 2 ] include the the innerouter spool rotating speed ratio, [
damping coefficients in the bearings, [ ] the total stiffness matrix (bearings plus strain stiffness), and are the applied forces along the two defined generalized coordinates and .
Despite the previous deduction has been applied to a Multirotor configuration, it is easily adapted to a Monorotor configuration if the outer rotor terms in (2.1.2.26) are considered null. 2.1.3 Rotordynamics Analysis Application to the Multirotor Model In this work, both undamped asymmetric and damped asymmetric bearings will be considered. The computation of the natural frequencies of the rotors along with an expedite way of presenting their variation with rotating speed will be first addressed. After that, the response of the considered rotors due to mass unbalances is analyzed. The coupled terms in the stiffness and damping matrices will be neglected on this section. The following explanation follows the procedure adopted in [4]. 1. Campbell diagram in equation (2.1.2.26) is made equal to zero,
since the natural frequencies are obtained with the rotor free of loads (free vibration) and in harmonic motion conditions, which can be expressed by: (2.1.3.1) (2.1.3.2)
with: Where
denotes the angular frequency of the free vibrations and denotes the modal
damping associated with each free vibration mode. Of course imaginary unit defined as coordinates . .
Introducing these equations in (2.1.2.26) it results the following eigenvalue/eigenvector modal problem:
16
]{
{ }
(2.1.3.3)
( ( (
( ) ) ( )
(2.1.3.4)
The solution of the equation (2.1.3.4) leads to two pairs of complex conjugate roots,
and
, where
and
frequencies of the rotor and are dependent of the rotating speed of the inner shaft ( ), and
are the associated modal damping. This procedure is valid whether or not viscous damping is present. These results yield to the equations that are used to obtain the Campbell Diagram. The Campbell Diagram, exemplified on the Figure 2.8, is a graphic that show the variation of the natural
frequencies of the rotor with increasing rotating speed in turn of its axis, i.e. the frequency curves. Alongside this representation, several lines can be traced from the graphics origin with an inclination that establishes a relevant relation between the rotating speed and the natural frequencies. These lines are generically defined by , where is the innerouter spool rotating speed ratio and
the rotating speed in rotations per minute. The most common line traced on the Campbell Diagram is the synchronous line, i.e. the line that includes the points at which the natural frequency equals the rotating speed, and corresponds to the line defined by on Figure 2.8 The knowledge of the
intersection points of these lines with the frequency curves is very relevant for the prediction of critical operation points as it will be shown later.
17
2.
Similarly to the description in the point 4 of the section 2.1.1, the effect of a punctual mass at a given distance from the center of the disk in the force vector is:
( ) } ( )
( ) ( )
( (
) } )
(2.1.3.5)
in which ( ) is the value of the displacement function in the location of the disk. Considering additionally that viscous damping effects are neglected ([ ] the resulting equation are sought in the following form: [ ]) the solutions of
(2.1.3.6) (2.1.3.7) Substituting (2.1.3.4), (2.1.3.5) and (2.1.3.6) in (2.1.2.26), and considering that the unbalance mass is situated in the disk 1 situated at , it results:
( [
( ( )
])
]] {
( ) ( )
}
(2.1.3.8)
and ( ) ( ( ) (
, it yields: ) ) ) ) ) )
(2.1.3.9)
(2.1.3.10)
(2.1.3.67) must be the rotating speed of the respective shaft. Since disk 2 is located in the outer shaft is the proper speed to use. The modal vector equations are then obtained by following the procedure used before, and are shown just below: ( ) ( ( ) ( If )( )( ( ( ) ( ( ( ) ( ) ) ) ) ) )
(2.1.3.11)
(2.1.3.12)
orbits; otherwise the orbits are circular. If the denominators are made equal to zero, we can obtain the critical speeds by solving the resultant equation. There are two critical speeds when the rotor is asymmetric and only one solution when the rotor is symmetric.
18
Since an unbalance on the inner disk is synchronous with the rotation of the inner shaft, these critical speeds will correspond to the intersection points between the synchronous line and the frequency curves on the Campbell Diagram if disk one is unbalanced. But if the unbalanced mass is applied on disk 2, the imparted force can be asynchronous in relation to the inner shaft depending on the relation between rotating speeds quantified by . So the critical speeds of such an unbalance will correspond to the intersection points between the curves on the Campbell Diagram. If viscous damping is added to the model then the solutions can be sought in the following form: (2.1.3.13) (2.1.3.14) dependent asynchronous line and the frequency
In its turn, using (2.1.3.13), (2.1.3.14) and (2.1.3.5) in the equation (2.1.2.26), the values of the coefficients , , and are obtained by solving the resultant system.
The orbits will be elliptical in case of asymmetric stiffness in the bearings but the existence of damping animates this ellipse with a precession motion. This means that the semimajor and semiminor axis of the ellipse will make an angle relative to the inertial reference frame axis. Caution must be taken in the used value of the speed in the solution equations (2.1.3.1314), if the unbalance mass is placed on disk 2 then again is the rotating speed to use.
The Campbell Diagram can be used on the prediction of the critical speeds for this case exactly in the same way as it was described previously, attending, of course, if the considered excitation force is synchronous or asynchronous, i.e. affected by the factor . Equations (2.1.3.914) can now be used to obtain the response diagram of the rotor with the respective bearing conditions. The response diagram in Multirotor configuration is a plot of the logarithm of the sum of the transversal vibration amplitude( inmost shaft, as exemplifies Figure 2.9. ) against the rotating speed of the
19
2.1.4
Rotordynamics Modal Orbits and Sense of the Whirl In the last section rotor vibration orbits were characterized for each Multirotor type.
Nevertheless, nothing was said about the sense of the orbit described by the rotor while it vibrates and rotates simultaneously. In fact, as it will be addressed shortly, rotor orbits are not trivial phenomena. In some rotors the transversal orbit described by the shaft vibration has an opposite sense to that of the rotors rotating sense, it is then said that the rotor is in backward whirl. If the shaft vibration orbit has a corotational sense with that of the rotors rotating speed, then the rotor motion is dubbed as forward whirl. On this section, it will be analytically shown, the existence of this phenomena as well as what causes the rotor to be in backward whirl instead of forward whirl and viceversa. Let us first consider again the Multirotor represented in Figure 2.6. As previously discussed, the displacements of the rotor in the and directions are given by and expressions such as
that displayed in the previous section. It was already mentioned in that section that the orbits could be circular or elliptical depending if the rotor was symmetric or asymmetric. Figure 2.10 (ac) shows the various possible orbit shapes in Rotordynamics, summarizing also the bearing characteristics behind each one of them. (a) (b)
Shaft position
Shaft position
(c)
Shaft position
Now let us show the way the sense of whirl is determined. For this let us consider the displacement vector of the rotor rotating axis center relative to the inertial reference frame origin, displayed in the Figure 2.11.
20
Shaft position at
[ ]
(2.1.4.1)
Consequently the displacement vector derivative yields, making use of the chain rule:
(2.1.4.2)
The sense of whirl is deduced from the signal of the crossed product between the displacement vector and its derivative:
(2.1.4.3)
said to be in forward whirl (FW). On the contrary if it is pointing the other way around it is said to be in backward whirl (BW). To help the visualization of this phenomenon Figure 2.12 shows position of an unbalanced mass relative to the inertial axis as the disk of the Monorotor there represented follows the path both in forward and backward whirl. This depiction is only valid if the disk s rotating speed is considered to be equal to the orbit speed, i.e. synchronous. This assumption is consistent with what was predicted on the last section. As we saw there, for a mass unbalance on the inner rotors disk of a Multirotor configuration, whose vibration modes are given by the solutions (2.1.3.67), the orbit revolution speed is synchronous with the disks rotating speed .
21
Figure 2.12 Position of a mass unbalance (in bold) in a disk performing Forward and Backward Whirl
The expressions of
and
Anyway, only for exemplificative purposes the determination of the whirl sense for a particular case of the undamped Multirotor like the one shown in Figure 2.6 with asymmetric stiffness bearing properties, and a mass unbalance on disk 1, is presented in the Appendix 1 to this work.
[ ]{ }
[ ]{ }
[ ]{ }
22
{ ( )}
(2.2.1.1)
Where [ ]
the
element model. Vector { ( )} includes the loads exerted in the systems dofs. Equation (2.1.2.26) for instance, is a particular application of equation (2.2.1.1) to Multirotors. The Mono and Multirotor dynamic systems matrices , and are computable through application
of the RayleighRitz method as shown in chapter 2.1.2, or by using the finite element model as it will be shown later on the chapter 3.1. For each frequency value, the response in the as: (2.2.1.2) Applying the first and second derivatives with respect to time, one obtains respectively: dof in steadystate conditions can be written
After substituting (2.2.1.3) and (2.2.1.4) in equation (2.2.1.1) it follows that:
(2.2.1.3) (2.2.1.4)
[ ]
[ ]
[ ( )]
[ ] ]{ }
{ ( )}
(2.2.1.5)
where:
{ }
Observing equation (2.2.1.5) one should notice that the relation between the loads acting on the system and the caused displacements is only dependent of the matrix [ ( )] . Due to its determinant importance the [ ( )] matrix is known as the dynamic stiffness matrix. If the dynamic stiffness matrix is computed the force reconstruction becomes possible in every node simply by multiplying it by the dofs measured response as the following equation shows.
{ ( )}
[ ( )]{ }
(2.2.1.6)
Despite its simple aspect, equation (2.2.1.6) is hard to apply to complex systems. In the majority of the applications there are a large number of dofs, or some measurement points are simply inaccessible making the measurement of all the systems dofs unpractical. Therefore a way of determining the unknown systems dofs response using the known ones is vital. The Transmissibility concept in multidof systems is the tool that supplies that result. This means that measurements of the response done in some few nodes are used to deduce the response in the dofs where the response is unknown. A recent approach made by [15] allows not only the deduction of the responses in all the 23
structures dofs, but also the localization of the loads which are acting in the structure. This approach will be briefly introduced in the end of this section. Even knowing all the systems dofs responses, it is not practical to reconstruct all the systems load vector. Instead it is more efficient to reconstruct the loads in the spots where we are sure they are acting. So if the location of the applied loads is known, the problem can then be reduced to the following equation:
{ ( )}
where is the number of force inputs and
[ ( )]
{ }
a reduced dynamic stiffness matrix that relates only the involved dofs. Equation (2.2.1.7) is solvable as long as the number of used responses is larger or equal to the number of Forces acting on the structural system.
Force localization in the Frequency Domain Some brief notes regarding the method of force localization explained in the recent work of [15] will now be introduced. The motivation for this procedure has been already mentioned before, and mainly it has to do with the impossibility in many applications to determine the responses in all the systems dofs and/or because the point of application of the loads is unknown. This methodology, begins by defining two response vectors { } and { } dividing among them the responses extracted from a limited set of the structures dofs, each of them containing the responses in the and coordinates respectively. A load vector { } containing the loads acting in and the
coordinates is also defined. The number of forces acting on the system will be dubbed as number of extracted responses designated by the responses and the forces is given by:
{ ( )}
where: matrix.
[ ( )]{ ( )}
(2.2.1.8)
[ ]
[ ]
{ } { }
Where the indices coordinates and and , and the loads coordinates
[ [
]{ } ]{ }
respectively. (2.2.1.9)
Solving equations (2.2.1.9) by relating each one of them through the load vector { } , it results:
24
{ }
][
[ ]
] { }
(2.2.1.10)
matrix establishes a relation between the dofs responses under a specific load condition
proposed force localization method works by assuming random and different combinations for the force point of application and to compute the resulting transmissibility matrix for each combination since, as it was already mentioned, the matrix matrices are assumed to be known. After equation (2.2.1.10) is applied in a user defined frequency range actually measured response vector { }. For each combination of forces the accumulated error between vectors { } and { } is computed component by component as the next expression states, and saved in an array : and a result is obtained for the response vector { }. The symbol was added, to distinguish between the computed response vector from the
( ( )))
( ( ))))
{ }
}
(2.2.1.11)
The combination at which the error is minimized is expected to correspond to the real point of application of the forces. After this is accomplished the amplitude of the loads can be determined through equation (2.2.1.7), keeping on mind that this is possible, as long as the number of used responses or equal to the number of forces acting on the structural system. is larger
Transformation of the Load Vector from the Frequency Domain Method to the TimeDomain If is intended a comparison between the force reconstruction obtained using the FD with the results obtained by the timedomain methods presented below, an inverse FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) can be applied to load vector estimated by the FD method in order to convert frequencydomain results into timedomain results.
25
Figure 2.13 illustrates how a spectrum of a response signal can be obtained from the FRF (Frequency Response Function) through the discrete sum of individual sinusoidal modal contributions. This is the procedure followed by the inverse FFT. Likewise, if it is applied to the load vector in the frequency domain obtained in (2.2.1.7), a timedomain representation of the loads can be achieved. 2.2.2 SWAT Sum of Weighted Accelerations Technique The SWAT method makes use of the concept of modal filter. Good revision of these topics can be found in [18]. The whole method is based in the computation of a weighting matrix that after applied to a structures response, isolate the rigid body accelerations of the structure from the influence of the flexible modes response. The weighting matrix is the modal filter, since it is detaching the rigid body accelerations from a response consisting of both rigid body and flexible modes. Following the computation of the rigid body accelerations, the loads acting on the center of gravity of a structure can be estimated from the multiplication between the rigid body accelerations and its mass properties. The main limitation of this method is that it does not enable by itself the determination of the spatial application point of the load; thus force identification is not possible without external assumptions. Despite that fact, force reconstruction is possible provided that the applied loads are less or equal to the number of rigid body modes. Another setback of this method is that, the number of acceleration measurements must be at least as great as the number of rigid body plus the number of flexible modes to be successful. Additionally in the experimental case, the sensors must be placed in a way that enables a proper determination of the modes of the structure. In this text, the approach followed by Carne et al. [26] to derive the SWAT method is presented and implemented. As previously mentioned the weighting matrix is applied to the measures to obtain the rigid body accelerations. Following this statement it can established that:
{
where the sought body accelerations, being points.
[ ] { }
vector {
(2.2.2.1) } of rigid
weighting matrix [ ] is used to extract the the number of rigid body modes, and
The method is completed after multiplying the rigid body accelerations by the rigid body mass properties to obtain the load vector { ( )} .
{ ( )}
(2.2.2.2)
If this method is systematically applied to the measurements at each time instant, a time domain force reconstruction at the structures center of gravity is obtained. Let us now introduce how the weighting matrix [ ] is computed. Firstly, it begins by establishing a relationship between the measured accelerations and the modal shapes using a sum of modal contributions representation.
26
{ }
where { } is a is the shapes,
[ ]{ }
(2.2.2.3)
vector that contains the measured accelerations at the measurement points, { } matrix containing the mode
is the number of modes (both rigid body and flexible).It should be remarked that, according
to vibrations theory, any continuous system has an infinite number of modes, meaning that (2.2.2.3) is just an approximation. Matrix [ ] can either be computed solving the Eigen problem if a finite element model of the structure is available or through the algorithm of mode isolation (AMI) [27] if an experimental mount is being analyzed. Equation (2.2.2.3) can be rewritten in a more convenient way, if the rigid body mode vectors are considered mass normalized, i.e. the modal vectors { } are such that make { } [ ]{ } { } [ ]{ } [ ] , being [ ] the identity matrix and the assigned to the leading columns of [ ], it results: [ ] and
{ }
where the and
[[
] [
{ } ]] { } { }
(2.2.2.4)
indices correspond to the rigid body and elastic modes, respectively and { } ]
represent the second derivative of the elastic modal displacements which will multiply by the [
matrix columns. If (2.2.2.1) is introduced in (2.2.2.4), and taking into account once again that the weighting matrix must isolate the rigid body modes, it yields:
[ ] [[
] [ ]
[ ([[
]]
[[ ] ] [
[ ] [ ] ]] ) [ [ ]
] ]
(2.2.2.5) columns of the
is verified, the
weighting matrix are able to extract the rigid body accelerations from the modal data. After [ ] is determined equations (2.2.2.12) are ready to be computed, giving the load timehistory of the resultant in the structures center of gravity of the loads corresponding to the rigid body motions introduced in (2.2.2.5) in the [ ] matrix.
To conclude this section it is worth mentioning that a SWAT variant was developed by Genaro and Rade [20] that enhances this method allowing the possibility to determine multiple forces acting simultaneously. 2.2.3 StateSpace Fundamentals Next, an introduction to the statespace fundamentals is done, as it is needed for the next two identification methods. StateSpace system representation has applications in many fields of engineering. Particularly in the analysis of dynamics systems, the statespace formulation is used to write in an alternative way the multidegree of freedom equations of motion. In the most general case the continuoustime statespace system equations [12] are given by: 27
{ ( )} { ( )}
Here, { } is the matrix, [ ] the { } is the vector that contains the
]{ ( )}
[ ]{ ( )} [ ]{ ( )}
] is the (2.2.3.1) inputs acting on the system, systems ] is the
[ ]{ ( )}
system and { } is the first time derivative of vector . The first expression in (2.2.3.1) is called the statespace equation and the second expression is dubbed the output equation. In many applications, e.g. in experimental applications, a discrete time representation of the statespace is preferred. The output of the discrete time system will exactly reproduce the one obtained with the continuous time system, as long as the zero order hold (ZOH) condition is verified, i.e. if the input is constant between samples [12]. The discrete time statespace equations are the following ones [21]:
{ { }
[ ]{ [ ]{ }
[ ]{ [ ]{ }
}
(2.2.3.2)
The matrices and vectors of this system have an identical meaning to the ones on the continuous time statespace system, and the index is the sample instant number. The conversion from continuous to discrete time statespace imply a manipulation of the [ ] and [ ] matrices, while [ ] and [ ] remain unaltered. The new matrices are displayed in the following equations. [12]
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ [ ] [ ]
in equation (2.2.3.3)
( ( [ ] [ ] )
) [ ]] [ ]
(2.2.3.3)
is the time between successive time samples. The time at which each sample by the th time step at which time is intended
Let us now focus on the content of the vectors and matrices of the statespace systems in the context of the dynamic of mechanical systems. In the most general case of a degree of freedom dynamic system, with stiffness [ ], mass [ ], damping [ ] and with a load { ( )} acting on it, the equations of motion are:
[ ]
{ ( )}
[ ]
{ ( )}
[ ]
{ ( )}
{ ( )}
(2.2.3.6)
28
where { } is the modal coordinates vector of the system and where { } and { } denote the second and first time derivates of the modal coordinate vector. [ that selects the subset at which forces are being applied, ] is simply a matrix of ones and zeros
{ }
{ } { } { }
(2.2.3.7)
Let us now introduce the state vector { } on equation (2.2.3.6). It returns the following representation:
[ ] [ ]
[ ] [ ]
] { }
[ ] [ [ ]
[ ] [ ]
]{ }
[ ] [ ]
][
]{ }
(2.2.3.8)
If one works out this equation one obtains in the end the following expression:
{ }
[ ] [ [ ][ ]
[ ]
[ ] [ ][ ]
]{ }
[ ] [ [ ]
[
][
]
]{ }
(2.2.3.9) Comparing equation (2.2.3.9) with the statespace equation in (2.2.3.1), matrices [ become determined by similarity. The matrices of the output equation, i.e. the second expression in (2.2.3.2), depend on the nature of the system as well as on the intended output variable. For structural systems such the ones studied in this work, where the force locations are not always entirely known, measures are obtained for degreesoffreedom on which forces are not applied, the system is therefore called a noncollocated system. The statespace of noncollocated systems possesses nonminimum phase zeros, this statement implies that the direct throughput matrix [ ] is dropped rank and thus the output equation ] and [ ]
for this systems will only depend on the output influence matrix [21]. In control theory, a system is said to be minimumphase if the system and its inverse are causal and stable. This is not the case of the statespace system used in force identification methods, since they may be associated to unstable inverse systems. This essentially happens because the zeros of the noncollocated statespace systems have positive real parts, i.e. in the righthand side of the complex plane. This is a condition for a system to have an unstable inverse system according to the control theory, since the eigenvalues of the inverse system are the zeros of its associated system. Recall from vibration theory how positive real parts in the eigenvalues are closely related to unstable phenomena (see Appendix 2). The output influence matrix [ ], will work simply as an output selector, in which the selection options are the state vector components. If the displacements on the degreesoffreedom of structure 29
are considered as the output of the system, and recalling that the nodal displacements are included in the first positions of the state vector in (2.2.3.7), it results for the output equation:
{ }
[[ ]
[
[ ]
]
]{ }
(2.2.3.10)
This is not whatsoever the only way to determine the matrices comprising the Statespace system. For instance, Allen and Carne [26] have derived the statespace system of the structures they have tested from modal parameters. This has been made fitting to the experimentally measured Frequency Response Function (FRF) [27] a statespace modal model that follows the standard definition:
[ ( )]
)
,
where ( ) denotes the complex conjugate, [ ( )] is the FRF matrix at frequency eigenvalue, i.e. , where
undamped natural frequency for the th mode of vibration. [ ] is the residue matrix, defined as:
[ ]
where { } and {
} {
(2.2.3.12)
} are the modal vectors of the statespace of the response and drive (load)
locations. Considering that the loads are only applied to a subset of the response locations, it can be expressed by:
{ } { }
} { } [ ]
(2.2.3.13)
[ [ ]
] [
[ ]
] [
],
(2.2.3.14)
where
contain the { } vectors in the same order as the eigenvalues. These matrices are then introduced in the statespace equations (2.2.3.1). [ justified before. Now that the continuous statespace system has been completely characterized for a structural system, and after presenting two ways of describing the systems matrices, the topic of the inverse statespace system dubbed the inverse structural filter will be addressed. ] is zero since the system is a nonminimum phase one as was
30
2.2.4
ISF Inverse Structural Filter The inverse structural filter (ISF) first deduced by Steltzner and Kammer [21], is a time domain
method which is based on the inversion of the statespace system depiction of the equations of motion, in which the taken inputs are the structural response data and returned outputs are the estimations of the input loads applied in a specific point of the structure. This is an advantage compared to the SWAT method, which only computes the resultant forces and the center of gravity of the structure. Before inverting the system, an additional manipulation should be performed on the statespace system. On experimental applications accelerations are more easily measured than displacements. Therefore, the second derivative of the state and output equations will be computed in order to obtain a statespace representation of the accelerations. They are expressed in the following form:
{ } { }
with:
[ [
]{ } [ ]([ ]{ } ]
[ [
]{ }, ]{ } ]{ }, [ ]{ }),
(2.2.4.1)
[ ]{ } { }
[ ][
] [
[ ][ ]
] and [ ] remain constant and equal to
The discrete time representation is simply obtained for the acceleration representation after the matrix transformations in (2.2.3.3) are applied. While [ [ ] and [ ] respectively.
{ { }
[ ]{ } [ ]{ }
[ ]{ }, [ ]{ }
(2.2.4.2)
Steltzner and Kammer [21] have then manipulated the discrete time statespace equations yielding to the interchange of the input with the output, obtaining the following inverse statespace system:
} { }
[ ]{ } [ ]{ }
[ ]{ } [ ]{ }
(2.2.4.3)
where,
are the inverse statespace system matrices.
(2.2.4.4)
31
It should be noted that what is obtained in equation (2.2.4.3) is the time derivative of the loads, meaning that afterwards a numeric integration method should be applied in order to obtain the load reconstruction. As it has been told, noncollocated statespace systems are common practice in the field of force reconstruction. It can be shown [21] that the nonminimum phase zeros that characterize such statespace systems, have positive real parts, and become the eigenvalues of the inverse statespace system. This generates an unstable inverse system. Due to this fact, the formulation displayed in equation (2.2.4.3) has not been used, and alternative ways of representation of the structure were implemented. Steltzner and Kammer, [21], used expression (2.2.4.5) for the pulse response of the statespace system assuming zero initial conditions for the structural acceleration, which is presented below:
(2.2.4.5)
Equation (2.2.4.5) is derived stepping forward the expressions in (2.2.4.2), i.e. substituting successively the first expression in (2.2.4.2), into the second expression in (2.2.4.2).
{ }
[ ]([ ]{ }
}
} [ ]{
(2.2.4.5)
[ ]{ })
[ ][ ][ ]{
})
}
[ ]{ } }
}
{ }
[ ][ ]( [ ]{
: { }
[ ][ ]{
[ ][ ]{
[ ]{ }
[ ]{ }
[ ][ ] [ ]{
Though this expression involves a limitless number of Markov parameters, it is known [21] that the system becomes fully described using only Markov parameters, being the number of
observable and controllable modes of the structural system. Likewise, the same representation can be adopted for the inverse system displayed in (2.2.4.3), again based on the assumption of zero initial conditions and following the same procedure described for the demonstration of expression (2.2.4.5), but this time applied to the expressions in (2.2.4.3). Following this procedure it results for the inverse system:
presented below:
(2.2.4.6)
The inverse system Markov parameters proposed by Steltzner and Kammer [21] are
32
(2.2.4.7)
This representation does not always result in a converging sum, for the same reasons explained previously involving noncollocated systems. In the literature, various authors as in [21] as well as in [12] have opted to neglect the direct throughput matrix [ ] of the discrete statespace system and to step forward the time of the system times in order to improve the ISF performance. The direct throughput matrix result from the multiplication between [ ] and [ ], which in case modal parameters are used to the construction of the statespace, is highly dependent on the real part of [ ][ ][ ] . This term in its turn could be very small when applied to lightly damped structures, also meaning lack of accuracy in its determination. Applying these changes to equations (2.2.4.2) it results in the following equations:
{ { { } }
[ ]{ } }
[ ]{ } [ ]{
(
[ ]{
}
)
[ ]([ ]{ }
[ ]{ })
[ ][ ] { }
[ ]
[ ][ ] { }
[ ]
{ { { } }
[ ]{ } }
[ ]{ } [ ][ ]{
(
[ ][ ]{
} {
)
[ ][ ]([ ]{ } { }
[ ]{ })
[ ][ ]
[ ][ ] { }
[ ]
[ ][ ][ ] { }
[ ]
[ ][ ] { }
[ ]
[ ][ ]
[ ]
[ ]{ }
(2.2.4.8)
The inversion of this statespace system follows exactly the same standard procedure used in (2.2.4.3) and (2.2.4.4), with the slightly difference that instead of [ ]or [ ] the inverse system matrices should be computed with [ ] and [ ] since the statespace system is now defined in a different way. Using this inverse system (2.2.4.6) becomes:
with:
(2.2.4.9)
previous instant , i.e. the inverse system associated with (2.2.4.9) is noncausal. This solution has made results obtained with ISF stable in structures where they otherwise were divergent. 33
2.2.5
DMISF Delayed Multistep Structural Filter Based on the work of Steltzner and Kammer, Allen and Carne [12] developed the Delayed
Multistep Inverse Structural Filter (DMISF). This method improves the performance of the common ISF since it takes into account the stabilizing effect of the noncausal ISF, i.e. an ISF that uses future values of the response to estimate the forces at a given time. This implies that a delay is involved between the response data acquisition and the load reconstruction. Recalling the stepping forward procedure displayed in the expression (2.2.4.8), Allen and Carne reformulate the output equation of the statespace system by stacking this equations for a given number of time steps and rewriting (2.2.4.8) for a step of 1 time instant as:
{ { {
For the next
} } }
[ ]{ } [ ]([ ]{ }
[ ]{ } [ ]{ }) [ ][ ] { }
[ ] (2.2.5.1)
[ ][ ] { }
[ ]
{ { {
{ } [ ][ ]
} } [
[ ]{ } ]{ [ }
[ ]{ } [ ]{ [
][ ]{
} ]{
}
(2.2.5.2)
}
{ }
[
[
][ ]{ }
][ ]
][ ]{ }
[
}
[ ]{ })
[ ]{ }
Stacking the time output equation for each time step, it results in the following modified output equation.
{ { {{
{
} } }}
}
[ [ [
] ][ ]
[ ]{ } [ [[ ][ ]
] ][ ]
[ ] [ ] [ ]
]
[ ][ ]
[ ]
[ ] [ ][ ]
[
[ [ [ [
{ } ] ] { } ] }} ]] {{
{ }
(2.2.5.3) The state equation must be also slightly changed, in order to consider the new definition of the input load stacking vector { }. It is called so because it literally stacks each time instant of the load considered in the DMISF force reconstruction. The improved statespace system obtained using the DMISF becomes:
} [ ]
[ ]{ } [[ ] [ ]
34
[ ][ ]{ } [ ]]
(2.2.5.4)
]{ }
]{ }
In equation (2.2.5.4) [ ] is a matrix that isolates the input sub vector { } out of the input vector { }, in conformity with the definition of the state equation in (2.2.5.1) and (2.2.5.2). The inverse structural filter procedure in (2.2.4.3) and (2.2.4.4) is then applied to the statespace system in (2.2.5.4) by:
} { }
[ ]{ } [ ]{ }
[ ]{ [ ]{
} } ..
(2.2.5.5)
where,
to instant from the responses between to
(2.2.5.6)
This inverse system estimates the time derivate of the applied loads at time instants between . If response data is recorded until a given time multiple load estimates.
DMISF has shown in [12] and [26] to be more stable and slightly more accurate than ISF, SWAT and FD methods.
35
3 NUMERICAL METHODS
3.1 Numerical Aspects of the Rotordynamics Finite Elements
On this chapter, it is described how the finite element method implemented in the authors code were applied to each rotor part, becoming therefore possible to build and analyze rotor system models such as Monorotors and Multirotors. This chapter follows the explanation made by Lalanne and Ferraris [4]. 3.1.1 The displacement vector First of all the definition of the displacement vector must be done in order to apply the Lagrange equation (2.1.1.1) to the rotor part energy equation defined in the chapter 2.1.1. To define the displacement vector, four degrees of freedom will be considered per rotor node. These dofs were already shown in Figure 2.7, and they are two translational displacements along the and and
axis of the inertial reference frame respectively, and two slopes about these two axis and respectively. The slopes are related to the displacements through the
designated by equations:
(3.1.1.2)
The axial and the torsional dofs will not be considered. 3.1.2 The finite elements of the rotor parts Let us now define each finite element composing the different parts of the rotor model: the disk, the shaft and the bearings. A perturbation caused by the mass unbalance on the disk will also be included in the finite element model. The disk The disk element will be considered as having only one node, representing therefore a rigid disk. Thus the element matrices of the disk are obtained simply by applying the Lagrange equation (2.1.1.1) to the equation (2.1.1.4) which includes the total energy of the disk of the rotor. If additionally the displacement vector defined in (3.1.1.2) is introduced in (2.1.1.1) in spite of the generalized coordinate vector it results:
( ) [ ][ ] [
][ ]
(3.1.2.1)
36
Therefore one can conclude that the disk element contributes with a mass matrix (the first in equation (3.1.2.1)) and with a gyroscopic matrix which is the one that depend on the rotating speed . This element corresponds to the MASS21 element in ANSYS. The shaft The shaft element of length will be modeled as a two node beam element with constant
circular crosssection, and is illustrated in the Figure 3.1. The EulerBernoulli beam theory will be the considered for the elastic shaft since the modeled shaft is long and slender. Other theories, like the Timoshenko beam theory is proper for shorter beams and larger crosssections, and includes the influence cause by shear loads on the shaft. This affects its total stiffness. Since this effect could be important in rotor shafts, a way to include a shear correction is presented.
Both nodes are characterized by the displacement vector defined in equation (3.1.1.2). The nodal displacement vector for the shaft element can be written as:
(3.1.2.2)
Now in order to build the shaft finite element the displacements must be related to shape functions ( ), as the next equation states:
( ) ( )
where and include the displacements contained in (3.1.2.2) in the and (3.1.2.3)
directions
[ [
37
] ]
(3.1.2.4)
( ) and
( ) ( )
[ [
] ]
(3.1.2.5)
Introducing the equations in (3.1.2.3) and its derivatives in the total kinetic energy expression (2.1.1.5), computing the integrations and introducing the resulting expression on the Lagrange equation, it results:
(
where , and are:
(3.1.2.6)
(3.1.2.7)
(3.1.2.8)
38
(3.1.2.9)
Likewise, introducing again the equations in (3.1.2.3) in the strain energy expression in (2.1.1.6), performing all the integral operations involved, and applying the Lagrange equation, it yields:
(
with and equal to:
(3.1.2.10)
(
( )
) ( )
) ( )
( [
) ( )
) ( ) ]
(3.1.2.11)
(3.1.2.12)
[
where equal to:
is the correction factor that takes into account the shear effect in the shafts stiffness, and it is
39
( where
(3.1.2.14) is the reduced area of its crosssection represents the classical stiffness matrix
approximately equal to the crosssection area . The matrix of the shaft while the matrix shaft.
Though based in the Timoshenko theory the ANSYS element BEAM188 (2 node/6 dofs), is the assigned element to model the shaft. The determinant reason to choose this element was the fact that this is the only two node beam element available in ANSYS that includes the Coriolis effect in its computations. Besides that, it is recommended for slender to moderately slender beams, such the ones considered to model the shafts of the rotors in this work. The Bearings The bearings in the finite element system are subjected to the same assumptions referred on the chapter 2.1.1. Adapting equation (2.1.1.9) to the displacement vector considered in the finite element model in (3.1.1.2), it results for the forces acting on the bearings:
][ ]
][ ]
(3.1.2.15)
In ANSYS this was modeled using the spring/damper element COMBIN14 Mass unbalance The kinetic energy related to a mass placed with a specific offset in relation to the rotation axis is shown in equation (2.1.1.12). Like has been done before if this kinetic energy expression is introduced in the Lagrange equation the finite element model of this mass gives:
( )
(3.1.2.16)
As it is shown in equation 3.1.2.16 the mass unbalance effect acts along the two translational directions stated on the displacement vector in equation 3.1.1.2. The way the mass unbalance is implemented in ANSYS will be subject of discussion on the chapter 3.3. 3.1.3 Solution of the Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem In chapter 2.1.3 the most general case of the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem in Rotordynamics was enunciated, and it was briefly mentioned how in general terms it should be solved
40
to give the natural frequencies and the modal vectors. Now in this section the exact procedure of the solution is made clear, so that the numerical implementation become fully comprehended. Two methods of solving this problem will be very shortly presented: The pseudomodal method, quicker and more efficient, and the direct method, more precise but more demanding of computational effort. The general equation used to compute the natural frequencies and the modal vectors is:
[ ]
where respectively. The pseudomodal method
[ ]
[ ]
(3.1.3.1)
is the modal displacement and [ ], [ ] and [ ] are the mass, damping and stiffness matrices
The pseudomodal method starts with the solution of the eigenvectors of the following reduced system:
[ ]
[ ]
(3.1.3.2)
where [ ] is the stiffness matrix without the bearing stiffness terms. The eigenvectors { } resulting from this system are then used to state the following equation:
{ }
where contains the displacements in the principal coordinates. Introducing (3.1.3.3) in the equation (3.1.3.1) it gives:
(3.1.3.3)
{ } [ ]{ }
{ } [ ]{ }
{ } [ ]{ }
(3.1.3.4)
In rotors, as it was seen, the damping matrix depends on the rotating speed , therefore equation (3.1.3.4) should be solved for specific values of . The solutions are sought as before:
[
where , and are given respectively by:
(3.1.3.6)
(3.1.3.7)
41
[
Solving the Eigenproblem of matrix semivector
][
(3.1.3.8)
in (3.1.3.8), the modal vectors are extracted from the in the form already defined in the
beginning of the section 2.1.3. The direct method Direct method corresponds to the solution of the equation (3.1.3.1) without intermediate steps. There are several numeric functions capable of that. In Matlab, for instance, this is possible using function polyeig that solves the polynomial eigenvalue/eigenvector problem of second degree stated below:
[
if where correspond to the systems eigenvectors and
]{ }
{ }
(3.1.3.9)
42
are employed as described in 2.2.4.2.2.5. After the full transient analysis is performed, the accelerations at the desire dofs are extracted using the ANSYS time history postprocessor. These measurements are then loaded in Matlab where the response vector is built. The way the measurements are organized inside the vector depend on the sequence of the dofs of the numerical method used to build the inverse system of the structure. After this is accomplished, the Matlab code proceeds with the specific force identification algorithms for each of the implemented timedomain force identification methods. 3.2.2 Frequency Domain Method After the determination of the finite element model of the structure under study, the responses in the permanent state resultant from generic harmonic force acting on it are calculated applying equation (2.2.1.8) in the following way:
{ ( )}
[ ]
[ ]
[ ( )]
[ ]]
{ ( )}
(3.2.2.1)
This is done in an arbitrary range of frequencies { }, this can be also arbitrated by the user.
The next step is to choose what dofs responses should be included either in vector { } and
The code is programmed to scroll all the possible combinations of application points of the force, and to successively apply equations (2.2.1.1011). In each combination step the program gets the proper values for the matrices [ ] and [
]
using the finite element model in the chosen frequency interval. By definition the code will get the nodes where the lowest error was registered and considers that the loads are acting in the resulting nodes. Finally the amplitude of the loads is then computed with equation (2.2.1.7). 3.2.3 SWAT In this method the first step consists of determining the weighting matrix as described in equation 2.2.2.4. For that the elastic modal vectors of the considered finite element model of the structure are first determined through the solution of the respectively associated
eigenvalue/eigenvector problem using the direct method. This second finite element model must be as close as possible to the ANSYS finite element model where responses are extracted, i.e. with similar element and equal discretization of the mesh, and it is built in a separate code. Then the rigid body modes vectors are computed in conformity with the structural system under study. The user can choose what rigid body vectors to include, since the SWAT method, as described in section 2.2.2 estimates the force in the direction of the correspondent rigid body motions. To show this let us consider, for instance, a beam finite element. This beam element is characterized by three dofs per node, so it has also three rigid body modes. Two of them are translational (longitudinal translation is the first nodal dof and vertical translation the second), and a third one is rotational (rotation about an axis perpendicular to the beams lateral section , which is the also the third nodal dof). Figure 6.8 in Appendix 5 shows the mentioned beam finite element. In a 43
translational rigid body mode vector, the vertical for instance, every single dof in that direction moves and the others have a null modal displacement. Generalizing for the other two rigid body modes, one can conclude that for the beam element the rigid body vectors are:
[ [ [
] ] ] [ [
[ ] ]
]
(3.2.3.1)
Thus, one can conclude that in the developed code, the rigid body vectors are built by making all the dofs in the direction in which the rigid body motion is being considered equal to one, while the other vector positions are considered null. As described, the elastic mode vectors are obtained solving the eigenvector problem, which in a generic dynamic system is:
[
with: Here , and
]{
{ }
(3.2.3.2)
are the mass, damping and stiffness matrices of the studied system. And } are complex, only the real part is considered
as described in [12]. The number of flexible modes to include in the weighting matrix computation is chosen by the user. Now the weighting matrix is computable and the programmed Matlab follows the sequence already explained in chapter 2.2.2. As is visible in equation 2.2.2.1, the weighting matrix [ ] is applied to the vector { } rigid body accelerations. The extracted responses for a specific time instant will be placed in the vector { } attending the sequence in the modal vectors of the structure. Then, equation 2.2.2.5 is applied to determine the load vector in the considered instant, where the inertial characteristics are immediately determined, since the geometry and the density of the material is assumed to be known. Finally a cycle is applied so that equations 2.2.2.2 and 2.2.2.5 are successively applied in the considered time domain. 3.2.4 ISF The ISF method begins with the definition of the statespace system matrices. As we saw back on chapter 2.2.3 theres actually two ways of doing so: through the systems matrices, or through modal parameters. Only the sate space system based on the system matrices was numerically implemented. The programmed code follows the explanation shown in chapter 2.2.3. The system matrices were built in a 44 which includes the instant accelerations in every dof, in order to compute the
separate finite element program, as was previously said for the SWAT method this finite element model is similar to the finite element model from where the structures responses w ere extracted. The user must also introduce matrix [ ], since it will indicate the location of the degreeoffreedom where
the forces are to be reconstructed, by introducing 1 in the array position(s) corresponding to the force location and 0 in the remaining array positions. The next step consists on defining the statespace system itself. This was done using the Simulink tools present in Matlab. This tools are very important, since they include a function s2d that automatically discretizes the statespace system giving its altered matrices. All the user needs to introduce in the programmed is the constant time step used on the discretization. Note that the used time step must be equal to the acquisition interval used in the transient analysis made on ANSYS from where the responses were extracted. So far the described procedure is shared between the ISF and the DMISF techniques. Before the inverse system is programmed, the noncausal lead must be introduced by the user along with the number of Markov parameters he wants to use. Finally the inverse system is ready for computation. The inverse system matrices must first be built according to the equations (2.2.4.4). After this, the Markov parameters of the inverse can be computed according to (2.2.4.7), at last equation (2.2.4.10) is cyclically applied to each time step between and , being the total number of substeps of the extracted response.
Since only the first time derivative is obtained from equation (2.2.4.10), a numeric integration method must be applied in order to obtain the force reconstruction. This aspect is common both to ISF and DMISF methods. The NewtonCotes Simpson rule is the used numeric integration method, applied in the context of the ISF method, and noticing that the time step is constant, it results:
[
where step .
represents the time step number. The integration is applied between time step
In the case a force impulse rather than a harmonic force was estimated, the Simpson rule has proven to lead to wrong estimations. Therefore, for the examples where the force impulse is being estimated, the trapezoidal integration method is used, following the equation (3.2.4.2) displayed just below.
[
3.2.5 DMISF
(3.2.4.2)
The first steps of the DMISF are common to the ISF method as it was mentioned above. After the discrete spacestate system matrices are defined, the user must introduce the delay to use to run the force reconstruction. For the chosen delay matrices [ ] and [ he intends
The next step consists of obtaining the inverse spacestate system following the procedure and matricidal transformations described in equations (2.2.5.56). Vector { } is then obtained via equation (2.2.5.5), which contains reconstructions of the load first time derivative. Only the last line } , since they of this vector is considered for integration, i.e. the positions corresponding to { correspond to the last and thus more perfected, force estimation. Therefore the following integration necessary for the force reconstruction gives, according to Simpson:
[
where
]
(3.2.5.1) until
represent once more the time step. The integration is applied between time step .
time step
Again for the estimation of force impulses the trapezoidal integration method was employed as follows:
(3.2.5.2)
Figure 3.2 Force components due to the presence of a mass unbalance in the disk of the rotor.
In ANSYS this was modeled by applying to punctual forces along the two directions perpendicular to the rotating axis. The way these two components are defined depends on the performed analysis. 46
Knowing that the forces related with mass unbalances of the disk are synchronous, one just needs to specify the force amplitude and force component phase angle when performing a harmonic analysis in ANSYS. When a transient analysis is performed there is no way to define a synchronous force automatically. So it is necessary to compute the force components in each time instant and save them in specific arrays in coherence with the force equations 2.1.3.5 associated with the mass unbalance. The program will go through the saved arrays and apply the correspondent loads in the proper time instants.
47
Making reference to Figure 4.1, note that the Multirotor consists of two coaxial shafts, the inner shaft is simple supported in two rigid bearings in points A and D, the two shafts are connected in one of the outer shafts ends corresponding to point C, and the other end of the outer shaft, w hich is symbolized by point B, is considered to be simple supported. Each shaft drives one disk. The disks in their turn are perfectly located and labeled in Figure 4.1 under the designations Disk 1 and Disk 2. Additionally an elastic bearing is considered to be supporting the outer shaft in the coordinate corresponding to point C. Solving Methods The used solution methods to obtain the Campbell and Response Diagrams are the RayleighRitz and the finite element method, using for this last method a model made in ANSYS. The application of the RaleighRitz method has been already described in the chapter 2.1.2. The finite element model is presented in the next section along with the used elements. The Campbell Diagram is obtained in ANSYS through a pseudomodal analysis (QRDAMP), such as that explained in chapter 3.1.3, applied successively to an array of various rotating speeds. The Response Diagram is obtained through a full harmonic analysis, based in the direct method (recall the meaning of the direct method in chapter 3.1.3) modal solution of the finite element model.
48
4.1.1
The Finite Element Model The modeling in ANSYS of the considered problem is based on the examples of the
Rotordynamics chapter of the ANSYS Manual. Here the shafts are modeled using a set of equally spaced axial nodes, to which are attributed beam elements (BEAM 188 with quadratic polynomials) with the section properties of each respective shaft. In this model the inner shaft is divided in 15 equal parts (16 nodes) and the outer is divided in 4 equal parts (5 nodes). The disks are modeled as punctual masses (MASS21), with the respective inertial properties, in the nodes corresponding to their location and to their shaft. The bearings are modeled using two springdamper elements (COMBIN14), and are connected to the node in the bearing location corresponding to the outer shaft. The outer and the inner shafts are considered connected in the right end node of the outer one. Here a constrain linking the displacements in the outer shafts nodes in this location is applied. The inner shaft is simple supported in both ends so the displacements in the corresponding nodes are constrained. The outer one is simple supported only in the left end node, meaning therefore that the displacements in the corresponding node are subjected to the same constrains. Additionally, the displacements and rotations about the axis are constrained in all nodes. and directions between the inner and the
The only exception is in the case where an axial moment is applied in the inner shaft. Here the rotations about inner shaft. 4.1.2 Validation of the Finite Element Model To validate the previous presented finite element model were developed two additional finite element models, one with a coarser mesh and another with a more refined mesh. After this, a Campbell diagram drawing was performed and the critical speeds calculated for each of the three meshes (these two and the one presented in the last section). The Campbell diagram construction was again performed in ANSYS making use of the pseudomodal method QRDAMP. For each analysis the used rotating speed ratio parameter was i.e.: and no elastic bearing was considered, are only constrained in the nodes of the outer shaft and in the right end node of the
The net change of the values of the critical speeds will work as convergence criteria in this validation. The elements that were used in these two additional meshes were the same used for each rotor component as it was stated on chapter 4.1.1. In the coarser mesh was employed the half of the elements used in the previous described mesh. In the most refined mesh was employed the double of the elements per shaft used in the mesh described on chapter 4.1.1. Figure 4.2 along with table 4.1 show the Campbell diagrams and the values of the inner and outer shaft synchronous critical speeds for the three studied meshes.
49
Coarse (7/2)
Used (15/4)
Refined (30/8)
Figure 4.2 Campbell Diagram convergence the brackets above represent: (number of elements in the inner shaft/number of elements in the outer shaft)
Table 4.1 Critical speeds of each mesh and the correspondent errors computed using the FE solution as reference Coarse Used Refined Inner synch Critical Speeds (rpm) FW BW FW BW FW BW Inner Synch Outer Synch Errors (%) Inner Synch Outer Synch 12339 2611 14410 2693 8710.453 1908.433 11406.598 2011.715 8710.451 1908.433 11406.595 2011.714
From the mentioned Figure 4.2 and table 4.1 it is visible that the error between the used finite element model and the most refined mesh is irrelevant (in the order of %). So the quality of the
used discretization is confirmed for the purpose of the natural frequencies calculation. 4.1.3 Numerical Data The numerical data of the model is presented below referring to the terminology used on the Figure 4.1.1:
The mass unbalance data is: The bearing properties and the shafts rotating speeds will differ from each particular solution.
50
4.1.4
Results and Results Discussion It will be now presented the Campbell and Response Diagrams for various conditions of
elastic bearing properties, like stiffness asymmetry and damping. The influence of multiple inner and outer rotating speed ratios, which relation is governed by the parameter that was first presented in
equation (2.1.2.17) will be also a focus of the following section. The effects caused by a torsional moment placed in the inner shaft will also be considered late on this section. The Campbell Diagrams will be drawn taking into consideration a step of between
each computation of the natural frequencies. In the Response Diagrams it is used a step of between each response measurement. The term rotating speed in the diagrams refers to the rotating speed of the inmost shaft, i.e. the value of . The Campbell Diagrams include the representation of the inner shaft synchronous ( ) and the outer shaft synchronous ( ) lines.
The errors between the RayleighRitz and finite element methods presented in this section are always computed relatively to the finite element numeric value. Symmetric system For the symmetric system the elastic bearing properties are:
Example 1 For :
Figure 4.3 Campbell diagram Symmetric rotor Example 1 Table 4.2 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram RR/FE error Inner shaft synchronous Outer shaft synchronous Critical Speeds (rpm) (rpm) FW RayleighRitz Finite Element Error (%) 8743 8710 0.38 BW 12008 11407 5.27 FW 1940 1908 1.68 BW 2064 2012 2.58
51
There are some remarkable aspects in Figure 4.3, namely: 1. The obtained curves using the finite element method have lower natural
frequencies comparing with the computed solutions using the RayleighRitz method. This result has already been documented in the literature, particularly in [4]. Being the shape equation used in the RayleighRitz method the first mode exact solution of a beam in bending, and the finite element method an approximation method, it was expectable that the opposite was verified, since the exact solutions shape function would adapt better to the first mode shape. To explain this disparity let us analyze the first mode shape. The rotors shaft shape in bending is deformed by the presence of the disk, since it concentrates the majority of the rotors weight. The interaction with the bearings would also play a role if the tested rotor had one. The modal shape obtained with the finite element method therefore presents lower natural frequencies because the used mesh allows a better agreement between the deformation computed numerically and the deformation that is actually being observed in the shaft. To prove this way of reasoning, a detailed study of the influence of t he disks weight and position is present in the Appendix 3 to this work.
2.
The BW natural frequencies grow and the FW natural frequencies decrease with
increasing rotating speed.. The gyroscopic effect is rather complex in a Multirotor configuration. In this particular case , this means that the outer shaft is rotating 5 times faster and in the
opposite direction relative to the inner shaft. Consequently the skewsymmetric part of the damping matrix governed by the term is negative. This means therefore that the gyroscopic effect will
act in the opposite sense it used to if the Multirotor was constituted solely by the inner shaft, reducing the stiffness whenever it is in FW and increasing it when the Multirotor is in BW. Response diagram mass unbalance in disk 1:
Figure 4.4 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3)
1.
inner shaft
synchronous FW critical rotating speed of the considered symmetric system, after which it decreases and stabilizes. The reason why no resonance is verified at the BW critical rotating speed is related with the fact that the rotor is symmetric. Consequently the rotors orbits will be circular. Moreover since the unbalance is present in disk 1, the excitation force is synchronous and corotational with the inner shaft who governs the overall rotor orbit. In this particular situation as it was justified in chapter 2.1.3 there is only one resonance operating point, and it corresponds to the FW mode, since it is being excited by a corotational excitation force. 2. The finite element results differ from those obtained with the RaleighRitz
method. The asymptote of the finite element computed response is verified for slightly lower rotating speeds since, as it was previously explained, the computed natural frequencies are lower using the finite element method than using the RayleighRitz method. Moreover the absolute values of the amplitude obtained with each of the employed methods differ slightly from each other. Again this has to be with the fact that the finite element method results adapt better to the modal shape of the Multirotor first bending mode (see Appendix 3). Response diagram mass unbalance in disk 2
Figure 4.5 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3)
It can be verified in Figure 4.5 that: 1. The critical speeds asymptotes occur only for the outer shaft synchronous BW
modes. This happens because the excitation force, caused by the mass unbalance in disk 2, is counterrotational to the inner shaft and outer shaft synchronous, and therefore excites only the outer shaft synchronous BW orbits. 2. The finite element results of the Response Diagrams are not coherent with the
finite element results of the correspondent Campbell Diagram. Namely, the asymptote corresponding to the BW critical speed for the finite element curve, does not agree with the computed 53
, another
asymptote is visible. This happens because, as it was said in the Solving Methods in the beginning of chapter 4.1, the harmonic solution of ANSYS uses the direct method to compute the natural frequencies and the pseudomodal method was the employed method for the natural frequencies computation to construct the Campbell diagrams on this work. As it is shown in the Appendix 4 to this work, if the direct method was used to determine the natural frequencies and consequently to build the Campbell Diagrams, the frequency curves would present a deviation from the solutions obtained using the pseudomodal method, especially at higher frequencies. This explains the deviation in the finite element results. Additionally the direct method used in the harmonic analysis includes all the modes in the frequency range under study, and not just the first mode as the RayleighRitz equations in chapter 2.1.3 contemplate. This explains the extra asymptote, which corresponds to the BW of the second vibration mode of the symmetric Multirotor which is within the range of the harmonic analysis done for the mass unbalance in disk 2. 3. The amplitude differences between the response curve obtained with the
RayleighRitz method and the curve obtained with the finite element method are larger for a mass unbalance in disk 2 than for a mass unbalance in disk 1. This could be related with the fact that when the Rayleigh.Ritz method was deduced for the Multirotor on chapter 2.1.2, the outer shaft was considered as rigid. This assumption was no longer taken into account when the finite element model was built. Example 2 For
54
Table 4.3 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram RR/FE error Critical Speeds Inner/outer shaft synchronous (rpm) RayleighRitz BW 9658 Finite Element Error (%) 9436 2.35 FW 10371 10188 1.80
Comparing figures 4.3 and 4.6 it is visible that: 1. The BW and FW are now much closer. This is related to the gyroscopic effect.
Because the rotors are rotating at equal speeds but in opposite senses, making the gyroscopic term present in the curves. 2. The FW mode is now increasing and the BW mode decreasing with increasing , and thus the gyroscopic force vector is now matrix very low and therefore diminishing the gap between the BW and FW
rotating speed. This happens because corotational with the inner shaft spin speed vector.
Figure 4.7 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3)
55
Figure 4.8 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3)
Figures 4.78 confirm what was previously said about the effect of the mass unbalance in the disks of the rotor. The differences between the finite elements and the RayleighRitz theories were already been justified.
Example 3 For
56
Table 4.4 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram RR/FE error Inner shaft synchronous Outer shaft synchronous Critical Speeds (rpm) (rpm) BW RayleighRitz Finite Element Error (%) 7809 7774 0.45 FW 16624 15223 9.20 BW 1883 1853 1.62 FW 2140 2084 2.69
In Figure 4.9 the only new aspect worth discussion is the large gap between the FW and BW curves. This is easily explained by the corotate operation of both shafts in this case. This will result in the largest absolute value of in the set of results presented until now. Consequently the
gyroscopic effect is significant which will lead to a sharper increase in the distance between the curves. Response diagram mass unbalance in disk 1
Figure 4.10 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3)
57
Figure 4.11 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3)
The deviation between the finite elements calculated critical speeds, using the direct and pseudomodal methods, was already subject to discussion. Anyway one should notice the increased deviation between the finite element FW critical speed computed in the Campbell diagram in Figure 4.9 ( ), the same critical speed compute with the RayleighRitz method ( )and the correspondent asymptote location in the response diagram 4.10 ( ). This could be related
either with numeric aspects of the finite element solution of the direct method, or with errors introduced by the assumptions taken in the RayleighRitz and the finite element pseudomodal approximate methods. Recall that the RayleighRitz method, for instance, doesnt include a correction for the disks inertia influence on the modes shape. Asymmetric system For the asymmetric system the elastic bearing properties are:
58
For
Figure 4.12 Campbell diagram Asymmetric Multirotor Table 4.5 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram RR/FE error Inner shaft synchronous Critical Speeds (rpm) RayleighRitz Finite Element Error (%) FW 9224 9180 0.48 BW 13039 12177 7.08
Comparing the Campbell Figure 4.12 with Figure 4.3, built in the same rotating speed ratio conditions in the symmetric system, there are some noticeable changes. 1. When the rotor is stopped there are two natural frequencies instead of one.
Since the bearing stiffness characteristics are now asymmetric, the bending natural frequencies will now be sensible to the different stiffness properties in the and directions. The same is to say, .
that the characteristic equation (2.1.3.4) will now have two solutions for 2.
The FW critical speeds are higher for the asymmetric Multirotor than for the
symmetric and the BW critical speeds are lower. We can conclude that the asymmetric stiffness properties of the bearing causes the FW and BW curves to drift apart relative to the symmetric Multirotor FW and BW curves.
59
Figure 4.13 Finite element curves make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3)
In Figure 4.13 is interesting to note that when asymmetric stiffness properties in the bearings are verified, a FW excitation force such as that caused by a mass unbalance in disk 1, can also cause resonant behavior at BW critical speeds. The response diagram differences caused by a mass unbalance in disk 2 relative to a mass unbalance in disk 1 were already widely discussed in the previous results. For this reason we will skip the response diagram for a mass unbalance in disk 2 from this point onwards.
Damped system The previous results were sufficient to show the most relevant differences between the finite element and the RaleighRitz method. For this reason, in the damped system we will just consider the solutions obtained via finite element method, again using the pseudomodal method for the Campbell diagrams and the direct method for the response diagrams. For the damped system the elastic bearing properties are:
60
Example 1 For :
Figure 4.14 Campbell Diagram Damped Multirotor Example 1 Table 4.6 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram Inner shaft synchronous (rpm) FW 9453 BW 12153
The introduction of small amount of damping doesnt change significantly the Campbell diagram and the value of the critical speeds. This is visible if we compare the Figure 4.14 with Figure 4.12. Response diagram mass unbalance in disk 1
Figure 4.15 Results make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3)
61
The Response diagram by the contrary shows substantial differences after the introduction of damping. Asymptotes are now longer visible and the overall vibration amplitude has decreased.
Example 2 For
Figure 4.16 Campbell Diagram Damped Multirotor Example 2 Table 4.7 Critical speeds associated with the previous Campbell diagram Inner shaft synchronous (rpm) BW 9186 FW 9837
The Campbell diagram shown in Figure 4.16, presents major alterations in its curves with increasing damping. High damping cause the FW whirl curve to appear above the BW curve for lower rotating speeds even when , and for higher rotating speeds the curves relative
62
Figure 4.17 Results make use of the direct method (chapter 3.1.3)
Figure 4.17 shows once more the general tendency of the response diagram of an increasingly damped rotor: Lower amplitude and less sharp peaks.
The Problem Let us then start by reconstruction a force acting transversally to a beam in a previously known location. The problem to be solved here is based on the beam that was subject of experimental studies on the article of Allen and Carne about DMISF [12]. Figure 4.18 shows the beam in question. In all examples the beam is considered free of any constrains.
63
Figure 4.18 Beam Model with Force Impulse position represented by vector F
An impulse force is applied in the leftmost end of the beam. In the preceding analysis it will be tested the capacity of each timedomain method to reconstruct the force impulse. Solving Methods Every timedomain, namely the SWAT, ISF and DMISF methods will be applied to the previous described beam following the numeric implementation explained on chapter 3.2, and the fundamentals on chapter 2.2. The Frequency domain method was not implemented, because it was only programmed for harmonic forces and not for impulse forces such as the one applied on this example. An application of the FD method will be illustrated on the chapter 4.2.2. The structure responses are extracted as mentioned on chapter 3.2.1. In the particular case of the beam the translational and rotational accelerations in every node are extracted and used in the reconstruction systems of each force reconstruction method. The Finite Element Model As was made clear on chapter 3, there are two finite element models. One for extract the structures responses and another to build the systems matrices , and used in SWAT to compute the flexible modes modal vectors and in the ISF and DMISF to build the state space system matrices. These finite element models have in common the discretization of the mesh. In the particular case of this beam, 12 equally spaced beam elements were used as shown on Figure 4.19 along with the finite element assembly table.
64
Table 4.8 Assembly between global and local dofs of the Beam mesh Element Number Element Type 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 2 5 8 11 14 17 20 23 26 29 3235 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 3336 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 5 8 11 14 17 20 23 26 29 3235 38 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 3336 39
In the ANSYS finite element model, where the transient analysis of the beam subject to an impulse was made, the beam model was built with BEAM188 (six degreeoffreedom per node) elements, that makes use of quadratic polynomials. Though based in the Timoshenko beam theory it is the recommended beam element for slender to moderately slender beams. The systems matrices were built using a three degreeoffreedom per node beam element, whose element matrices and characterization is stated on the Appendix 5 to this work. To complete the beam model, it will be supported by two soft springs to simulate freefree boundary conditions and the force will be applied on the leftmost node of the beam. In ANSYS these springs were introduced with COMBIN14 elements, while in the systems matrices the springs stiffness was simply added in the proper positions of the systems matrix.
Additionally a small value of internal damping is assigned to the beam to simulate the experimental conditioning of the beam. This was done by considering a stiffness dependent damping matrix, expressed by a positive integer factor , i.e. [ ] general systems stiffness matrix the MP, DAMP function. [ ] . Of course the spring stiffness is is used to distinguish from the not considered in the computation thats why the designation . In ANSYS factor
Numeric Data and Force Input Timehistory Table 4.2.1.1 includes all its relevant material and dimensional parameters.
Table 4.9 Numeric data of the beam Material Constants Section Dimensions Spring Stiffness (Density)
(Young Modulus)
65
The Force input signal has the characteristics displayed in table 4.2.1.2.
Table 4.10 Transient analysis and force impulse data Recorded Time Force Impulse Amplitude Force Impulse Application Instant Force Impulse Duration Sampling Time Interval
Results and Results Discussion 1. SWAT To apply the SWAT method to the beam a 15 elastic modes were included in order to apply the force reconstruction method. The obtained solution is displayed in Figure 4.20 for the entire analyzed domain on the lefthand side, and only for the first of the analysis on the righthand
side. Both the measured and reconstructed forces timehistory are displayed in the graphics. Recall that SWAT estimates the resultant force impulse in the center of gravity of the structure. The impulse was defined in the transient analysis performed in ANSYS with the properties described in Table 4.10.
Notice that the force impulse estimated by the SWAT method is about force impulse actually acting in the beam. This is slightly higher than the SWAT method in [12]. In this analysis there are several sources of error.
First of all the finite element model used to build the force reconstruction system have slightly differences from the finite element model from where the responses were extracted. This means that the force was estimated in a structural system with responses that not exactly match the response it would have if the force impulse was applied on it.
66
Additionally in the mentioned work of Carne et al. the method was applied experimentally and not numerically, which implies a different procedure in the way the elastic modes are obtained and treated. To conclude, it can be said that the SWAT method presents rather good results for the estimation of the force impulse amplitude in the beam. After the force impulse is removed the SWAT method stills estimating a nonzero force value, but even though the main estimated curve peak is clearly located between the time intervals in which the force impulse was acting in the beam. 2. ISF For the ISF method the lower delay parameter value at which stable results were obtained was , the chosen number of Markov parameters to use in this analysis was . The force is being ], has a 1 in the second array position and 0 in the remaining. The results thus
estimated in the dof where the force is applied. It corresponds to dof number 2 as shown on Figure 4.2.1.1. So vector [
obtained are displayed in Figure 4.21. Again with the entire time domain in the lefthand side and the first time instants displayed on the righthand side.
As expected from the results in the literature [12], the ISF leads to very good estimations with low errors. The estimated curve practically overlays the measured force impulse. Despite this fact, it is noticeable the residual ringing conducted by the estimated force curve after the force impulse is removed. 3. DMISF The first stable solution for the beam using DMISF was obtained for method vector [ . As in the ISF ] will make the force estimation to take place in the dof where we know the force is
applied. Figure 4.22 shows the obtained results for the entire time domain on the lefthand side and the first time instants zoom on the righthand side.
67
The results obtained with DMISF are as good as that obtained with the ISF method. The estimated force almost overlaps the measured force in the impulse application time instants. Despite this, it is noticeable a slight reduction in the estimation curve ringing in the postforce impulse time period.
This set of results globally suggests that the DMISF presents better results than the other methods, since the estimated force follows in perfection the measured force and it has the less significant residual ringing. 4.2.2 Application to a Symmetric Rotor
The Problem Now let us consider a symmetric rotor, such as that shown in Figure 4.23 with a simple supported shaft, no elastic bearings, and one disk.
The considered rotating rotor will be subject to a harmonic force excitation caused by a mass unbalance in the disk. The rotor is considered to be rotating at constant speed.
68
Solving Methods Firstly the Frequency domain method will be applied to the current problem in order to localize the input load. Then the SWAT, ISF and DMISF methods will be successively applied to the rotor to determine the timehistory of the force. The method implementation follows the description made on chapters 3.2 and 2.2. Once more time the response is extracted from a finite element model as mentioned on chapter 3.2.1. The translational and rotation accelerations about the two perpendicular axes to the rotor rotating axis, in every model node, compose the response data from which forces are to be estimated. The Finite Element Model Right below in Figure 4.24, the used mesh in the finite element models is represented for this rotor along with the assembly matrix used to build the matrices of the system, with every dof number identified.
Figure 4.24 Finite element model with the element numbers in black and the nodal numbers in blue
Table 4.11 Assembly between global and local dofs of the Monorotor mesh Element Number Element Type 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam Punctual Mass 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 13 2 6 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 14 3 7 11 15 19 23 27 31 35 15 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 16 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 6 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 38 7 11 15 19 23 27 31 35 39 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 
The element matrices for the rotor components are shown on chapter 3.1.2. In this example the used element stiffness matrices are the ones which include a shear correction. Since no axial force is applied in the rotor, the axial force stiffness influence is null. In the ANSYS finite element model the shaft is modeled with BEAM188 (six dof per node) elements with quadratic polynomials, the disk is represented by a punctual mass of equivalent inertia
69
using the element MASS21, and the displacements in the transversal directions are constrained at the shafts extremity nodes. Theres no addition of damping factors. Numeric Data and Force Input Timehistory Table 4.12 includes all its relevant material and dimensional parameters.
Table 4.12 Numeric data of the Monorotor Material Constants Dimensions Mass Unbalance (Density)
(Young Modulus)
(Poisson Ratio)
Table 4.13 includes all relevant data used in the frequency domain analysis.
Table 4.13 Relevant data for the frequency domain force identification method Initial frequency Final frequency Number of solutions
The time domain analysis parameters as well as the value of the rotating speed that influences the force input signal has the characteristics displayed in Table 4.14.
Table 4.14 Relevant data for the time domain force identification methods Recorded Time Rotating speed Sampling Time Interval
Results and Results Discussion 1. Frequency Domain For the Frequency domain force localization problem it is necessary to define the nodes where the response is known and where it is unknown as demonstrated on chapter 2.2.1. This information is condensed in table 4.15.
Table 4.15 List of the known and unknown nodes Node number Known Unknown
70
Appling the Frequency domain method as stated in the parameters present in table 4.13, the error graphic for each force combination, computed as demonstrated in equation (2.2.1.11), it results a graphic such as Figure 4.25 displays below.
As is perceptible in Figure 4.25, the error is minimized in the in the rigid supports and in the disks node. The force position is therefore determined as being placed at the disk. 2. SWAT
combination corresponds to the three forces acting respectively in the nodes number ,
The rotor is now rotating at constant speed and it is intended to determine the force time history of the applied load at the disk. Recall that the estimated force determined with the SWAT method estimates the resultant force at the structures gravity center. As the disk is rotating, so does the force, since the mass unbalance that causes the unbalance rotates with it. Therefore the force will be reconstructed in both rotor transversal directions. The following results were obtained using 20 elastic modes, and the two translation rigid body mode vectors (each for nodal translation dof) are built as stated on chapter 3.2.3.
71
The results for each direction are displayed in Figure 4.26 below.
Notice that the estimated force curve present higher values than the measured force when the force amplitude approaches the higher peaks. As the force approaches its lower amplitude peaks, the estimated force curve starts do adjust better the measured force curve results. In this particular case the error is even less than the 20% error obtained when SWAT was applied to the beam. Again the differences between the finite element models used to extract and to estimate the force input induce some error into the solution. These results are highly dependent of the number of elastic modes included in the analysis. The best results for the rotor were obtained with the 20 elastic modes in the in the direction. As it was expectable the force timehistory present minimum amplitude in one direction in the time instant it is achieving the maximum amplitude in the other direction. Despite the described handicaps SWAT allows a good understanding of the timedomain evolution of the force acting on the structure. 3. ISF Applying the ISF method with a delay parameter and Markov parameters, a stable ] vectors with a solution was obtained for the force applied at the disks node in both transversal directions. To obtain a force estimation in each direction, it is necessary to generate two [ in the array direction and 30 modes
position correspondent to the dof in the desired position and direction in each analysis. The obtained graphics are represented in Figure 4.27.
72
In general the estimated force curve closely follows the measured force curve. Despite of that it should be mentioned, the difficulty demonstrated by the estimated force curve to follow the peaks at lower amplitudes, exceeding in some points the amplitude of the measured force. Also note the intense ringing of the estimated force in the first time instants of the reconstructed force in the direction.
4. DMISF Using the same [ of the force in the and ] vectors that were used in the ISF method in order to obtain an estimation directions, and applying a delay parameter of , it results two
Notice that the ring is much less intense in the DMISF estimated curve when in comparison with the ISF estimated curve. Nevertheless, the estimated force amplitude especially in the higher force peaks fails to meet a perfect matching with the measured force curve.
Globally it can be said that timedomain force identification methods present good results when applied to simple examples of Rotordynamics. SWAT presents good results qualitatively speaking, but fails to present consisting force amplitude reconstruction. The ISF method despite showing some ringing has proven to be highly reliable in force amplitude prediction, while the DMISF method has shown difficulties in determining the force amplitude at the higher force amplitude peaks, but diminishes the ringing of the force curve. This is consistent with what was obtained in the beam application example.
73
The DUPRIN project was launched with the support of the European Commission in 1990, in which 14 European research partners were involved. They had the objective of developing a High bypass, low fuel consumption and highly efficient jet engine to meet the growing needs of sustainability in the aircraft propulsion market [5]. The achieved design included a compressed air fed four stage turbine that supplied the shafts connected with two counterrotating ducted propfans with 160kW allowing a maximum rotating speed of up to 16 000 rpm. [6]
Figure 4.29 The DUPRIN Propfan in its test facility source: [6]
The first task to perform will be the reproduction of the Campbell Diagram and the first two modal, and to compare the achieved solutions with that present on the literature [6]. For that a selfmade finite element model in ANSYS is used. To finish the chapter, the ISF method will be applied to the finite model of a Propfan engine to reconstruct a force whose location is known but whose amplitude and periodicity is ignored. This last example intends to show that time domain force identification can be of practical use in aircraft propulsion applications. 4.3.1 Modal Analysis In this section the modal analysis representation in Rotordynamics, the Campbell diagram, will be presented for the DUPRIN Propfan. The BW and FW orbits of the first vibration mode are also shown. This set of results intends to validate the coherence of the dynamic behavior of our Propfan model. The Problem The structure to be analyzed is a Multirotor configuration based on the DUPRIN Propfan. The exact dimensions (with exception of the its length and maximum radius indicated in [29] ) of the Propfan engine, as well as its constituent materials were not provided. A trial to achieve an approximate model becomes therefore the only available choice.
74
In what concerns the materials, a titanium alloy was assumed to the elements corresponding to the fans, and a stainless steel was assumed in the remaining elements representing the Propfans shaft. Lalanne et al. show a picture of their Propfan finite element model when they performed studies in the subject [6]. This picture was used to scale the Propfan engine finite element model used in this work. To define the dimensions of the model of the engine a crossreference between the scale and the two known dimensions was made determining therefore the remaining dimensions of the Propfan, resulting in the schematic shown in Figure 4.30.
The Propfan model has three bearings whose longitudinal and radial coordinates are displayed in Figure 4.30 as well, and they include only stiffness terms in the material damping term was also considered, equivalent to a quality factor and components. A
because the authors in [6] considered it appropriate to describe the real dynamic behavior of the engine. The numeric values of the stiffness of the bearings were not provided as well, therefore its values were adjusted until an acceptable agreement between the authors results a nd that present in [6] was met.
Solving Methods In order to obtain the intended results, a finite element model was built in ANSYS and a modal analysis performed. After this the ANSYS Rotordynamics Postprocessing tools were used to extract the Campbell diagram representation, to compute the correspondent critical speeds and to display the orbit shapes associated with the first two vibration modes.
The Finite Element Model The developed finite element model was inspired in the one used by Lalanne and Ferraris [6]. The inner shaft was divided in 25 BEAM 188 elements and the outer one was divided in 15 BEAM 188 elements. Recalling the finite element model used in the Multirotor example on chapter 4.1, and comparing it with this example, it is noticeable the degree of refinement used in this particular model.
75
Additionally, and as it was performed for the Multirotor example in chapter 4.1, the disks were modeled by punctual masses of equivalent inertia, using element MASS 21 and the bearings stiffness was modeled with COMBIN14 spring elements. To simplify the finite element model the stiffness of the spring connecting the inner and the outer shaft was considered infinite. This was also an assumption taken in the Multirotor example present in this work, and it has given satisfactory results. The quality factor was was accounted for making use of the function MP/ DMPR.
The resultant finite element model is shown in Figure 4.31 just below.
Numerical Data The Propfan dimensions are already shown in the sketch shown in Figure 4.30. The remaining data is described on Table 4.16 below.
Table 4.16 Numeric data of the Propfan Material Constants Bearing Properties Stainless Steel (Density) Titanium (Density)
(Young Modulus)
(Young Modulus)
(Poisson Ratio)
(Poisson Ratio)
76
Results and Results Discussion Campbell Diagram The obtained Campbell Diagram for the Propfan used in this work is shown in Figure 4.32 along with the Campbell Diagram obtained in [6] for the same structure. The associated critical speeds are indicated in Table 4.17.
Figure 4.32 Propfan Campbell diagram comparison Table 4.17 Error computed relative to the values obtained with the authors finite element model Inner/Outer shaft synchronous Critical Speeds (rpm) FW Finite Element 7146 Lalanne et al. Error (%) 7019 1.78 8421 8357 0.76 BW
Modal orbits The modal orbits for the first two vibration modes are here depicted in Figure 4.33 and compared with the results of Lalanne et al. This is done to confirm the coherence of the obtained modal analysis solution.
77
Figure 4.33 First two modal shapes of the Propfan; Authors model above/Model in [6] below; FW (Left) and BW(Right)
Several conclusions can be taken from the established comparisons evident in Figures 4.3233. 1. The dynamic behavior is coherent, i.e. in the frequency range contained in the
Campbell Diagrams in Figure 4.32 the whirl sequence at which the vibration modes appear is the same in both finite element models. Adding to this the modal shapes associated with the first two vibration modes computed with the developed finite element model coincide with the modal shapes obtained by Lalanne et al. in their work about the DUPRIN project. 2. The evolution of the first two frequency curves as well as the critical speed
values is similar in both finite element models as Figure 4.32 and Table 4.17 state. These two conclusions suggest the reliability of the developed finite element model and give the necessary confidence to try the application of a timedomain force reconstruction method in this Propfan model. 3. The verified differences for the third and fourth vibration modes should be related with
incorrect assumptions in the dimensioning and material constant choice for each Propfan part, between the inhouse developed Propfan finite element model and the one developed in the studies of Lalanne et al. [6]
78
4.3.2
The Problem The force excitation at which the Propfan shown in Figure 4.30 will be subjected is caused by a mass unbalance in Fan 1. The Propfan will start from rest and will accelerate at constant rate to a speed of 625 achieved 0.5 seconds afterwards. The two shafts constituting the Propfan are running at the same speed but in opposite senses. The Fundaments Chapter 2.1 of this work didnt contain any mention to transient motion of rotors. Therefore a brief description of these motions is provided in the Appendix 6 to this work.
Solving Methods The finite element model presented in the last section (4.3.1) is slightly changed before being applied to this problem. The couple between the two rotors used in the previous model to connect the inner and the outer shafts was removed, and a small stiffness spring was introduced in both and
directions. This was performed because when the Transient analysis was carried out in the finite element model of the Propfan, the force reported to be applied in the node of the FAN 1 differed from the force actually being applied in that node, leading to erroneous values of the response. The author could only overtake this issue, in the available time frame for this work, by removing the referred coupling and by introducing the springs. This means that the modal analysis that was previously undertaken not actually corresponds to the behavior of the finite element model employed in the Transient analysis code. A full transient analysis, in the previously described conditions, was performed in ANSYS in order to get the Propfan responses. The force was modeled as two punctual forces acting along the and components as described on chapter 3.3, that follow the force functions present in equation
A6.8 for transient motion deduced in Appendix 6. Since the Propfan model is much more complex than the Symmetric rotor considered in chapter 4.2.2, the accelerations will be only registered in the translational dofs of the even nodes of the inner rotor (13 nodes 26 measurements), and in the translational dofs of each node of the outer shaft (16 nodes 32 measurements) limiting the response array in each time instant to 58 values. Additionally in order to apply the ISF, the statespace system was built using the systems matrices. These matrices were built using the Substructure tool of ANSYS using the same 58 dofs from where the response was extracted as master dofs, i.e. ANSYS built a simplified model from the dofs the user wants to include in the force reconstruction process. ISF is now ready for application according to chapters 2.2.4 and 3.2.4, with the nuance that the damping matrix [ ] that include the gyroscopic terms is now varying from time instant to time instant, and that new stiffness matrix terms appear. This is achieved through cyclic computation. One may think that the problem is simply solved by applying the ISF method with matrix [ ] changing in each time instant. This however has led to unstable solutions. Another cyclic methodology is proposed by the author.
79
Each cycle step will correspond to a time instant. Firstly the rotating speed is fixed with its instantaneous value. Then the estimated force is computed for the time domain comprising the initial time instant and the actual time instant with constant rotating speed equal to the instantaneous rotating speed. When the force estimation is obtained, only the value corresponding to the step time instant is saved to the force estimation array. This methodology has presented stable solutions but increased computation time. ISF will be the only force reconstruction method applied since it demonstrated to be the most computer efficient method in the authors experience.
Numerical Data The data in Table 4.16 is again applicable to this case. It must be now added the Transient analysis data, the mass unbalance data as well as the stiffness of the springs connecting the inner shaft with the outer one, included in Table 4.18.
Table 4.18 Transient analysis and mass unbalance data Recorded Time Sampling Time Interval Mass unbalance Offset Spring stiffness data
Results and Results Discussion The resultant estimated force curves are shown in Figure 4.34 along with the force actually acting on the node corresponding to Fan 1. The elapsed analysis time is also shown.
The estimated curves present a reasonable agreement with the measured force at lower force amplitudes and a considerable deviation at the higher amplitudes. These deviations may be related with the reduced set of measurement points and with imprecisions in the finite element model developed in ANSYS, from which the responses were obtained. Additionally the elapsed analysis time starts to become an issue. In the average of the two reconstructions the code needed 647 seconds to reconstruct 0.5 seconds of force timehistory. The 80
ISF method was used at the first place and the number of Markov parameters was kept low, since this configuration has shown the most computer efficient performance.
81
of the solution of ISF and DMISF and how the inclusion of more or less flexible modes would affect the ability of SWAT to estimate better or worse the forces. It would be interesting though to develop this kind of work in the future, for the sake of the optimization of the force identification process. To improve the stability of ISF and DMISF methods, it would be interesting to employ nonlinear control optimization techniques as proposed in the Appendix of the paper by Allen and Carne [26]. In what concerns the SWAT method, the generalization presented by Genaro and Rade [20] to systems with multiple forces acting simultaneously, would be an important step in the improvement reliability of this method. It would be also interesting in the context of rotor transient operation to employ these methods on the detection of changes in the rotor dynamic operation, i.e. to detect changes in the rotors spin speed or even in the spin speed change rate (see Appendix 6). One should recall finally that these methods were applied exclusively numerically. Experimental application would imply necessarily adjustments in the followed procedure, namely in the definition of the statespace system used in the ISF and DMISF methods. In the mentioned methods, it would be more advantageous to use the statespace system based on modal properties (easily accessed in experimental test mounts) rather than based on the system matrices (that implies the usage of a numeric finite element model).
83
REFERENCES
[1] F. Nelson, Rotor Dynamics without Equations, vol. 10(3), 2007, pp. 210. [2] D. J. Ewins, Control of vibration and resonance in aero engines and rotating machinery  An overview, vol. 87, Imperial College London, United Kingdom: International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2010, pp. 504510. [3] J. J. Sinou, D. Demailly, C. Villa, M. Massenzio and F. Laurant, Rotordynamics Analysis: Experimental and Numerical Investigations, Vols. Volume 5: 19th Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise, Parts A, B, and C, ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
(IDETC/CIE2003). [4] M. Lalanne and G. Ferraris, Rotordynamics prediction in Engineering, Wiley; 2 edition, 1998. [5] H. P. M. ErnstHeinrich Hirschel, Aeronautical research in Germany: from Lilienthal until today, vol. Volume 147, Springer, 2004. [6] G. Ferraris, V. Maisonneuve and M. Lalanne, Prediction of the Dynamic Behavior of Nonsymmetric Coaxial Co or CounterRotating Rotors, vol. 195(4), Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1996, pp. 649666. [7] M. Adams, Rotating Machinery Vibration, 2nd Edition ed., CRC Press, 2009. [8] J. C. Pereira, Introduo Dinmica de Rotores, Florianpolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2003. [9] E. Assis and V. Steffen Jr., Inverse Problem Techniques For The Identification Of RotorBearing Systems, vol. 11, Inverse Problems in Engineering, 2003, pp. 3953. [10] Q. Han, H. Yao and B. Wen, Parameter identifications for a rotor system based on its finite element model and with varying speeds, vol. 26, Acta Mech Sin, 2010, pp. 299303. [11] K. Stevens, Force Identification Problems  An Overview, Proceedings of the 1987 SEM Spring Conference on Experimental Mechanics, 1987, pp. 838844. [12] M. S. Allen and T. G. Carne, Delayed, multistep inverse structural filter for robust force identification, vol. 22, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2008, pp. 10361054. [13] R. J. Hundhausen, D. E. Adams, M. Derriso, P. Kukuchek and R. Alloway, Transient loads identification for a standof metallic thermal protection system panel, Orlando, Florida, 2005. [14] M. M. Neves and N. M. M. Maia, Estimation of Applied Forces Using The Transmissibility Concept, vol. paper 377, IDMECIST, Technical University of Lisbon, Department of Mechanical Engineering: ISMA 2010. [15] Y. Lage, N. M. M. Maia, M. M. Neves and A. M. R. Ribeiro, A Force Identification Approach with the Transmissibility Concept for MultiDegreeOfFreedom Systems, IDMEC, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Instituto Superior Tcnico.
84
[16] N. Maia, M. Fontul and A. Ribeiro, Transmissibility of Forces in MultipleDegreeofFreedom Systems, Leuven, Belgium: Proceedings of ISMA 2006, "Noise and Vibration Engineering", 2006. [17] A. M. R. Ribeiro, N. M. M. Maia and J. Silva, On the Generalization of the Transmissibility Concept, vol. 14, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2000, pp. 2935. [18] T. G. Carne, V. I. Bateman and R. L. Mayes, Force Reconstruction using the sum of weighted accelerations technique, San Diego, CA: 10th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC X), 1992, pp. 291298. [19] D. L. Gregory, T. G. Priddy and D. O. Smallwood, Experimental Determination of the Dynamic Forces Acting on Nonrigid Bodies, Long Beach, CA: Aerospace Technology Conference and Exposition, 1986, p. SAE Paper 861791. [20] G. Genaro and D. A. Rade, Input force identification in the timedomain, Santa Barbara, CA: 16th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC XVI), 1998, pp. 124129. [21] A. D. Kammer and D. C. Steltzner, Input Force Estimation Using an Inverse Structural Filter, 17th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC XVII), 1999, pp. 954960. [22] J. Unger and G. De Roeck, System Identification and Damage Detection in Civil Engineering, unpublished, 2002. [23] Z. S. Zutavern and D. W. Childs, Identification of Rotordynamic Forces in a Flexible Rotor System Using Magnetic Bearings, vol. Vol. 130, Transactions of the ASME, 2008, pp. 022504/16. [24] J. Verhoeven, Excitation force identification of rotating machines using operational rotor/stator amplitude data and analytical synthesized tranfer functions, vol. 110, Boston: American society of mechanical engineers, Design engineering technology conferences, 1987, pp. 307314. [25] M. Spirig and T. Staubli, Identification of Nonlinear Rotor Dynamic Coefficients Using Multiple Circunfrencial Pressure Measurements, Hochschule Luzern, 1997. [26] M. S. Allen and T. G. Carne, Comparison of Inverse Structural Filter and Sum of Weighted Accelerations Technique Time Domain Force Identification Methods, 47th AIAAASMEASCEAHSASC Structures, Strustural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2006. [27] M. S. Allen and J. H. Ginsberg, A global, singleinputmultioutput (SIMO) implementation of the algorithm of mode isolation and application to analytical and experimental data, 2006, p. 1090 1111. [28] Release Documentation for ANSYS, Theory Reference, Chapter 17. Analysis Procedures, 17.2. Transient Analysis. [29] G. H. Hegen, W. PuffertMeissner, L. Dieterle and H. Vollmers, Flow field investigations on a wing installed Counter Rotating Ultrahighbypass Fan engine simulator in the low speed wind tunnel DNWLST, Vols. NLRTP99104, National Aerospace Laborator y NLR, 1999.
85
APPENDIXES
(A.1.1)
From the inspection of the equations (2.1.3.910), it is visible that the sign of the product is dependent of the sign of the following expression :
)(
(A.1.2)
The points of sense of whirl change, are the point at which speeds at which this happens are easily obtained from (A.1.2), giving:
So we can conclude from a signal analysis of equation (A.1.2) that: rotor in FW rotor in BW Another interesting aspect, is the location of the critical speeds relative to the whirl change speeds and . As it was referred in the previous section, the critical speeds are determined making the denominator of the expressions (2.1.3.910) equal to zero. Concretizing this statement, it results: (A.1.3)
)(
(A.1.4)
) )
(A.1.5)
86
Because function ( ) is a quadratic one we can conclude that it is positive if , being and the two critical speeds. It can be shown that introducing the expressions in (A.1.3) in equation (A.1.4) it results:
and
( (
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
(A.1.6)
So, if the asymmetry in the bearings is so that in both situations of signal (see the definitions of in equations 2.1.2.1516), the relations between critical speeds and whirl sense change speeds are: with with Additionally is curious to verify that the elliptical orbit become progressively flatter on the axis and more elongated on the axis as the rotor passes the BW region. These situations are all depicted on the Figures A.12.
87
[ ]{ }
[ ]{ }
[ ]{ }
{ ( )}
(A.2.1)
whose meaning of the matrices and vectors are already known from previous sections. To start with, the matrices of equation (A.2.1) are decomposed into their symmetric and skewsymmetric parts. This is done so that the dynamical effects could be identified as energy conservative and energy nonconservative. From the matrix algebra theory, the decomposition of a generic matrix [ ], can be expressed as follows:
88
[
where:
] ] ]
[ [ [
] ] ]
(A.2.2)
[ [
(A.2.3)
The and indexes designate the symmetric and skewsymmetric parts respectively. In the same way the matrices of (2.1.5.1) are decomposed, resulting:
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
(A.2.4) [ ] [ ] [ ] That and are conservative, and nonconservative, can be an accepted statement [7]. The skewsymmetric parts are now further analyzed, regarding their influence in the incremental work done on the rotor, so that they could be classified into causers of conservative or nonconservative energetic effects. ] will be analyzed. In equation (2.1.2.26), it is visible that the contributions to the Firstly [ skewsymmetric part of the damping matrix come from two different sources. The first contribution is always present in the considered model and that is the damping effect resultant from the gyroscopic effect, the second contribution depends on the skewsymmetric characteristics of the bearings ( and ), coherent with the definition shown in Figure 2.4. The computation of the incremental work done by these two contributions must be effectuated, so that the energetic effects can be determined. The incremental work done on the rotor by the skewsymmetric terms of a bearing is written in the following way:
[
in which:
]{ }{ ] [
} ]
(A.2.5)
[
Applying the chain rule ( results:
(A.2.6)
(A.2.7)
The incremental work is null, since the force vector is always perpendicular to its associated velocity vector. Let us now focus on the gyroscopic moment effects in what concerns the incremental work done on the rotor. The expression that shows this relation is:
[ [
]{ }{ ]{ }{
} }
(A.2.8) Again the resulting incremental work is null, because the gyroscopic moment vector is always perpendicular to its associated angular velocity vector. The conclusion to be taken from (A.2.7) and (A.2.8), is that the skewsymmetric part of the damping matrix includes only conservative force fields and doesnt contribute therefore to the addition or dissipation of energy of the rotor. Considering again the course of reasoning used to obtain the expression (2.1.2.26), it is visible that the strain energy is only responsible for the symmetric terms of the stiffness matrix [ ] . So, the 89
skewsymmetric terms [
rotors bearings. Again, to determine the energy effect of these terms the calculation of the incremental work is indispensable:
[
Where:
]{ }{
}
(A.2.9)
and Hence, the incremental work done by the skewsymmetric part of the bearings is an exact differential, meaning that the transferred energy between any two given points of the rotor s trajectory is path dependent and therefore, nonconservative.
()
()
FigureA.3 Generic periodic orbit of a rotor relative to a inertial reference frame source: [7]  edited
Now it must be determined if this nonconservative effect adds or dissipates energy from the rotor. That can be achieved formulating the expression an expression of the net energypercycle exchange resultant from the [ ] terms:
(A.2.10) With the help of the Figure A.3, and considering two line integrals between the generic points and , the previous integral becomes:
(A.2.11) Watching carefully the expression (A.2.11), it is perceivable that the integral represents the orbit area, and that its value is positive when in corotational whirl, and negative otherwise. It should be noted additionally, that when theres dissipation of energy , and when theres energy being added to the rotor . Since , it can be concluded that the skewsymmetric terms of the stiffness have a dissipative effect in backward whirl conditions and excites (energy addition) the rotor if the whirl is forwards. 90
] terms are now investigated. This terms can only result from the rotors The effects of [ elements mass matrices, namely from those of the disk and the shaft. By similarity with the formulation followed in equations (A.2.9), (A.2.10) and (A.2.11), it can be obtained for the energypercycle influence of the skew symmetric part of the mass energy the expression right below:
(A.2.12) If the rotor transversal vibration is considered as harmonic, such is the case of equations (2.1.2.5) and (2.1.2.6). The equation (A.2.12) can be further simplified:
(A.2.13) The factor comes from the second time derivative of the trigonometric functions present in (2.1.2.5) and (2.1.2.6). Similarly with what was done to obtain equation (A.2.11), the integral in (A.2.13 can be split in two line integrals giving:
(A.2.14) For , and recalling the considerations previously written regarding the nature and signal of the line integral displayed in (A.2.14), one concludes that the skewsymmetric part of the mass matrix dissipates energy ( ) when the rotor is in forward whirl, and an instability causer ( ) when the opposite is verified. Although this phenomena is theoretically possible, it has never been documented [7](page 76), meaning that is consistent with physical reality. This conclusion is significant, since it implies that the rotors mass matrix must be constrained to symmetry in order to reproduce real results. Neglecting therefore let us now write an expression that includes nonconservative contributions of the skewsymmetric stiffness matrix and the symmetric damping matrix, in one single expression, so that the total energypercycle exchange of the rotor can be obtained. It is worth to mention, that both nonconservative contributions depend only on the bearing stiffness and damping characteristics. For a better visualization of the mentioned effects of the symmetric and skewsymmetric parts Figure A.3, shows two typical rotor orbits, both in FW (a) and (c) and BW (b) and (d).
91
Figure A.4 Force components of the various matrices decomposed on its symmetric and skewsymmetric terms source: [7]
On the circular orbits in Figure A.4 (a) and (b), it is visible that the only force components that change their sense when the rotor changes from FW to BW, are the vectors and . The first acts always parallel, but in the opposite sense to the instantaneous velocity vector, thus contributing for the stable behavior of the rotor. The second always acts radially to the rotors orbit but has a centripetal sense if the rotor is in FW and centrifugal sense when the rotor is in BW. This happens because is the gyroscopic effect term, and is this effect the responsible for the divergence of the FW and BW branches of the Campbell Diagram as Figure 2.8 states. The frequency grows with the rotating speed if the Monorotor is in FW because the gyroscopic effect force vector has the same sense of the rotor stiffness force vector , causing virtual structure stiffening and therefore a natural frequency growth. The opposite happens when the Monorotor is in BW. It is also observable that the instability generator terms ( ) and ( ), are acting parallel and in the sense of motion of the orbit, when it is in FW and BW respectively. This confirms what was said concerning the nonconservative effects of these terms. On the same Figure A.4 are represented in (c) and (d) an elliptical rotor orbit shape. The general conclusions taken before to the circular shape orbits, regarding the sense of action and the stability effects of each term, can be taken again into account for these orbits, excepting that this time the forces acting on the rotor are harder to visualize, since the displacement vector is no longer perpendicular to the instantaneous velocity vector , with the exception, of course, of the points where ) vector overlap the semimajor and semiminor axis of the ellipse. Consequently, force vector ( stops acting exclusively perpendicularly to the instantaneous velocity vector. This fact is particularly relevant since it explains why, when the orbits are elliptical, and hence when the rotor is asymmetric, a corotational excitation force such as that caused by a mass unbalance present in a rotors disk, can induce both FW and BW vibrations, while it induces in a symmetric rotor (circular orbit) only FW vibrations. Let us recall the expression (2.1.2.19), which describes the radial interaction force vector { } on a bearing of the rotor. The incremental work done by the forces acting on the bearing is simply calculated multiplying each component of this force vector by the respective incremental displacements. The energypercycle exchange on the bearings can then be written as:
92
)
(A.2.15)
Let us consider a generic harmonic rotor orbit, so that an expression for the energy exchange per harmonic cycle can be obtained. For this purpose, and will be defined as:
( (
) )
(A.2.16)
Substituting expressions, (A.2.16) and (2.1.2.19) in (A.2.15), solving the resultant integral, and recalling that the incremental work done by the symmetric part of the stiffness matrix and the skewsymmetric part of the damping matrix is null, it yields:
[ (
)]
(A.2.17)
The parameters , , , , and are all positive, furthermore the phase angles ) difference is positive for forward whirl ( ( ), and negative for backward whirl rotor motion ) ( ( ). Typically the dependent term of the equation (A.2.17), grows faster than the dependent term, with increasing rotating speed. This means, that for corotational whirl (forward whirl), the two effects can exactly balance at a given rotating speed . This speed is dubbed the instability threshold speed, since an increment in the rotating speed would lead the rotor into an energy addition state or selfexcitation. It becomes therefore clear, from the analysis of the previous equation that unstable phenomena can only derive from forward whirl state. Moreover, it is worth noting, that instability will occur first in the lowestfrequency mode, since it is characterized by the largest traversed orbit areas, and consequently by higher products. With these equations the fundamentals of energy are concluded. In the first sections of chapter 2.1 the kinetic and strain energies resultant of the rotor operation were presented, those equation together with the ones presented just now, that account for the dissipation selfexcitation energy with origin on the bearings, supply the necessary tools for a basic study on rotors energy efficiency. Instability Critical Speed Determination and Parameters that Affect its Performance Despite the energypercycle exchange in the bearing capability to detect the stability threshold speed, it isnt the usual method used to this end. In fact the eigenvalues of the dynamic system are the most common tool for instability prediction. This is so because usually in computational methods theres an inherent error associated with the extraction of the eigenvectors [7]. This leads to slightly different orbits and consequently the variables in equations (A.2.16) are affected by this error contaminating the speed threshold computation through equation (A.2.17). As it will be shown, the methods based on the determination of the eigenvalues in free motion conditions are more simple and precise since they dont involve so much intermediate calculations as the energy based method of equation (A.2.17). On a generic damped rotor in free motion, the solutions of the eigenvalue/eigenvector problem are given as described by the equations (2.1.3.12) whose eigenvalues are in the form: (A.2.18) 93
whose variables meanings were already explained. Introducing equation (A.2.18) in the solution equations (2.1.3.12) it results: ( ( ) )
( (
) )
(A.2.19)
where the second terms ( ) represent oscillatory motion and the first terms , represent the amplitude decay or increase over time, depending if its exponent is negative or positive respectively. The Table A.1 summarizes how will the structural system behave with the change of the values of and .
and
Signal
Table A.1 source: [7]  edited Modal Motion Zero damped, steady state sinusoidal motion Underdamped, sinusoidal, exponential decay Negatively damped, sinusoidal, exponential growth Rigid body mode Overdamped, nonoscillatory, exponential decay Statically unstable, nonoscillatory, exponential growth
As the table shows, a dynamic system will enter into instability whenever the value of is negative, since it changes makes the real part of the eigenvalue positive. So for a simple damped rotor, one can compute the eigenvalues for several rotating speeds until the real part becomes real. This method besides giving the critical speed for instability would also give the value of the natural frequency at which an unstable state is verified. Another method present in the literature [4] is the RouthHurwitz criterion. In order to make this method clear, let us consider again equation (2.1.3.4) for a Multirotor. This equation can be generically described as the following polynomial equation: (A.2.20) where are the coefficients of the characteristic equation. The RouthHurwitz method defines a matrix with the coefficients of the characteristic equation, which is:
(A.2.21)
[
with the coefficients of equation (A.2.20), (A.2.21) becomes:
94
(A.2.22)
from which are deductible the RouthHurwitz coefficients for Multirotor system:
[ [ ] [ [
]  ] ] 
(A.2.23)
),
(A.2.24)
Substituting the expressions of (A.2.24) into the RouthHurwitz coefficients whose calculation is expressed in (A.2.23), it yields: ( ( )(
)(
) ) )
(
(
)
)
(A.2.25) Routh and Hurwitz have demonstrated that the system is unstable whenever one of the RouthHurwitz coefficients is negative [4]. Note that if the couple terms of the bearings stiffness are equal to zero, the Multirotor is stable for any value of , which confirms the statements made after the deduction of equation (A.2.17).
95
describe the first bending mode of a simple supported beam. For this function the deformed shape of the rotor would have its maximum value at the middle point of the shaft. In rotors with complex geometries, where, for instance, the disks and elastic bearings are deviated from the shafts middle point, and an additional outer shaft is considered the first mode shape can be slightly different from that described by the shape function in equation (2.1.2.1). Let us watch closely the first bending vibration mode shape of a symmetric Multirotor such as that used in chapter 4.1.4 at rest. For this purpose we will use a finite element model and the ANSYS toolset, and the refined mesh presented on chapter 4.1.2. The models nodes along with the modal shape normalized to the mass matrix are presented in the Figure A.5. while the total nodal displacement is presented in Table A.2 for each node number.
Inner shaft
Springs
Outer shaft Figure A.5 First bending mode shape of the Multirotor
Table A.2 Nodal displacements Node nr. Displ. (m) Node nr. Displ. (m) Node nr. Displ. (m) Node nr. Displ. (m) Node nr. Node nr. 1 0 8 0.16165 15 0.23507 22 0.1816 29 36 2 9 0.17978 16 0.23444 23 0.1658 30 37 0.12267 3 10 0.19595 17 0.23127 24 0.14847 31 0 38 0.14703 4 11 0.2099 18 0.22569 25 0.12979 32 0 39 0.17136 5 12 0.22057 19 0.21781 26 0.10994 33 40 0.19567 6 0.12043 13 0.22825 20 0.20776 27 34 7 0.14178 14 0.23304 21 0.19567 28 35 0.025083 0.049917 0.074252 0.097839
0.089121 0.067524
In Figure A.5 it is visible that the middle point of the inner shaft corresponds to node 16, but the displacement Table A.2 shows that the maximum displacement is verified in node 15. This slight difference in the modes shape can contribute decisively for the disparities in the computation of natural frequencies of the rotor with each of the used methods.
Appendix 4 Deviation Between the Natural Frequencies Obtained via Direct Method and the Pseudo modal Method
Here it is intended to explain the reason way some additional asymptotes appear in the Response diagrams where the finite element method was employed and to explain way some critical
96
resonance speeds in the response diagrams are slightly deviated from the predicted critical speeds in the Campbell diagrams. This is actually related with the methods used in ANSYS to determine both the Campbell and the Response diagrams. As it was said in chapter 4.1 the Campbell diagrams were computed using a pseudomodal method and the response diagram was obtained by performing a full harmonic analysis which computes the structures modes through the direct method and considers all the structures modes in its construction. To show this, the response diagram shown in Figure 4.5 is again considered and reproduced in Figure A.6.
Figure A.6
Now the resultant Campbell diagram for the correspondent situation calculated with the direct method instead of the pseudomodal method is displayed in Figure A.7. The relevant critical speeds are in the annexed table A.3.
Figure A.7
97
Table A.3 Outer shaft synchronous critical speeds (rpm) Direct Method 1FW 2BW 2FW 1906 2009 5018 Pseudomodal 1FW 2BW 1908 2012 Error Direct/Pseudomodal methods (%) 1FW 2BW 0.105 0.149
As it is visible in Figure A.7, the antiresonance observed in the Response Diagram in Figure A.6 is related with the proximity of the critical speed of the second bending vibration mode FW. Additionally note that the natural frequencies obtained with the direct method have slightly lower values than that obtained with the pseudomodal method. This difference is accentuated with growing rotating speed.
[
This element is characterized by the following mass and stiffness:
(A.5.1)
[ ] [ ]
(A.5.2)
98
[ ] [ ]
(A.5.3)
( ) ( ) ( )
(A.6.1)
(A.6.3)
If the Lagrange equation is applied with the considered displacement vector (3.1.1.2) in chapter 3.1.1, to the disks and the shafts kinetic energy expressions (A.6.23), it results.
) (
(A.6.4)
where is the mass matrix in equation (3.1.2.1) and the gyroscopic effect matrix also in ) correspond to the matrices with the same nomenclature (3.1.2.1) but divided by . ( presented on chapter 3.1.2 and is the matrix (3.1.2.9) divided by . Matrices and are two additional terms present only in transient motion defined as:
(A.6.5)
99
(A.6.6)
In what concerns the mass unbalance, its kinetic energy expression for transient motions is given by:
(A.6.7)
]
(A.6.8)
To describe the evolution of the rotating speed with time, a linear law was chosen, characterized by the following expression:
( )
in which and are given by:
(A.6.9)
where , , , are initial conditions of the transient problem and denote respectively the initial and final rotating speeds and time instants of the transient motion. Finally it is worth defining the following expressions:
( )
with:
(A.6.10) (A.6.11)
100