Models Released
Silverado.2.2617kg.k
Standard frontal NCAP validated model Model massed to reflect NCAP test mass (includes dummy mass and instrumentation mass)
Silverado.2.2270kg.k
Model massed to proposed MASH-08 test level 3-11 vehicle
Inertia Comparison
Weight,kg Pitchinertia, kgm^2 Yawinertia, kgm^2 Rollinertia, kgm^2 VehicleCGheight, in
Physical Vehicle
2337 6155 6453 1051 27 96 27.96
FEModel
2270 6028 6490 1050 28 64 28.64
% difference
2.86 2.06 0.57 0.09 2 32 2.32
2/26/2009
Detailed model, can be used for most impact p scenarios Interiors will be added in the next release Material data deri derived ed from coupon co pon testing Frontal impact validation into a rigid l d cell load ll wall ll complete l t
2/26/2009
Number of Parts Number of Nodes Number of Shells Number of Beams Number of Solids Number of Elements
Accelerometer Locations
L Location i Right seat Left seat Engine bottom Vehicle CG - Node N d ID - 2739121 - 2739129 - 2939137 - 2942560
2/26/2009
Benchmark Data
LS-DYNA V i Version: mpp971 971 R2 Revision: 7600.1224 Platform: SGI Altix (Itanium 2) OS level: Linux 2.4 Precision: Single precision (I4R4) Total Elapsed time: ~ 16 hrs (for 150 ms) Number of processors: 16
2/26/2009
Vehicle Comparison
FE Model
Left Side View L
Weight (Kgs) Engine Type Tire size Attitude (mm) As delivered Wheelbase (mm) CG (mm) ( )
1664
1664
2/26/2009
2/26/2009
2/26/2009
2/26/2009
Crush Modes
2/26/2009
Post-Test
Pre-Test
NHTSA Test
NHTSA Test 5877, frontal NCAP
2007 Ch Chevy Sil Silverado d NCAP test 45 load cell wall
2/26/2009
Accelerometer Data
2/26/2009
ForceForce -displacement
Note: Missing g data f from Load Cell C3 in Test 5877 One or more load cells saturated (force does not reach zero at the end)
2/26/2009
Energy Balance
2/26/2009
Summary
Model verified against frontal NCAP test (NHTSA Test No. 5877). Th The crush h mode d of f the th rails il and d the th structural t t l members b shows h good d correlation between test and simulation. Engine and Body mount failure were observed in the NCAP test. Current model does not include failure of these components to ensure robustness. Suspension system is modeled in greater detail. Vehicle is set to equilibrium position under gravity loading. Future updates will include verification against low speed bump and terrain tests conducted at FOIL. FE model is stable in full frontal flat rigid wall simulations ( Model has been run at 25, 30 and 35 mph to ensure stability).
2/26/2009