The Nuclear Bible: Dictionary

Black Operation/Black Op(s): Is a covert operation typically involving activities that are highly clandestine and, often, outside of standard military protocol or even against the law. A key factor in making an operation "black" is that it is carried out with great secrecy; in many cases no records of the operation are kept. Similarly, a secret budget (such as for military or intelligence operations) is called a "black budget" (Wikipedia, 2010). Coup d'tat: Known as a coup, putsch, and overthrowis the sudden, illegal deposition of a government, usually by a small group of the existing state establishmenttypically the militaryto replace the deposed government with another body; either civil or military. A coup d'tat succeeds when the usurpers establish their legitimacy if the attacked government fails to thwart them, by allowing their (strategic, tactical, political) consolidation and then receiving the deposed government's surrender; or the acquiescence of the populace and the nonparticipant military forces. Typically, a coup d'tat uses the extant government's power to assume political control of the country. In Coup d'tat: A Practical Handbook, military historian Edward Luttwak says, "A coup consists of the infiltration of a small, but critical, segment of the state apparatus, which is then used to displace the government from its control of the remainder", thus, armed force (either military or paramilitary) is not a defining feature of a coup d'tat (Wikipedia, 2010). False-Flag Terrorism: False-Flag operations are covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and can be used in peace-time (Wikipedia, 2010). Full Spectrum Dominance: A military concept whereby a joint military structure achieves control over ALL elements of the battlespace using land, air, maritime and space based assets. Full spectrum dominance includes the physical battlespace; air, surface and sub-surface as well as the electromagnetic spectrum and information space (Wikipedia, 2010). Unseen TOTAL control over both sides of a perceived conflict (i.e. Al Qaeda and the Pentagon). Globalists: (The New World Order/Nuclear World Order) European Royalty, The Vatican/The Church, The Illuminati, The Rothschilds, The Rockefellers, The Anglo-European/American Establishment, The Zionist Establishment, The Tri-Lateral Commission, Bilderberg, The Council On Foreign Relations, The Club of Rome, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, etc. Hegelian Dialectic: (Problem, Reaction, Solution) Usually presented in a three-fold manner, was stated by Heinrich Moritz Chalybus as comprising three dialectical stages of development: a thesis, giving rise to its reaction, an antithesis, which contradicts or negates the thesis, and the tension between the two being resolved by means of a synthesis (Wikipedia, 2010). Nucflash: Refers to detonation or possible detonation of a nuclear weapon which creates a risk of an outbreak of nuclear war. Events which may be classified Pinnacle - Nucflash include:

Accidental, unauthorized, or unexplained nuclear detonation or possible detonation. Accidental or unauthorized launch of a nuclear-armed or nuclear-capable missile in the direction of, or having the capability to reach, another nuclear-capable country. Unauthorized flight of, or deviation from an approved flight plan by, a nuclear armed or nuclear-capable aircraft with the capability to penetrate the airspace of another nuclear-capable country. Detection of unidentified objects by a missile warning system or interference (experienced by such a system or related communications) that appears threatening and could create a risk of nuclear war.

This term (Pinnacle Nucflash) is a report that has the highest precedence in the OPREP-3 reporting structure. All other reporting terms such as Broken Arrow, Empty Quiver, etc., while very important, are secondary to this report. (Reference Air Force Instruction 10-206, dated 4 October 2004) (Wikipedia, 2010). Nuclear Proliferation: A term now used to describe the spread of nuclear weapons, fissile material, and weapons-applicable nuclear technology and information, to nations which are not recognized as "Nuclear Weapon States" by the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons, also known as the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty or NPT. Proliferation has been opposed by many nations with and without nuclear weapons, the governments of which fear that more countries with nuclear weapons may increase the possibility of nuclear warfare (up to and including the so-called "countervalue" targeting of civilians with nuclear weapons), de-stabilize international or regional relations, or infringe upon the national sovereignty of states. Four nations besides the five recognized Nuclear Weapons States, none of which signed or ratified the NPT, have acquired, or are presumed to have acquired, nuclear weapons: India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel. One critique of the NPT is that it is discriminatory in recognizing as nuclear weapon states only those countries that tested nuclear weapons before 1968 and requiring all other states joining the treaty to forswear nuclear weapons (Wikipedia, 2010). Nuclear Terrorism (A): Denotes the use, or threat of the use, of nuclear weapons or radiological weapons in acts of terrorism, including attacks against facilities where radioactive materials are present. In legal terms, nuclear terrorism is an offense committed if a person unlawfully and intentionally uses in any way radioactive material with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; or with the intent to cause substantial damage to property or to the environment; or with the intent to compel a natural or legal person, an international

organization or a State to do or refrain from doing an act, according to 2005 United Nations International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism. The notion of terrorist organizations using nuclear weapons (especially very small ones, such as suitcase nukes) has been a threat in American rhetoric and culture. It is considered plausible that terrorists could acquire a nuclear weapon (Wikipedia, 2010).

Nuclear Terrorism (B): Steal, buy or otherwise acquire fissile material and fabricate a crude nuclear bomb Steal, buy or otherwise acquire a ready-made nuclear weapon; or take over a nuclear-armed submarine, plane or base. Attack a nuclear reactor or waste fuel cooling pond. Disrupt critical inputs for the safe running of a nuclear reactor e.g. water supply for cooling, electrical power supply systems. Attack or steal nuclear fuel or waste containers, most likely in transit. Make and detonate a radiological weapon, or dirty bomb, to spread radioactive material (Ruff, 2006).

Example: On August 29th, 2007, (6) U.S. nuclear tipped AGM-29 (150 kiloton) warheads went missing on a B-52 flight from North Dakotas Minot Air Force Base to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. To date, it has been impossible to account for all six nuclear weapons, due to the suspicious deaths of all nine U.S. airmen who were involved in the unprecedented incident. Pro-Active Journalism: The act of writing about an event prior to it actually taking place. The process embodies the calculation, correlation and analyzation of news, propaganda, information and social trends in an attempt to predict future events. Over time, the quantitative connecting of the dots begats a rather predictable reality with endless possibilities. State-Sponsored Terrorism: A term used to describe terrorism sponsored by nation-states. As with terrorism, the precise definition, and the identification of particular examples, are subjects of heated political dispute. In general state-sponsored terrorism is associated with paramilitaries. It is also frequently used in conjunction with state terrorism, which is (an accusation of) terrorism committed by governments (Wikipedia, 2010). Please watch the best documentary available on State Sponsored Terror entitled Terrorstorm for free on Google video

Zionism: The word Zionism has a lot of connotations to it that go beyond that simple definition. Those connotations mainly revolve around the Jewish religion and ethnic culture. The term Zionist has become almost synonymous with the word Jew in our cul ture, making it difficult to oppose political Zionism without being labeled an anti-Semite. This disconnect has added an emotional tag to the purely political movement that is Zionism. Whether that tag was inserted on purpose, conspiratorially, or as an uncontrolled social phenomenon is a matter of debate as well, but is not the point here. Regardless, Zionism is a political movement that happens to be centered around a specific culture. That does not make Zionism equal to that culture, however. No one would claim that all Republicans are fascists, for instance, just because a subset of them advocate fascist conceptsand be serious about the claim, anyway. There are two aspects to Zionism that are important to include in any conversation on the subject. The first, of course, is the political movement that started before the turn of the century and culminated in the creation of the State of Israel in Palestine. That political subject now (aka Modern Zionism) has evolved into a discussion of the policies of the Stat e of Israel. The other aspect is the cultural phenomena that surround Zionism itself. Besides the political creation of Israel and the ethnic connections the word has, there are also the highly-charged emotional and almost fanatical religious beliefs that surround the idea of Zionism as well. All of these things come together to define Zionism as we see it today, much of it driven by several of the factors mentioned herein. On the flip side of that coin, many people who are anti-Zionists are also fanatically obsessed with anti-Semitic thought. These people feed directly into the notion that Zionism is equal to Judaism. In the United States, Zionism takes on a whole new set of baggage. Christian fundamentalists in America have a large group following that believes that Zionism (the creation of a Jewish State or Israel) is not only prophesied in the Bible, but that it must happen in order for Armageddon and the rapture to come to pass. This has led to a large corps of unexpected support for the Zionist cause. On another front, the Israeli lobby (aka AIPAC) is extremely strong and well-funded in the U.S. The United States government gives unprecedented and, to most people, unquestioning support to the State of Israel. This support is a bone of contention in all U.S. foreign policy, but is never changed. Currently, the U.S. government gives about 1/3 of its total foreign aid to Israel. Through direct cash handouts to military supplies and information to loans that are later written off as grants, the United States gives more to Israel than we do to the entire continent of Africa, the whole of South America, and more. Finally, the world seems to almost entirely oppose the State of Israel and its actions on both military and political foreign relations fronts. Israel is accused of war crimes, genocide, theft and bribery, ignorance of diplomacy, breaking treaties, and more. Without wavering, the United States backs up Israel in every argument. Even to the point of using our special veto power in the United Nations to shut down anti-Israeli measures. Almost all politicians of any size in the U.S. receive funding, donations, and support from AIPAC. None dare oppose them for fear of political ruination and being labeled anti -semitic. All of this adds up to an unprecedented amount of control over politics, political discussion, cultural aspects (as related to Zion), and more in the name of Zionism (Truth-It, 2010).