: : : : :
Part A
2.0 Problem Statement Problem is well described and the project purpose is clearly explained. Problem is not well described. Problem is not explained or is plagiarized. Objective and Scope Clear and realistic objective and scope Either objective or scope is not clear Objective and scope are not explained or are plagiarized. Experiment/Project Background Theory presented is clear and complete as to enhance experiment/project impact. Sources of information are properly cited. Theory presented is complete and clear. Most sources of information are properly cited. Reader may have a few questions on theory or have to revise the material. Most sources of information are not cited. Missing, incomplete or incorrect description of theory.
3.0
3 1 0.5 0 2 1 0.5 0 1 0.5 0 2 1 0.5 0 2 1 0.5 0 2 1 0.5 0 1 0.5 0 6 2 1 0.5 0 3 1 0.5 0 6 2 1 0.5 0 6 2 1 0.5 0 6 2 1 0.5 0 2 1 0.5 0 2 1 0.5 0 2 1 0.5 0 1 0.5 0 2 1 0.5 0 1 0.5 0
4.0
5.0
Methodology
Methodology is correct, well described and most details are covered. Methodology is acceptable but some details are missing. Methodology is not acceptable.
6.0
Results
Data are presented clearly in table, graph or any appropriate formats. Result is fully achieved project objectives. Data are presented clearly in table, graph or any appropriate formats. Result is partially achieved project objectives. Insufficient and poor presentation of data. No results or plagiarized data are presented.
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Report Format and Writing Skill Report is very clear and sentences easy to understand. Minor grammatical errors. Report is well structured and follows standard format. Report is well written but occasionally some points are not easy to understand. Some grammatical errors present. Standard format is used. Report is not well written with many grammatical errors and/or standard format is not followed. Report is too difficult to understand or plagiarized work was presented and/or standard format is not followed. References Good reference sources and follow standard format of referencing. Acceptable reference sources and follow standard format of referencing. Poor reference sources and incorrect referencing format. No references.
6 5 3 1 0 4 4 2 1 0 3 6 4 2
TOTAL
42
Comment / Suggestion:
Evaluated by Date
: :
: :