Anda di halaman 1dari 2
A. Student Details UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN ELEKTRIK LABORATORY REPORT RUBRICS BEKU 1221

A. Student Details

UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA

FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN ELEKTRIK

LABORATORY REPORT RUBRICS BEKU 1221 Lab 3

Course/Group

:

Semester/Session

:

Name A

:

Matrix No. A

:

Name B

:

Matrix No. B

:

Name C

:

Matrix No. C

:

Title

 

:

Date

:

 

B.

Report

 

Obtained

1.0

Abstract

 

2

 

Abstract is clear and well described.

   

2

Abstract is not well described.

   

1

Abstract is not presented or is plagiarized.

   

0

   

Part

Part

Part

B

A C

2.0

Problem Statement

   

0

 

Problem is well described and the project purpose is clearly explained.

     

Problem is not well described.

       

Problem is not explained or is plagiarized.

       

3.0

Objective and Scope

   

3

 

Clear and realistic objective and scope

   

1

1 1

 

Either objective or scope is not clear

 

0.5

0.5

0.5

Objective and scope are not explained or are plagiarized.

 

0

0

0

4.0

Experiment/Project Background

   

6

 

Theory presented is clear and complete as to enhance experiment/project impact. Sources of information are properly cited.

2

2

2

Theory presented is complete and clear. Most sources of information are properly cited.

1

1

1

Reader may have a few questions on theory or have to revise the material. Most sources of information are not cited.

0.5

0.5

0.5

Missing, incomplete or incorrect description of theory.

 

0

 

0 0

5.0

Methodology

   

3

 

Methodology is correct, well described and most details are covered.

1

1 1

 

Methodology is acceptable but some details are missing.

 

0.5

0.5

0.5

Methodology is not acceptable.

 

0

0

0

6.0

Results

 

6

 

Data are presented clearly in table, graph or any appropriate formats. Result is fully achieved project objectives.

2

2

2

Data are presented clearly in table, graph or any appropriate formats. Result is partially achieved project objectives.

1

1

1

Insufficient and poor presentation of data.

 

0.5

0.5

0.5

No results or plagiarized data are presented.

 

0

0

0

7.0

Analysis and Discussion

   

6

 

Sufficient and accurate analysis. Detailed discussion and related to results.

2

2

2

 

Sufficient but few inaccurate analyses. Discussion is related to results

1

1

1

 

Insufficient analysis. Discussion is not related to results.

 

0.5

0.5

0.5

 

No analysis and discussion.

 

0

0

0

8.0

Conclusion and Recommendation

   

6

 

Clear and complete summarization of experiment/project achievements. Clear and realistic recommendations for future works.

2

2

2

 

Sufficient summarization of experiment/project achievements. Acceptable recommendations for future works.

1

1

1

 

Insufficient summarization of experiment/project achievements. No recommendations for future works.

0.5

0.5

0.5

 

Conclusion and recommendations are not explained.

 

0

0

0

9.0

Report Format and Writing Skill

 

6

 

Report is very clear and sentences easy to understand. Minor grammatical errors. Report is well structured and follows standard format.

5

6

 

Report is well written but occasionally some points are not easy to understand. Some grammatical errors present. Standard format is used.

3

4

 

Report is not well written with many grammatical errors and/or standard format is not followed.

1

2

 

Report is too difficult to understand or plagiarized work was presented and/or standard format is not followed.

 

0

10.0

References

 

4

 

Good reference sources and follow standard format of referencing.

 

4

 

Acceptable reference sources and follow standard format of referencing.

2

3

 

Poor reference sources and incorrect referencing format.

1

 

No references.

 

0

 

TOTAL

 

42

Comment / Suggestion:

Evaluated by

:

Date

:

Signature

:

Official Stamp

: