CHAPTER IV

RESULT OF ANALYSIS
A. Frequency of Distribution
The following table contains of the scores of a group of 30
students on English test consisting of 30 items. The table contains a
frequency distribution showing the number of students who obtained
each mark awarded; tallies, which are the strokes representing the
number of students obtaining the same scores; the frequency and the
percentage of each score.
Table 1: The Frequency Distribution of Scores
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Raw
Score
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
12
11
10
Total

Final
Score
77
73
70
67
63
60
57
53
50
40
37
33

Tally

Frequency

Percentage

/
///
///
//
//// /
///
//
//
//
////
/
/
30

1
3
3
2
6
3
2
2
2
4
1
1
30

3.3
10.0
10.0
6.7
20.0
10.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
13.3
3.3
3.3
100

Raw Score
Final score

: Total of correct answer

: Score of students get,

Tally/Freq

: Number of student gets the same raw score

Percentage

The distribution of the scores illustrated above can be presented in

another way as in the following frequency polygon:
The Distribution of the Score
8

4
3

4
2

3
2

11

10

0
23

22

21

20

19

18

17

16

15

12

Students' Score Frequency

B. Measures of Central Tendency

There are three ways of measuring central tendency, mode,
median, and mean, of which the mean is the most efficiency measure,
but it is not always appropriate.
1. Mode
The mode refers to the score which most candidates obtained, or the
most frequent emergence of the same score. In this case, it is 63, as
six testees have scored this mark.
2. Median
The median refers to the score gained by the middle candidate in the
order of merit. In this case of the 30 students here, the medium score
is 63.
3. Mean
The mean score of any test is arithmetical average, i.e. the sum of the
separate scores divided by the total number of testees. In the
following table 2 and formula, note that the symbol x is used to

denote the score, N the number of the testees, and x the mean. The
symbol f denotes the frequency with which the score occurs. The
symbol means the sum of.

Table 2: The Frequency Distribution of Score

No

Fx

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Total

7.70
7.30
7.00
6.70
6.30
6.00
5.70
5.30
5.00
4.00
3.70
3.00
67.70

1
3
3
2
6
3
2
2
2
4
1
1
30.00

7.70
21.90
21.00
13.40
37.80
18.00
11.40
10.60
10.00
16.00
3.70
3.00
fx = 174.50

x : Students final score

f : Frequency
Fx: Students final score (x) frequency = 7.70 x 1 = 7.70
From the data, we can account the mean score as follows:

Mean (X)

C. Measure of Dispersion
The measure of dispersion is related to the range or spread of
scores. The mean by itself enable us to describe an individual students
score by comparing it with average set of scores obtained by a group,
but it tells us nothing about the highest and the lowest scores and the
spread of marks.
1. Range
One simple way of measuring the spread of marks is based on the
difference between the highest and the lowest score on a 30 item test
is 7.70 and the lowest is 3.00.
Range = the highest score the lowest score
(7.70 3.00 = 4.70)
The range is from 3.00 to 7.70 = 4.70
2. Standard deviation
The standard deviation, another way of showing the spread of scores,
measures the degree to which the group of scores deviates from the
mean; in the other words, it shows how all the scores are spread out
and thus gives a fuller description of test scores than the range,
which simply describes the gap between the highest and the lowest
marks and ignores the information provided by all the remaining
scores. Standard deviation may be abbreviated as s.d or (sigma) or
s.

s.d =

Table 3: Standard Deviation

No

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

7.70
7.30
7.30
7.30
7.00
7.00
7.00
6.70
6.70
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.30
6.00
6.00
6.00
5.70
5.70
5.30
5.30
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.70
3.00

1.88
1.48
1.48
1.48
1.18
1.18
1.18
0.88
0.88
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.18
0.18
0.18
-0.12
-0.12
-0.52
-0.52
-0.82
-0.82
-1.82
-1.82
-1.82
-1.82
-2.12
-2.82

3.549456
2.202256
2.202256
2.202256
1.401856
1.401856
1.401856
0.781456
0.781456
0.234256
0.234256
0.234256
0.234256
0.234256
0.234256
0.033856
0.033856
0.033856
0.013456
0.013456
0.266256
0.266256
0.665856
0.665856
3.297856
3.297856
3.297856
3.297856
4.477456
7.929856

Total

174.50

44.922

x : Students final score

d : x (-) mean, 7.0 - 5.82 = 1.88
d2 : 1.882 = 3.549456
s.d =

=
s.d =

1.22

D. Validity
In terms of the test validity, we can show the tests to the colleagues
for face validity, compare the course objective and the test items for
content validity, check whether the students respond in the way they are
expected in doing the test for response validity, and calculate the point
bi-serial correlation for item validity using the following formula:

rpbi =

(Sudjiono, 2003:185)
rpbi

= Point bi-serial Correlation Coefficient, i.e. item validity coefficient

Mp

= Mean scores of testees correctly answering the analyzed item

Mt

= Mean scores of the total scores

SDt

= Standard deviation of the total score

= Proportion of testees correctly answering the analyzed item

= Proportion of testees incorrectly answering the analyzed item

Table 4: Test Validity

No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

Nama
RIKA FADILLAH
SITI AMINAH
RASMITA ARSYAD
NURUL CHALIZA USMAN
BARIAH MANSUR
BATARY RESKY M
SASTRA GAGAH AGUNG
AKHMAD RIDHAL
RAHMANIAR
MIHRA YUSTIKA
AMRAINI ARSYAD
ANDIRA S
NURHIDAYAH
RADA R
FAHMI AMIN S
ISMALIANI GM
NURHIDAYAH SUCI
FATMAWATI ANWAR
NASRUDDIN DAUD
ST. AINUN MARDIYAH
NUR BAHMA JUNIARSI
SURIANI AKIB
HARNI
RAHMAT HIDAYATULLAH
AINUND SABRINA
MUH TAUFIQ
YUSWANDI
IHSAN MUHLISIN
NURKHOLIS R
MIFTAHULJANNAH N
X
Mp
Mt
SD
P
Q
Rpbi

Test Item
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
18
17
5
3
18
29
22
29
19.06 18.29 18.2
18
18.56 17.76 18.36 17.69
17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
0.6
0.6
0.2
0.1
0.6
1.0
0.7
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.9
0.4
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.588 0.757 0.261 0.139 1.077 1.161 1.193 0.851

Test Validity
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
27
17.3
17.5
1.2
0.9
0.1
-0.5

10
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
15
18.2
17.5
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.63

11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
17
18.5
17.5
1.2
0.6
0.4
0.98

12
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
19
18.4
17.5
1.2
0.6
0.4
1.00

13
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
18
18.4
17.5
1.2
0.6
0.4
0.96

Test Item
14
15
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
28
16
17.6 18.6
17.5 17.5
1.2
1.2
0.9
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.55 1.05

16
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
13
18
17.5
1.2
0.4
0.6
0.36

17
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
8
17.7
17.5
1.2
0.3
0.7
0.12

18
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
16.8
17.5
1.2
0.4
0.6
-0.4

19
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
15
18.1
17.5
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.52

20
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
18
18.8
17.5
1.2
0.6
0.4
1.41

Test Validity
Test Item
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
20
17
12
10
19
23
13
23
18
23
18.5
19
19.25 18.9 18.05 17.96 18.31 17.52
19
18.35
17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.2
0.4
0.2
1.179 1.429 1.191 0.825 0.605 0.69 0.589 0.033 1.531 1.281

19
21
21
23
22
19
19
22
16
12
17
12
19
17
15
18
20
21
19
12
18
16
19
20
18
11
12
15
22
10
525

The following steps are recommended for calculation, taking

item number 1 as the sample of calculation.
1. Determining the proportion of testees correctly answering the analyzed
item:

p=

= 0.6

2. Determining the proportion of testees incorrectly answering the

analyzed item:

q =1p

= 1 0.6 = 0.4

3. Calculating the mean score of the total scores:

Mt =

= 17.5

4. Calculating the mean score of testees correctly answering the analyzed

item:

Mp =
= 19.1
5. Calculating the standard deviation of the total score: SD = 1.2
6. Calculating the item validity coefficient:

rpbi =
= 1.59

E. Reliability
In terms of test reliability, we can use single test single triad
method with split half reliability; applying Pearson Product Moment
correlation and Spearman-Brown odd even model correlation. This
calculation may be processed through SPSS program, based on the
level of significant of 5. The formula Pearson Product Moment
Correlation is as follows:

}{

(Surapranata, 2004:58)
= Pearson product moment correlation between variable x & y
= number of students taking test

= sum of variable x

= sum of variable y

= sum of multiplication of variable x and variable y

= sum of square x

= sum of square y

Table 5: Person Product Moment Correlation

No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

X
7
12
10
13
11
10
10
10
7
6
8
5
8
7
10
7
9
10
11
4
8
7
8
9
8
4
4
8
11
4
246

Y
12
9
11
10
11
9
9
12
9
6
9
7
11
10
5
11
11
11
8
8
10
9
11
11
10
7
8
7
11
6
279

X
49
144
100
169
121
100
100
100
49
36
64
25
64
49
100
49
81
100
121
16
64
49
64
81
64
16
16
64
121
16
2192

Y
144
81
121
100
121
81
81
144
81
36
81
49
121
100
25
121
121
121
64
64
100
81
121
121
100
49
64
49
121
36
2699

XY
84
108
110
130
121
90
90
120
63
36
72
35
88
70
50
77
99
110
88
32
80
63
88
99
80
28
32
56
121
24
2344

The calculation above used split half reliability where the scores
are divided into two parts, odd and even. The score of each part are
correlated with other half.

{
=
=
=
=

}{

}{

{
}{

}{

}
}

=
= 0.42

The result of this calculation 0.42 is quite high which show that
there is a correlation between the two sets of scores. The result of this
calculation is then analyzed using Spearman-Brown odd even model
correlation to see the reliability of the test.

(Sudjiono, 2003:206)
= total test coefficient reliability (tt = total test)
= Product moment Correlation coefficient between first half and
the second half of the test (hh = half-half)
= constant number

=
= 0.59
The resulted calculation (

is 0.59 that is higher than 0.42. It

means the evaluated test is highly reliable. Therefore, the result of

calculation is reliable.

F. Item Analysis
1. Item Difficulty
The index of difficult:
0.00 0.30

: difficult

0.31 0.70

: normal

0.71 1.00

: very easy

If the number of item is on level too difficult or too easy, it is not

good to include them to the test.

IF =
IF is index of facility,
by upper group,
taking the test.

represents the number of correct answers

by the lower group, and

the number students

Table 6: Scores in Range

No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

Nama
NURUL CHALIZA USMAN
BARIAH MANSUR
AKHMAD RIDHAL
NURKHOLIS R
SITI AMINAH
RASMITA ARSYAD
FATMAWATI ANWAR
NURHIDAYAH SUCI
RAHMAT HIDAYATULLAH
RIKA FADILLAH
BATARY RESKY M
SASTRA GAGAH AGUNG
NURHIDAYAH
NASRUDDIN DAUD
HARNI
ISMALIANI GM
NUR BAHMA JUNIARSI
AINUND SABRINA
AMRAINI ARSYAD
RADA R
RAHMANIAR
SURIANI AKIB
FAHMI AMIN S
IHSAN MUHLISIN
MIHRA YUSTIKA
ANDIRA S
ST. AINUN MARDIYAH
YUSWANDI
MUH TAUFIQ
MIFTAHULJANNAH N
UG
LG

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
12
6

2
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
10
7

3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3

Test Item
4
5
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
11
2
7

6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
15
14

7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
13
9

8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
15
14

UPPER
GROUP
(UG)

LOWER
GROUP
(LG)

Scores in Range

9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
15

10
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
10
5

11
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
11
6

12
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
12
7

13
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
11
7

Test Item
14
15
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
14
12
14
4

16
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
7
6

17
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
3

18
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
5
7

19
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
9
6

20
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
12
6

UPPER
GROUP
(UG)

LOWER
GROUP
(LG)

Scores in Range

21
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
13
7

22
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
12
5

23
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
4

24
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
4

Test Item
25
26
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
11
13
8
10

27
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
8
5

28
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
12
11

29
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
7

30
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
13
10

X
23
22
22
22
21
21
21
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
19
18
18
18
17
17
16
16
15
15
12
12
12
12
11
10
306
219

UPPER
GROUP
(UG)

LOWER
GROUP
(LG)

2. Item Discrimination
The index of discrimination:
High discrimination index

: + 1.00 0.50

Low discrimination

: 0.40 0.00

Negative discrimination

: -0.10 -1.00

= index of discrimination
= number of students n one group (1/2 N)
= frequency of score by upper group (upper half)
= frequency of score by lower group (lower half)

Table 7: The Indicates of Facility and Discrimination

Item
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

UG
12
10
2
1
11
15
13
15
12
10
11
12
11
14
12
7

LG
6
7
3
2
7
14
9
14
15
5
6
7
7
14
4
6

IF
0.60
0.57
0.17
0.10
0.60
0.97
0.73
0.97
0.90
0.50
0.57
0.63
0.60
0.93
0.53
0.43

ID
0.40
0.20
-0.07
-0.07
0.27
0.07
0.27
0.07
-0.20
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.27
0.00
0.53
0.07

Remark IF
proper
proper
difficult
difficult
proper
easy
proper
easy
easy
proper
proper
proper
proper
easy
proper
proper

Remark ID
proper
improper
Inverse
Inverse
proper
improper
proper
improper
Inverse
proper
proper
proper
proper
improper
proper
improper

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

5
5
9
12
13
12
8
6
11
13
8
12
11
13

3
7
6
6
7
5
4
4
8
10
5
11
7
10

0.27
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.67
0.57
0.40
0.33
0.63
0.77
0.43
0.77
0.60
0.77

0.13
-0.13
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.47
0.27
0.13
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.07
0.27
0.20

proper
proper
proper
proper
proper
proper
proper
proper
proper
easy
proper
easy
proper
easy

improper
inverse
improper
proper
proper
proper
proper
improper
improper
improper
improper
improper
proper
improper

On the result listed in table 7 above, only items 1, 5, 7, 10, 11,

12, 13, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 29 could be safely used in the future
tests without being rewritten.
3. Full Item Analysis
UG

: Number of correct answer from Upper Group

LG

: Number of correct answer from Lower Group

: Number of student in one group (1/2 N)

IF

;
= 0.60

ID

:
= 0.40

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
3
12
0
0
15

LG
9
6
0
0
15

UG+LG
12
18
0
0
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
6
2
4
3
15

LG
5
3
6
1
15

UG+LG
11
5
10
4
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
1
2
11
1
15

LG
3
5
7
0
15

UG+LG
4
7
18
1
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
2
0
13
2
17

LG
3
0
9
1
13

UG+LG
5
0
22
3
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
12
0
0
3
15

LG
15
0
0
0
15

UG+LG
27
0
0
3
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
0
5
0
10
15

LG
1
5
2
7
15

UG+LG
1
10
0
17
30

IF= 0.57
ID= 0.20

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
13
0
1
2
16

LG
10
2
2
0
14

UG+LG
23
2
3
2
30

IF= 0.10
ID= -0.07

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
1
0
15
0
16

LG
0
0
14
0
14

UG+LG
1
0
29
0
30

IF= 0.97
ID= 0.07

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
0
15
1
0
16

LG
0
14
0
0
14

UG+LG
0
29
1
0
30

IF= 0.97
ID= 0.07

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
3
10
5
1
19

LG
1
5
3
2
11

UG+LG
4
15
8
3
30

IF= 0.50
ID= 0.33

2
IF= 0.60
ID= 0.40

4
IF= 0.17
ID= -0.07

6
IF= 0.60
ID= 0.27

8
IF= 0.73
ID= 0.27

10
IF= 0.90
ID= -0.20

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
11
3
1
0
15

LG
6
9
0
0
15

UG+LG
17
12
1
0
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
11
4
2
0
17

LG
7
4
0
2
13

UG+LG
18
8
2
2
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
12
0
3
2
17

LG
4
3
3
3
13

UG+LG
16
3
6
5
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
2
7
5
5
19

LG
1
2
5
3
11

UG+LG
3
9
10
8
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
2
9
4
0
15

LG
6
6
1
2
15

UG+LG
8
15
5
2
30

11

13

15

17

19

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
1
0
12
0
13

LG
5
3
7
2
17

UG+LG
6
3
19
2
30

IF= 0.63
ID= 0.33

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
2
14
0
0
16

LG
0
14
0
0
14

UG+LG
2
28
0
0
30

IF= 0.93
ID= 0.00

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
0
5
3
7
15

LG
2
4
3
6
15

UG+LG
2
9
6
13
30

IF= 0.43
ID= 0.07

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
5
7
0
1
13

LG
7
5
5
0
17

UG+LG
12
12
5
1
30

IF= 0.40
ID= -0.13

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
12
2
1
1
16

LG
6
4
3
1
14

UG+LG
18
6
4
2
30

IF= 0.60
ID= 0.40

12
IF= 0.57
ID= 0.33

14
IF= 0.60
ID= 0.27

16
IF= 0.53
ID= 0.53

18
IF= 0.27
ID= 0.13

20
IF= 0.50
ID= 0.20

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
0
13
0
0
13

LG
5
7
4
1
17

UG+LG
5
20
4
1
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
5
4
0
8
17

LG
3
5
1
4
13

UG+LG
8
9
1
12
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
3
11
0
0
14

LG
3
8
3
2
16

UG+LG
6
19
3
2
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
1
4
0
8
13

LG
7
3
2
5
17

UG+LG
8
7
2
13
30

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
1
0
11
6
18

LG
1
0
7
4
12

UG+LG
2
0
18
10
30

21

23

25

27

29

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
2
1
12
2
17

LG
0
7
5
1
13

UG+LG
2
8
17
3
30

IF= 0.57
ID= 0.47

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
6
9
4
0
19

LG
4
3
0
4
11

UG+LG
10
12
4
4
30

IF= 0.33
ID= 0.13

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
1
13
0
0
14

LG
0
10
0
6
16

UG+LG
1
23
0
6
30

IF= 0.77
ID= 0.20

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
12
0
1
0
13

LG
11
0
0
6
17

UG+LG
23
0
1
6
30

IF= 0.77
ID= 0.07

A
B
C
D
Total

UG
1
13
1
1
16

LG
3
10
0
1
14

UG+LG
4
23
1
2
30

IF= 0.77
ID= 0.20

22
IF= 0.67
ID= 0.40

24
IF= 0.40
ID= 0.27

26
IF= 0.63
ID= 0.20

28
IF= 0.43
ID= 0.20

30
IF= 0.60
ID= 0.27