2
T
2
1
+
1
_
T
t
+
2
T
t
2
_
= 0 (1)
in the domain (, t) ]0, R[]0, [, with the
initial and boundary conditions
T(, 0) = T
0
T
t
(, 0) = 0 ]0, R[, (2)
T
(R, t) =
Q
0
k
_
H(t) + (t)
_
t > 0. (4)
Following [1] we introduce the dimensionless
Proceedings of the 2nd WSEAS Int. Conference on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, Venice, Italy, November 20-22, 2006 63
variables
V (, t) = k
T(, t) T
0
R Q
0
, (5)
=
R
, =
t
4 R
2
, =
4 R
2
(6)
which yield to the problem
2
V
2
1
+
1
4
_
V
2
V
2
_
= 0 (7)
in the new domain (, ) ]0, 1[]0, [,
V (, 0) =
V
2
G
2
1
+
1
4
_
G
2
G
2
_
=
=
1
(
0
) (
0
) (, ) ]0, 1[R,
(11)
G
(0, ) =
G
(1, ) = 0 R (12)
and
lim
G(, ) = lim
(, ) = 0 ]0, 1[.
(13)
Denoting by L(, p) the Schwartz-Laplace
transform with respect to of G(, ) we ob-
tain (see [6])
2
L
2
(, p)
1
(, p)+
+
1
4
(p + p
2
) L(, p) =
1
(
0
) e
p
0
,
(14)
L
(0, p) =
L
(1, p) = 0 (15)
and (16)
lim
p0
L(, p) = lim
p0
p L(, p) = 0. (17)
In order to verify (15), condition (17) allow
us to take nite Hankel transforms of second
kind with respect to
H
m
(p) :=
_
1
0
J
0
(
m
) L(, p) d
(m N {0}) where {
m
}
m=0
is the strictly
increasing sequence of non negative zeros of
the equation J
1
() = 0, the Bessel function
of rst kind and order 1. Thus, using equation
(14) and the inversion formula of nite Hankel
transforms (see [7]) we obtain
L(, p) =
= 8
m=0
J
0
(
m
0
) J
0
(
m
)
_
4
2
m
+ p + p
2
_
J
0
(
m
)
2
e
p
0
.
In order to simplify the exposition we assume
that the material of the cylinder is such that
16
2
m
1 = 0 for every m N{0}. Thus,
by inversion of Schwartz-Laplace transforms
we obtain the adimensional Greens function
G(, |
0
,
0
) = 16 H(
0
)
m=0
J
0
(
m
0
) J
0
(
m
)
J
0
(
m
)
2
F
m
(,
0
) (18)
where, for every m N {0}
F
m
(,
0
) = e
0
2
_
H
_
1 16
2
m
_
_
1 16
2
m
sinh
m
(
0
)+
Proceedings of the 2nd WSEAS Int. Conference on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, Venice, Italy, November 20-22, 2006 64
+
H
_
16
2
m
1
_
_
16
2
m
1
sin
m
(
0
)
_
where we have dened, for every m N
m
:=
_
1 16
2
m
2
,
m
:=
_
16
2
m
1
2
. (19)
3 Temperature in the case of
boundary constant ux
According to the theory of Greens func-
tions, the solution of problem (7)-(10) is given
directly by
(, ) ]0, 1[]0, [ V (, ) =
=
_
G(, |1,
0
)
_
H(
0
) + (
0
)
_
d
0
and after elementary computations and the
application of the equality (see [1])
m=1
J
0
(
m
)
2
m
J
0
(
m
)
=
2
4
1
8
we obtain
= 16
m=0
J
0
(
m
)
J
0
(
m
)
_
0
F
m
(,
0
) d
0
+
+ 16
m=0
J
0
(
m
)
J
0
(
m
)
F
m
(, 0) =
= 8 +
2
2
1
4
e
m=1
J
0
(
m
)
2
m
J
0
(
m
)
R
m
() (20)
where
m N R
m
() = H
_
1 16
2
m
_
_
cosh
m
+
2 16
2
m
_
1 16
2
m
sinh
m
_
+
+ H
_
16
2
m
1
_
_
cos
m
+
2 16
2
m
_
16
2
m
1
sin
m
_
.
It can be checked, after elementary compu-
tations, that this function coincides with the
obtained one in [1].
4 Thermal stresses
We start computing the actual value of
some expressions which will appear frequently
in the sequel. From (5), (6) and (20), by the
well known equality (see [8], page 45)
> 0
_
0
r J
0
( r) dr =
J
1
( )
we obtain
_
0
_
T(, t) T
0
_
rdr =
=
R Q
0
k
_
2
R
2
t +
4
8R
2
2
8
R e
t
2
m=1
J
1
_
m
R
_
3
m
J
0
(
m
)
R
m
_
t
4R
2
_
_
_
(21)
and thus
_
R
0
_
T(, t) T
0
_
d =
RQ
0
k
t. (22)
We are now in a position to compute the
thermal stresses in the cylinder. Since we are
concerned with an innitely long cylinder we
have to deal with a state of plane strain. It is
well known that in this case the components
of the stress tensor in cylindrical coordinates
are given by (see [4], page 206)
(, t) = 0
(, t) =
E
1
_
2
_
0
r
_
T(r, t) T
0
_
dr+
+
1
R
2
_
R
0
r
_
T(r, t) T
0
_
dr
_
,
(23)
Proceedings of the 2nd WSEAS Int. Conference on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, Venice, Italy, November 20-22, 2006 65
(, t) =
E
1
_
1
2
_
0
r
_
T(r, t) T
0
_
dr+
1
R
2
_
R
0
r
_
T(r, t) T
0
_
dr
_
T(, t) T
0
_
_
(24)
and
zz
(, t) =
E
1
_
2
R
2
_
R
0
r
_
T(r, t) T
0
_
dr
_
T(, t) T
0
__
(25)
having in mind the existence of an axial strain
of magnitude
0
(t) =
2Q
0
kR
t (26)
(see [4], page 205).
After substitution of previous results and
elementary computations we obtain
(, t) =
ERQ
0
k(1 )
_
1
8
2
8R
2
+
+
R
t
2
m=1
J
1
_
m
R
_
3
m
J
0
(
m
)
R
m
_
t
4R
2
_
_
_
,
(, t) =
ERQ
0
k(1 )
_
1
8
3
2
8R
2
R e
t
2
m=1
_
_
J
1
_
R
_
3
m
J
0
_
R
_
R
2
m
_
_
R
m
_
t
4R
2
_
J
0
(
m
)
_
_
,
(, t) = 0
and
zz
(, t) =
ERQ
0
k(1 )
_
1
4
2
2 R
2
+
+ e
t
2
m=1
J
0
_
m
R
_
2
m
J
0
(
m
)
R
m
_
t
4R
2
_
_
_
.
5 Comparison with the classi-
cal case
If we use the classical parabolic Fourier heat
equation to nd the temperature (denoted by
T
F
(, t) to distinguish) we arrive (see [1]) to
T
F
(, t) = T
0
+
RQ
0
k
V
F
_
R
,
t
4R
2
_
where
V
F
(, ) =
= 8 +
2
2
1
4
2
m=1
J
0
(
m
)
2
m
J
0
(
m
)
e
4
2
m
.
It can be seen that this temperature eld
produce the same axial strain
0
given by (26)
and that formulas (22) and
(, t) = 0 still
holds. However in this case we have
(, t) =
ERQ
0
k(1 )
_
1
8
2
8R
2
+
+2
R
m=1
J
1
_
m
R
_
3
m
J
0
(
m
)
e
2
m
R
2
t
_
_
,
(, t) =
ERQ
0
k(1 )
_
1
8
3
2
8R
2
2R
m=1
_
_
J
1
_
R
_
3
m
J
0
_
R
_
R
2
m
_
_
e
2
m
t
R
2
J
0
(
m
)
_
_
and
zz
(, t) =
ERQ
0
k(1 )
_
1
4
2
2 R
2
+
+2
m=1
J
0
_
m
R
_
2
m
J
0
(
m
)
e
2
m
t
R
2
_
_
.
(27)
The quantitative dierences arising in the
stresses values given by the hyperbolic and the
parabolic temperature models are numerically
considerable and thus very important concern-
ing practical industrial applications. Remark
Proceedings of the 2nd WSEAS Int. Conference on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, Venice, Italy, November 20-22, 2006 66
that these dierences are proportional to the
applied heat ux Q
0
(see the position of the
term Q
0
in all previous formulas of stresses)
and that high uxes applied in small tem-
poral intervals are more and more frequently
used in modern laser technology. As a sim-
ple illustration, working with the dimension-
less stresses deduced from (6) and ignoring the
factor
ERQ
0
k(1)
we have plotted in gures 1, 2
and 3 the radial variation of tension
in the
dimensionless time = 0.15, = 0.158 and
= 0.17 respectively, taking = 0.1 and us-
ing the dashed line for the tension computed
with Fourier heat equation and the solid line
in the case of using the hyperbolic heat equa-
tion.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Figure 1: Stress
corresponding to = 0.14
and = 0.1
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
Figure 2: Stress
corresponding to = 0.15
and = 0.1
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
Figure 3: Stress
corresponding to = 0.159
and = 0.1
References
[1] Barletta, A., Pulvirenti, B., Hyperbolic
thermal waves in a solid cylinder with a
non-stationary boundary heat ux, Int.
J. Heat Mass Transfer, 41,1, 1998, pp.
107-116.
[2] Ikawa, M., Hyperbolic partial dierential
equations and wave phenomena, Amer-
ican Mathematical Society, Providence,
USA, 2000.
[3] Lopez Molina, J. A., Trujillo, M., Exis-
tence and uniqueness of solutions of the
Neumann problem for the anisotropic
hyperbolic heat equation with non reg-
ular data, Preprint, 2006.
[4] Noda, N., Hetnarski, R. B., Tanigawa,
Y., Thermal stresses, Lastran Corpora-
tion, Rochester, NY, USA, 2000.
[5]
Ozisik, M. N., Tzou, D. Y., On the
wave theory in heat conduction, ASME
J. Heat Transfer, 116, 526-535, (1994).
[6] Pathak, R. S., Integral transforms of
generalized functions and their applica-
tions, Gordon and Breach Science Pub-
lishers, The Netherlands, 1997.
[7] Sneddon, I. N., Fourier transforms,
Dover Publications, Inc., New York,
1995.
[8] Watson, G. N., A treatise on the theory
of Bessel functions, Cambridge Univer-
sity Press, Cambridge, 1966.
Proceedings of the 2nd WSEAS Int. Conference on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, Venice, Italy, November 20-22, 2006 67