Scribd Logo
Unggah

Selamat datang di Scribd!

  • Labor Law Case on Masiador and Sentenciador Employment Status

    Diunggah oleh

    attyalan
    371 tayangan1 halaman
    Petitioners Semblante and Pilar worked as a masiador and sentenciador for cockfighting events, receiving IDs and salaries. One day, they were denied entry to the cockpit and filed a case for illegal dismissal. The court ruled that the petitioners were not employees as the respondents did not select or manage the petitioners. The petitioners' salaries also came from event proceeds and they performed their roles freely without direction or control, using their own expertise and tools. Therefore, no employee-employer relationship existed.

    Deskripsi Asli:

    Semblante vs CA digest

    Judul Asli

    Semblante vs CA

    Hak Cipta

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Format Tersedia

    DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd

    Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

    Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

    Laporkan Dokumen Ini
    Petitioners Semblante and Pilar worked as a masiador and sentenciador for cockfighting events, receiving IDs and salaries. One day, they were denied entry to the cockpit and filed a case for illegal dismissal. The court ruled that the petitioners were not employees as the respondents did not select or manage the petitioners. The petitioners' salaries also came from event proceeds and they performed their roles freely without direction or control, using their own expertise and tools. Therefore, no employee-employer relationship existed.

    Hak Cipta:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Unduh sebagai DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    371 tayangan1 halaman

    Labor Law Case on Masiador and Sentenciador Employment Status

    Diunggah oleh

    attyalan
    Petitioners Semblante and Pilar worked as a masiador and sentenciador for cockfighting events, receiving IDs and salaries. One day, they were denied entry to the cockpit and filed a case for illegal dismissal. The court ruled that the petitioners were not employees as the respondents did not select or manage the petitioners. The petitioners' salaries also came from event proceeds and they performed their roles freely without direction or control, using their own expertise and tools. Therefore, no employee-employer relationship existed.

    Hak Cipta:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Unduh sebagai DOCX, PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    dari 1

    Labor Standard Reviewer

    A-8 Art. 82-90 Case Title Semblante vs CA Fast Facts Petitioners Semblante and Pilar were masiador and sentenciador, respectively. They were given IDs and salary. One day they were not allowed entry into the cockpit. Filed for illegal dismissal. Ruling/Ratio Respondent spouses: (1) had no part in petitioners selection and management; (2) petitioners salaries were paid out of the arriba; and (3) petitioners performed their functions as masiador and sentenciador free from the direction and control of respondents, i.e., mainly on their expertise & they provided their own tools. No Ee-Er relationship.

    Anda mungkin juga menyukai