a b c d
a b c d e f
V =
4 3
r 3
4 5
0.03 cm3 2.1 1022 cm3 2.70 1020 cm3 130 times greater The uncharged sodium atom has two more occupied shells of electrons than the uncharged hydrogen atom. This law stated that if the elements were listed in order of increasing atomic weight, about every 8th element would have similar properties. It was proposed by John Newlands. Student responses.
Density (g cm3)
0.07 (l) 0.53 1.85 2.34 2.26 (graphite) 0.81 (l) 1.15 (O2, l) 1.51 (l) 0.97 1.74 2.70 2.33 1.82 (white) 2.07 (rhombic) 1.56 (l) 0.86 1.55 3.0 4.50 6.1 7.19 7.43 7.86 8.90 8.90 8.96 7.14 5.91 5.32 5.72 (grey) 4.80 (grey) 3.12 1.53 2.6 4.47 6.49
Hydrogen Lithium Beryllium Boron Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Sodium Magnesium Aluminium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Nickel Cobalt Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium
H Li Be B C N O F Na Mg Al Si P S Cl K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Ni Co Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Rb Sr Y Zr
Element
Symbol
Density (g cm3)
8.57 10.2 12.4 12.4 12.0 10.5 8.65 7.31 7.30 (white) 6.68 4.94 6.24 1.87 3.50
Niobium Molybdenum Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver Cadmium Indium Tin Antimony Iodine Tellurium Caesium Barium
*
Nb Mo Ru Rh Pd Ag Cd In Sn Sb I Te Cs Ba
92.9 95.9 101.1 102.9 106.4 107.9 112.4 114.8 118.7 121.8 126.9 127.6 132.9 137.3
Note: According to conventional practice, the number of significant figures in the answer has been determined by the number of significant figures in the experimental data (in this case, density).
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.2
Student response. A possible answer is shown next, based on fact that B and Al show similar patterns, Li, Na, K, Rb and Cs show similar patterns but not the same as H, and removing N from pattern since it is not a solid and therefore its density and hence calculated atomic volume are not compared fairly against those of most of the other elements. We place elements that display peaks or troughs or very similar values in same vertical columns. Table 4.2 Sorting the elements
H Li Na K Be Mg Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe Sr, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo Ba B Al Ni, Co, Cu Ru, Rh, Pd C Si Ga N P As O S Se F Cl Br
Rb Cs
Ag
Cd
In, Sn
Sb, I, Te
a b c
24 times bigger This is much smaller than the theoretical answer of 130. The assumption is that the atoms occupy the entire volume of the sample, i.e. there is no empty space between the atoms, which would decrease the density of the sample. Since atoms are spherical, which means there must be some unoccupied space at least when they pack together, and given the fact many elements do not exist as separate atoms, this assumption leads to quite significant error. The data have been obtained from the work of someone else or a group of other people and not directly by the person now using the data.
2 3 4
Formula of hydride
O F Na
H2O HF NaH
2 1 1, 2
Element
Symbol
Formula of hydride
Magnesium Aluminium Silicon Phosphorus Sulfur Chlorine Potassium Calcium Scandium Titanium Vanadium Chromium Manganese Iron Nickel Cobalt Copper Zinc Gallium Germanium Arsenic Selenium Bromine Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium
Mg Al Si P S Cl K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Ni Co Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Ru Rh Pd
24.3 27.0 28.1 31.0 32.1 35.5 39.1 40.1 45.0 47.9 50.9 52.0 54.9 55.8 58.7 58.9 63.5 65.4 69.7 72.6 74.9 79.0 79.9 85.5 87.6 88.9 91.2 92.9 95.9 101.1 102.9 106.4
MgH2 AlH3 Simplest is SiH4 * PH3 H2S HCl KH CaH2 GaH, Ga2H6 GeH4, Ge2H6 AsH3 H2Se HBr RbH SrH2
Element
Symbol
Formula of hydride
Ag Cd In Sn Sb I Te Cs Ba
*Note that these have been based on the assumption from the data in the exercise that oxygen only exhibits a valency of 2. The bolded number is the valency of the element in its hydrogen compound. Where a hydrogen compound does not exist, the lowest valency of the element in its oxygen compound is bolded instead.
Figure 4.3
Student response. (Students should put H in a different group to the other elements in the above column (Li etc), given that its density and atomic volume do not fall into the same patterns as those of Li etc.) Possible answers may include: The data for density jumps about and is difficult to compare for substances that are not solid at room temperature. There are no clear-cut rules, as there is still variation within each column. The data may be inaccurate, which may affect the patterns observed. The data on formulas of compounds did not show a clear pattern unless the graph focused on one of the values of valency for each elementwhere possible, deduced from its hydride. More data than this are needed to confirm positions, particularly for elements where no hydride or oxide was known. A spiral table would better show the continual increase in atomic weight and the corresponding trends in properties. a The early periodic table was based on experimental data only, including atomic weights of elements that were deduced from relative weights of substances reacting. The elements were listed in order of increasing atomic weight and placed into the same vertical column as those with similar properties. In the modern Periodic Table the elements are listed in order of increasing atomic number (which was deduced from experimental data), and they are still primarily placed into columns that are based on properties, although electron configurations also are taken into account. b The basis of organisation has changed because it was found that there were elements that needed to be placed out of order of atomic weight, if they were to be placed in the same column as elements with similar properties. Listing in order of increasing atomic number overcomes this problem. The repeating patterns in properties of the elements are due to repeating patterns in their electron configurations, since their properties are primarily determined by their electron configurations.