The use of multiple sensory channels increases the bandwidth of the interaction
between the human and the computer. It makes human computer interaction more
like the interaction between humans in their everyday environment. Discuss this
statement explaining the role of application of multi-sensory input in human
computer interaction.
Multi-sensory systems use more than one sensory channel in interaction E.g. sounds, text,
hypertext, animation, video, gestures, vision etc. this is used in a range of applications
and is particularly good for users with special needs, and virtual reality.
Speech Recognition: currently useful?: For a single user, limited vocabulary systems
can work satisfactorily. No general user, general vocabulary systems are commercially
successful, yet Large potential, however
• When users hands are already occupied -manufacturing, for example
• For users with physical disabilities
• Lightweight, mobile devices
Auditory Icons: Use natural sounds to represent different types of object or action.
Natural sounds have associated semantics which can be mapped onto similar meanings in
the interaction
• e.g. throwing something away can be represented by the sound of something smashing
Problem: not all things have associated meanings: e.g. copying
Application: SonicFinder for the Macintosh
Items and actions on the desktop have associated sounds
• Folders have a papery noise
• Moving files is accompanied by a dragging sound
• Copying (a problem one) has the sound of a liquid being poured into a receptacle; the
rising pitch indicates the progress of the copy
• Big files have a louder sound than smaller ones
Additional information can also be presented:
• Muffled sounds indicate the object is obscured or an action is in the background
• Use of stereo allows positional information to be added
Family earcons: Similar types of earcons represent similar classes of action or similar
objects: the family of “errors” would contain syntax and operating system errors.
Family earcons are easily grouped and refined due to compositional and hierarchical
nature Harder to associate with the interface task since there is no natural mapping.
Handwriting recognition: Handwriting is another communication mechanism, which
we are used to.
Technology: Handwriting consists of complex strokes and spaces Captured by digitising
tablet - strokes transformed to sequence of dots • large-scale tablets available, more
suitable for
digitising maps and technical drawings
• Smaller devices, some incorporating thin screens to display the information, becoming
available e.g.those produced by Apple as personal organizers
Recognition: Problems
• personal differences in letter formation
• co-articulation effects
Of limited success are systems that are trained on a few users, with separated letters
Generic multi-user naturally-written text recognition systems are not currently of
significant accuracy to be commercially successful.
Text and Hypertext: Text is a common form of output, and very useful in many
situations
• imposes a strict linear progression on the reader, according to the author’s ideas of what
is best – this may not be ideal
Hypertext structures blocks of text into a mesh or
network that can be traversed in many different ways
• allows a user to follow their own ideas and
concepts through information
• hypertext systems comprise:
• a number of pages, and
• links, that allow one page to be accessed from another
Animation: Animation refers to the addition of motion to images, which change and
move in time
Simple examples:
• clocks
Digital faces - seconds flick past
Analogue face - second hand sweeps round constantly
Salvador Dali clock - digital numbers warp and melt, one digit into the next
• cursor
Hourglass/watch/spinning disc indicates the system is busy flashing cursor indicates
typing position clearly different types of cursor pointer indicate different functionality
available, or different mode.
Animation used to great effect to indicate temporally varying information.
Useful in education and training: allow users to see things happening, as well as being
interesting and entertaining images in their own right
Utilising animation and video: Animation and video are potentially powerful tools
• Notice the success of television and arcade games however, the standard approaches to
interface design do not take into account the full possibilities of such media
We will probably only start to reap the full benefit from this technology when we have
much more experience. We also need to learn from the masters of this new art form:
interface designers will need to acquire the skills of film makers and cartoonists as well
as artists and writers.
Applications: Users with special needs have specialized requirements which are often
well-served by Multimedia and/or multimodal systems.
• Visual impairment - screen readers, SonicFinder
• Physical disability - speech input, gesture, recognition, predictive systems (e.g. Reactive
keyboard)
• Learning disabilities (e.g. dyslexia) - speech input, output
Multimodal user interface supports multiple computer input and output, e.g. using speech
together with pen-based gestures. Multi modal computer interaction can have two
perspectives: the human-centred and the technology-centered.
According to the human-centred perspective, multimodal systems should support more
than one sensory and response modality of the users. The technology-centred approach
defines a multimodal system to be one that supports concurrent combination of (input)
modes. Alternatively, it could at least specify which mode is operational on each situation.
While interacting with a multimodal system, users receive multimodal input and are able
to respond by using those modalities, which provide convenient means of interaction.
While in multimedia systems the user has to adapt to the system’s perceptual capabilities,
in multimodal systems the system adapts to the preferences and needs of the user.
A successful interaction with a multimodal system would be one that provides the user
with procedures unified into an integrated experience. In the case of educational
technology, a successful multimodal interaction would be one where users could overcome
the difficulties they have while interacting with technology and are able to concentrate on
the content of the information provided. In such an occasion the technology would fulfill its
main aim to become the artifact that provides information/knowledge to the user. From the
users’ perspective, users could unify their experience of interacting with technology into an
integrated one that would focus on learning.
Multimedia system: From the user's point of view, multi media means that
information can also be represented as audio signals or moved images. Multimedia'
focuses on the medium or technology rather than the application or user.
A multimedia user interface supports multiple outputs only, e.g. text with audio or tactile
information provided to the user. As a result, multimedia research is a subset of
multimodal research.
From the system’s point of view, a multimedia system is also multimodal because it
provides, via different media, the user with multimodal output, i.e. audio and visual
information, and multimodal input, e.g. typing with the keyboard, clicking the
mouse. From the user’s point of view, a multimedia system makes users receive
multimodal information. However, they can respond by using specific media, e.g.
keyboard and mouse, which are not adaptable to different users or contexts of use.
All computer systems, single user or multi-user interact with the work groups and
organizations in which they are used. However, group working is more complex
than that of a single person. Discuss this statement and briefly explain how
organizational factors can make or break groupware or single user factors.
1. Whether users of the groupware are working together at the same time ("real-
time" or "synchronous" groupware) or different times ("asynchronous"
groupware), and
2. Whether users are working together in the same place ("colocated" or "face-to-
face") or in different places ("non-colocated" or "distance").
o Organizing and scheduling for groups is more difficult than for individuals.
o Group interaction style is hard to select for beforehand, whereas individual
characteristics are often possible to determine before a study is conducted.
o Pre-established groups vary in interaction style, and the length of time they've
been a group affects their communication patterns.
o New groups change quickly during the group formation process.
o Groups are dynamic; roles change.
o Many studies need to be long-term, especially when studying asynchronous
groupware.
o Modifying prototypes can be technically difficult because of the added
complexity of groupware over single-user software.
o In software for large organizations, testing new prototypes can be difficult or
impossible because of the disruption caused by introducing new versions into an
organization.
Adoption and Acceptance: Many groupware systems simply cannot be successful unless
a critical mass of users chooses to use the system. Having a videophone is useless if
you're the only one who has it. Two of the most common reasons for failing to achieve
critical mass are lack of interoperability and the lack of appropriate individual benefit.
Interoperability: Lack of interoperability/compatibility. Compatibility issues lead to
general wariness among customers, who want to wait until a clear standard has emerged.
Avoiding Abuse: Most people are familiar with the problem of spamming with email.
Some other common violations of social protocol include: taking inappropriate advantage
of anonymity, sabotaging group work, or violating privacy.
Customization and Grounding: When groups are working together with the same
information, they may individually desire customized views. The challenge of
customized views is to support grounding: the establishment of a common ground or
shared understanding of what information is known and shared between the different
users.
Groupware offers significant advantages over single-user systems. These are some of the
most common reasons people want to use groupware:
Organisational issues
-Organisational factors can make or break groupware
-Studying the work group is not sufficient any system is used within a wider context and
--the crucial people need not be direct users
-Before installing a new system, the designer must understand:
Who benefits
Who puts in effort
The balance of power in the organization and
how it will be affected