Lauramidopropyl betaine
Lauramidopropyl betaine, the major component of cocamidopropyl betaine IUPAC name[hide] {[3-(Dodecanoylamino)propyl](dimethyl)ammonio}acetate Other names[hide] 2-[(3-Dodecanamidopropyl)dimethylaminio]acetate Identifiers CAS number 61789-40-0 PubChem 20280 ChemSpider 19106 EC number 263-058-8 Image 1 Jmol-3D images Image 2 Image 3 SMILES [show] InChI [show] Properties Molecular formula C19H38N2O3 Molar mass 342.52 g mol1 (verify) (what is: / ?) Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 C, 100 kPa) Infobox references
Cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) is an organic compound derived from coconut oil and dimethylaminopropylamine.[1] It is a zwitterion, consisting of both a quaternary ammonium cation and a carboxylate. CAPB is available as viscous pale yellow solution that is used as a surfactant in personal care products. The name reflects that the major part of the molecule, the lauric acid group, is derived from coconut oil. Cocamidopropyl betaine to a significant degree has replaced cocamide DEA.
Contents
[hide]
[edit] Production
Cocamidopropyl betaine can be viewed as the combination of cocamide and glycine betaine. It is however prepared by combining chloroacetic acid with the amide derived from dimethylaminopropylamine and lauric acid: CH3(CH2)10C(O)N(H)CH2CH2CH2N(CH3)2 + ClCH2CO2H + NaOH CH3(CH2)10C(O)N(H)CH2CH2CH2N+(CH3)2CH2CO2- + NaCl + H2O
Sodium monochloroacetate < 5 ppm Amidoamine (AA) < 0.3% dimethylaminopropylamine (DMAPA) < 15 ppm Glycerol < 3%
The impurities AA and DMAPA are most critical, as they have been shown to be responsible for skin sensitation reactions. These by-products can be avoided by a moderate excess chloroacetate and the exact adjustment of pH value during betainization reaction accompanied by regular analytical control.
[edit] Safety
CAPB has been claimed to cause allergic reactions in some users,[3][4][5] but a controlled pilot study has found that these cases may represent irritant reactions rather than true allergic reactions.[6] Furthermore, results of human studies have shown that CAPB has a low sensitizing
potential if impurities with amidoamine (AA) and dimethylaminopropylamine (DMAPA) are low and tightly controlled.[7][8] Other studies have concluded that most apparent allergic reactions to CAPB are more likely due to amidoamine.[1][9] Cocamidopropyl betaine was voted 2004 Allergen of the Year by the American Contact Dermatitis Society.[10]
Cocamidopropyl hydroxysultaine
[edit] References
^ a b Foti, C.; Bonamonte, D.; Mascolo, G.; Corcelli, A.; Lobasso, S.; Rigano, L.; Angelini, G. (2003). "The role of 3-dimethylaminopropylamine and amidoamine in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine". Contact dermatitis 48 (4): 194198. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.00078.x. PMID 12786723. edit 2. ^ Reich, Charles (1997). "Hair Cleansers". In Martin M. Rieger; Linda D. Rhein. Surfactants in Cosmetics. Surfactant Science Series 68 (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. p. 359. ISBN 978-0-8247-9805-5. Retrieved 9 December 2012. 3. ^ a b De Groot, A. C.; Van Der Walle, H. B.; Weyland, J. W. (1995). "Contact allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine". Contact dermatitis 33 (6): 419422. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb02078.x. PMID 8706401. edit 4. ^ a b Brand, R.; Delaney, T. A. (1998). "Allergic contact dermatitis to cocamidopropylbetaine in hair shampoo". The Australasian journal of dermatology 39 (2): 121122. doi:10.1111/j.1440-0960.1998.tb01264.x. PMID 9611386. edit 5. ^ a b Mowad, C. (2001). "Cocamidopropyl betaine allergy". American Journal of Contact Dermatitis 12 (4): 223224. doi:10.1053/ajcd.2001.29549. PMID 11753899. edit 6. ^ Shaffer, K. K.; Jaimes, J. P.; Hordinsky, M. K.; Zielke, G. R.; Warshaw, E. M. (2006). "Allergenicity and cross-reactivity of coconut oil derivatives: A double-blind randomized controlled pilot study". Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society, North American Contact Dermatitis Group 17 (2): 7176. PMID 16956456. edit 7. ^ Fowler Jr, J. F.; Zug, K. M.; Taylor, J. S.; Storrs, F. J.; Sherertz, E. A.; Sasseville, D. A.; Rietschel, R. L.; Pratt, M. D. et al. (2004). "Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine and amidoamine in North America". Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society, North American Contact Dermatitis Group 15 (1): 56. PMID 15573641. edit 8. ^ Korting, H. C.; Parsch, E. M.; Enders, F.; Przybilla, B. (1992). "Allergic contact dermatitis to cocamidopropyl betaine in shampoo". Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 27 (6 Pt 1): 10131015. doi:10.1016/S0190-9622(08)80270-8. PMID 1479082. edit 9. ^ Fowler, J. F.; Fowler, L. M.; Hunter, J. E. (1997). "Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine may be due to amidoamine: A patch test and product use test study". Contact dermatitis 37 (6): 276281. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb02464.x. PMID 9455630. edit 10. ^ History of Allergen of the Year. contactderm.org
1.