PENILAIAN / EVALUATION Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 30% daripada jumlah markah kursus berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik yang dilampirkan. / This assignment accounts for 30% of the total marks for the course and shall be assessed based on the Rubrics attached . Anda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan Akhir Semester bermula / You would be given feedback on the assignment before the Final Semester Examination commences. PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan, secara automatik, akan disemak untuk menentukan kadar pertindihan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong seperti berikut: / Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. If plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows: Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 10 - 30 % : potongan 20% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 31 - 50 % : potongan 40% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan lebih daripada 50%: Markah sifar akan diberikan. Assignments with 10 - 30 % overlap with others: 20% deduction from the total marks scored. Assignments with 31 - 50 % overlap with others: 40% deduction from the total marks scored. Assignments with more than 50% overlap with others: Zero mark would be given.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION
PURPOSE The purpose of this assignment is to develop learners ability to evaluate a real ethical problem in management and to recommend a suitable analytical method for solving the identified problem as discussed in the module or other relevant books. REQUIREMENT Identify ONE real ethical problem in management. Evaluate why it is considered as ethical problem and recommend a suitable analytical method for solving the identified problem. _________________________________________________________________________ MUKA SURAT TAMAT / END OF PAGE
Low Criteria Background of the ethical problem Weight 2.5 0 No description was given 1 Irrelevant description of the problem
Fair 2 Unclear description of the nature of the identified problem, when did it happen, the organisational background and the people involved
Above average 3 Clear description of the nature of the identified problem, and when did it happen, but unclear about the organisational background and the people involved Able to relate clearly the identified problem with TWO of the characteristics of ethical problems, but unable to explain clearly why the problem was a management ethical problem Clear and detail analysis of the problem. Able to relate the problem with TWO methods of analysis
Excellent 4 Clear description of the nature of the identified problem, when did it happen, the organisational background and the people involved Max Marks 10
Unable to relate the identified problem with any characteristic of ethical problem
Able to relate the identified problem with only ONE characteristic of ethical problem, but unable to explain why the problem was a management ethical problem
Able to relate clearly the identified problem with THREE characteristics of ethical problem. Able to explain clearly why the problem was a management ethical problem
Unclear analysis of the problem. Was not able to relate to any method of analysis
Clear and detail analysis of the problem. Able to relate the problem with ONE method of analysis
Clear and detail analysis of the identified problem. Able to relate the problem with THREE methods of analysis
1.5
The recommendations to solve the identified ethical problem were given. However, the recommendations were not justified and not practical
ONE feasible recommendation to solve the identified ethical problem was given. Each recommendation was supported with clear justification Some of the key points of the assignment were clearly summarised, but not written in a precise and convincing manner
TWO feasible recommendations to solve the identified ethical problem were given. Each recommendations was supported by a clear justification Key points of the assignment were clearly summarised. It was written in a precise and convincing manner
Summary 0.5
No summary
Some of the key points of the assignment were incorrectly identified and summarised
Some of the key points of the assignment were correctly identified but not clearly summarised
Total points
7.5
30