, (Fuko, 1980). ,
.
, ,
, ,
(Parker et al., 1995).
,
.
(Szasz, 1982; Cooper, 1986).
o
(Gergen, 1994),
(Simon, 1994). ,
,
,
(Benedict, 1934; Magaro,
1976; Loue, 1998).
,
,
.
: ?
,
(Rosenhan, 1984).
(Parker et al., 1995).
,
(Gaines, 1992),
.
,
;
,
. ,
, ,
.
470
,
(, )
. ,
.
, ,
,
,
. ,
(Gaines, 1992; Simon,
1994; Kutchins & Kirk, 1997; Neimeyer & Raskin, 2000; Horwitz, 2002).
(Mahoney & Lyddon, 1988),
. ,
,
.
:
, ?
,
(APA, 1994),
.
. , ,
.
, ,
,
,
.
471
,
; ;
, ,
. ,
,
,
, ,
,
(Leitner & Phillips, 2003). ,
.
, ,
(
),
.
,
, ,
, ,
.
;
,
.
: ?
472
,
.
,
.
. ,
.
, ,
,
.
.
.
,
.
, .
.
(, 1986: 615)
. : , , ,
, , ; ,
, , , ; , , , ;
. , . ;
, ;
; 1. ,
; 2. ;
() , , , ,
; , , ;
(Ibid.: 868).
, ,
.
, ,
, ,
, , .
,
.
(Fuko, 1971, 1980, 1990)
,
473
. ,
?,
. , ,
,
. , ,
,
.
.
.
,
.
,
.
.
.
.
Nullum crimen sine lege
,
. ,
.
,
(, 1997).
:
474
.
: ,
(Fuko, 1971),
- : ,
; ,
; ,
.
,
,
. ,
,
.
, .
, ,
.
: ,
-.
.
, ,
.
, ,
.
,
,
.
, .
, :
,
,
;
, (Schumacher, 1973:
34).
,
.
,
,
(Fuko, 1971: 419).
, ,
,
, .
-, -
475
: ,
. ,
,
.
. ,
,
(Lacan,
1981). ,
:
476
- ,
-.
,
: ,
, .
XIX ,
.
.
.
,
.
,
. ,
. , ,
,
.
:
. ,
.
:
( )
, . ,
,
. ,
, ,
.
, . ,
,
.
,
. ,
.
, ,
: ;
(Fuko, 1990).
- ,
.
. ,
. ,
, .
,
. ,
, ,
, , .
.
A
IV ( DSM-IV),
:
477
:
?
DSM-IV, je
(. )
(
) , ,
, . ,
, .
, ,
.
(. , )
,
(APA, 1994: xxi-xxii).
,
. DSM-IV
.
478
. ,
(Gergen, Homan & Anderson, 1996) 1929.
, ,
.
, 1938. ,
, ,
, .
, 1952. ,
,
198 .
, DSM-II, 1968. , 221 .
DSM-III, 1980. ,
1994. (DSM-IV) 340,
.
,
,
,
.
. ,
. ,
-.
.
, .
1
479
,
,
,
(Szasz, 1982).
,
. ,
1, :
. . .
.
,
, ,
.
.
,
. , .
(
),
DSM- 1968 ,
.
DSM-IV
,
.
.
:
480
: , , ,
, .
: , ,
(, , , .),
: , .
: , ,
, , ,
, , .
: , , . (Kutchins & Kirk,
1997: 59).
, , ,
.
.
,
.
(Hare-Mustin & Marecek, 1997)
, .
, ,
,
.
( drapethes , mani ).
je 1850. (Samuel Cartwright)
.
, ,
dyaesthesia
aethiopica, , ,
.
, .
,
( ),
, .
,
16 , ,
.
481
, ,
. XIX ,
, ,
- .
, , . ,
,
, .
,
( ),
, .
,
. ,
,
,
.
,
, .
,
,
, (. MacKenzie River).
48. .
12 13 .
. ,
.
.
482
.
e , ,
,
,
.
.
1991. .
,
.
,
,
, , .
:
,
-! , de jure
, de facto .
,
.
,
(Horwitz, 2002).
,
. ,
.
.
(Benedict, 1934),
,
,
. , ,
.
, ,
.
483
,
,
( )
.
, .
. ,
.
,
.
,
,
.
, 2002. ,
.
,
,
( )
.
, ,
-.
,
.
.
(Loue, 1998),
,
.
,
.
, , ,
,
,
.
.
.
:
484
. , ,
,
(Sasman, 1985). XVII ,
.
,
.
:
,
,
.
. ,
. , ,
. , ,
,
.
, ...
XIX .
(Sasman, 1985: 420).
, ,
. ,
. (Popper, 1972; Kuhn,
1974; Goodman, 1978; Searle, 1995)
, .
.
,
485
XX ,
.
.
XX
.
.
XX
,
. ,
,
.
. ,
,
: ,
(, 1951: 111).
.
, .
486
. ,
. ,
, , ,
. ,
. ,
.
.
, , ,
, ? ,
.
,
. , ,
,
(, 2001: 68) .
?
. ,
.
,
.
,
.
, ,
,
. , , ,
,
, , .
.
,
.
? ?
?
? ? ?
? ?
?
? ?
? ,
?
,
, ?
?
, , ,
,
487
,
. ,
, ,
. ,
,
,
.
,
. ,
, ,
.
.
,
.
.
.
. ,
.
,
.
488
. ,
,
.
,
.
, , , ,
,
, .
,
,
? ,
,
.
. ,
;
; ,
.
,
.
,
,
, ,
489
,
. ,
. ,
,
,
.
,
.
.
,
. , ,
.
.
, , ,
,
.
,
,
,
.
.
.
,
:
,
,
; ,
, :
, (Fuko, 1971: 421).
490
,
.
.
,
,
. , ,
, .
, .
.
.
.
,
.
491
492
:
, , , ,
,
Duan Stojnov
493
Summary
This paper reviews dierent approaches towards human normality, usually dealt
with in the context of sciences (psychology, psychiatry and psychotherapy).
The prevailing approach which states that normality is ntologically evident and
residing in natural behavior, is opposed to the approaches viewing the dimension
of normality versus abnormality, as socially constructed entity situated in culture.
It has been advocated that the boundary between normality and abnormality is
fuzzy, that it resides in the absent standards and gives a privilege to the social
groups that are not suciently transparent, while the criteria for construing
normality is varying through time in dierent cultures.