signs and symbols both within language and without. Literary theorists study the use of language in literature. Linguistics additionally draws on and informs work from such diverse fields as acoustics, anthropology, biology, computer science, human anatomy, informatics etc.
- Esthetic function- (is connected with stylistic devices/ metaphors, alliteration, assonance, intonation, meter, rhyme) -Phatic ( a friendly contact with the addressee/ nice weather, how are you, you know...) -Metalingual- less concentrated on what is been communicated- meta means outside)
7. Compare the functions of language suggested by J. Lyons and those suggested by G. Yule.
John Lyons identified 2 functions of the language The attitudinal function behavior (to express our state of mind or emotions like: solidarity, confidence, good will, love, hate etc.) The cognitive function- to express our perception believes about state of affairs. Interactional function- how human use language to interact to each other socially and emotionally. Tranzactional function- human use their language ability to communicate, to transfer knowledge from one generation to the next. Gorge Yule
We know that systems of communication are not unique only to human beings. Many animals and even plants communicate with each other. However, human language is unique in being a symbolic communication system that is learned instead of biologically inherited. But language properties are specific only to the Human communication system, because people have reason, they can think, speak, read, learn, write, dance, sing etc. But what we hear or see from animals, birds or plants these are only instincts. Thats way language properties are typical to the human communication system.
10. The origins of language. Compare two of the most known theories.
The origins of language have been the topic of scholarly discussions for several centuries. In spite of this, we dont know for sure an ultimate origin or age. It is an intriguing question, to which we may never have a complete answer. There are many theories about the origins of language. 1. The bow-wow theory. Language began as imitations of natural sounds -- moo, chopchop, crash, clang, buzz, bang, meow... This is more technically referred to as onomatopoeia or echoism. 2. The pooh-pooh theory. Language began with interjections, instinctive emotive cries such as oh! For surprise and ouch! For pain. 3. The yo-he-ho theory. Language began as rhythmic chants, perhaps ultimately from the grunts of heavy work (heave-ho!). The linguist A. S. Diamond suggests that these were perhaps calls for assistance or cooperation accompanied by appropriate gestures. This may relate yo-he-ho to the ding-dong theory, as in such words as cut, break, crush, strike...
11. Speak about the development of writing. Identify all forms of writing known.
One of the most important developments of human kind has been writing, but often people are unaware of how long and complicated this path has been. Some say that writing appeared in Mesopotamia 3000 years ago. They need to invent writing somehow to keep records. First of all appeared 1. PICTOGRAMES and IDEOGRAMES (20000 years ago) Pictogram into- ideograms (a
- means daytime.
The term cuneiform writing comes from the fact it is composed of signs that look like small wedges, in Latin: cuneus. Each of the symbol represented one word. Usually, the domestic animals and the agricultural products were represented by conventional signs, while for other objects and wild animals they used drawings that represented their distinctive characteristics. 3. HIEROGLIFIC WRITING The origin of the hieroglyphic writing was nearly contemporary to the cuneiform one. It did not evolve in the cuneiform structure, but it kept a pictographic representation of the signs. Probably, this was due to the fact the Egyptians did not use clay as a support for writing, but papyrus, wood and rock walls such as those of the temples. During its evolution, the hieroglyphic writing was influenced by the Sumerians, The hieroglyphic writing was at the same time phonetic, figurative and symbolic.
4. LOGOGRAFIC SYSTEM
A logogram is a single written character which represents a complete grammatical word. Most Chinese and Japanese characters are classified as logograms. Each character represents a single word (or, more precisely, a morpheme). While most languages do not use wholly logographic writing systems many languages use some logograms. A good example of modern western logograms are the Hindu-Arabic numerals everyone who uses those symbols understands what 1 means whether he or she calls it one, eins, uno, yi, ichi, ehad, ena or jedan. Other western logograms include the ampersand &, used for and, the at sign @, used in many contexts for at, the percent sign % and the many signs representing units of currency ($, , , , and so on.) 5. SYLLABIC SYSTEM (JAPON) A syllabary is a set of written symbols that represent (or approximate) syllables, which make up words. A symbol in a syllabary typically represents a consonant sound followed by a vowel sound, or just a vowel alone. In a "true syllabary", there is no systematic graphic similarity between phonetically related characters (though some do have graphic similarity for the vowels). That is, the characters for /ke/, /ka/ and /ko/ have no similarity to indicate their common "k" sound (voiceless velar plosive). Syllabaries are best suited to languages with relatively simple syllable structure, such as Japanese. 6. ALPHABETIC SYSTEM OF WRITING An alphabet is a small set of letters basic written symbols each of which roughly represents or represented historically a phoneme of a spoken language. The word alphabet is derived from alpha and beta, the first two symbols of the Greek alphabet.
12. Compare logographic and syllabic writing systems. Their advantages and disadvantages
LOGOGRAFIC SYSTEM A logogram is a single written character which represents a complete grammatical word. Most Chinese and Japanese characters are classified as logograms. Each character represents a single word (or, more precisely, a morpheme). While most languages do not use wholly logographic writing systems many languages use some logograms. A good example of modern western logograms are the Hindu-Arabic numerals everyone who uses those symbols understands what 1 means whether he or she calls it one, eins, uno, yi, ichi, ehad, ena or jedan. Other western logograms include the ampersand &, used for and, the at sign @, used in many contexts for at, the percent sign % and the many signs representing units of currency ($, , , , and so on.) SYLLABIC SYSTEM (JAPON) A syllabary is a set of written symbols that represent (or approximate) syllables, which make up words. A symbol in a syllabary typically represents a consonant sound followed by a vowel sound, or just a vowel alone. In a "true syllabary", there is no systematic graphic similarity between phonetically related characters (though some do have graphic similarity for the vowels). That is, the characters for /ke/, /ka/ and /ko/ have no similarity to indicate their common "k" sound (voiceless velar plosive). Syllabaries are best suited to languages with relatively simple syllable structure, such as Japanese.
13. What is the basic difference between a natural and conventional sign.
NATURAL SIGN- it is a natural result, it is something created by the nature. All sorts of sights, sounds and smells can be natural signs. They communicate to someone who observes and can interpret but their messages are unintentional the by-products of various events. CONVENTIONAL SIGNS- are the auditory and visual device that people have created to send routine messages to one another. For example: whistle, buzzers, sirens and bells.
14. What is a linguistic sign? What are the components of a linguistic sign?
A linguistic sign is an abstract structure whose instances participate in a linguistic system, or language. The components of the linguistic sign are: -a form component (whose elements are phonological units) -a grammatical component (whose elements are semantic units) -a meaning component (whose elements are semantic units)
Thee formal structure of the sign is determined by the grammar of the language. The information value of the linguistic sign, its meaning is not fixed, but determined by the conventions of the language.