Scribd Logo
Unggah

Selamat datang di Scribd!

  • BPM Conference Portugal 2013 - Ivo Velichkov "Reasoning With Taskless BPMN "

    Diunggah oleh

    Escola de Estudos Avançados Grupo Rumos
    230 tayangan42 halaman
    Ivo Velitchkov Independent Management Consultant at Kvistgaard Ivo Velitchkov is an independent management consultant, working in the areas of BPM and Enterprise Architecture. He’s been involved in these and other management areas for 16 years in various capacities: as CEO of a software company, university professor, project manager, consultant and researcher. Currently he is helping the BPM practice in the European Commission. Dr. Velitchkov has several publications, he is the author of the blog strategicstructures.com, and co-author of the book "Enterprise Architecture for Connected E-Government: Practices and Innovations. ​"Reasoning with Taskless BPMN" BPMN has so many drawbacks both for analysis and execution and yet, that's the first notation that achieved remarkable consensus between BPM communities. Although a vendors-led effort, and criticized all the way, it showed viability and in fact a remarkable adoption rate. Is there a way to use this consensus and the availability of so many tools that support BPMN in a way that would solve, or rather dissolve part of the problems of the notation? This presentation will suggest, instead of furnishing BPMN with what’s missing, taking out some elements that are not just excessive but in fact restrict the usage of BPMN. How about taking out the core element – the task? In fact all types of tasks. The presentation will try to show how this would enlarge the application of BPMN, making it a better communication medium by lowering the cognitive load for non-specialists. Furthermore such a subset of BPMN could be used for describing less predictable processes which is one area of justified criticism. Additionally, the befits for analysis and process improvement will be discussed, and last but not least – execution aspects. Inspired by cybernetics and semantic technologies, the presentation would hopefully provide some insights that would support further application of this approach, different parts of which have been already applied successfully in some organisations.

    Judul Asli

    BPM Conference Portugal 2013 - Ivo Velichkov "Reasoning with Taskless BPMN​"

    Hak Cipta

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Format Tersedia

    PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd

    Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

    Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

    Laporkan Dokumen Ini
    Ivo Velitchkov Independent Management Consultant at Kvistgaard Ivo Velitchkov is an independent management consultant, working in the areas of BPM and Enterprise Architecture. He’s been involved in these and other management areas for 16 years in various capacities: as CEO of a software company, university professor, project manager, consultant and researcher. Currently he is helping the BPM practice in the European Commission. Dr. Velitchkov has several publications, he is the author of the blog strategicstructures.com, and co-author of the book "Enterprise Architecture for Connected E-Government: Practices and Innovations. ​"Reasoning with Taskless BPMN" BPMN has so many drawbacks both for analysis and execution and yet, that's the first notation that achieved remarkable consensus between BPM communities. Although a vendors-led effort, and criticized all the way, it showed viability and in fact a remarkable adoption rate. Is there a way to use this consensus and the availability of so many tools that support BPMN in a way that would solve, or rather dissolve part of the problems of the notation? This presentation will suggest, instead of furnishing BPMN with what’s missing, taking out some elements that are not just excessive but in fact restrict the usage of BPMN. How about taking out the core element – the task? In fact all types of tasks. The presentation will try to show how this would enlarge the application of BPMN, making it a better communication medium by lowering the cognitive load for non-specialists. Furthermore such a subset of BPMN could be used for describing less predictable processes which is one area of justified criticism. Additionally, the befits for analysis and process improvement will be discussed, and last but not least – execution aspects. Inspired by cybernetics and semantic technologies, the presentation would hopefully provide some insights that would support further application of this approach, different parts of which have been already applied successfully in some organisations.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    230 tayangan42 halaman

    BPM Conference Portugal 2013 - Ivo Velichkov "Reasoning With Taskless BPMN "

    Diunggah oleh

    Escola de Estudos Avançados Grupo Rumos
    Ivo Velitchkov Independent Management Consultant at Kvistgaard Ivo Velitchkov is an independent management consultant, working in the areas of BPM and Enterprise Architecture. He’s been involved in these and other management areas for 16 years in various capacities: as CEO of a software company, university professor, project manager, consultant and researcher. Currently he is helping the BPM practice in the European Commission. Dr. Velitchkov has several publications, he is the author of the blog strategicstructures.com, and co-author of the book "Enterprise Architecture for Connected E-Government: Practices and Innovations. ​"Reasoning with Taskless BPMN" BPMN has so many drawbacks both for analysis and execution and yet, that's the first notation that achieved remarkable consensus between BPM communities. Although a vendors-led effort, and criticized all the way, it showed viability and in fact a remarkable adoption rate. Is there a way to use this consensus and the availability of so many tools that support BPMN in a way that would solve, or rather dissolve part of the problems of the notation? This presentation will suggest, instead of furnishing BPMN with what’s missing, taking out some elements that are not just excessive but in fact restrict the usage of BPMN. How about taking out the core element – the task? In fact all types of tasks. The presentation will try to show how this would enlarge the application of BPMN, making it a better communication medium by lowering the cognitive load for non-specialists. Furthermore such a subset of BPMN could be used for describing less predictable processes which is one area of justified criticism. Additionally, the befits for analysis and process improvement will be discussed, and last but not least – execution aspects. Inspired by cybernetics and semantic technologies, the presentation would hopefully provide some insights that would support further application of this approach, different parts of which have been already applied successfully in some organisations.

    Hak Cipta:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Unduh sebagai PDF, TXT atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    dari 42

    Reasoning with Taskless BPMN

    Ivo Velitchkov | 18 April 2013

    Why ST?

    Why BPMN? State Variety Execution EA

    Transformation Cybernetics Semantic technologies BPMN


    @kvistgaard

    @kvistgaard

    Image source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/renespitz/3383392840/sizes/o/in/photostream/

    - State - Transformation - Variety

    @kvistgaard

    Transformation

    @kvistgaard

    Transformation

    @kvistgaard

    Transformation (pre-defined)

    rules
    @kvistgaard

    Transformations (pre-defined)
    Objective: green circle

    rules
    @kvistgaard

    Transformations (pre-defined)
    Objective: green circle

    @kvistgaard

    Transformation (knowledge-based)
    I know colours

    I know shapes We can change shapes

    I can change colours

    capabilities
    @kvistgaard

    - State - Transformation - Variety

    @kvistgaard

    By a state of a system is meant any well-defined condition or property that can be recognised if it occurs again. (R. Ashby)

    horse walk -> trot -> canter -> gallop

    image source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Muybridge_race_horse_gallop.jpg

    @kvistgaard

    transformation

    12:30 = 06:03

    transition relative

    State
    also dynamic example: horse walk -> trot -> canter -> gallop
    @kvistgaard

    variety control complexity

    V1 < V 2
    tablet handheld read write clay
    @kvistgaard

    tablet handheld read* write* {many}


    Image source: http://www.katapi.org.uk/BibleMSS/ElAmarnaT.htm

    P P
    @kvistgaard

    P P
    @kvistgaard

    Why ST?

    Why BPMN? State Variety Execution EA

    Transformation Cybernetics Semantic technologies BPMN


    @kvistgaard

    Why BPMN?
    76 implementers Increasing adoption Problems with semantics of many elements (lanes, tasks, some gateways and events) Very weak on data and rules Cant express many common situations, yet has enormous number of elements Missing time dimension Not suitable for knowledge processes .

    Why BPMN?
    consensus C

    B D A G coherence
    Based on Consensus/Coherence model of D. Snowden. Source: http://cognitive-edge.com

    @kvistgaard

    Tasks are atomic


    A Task is an atomic Activity within a Process flow. A Task is used when the work in the Process cannot be broken down to a finer level of detail.
    BPMN2.0, p. 156

    so you cant

    @kvistgaard

    Tasks are restrictive


    Tasks try to restrict what should be done during run time with what is known during design time and thats often not much

    @kvistgaard

    Task-free

    Lets see what will happen without BPMN tasks


    @kvistgaard

    BPMN

    Without tasks, well have

    a leaner BPMN

    @kvistgaard

    Without tasks, our models can

    ...absorb more variety

    @kvistgaard

    The definition of these states, e.g., possible values and any specific semantic are out of scope of this specification. Therefore, BPMN adopters can use the State element and the BPMN extensibility capabilities to define their states.

    @kvistgaard

    @kvistgaard

    @kvistgaard

    C A B

    START

    C1

    C2

    C3

    C4

    END

    1. A in START 2. C1=true for A; B in START 3. A waiting for C3; C1=true for B 4. C3=true for A; C2=true for B; C in START
    @kvistgaard

    [1]

    [2]

    [3]

    [4]

    @kvistgaard

    @kvistgaard

    Job Application example

    @kvistgaard

    with interruption

    @kvistgaard

    using only conditional events

    @kvistgaard

    The first results


    Two types of use cases so far: Process improvement
    Derive to-be models
    But not from as-is, from ideal process (inspired by Ackoff ideal design) + constraints

    Case management with some degree of uncertainty


    @kvistgaard

    Why ST?

    Why BPMN? State Variety Execution EA

    Transformation Cybernetics Semantic technologies BPMN


    @kvistgaard

    Why using Semantic Technologies?

    OPEN
    Open world assumption Open-source data

    NATURAL
    Descriptions are close to the natural language, yet understandable by machines Rules are a natural part of the semantic web ecosystem
    @kvistgaard

    Source: http://leirdal.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/semanticcake2.jpg`

    @kvistgaard

    @kvistgaard

    @kvistgaard

    ONTOLOGY

    A A

    ONTOLOGY

    ONTOLOGY

    A A

    ONTOLOGY

    A A

    DOMAIN
    ONTOLOGY
    ONTOLOGY

    DOMAIN
    ONTOLOGY

    ONTOLOGY

    ONTOLOGY

    ONTOLOGY

    CORE ONTOLOGY
    ONTOLOGY

    ONTOLOGY

    ONTOLOGY

    ONTOLOGY

    A A

    DOMAIN
    ONTOLOGY
    ONTOLOGY

    DOMAIN
    ONTOLOGY

    ONTOLOGY

    ONTOLOGY

    ONTOLOGY

    @kvistgaard

    Core Civil Service Ontology


    CLASSES PROPERTIES

    @kvistgaard

    Leaner and easier BPMN Can deal with more uncertainty Execution through inference Open Enterprise Architecture

    @kvistgaard

    Anda mungkin juga menyukai