Anda di halaman 1dari 7

COFFEE PROBLEM

Consider the following two coffee mixes.


In mix A the ratio of milk to coffee is 2 : 3. In mix B the ratio of milk to coffee is 3 : 4.
Which recipe will make coffee that is the most “milky”? Solve the problem in two
different ways. In one of these ways, solve the problem without using fractions,
percentages, or decimals. Use a diagram to show why your strategy works. Record
your solution and diagram on chart paper.

Ben said he used percentages to figure out which mix will be the most “milky”. See
his work below. Does his strategy make sense?
Amanda disagrees. She claims that they are equally “milky” because they each have
one more unit of coffee than milk. Does her thinking make sense?
Mix A: Mix B:

What might you ask or what comment would you make in response to these student
strategies?

© 2008, University of Michigan


FACILITATING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Coffee Problem Transcript
T: I think that is just something for us to think about as teachers. more milk and there’s more altogether, so then this ones
Sam (P1), you had a comment? would be the milky one, which is B anyway.

P1: Well at first, looking at the bottom one, I … now I’ve got to P: But it’s harder to see.
make sure that my thinking is right. I didn’t like it nearly as
T: But I think that Sam was saying that with mixture A you have
much as the one on the side because the side, 14 over 35,
less milk but more coffee … Compared to mixture B, we have
that’s easy, your denominators is the P1e. But, looking at
more milk and less coffee. Which one is going to be more
this, if you remember the label, then you can remember that
milky? Can we reason about that too?
mixture A is close, but you can say that it has a little bit less
milk and more coffee, and B has more milk and less coffee. Ps: [Many are talking at once]
So just thinking of it that way you can kind of think, this one’s T: So we don’t always have to have the common numbers or the
gotta be more milky. common units, but it is usually easier to justify also. But we
P: I think it’s nice just when you have a common feature. You can reason about the other strategy as well.
either need to have a common milk or a common coffee or a T: But what’s interesting is, if we didn’t have 14 to 21, 15 to 20
mixture. Something needs to be in common so you can can we compare mixtures if the ratios were given like 2 to 3, 3
justify our reasoning. It’s easier, especially for kids. You need to 4 in the way that we compare 14 to 21, 15 to 20? Can we
to make the logic, whether its coffee and milk or milk and do that kind of comparison with the original ratios?
chocolate and your making chocolate milk, whatever it is. But
T: You know what I am trying to get at? In the original ratios, 2
I mean to justify it, I think you have something in common.
to 3, 3 to 4 … there is more coffee. So I cannot decide which
P: Well, here’s a, sorry … Like these two right here are always one is going to be more milky. But with the other two ratios
[unintelligible] multiply them both by four and three so that I that we came up with 14 to 21 and 15 to 20, it’s easy to see
got to the twelve. But here, so this one has less coffee and that in one case we have less milk but more coffee.
has a less concoction but there’s less milk. This one has
T: Do you see how different those two cases, those situations
are?
© 2008, University of Michigan
ANALYZING PD FACILITATION

Reflection as a Tool to Improve Facilitation Skills


1. What do you notice in this video clip?

2. What do participants seem to understand about the mathematics? What is your


evidence?

3. What was effective about this exchange? What could have been done to make this
exchange more effective?

4. What do you notice about the norms that have been established?
ADDING RATIOS sum of these two fractions gives us the amount of pizza two people
(one from each table) get, which is different from the ratio of pizza to
people when the two tables are combined. Then the teacher introduced
Sharing Pizza – Classroom Scenario on Day 1 the following notation.
You are going to eat pizza with your friends. When you arrive you see Teacher: We can actually represent this situation by using ratio notation.
that the restaurant has set up one large table that seats 10 people, and (She wrote
a small table that seats 8 people. The server places four pizzas on the 4 : 10 + 3 : 8 = 7 : 18 on the board.) Now, let’s discuss why this
large table and three pizzas on the small table. At each table, everyone statement makes sense.
shares the pizzas equally. Which table should you sit at if you are really
hungry and want to eat as much pizza as possible? Sharing Pizza – Classroom Scenario on Day 2
Students solved the Sharing Pizza, and then the teacher posed the You are going to eat pizza with your friends at the fourth-grade party. In
following question. one fourth-grade classroom the ratio of pizza to students is 3 : 8. In the
other fourth-grade classroom there were 2 pizzas for every 5 students.
Teacher: If you were to combine the two tables, what will be the ratio of
pizza to people? (After working on this in pairs for a while, they The teacher posted this problem on the board and she wanted students
had a whole group discussion.) to investigate the generalizabilitiy of the rule for combining ratios.

Carla: When you combine the two tables, there will be 7 pizzas and 18 Teacher: Yesterday we were talking about joining tables and we found
people. Therefore, the ratio of pizza to people will be 7 : 18. the combined ratio of pizza to people. Can we do the same
thing here? Can we find the ratio of pizza to students if the pizza
Rob: I have the number sentence for what you just did. (He wrote the
and students are combined in one classroom?
following statement on the board: 4/10 + 3/8 = 7/18.)

Students: That can’t be right. Analyzing the Mathematics & Connecting to Practice
1. What conclusions might students make about the generalizability of
Teacher: Why not?
the rule for combining ratios?
Jack: Both 4/10 and 3/8 are close to a half. When you put them
2. How would you respond if some of your students suggest that it
together you have to be close to 1. But 7/18 is not even a half.
makes sense to use 3 : 8 + 2 : 5 = 5 : 13 to figure out the
At this point the teacher invited the whole group to think about the combined ratio of pizza to students?
meaning of each fraction in the context of the problem. They decided
that 4/10 of a pizza is the amount each person gets at Table 1 and 3/8
of a pizza is the amount each person gets at Table 2. Therefore, the
Features of High Quality
Professional Development
(Smith, 2001 )

Cadre II Teachers’ rankings on April 17, 2009

Professional development should: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean Median Mode

Have students’ learning as the ultimate goal 20 1 1 1 1.39 1 1

Support the ongoing work of teaching 3 4 5 1 3 2 3 2 6.09 5 5

Be grounded in mathematics content 1 7 1 3 3 4 2 2 4.48 4 2

Model and reflect the pedagogy of good instruction 1 3 5 4 1 5 2 1 1 4.61 4 3& 6

Create some disequilibrium for teachers 2 1 3 6 1 3 7 7.61 7 10

Encourage teacher collaboration 3 5 3 4 2 2 2 2 4.91 5 3

Take into account teachers’ contexts 2 1 1 1 3 2 6 2 5 7.13 8 8

Make use of the knowledge and expertise of teachers 5 1 6 2 2 3 2 1 1 5.00 4 4

Be sustained and cohesive 3 3 1 4 1 1 5 5 5.96 6 8& 9

Continue over the course of a teacher’s career 1 1 2 1 4 3 4 7 7.74 8 10

Anda mungkin juga menyukai