MOOREPARK FOOD RESEARCH CENTRE
END OF PROJECT REPORT 2005 MFRC No.60
CHEESE TEXTURE
D.J. O’Callaghan
Project Team
Moorepark Food Research Centre Teagasc:
D.J. O’Callaghan (Leader)
T.P. Guinee
V. Howard (MFRC)
G. Downey (AFRC)
In Collaboration with:
C.P. O’Donnell and C.D. Everard, Biosystems Engineering Department,
University College Dublin
C.M.Delahunty and E.M. Sheehan, Department of Nutritional Sciences,
University College Cork
Funding
was
provided
under
the
National
Development
Plan,
through
the
Food
Institutional
Research
Measure,
administered
by
the
Department
of
Agriculture
and
Food.
Moorepark
Food
Research
Centre
Moorepark,
Fermoy,
Co.
Cork
ISBN:
1
84170
421
0
MFRC
No.
60
©
Teagasc,
December
2005
Teagasc,
Oak
Park,
Carlow
2
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 3
Sensory
and
rheological
techniques
were
used
to
assess
natural
and
processed
cheese
texture.
The
influence
of
moisture
and
pH
on
texture
characteristics
of
Cheddar
cheese
and
processed
cheese
was
investigated.
A
new
technique
was
developed
for
measuring
rheology
of
soft
cheeses.
Near
infrared
(NIR)
spectroscopy
was
investigated
for
prediction
of
cheese
texture
and
for
monitoring
moisture,
pH
and
ripening
of
Cheddar
cheese
and
composition
of
processed
cheese.
The main findings were as follows:
* The
firmness
of
Cheddar
cheese
decreased
during
maturation,
as
one
might
expect
due
to
proteolysis.
* During
the
early
ripening
period,
Cheddar
cheese
generally
became
less
chewy
and
springy,
increased
in
the
sensory
attributes
‘crumbly’
and
‘mass-
formation’
and
decreased
in
‘moist’.
* Mature
cheese
showed
less
variation
in
texture
than
young
cheese.
* NIR
spectra
could
be
used
to
estimate
the
maturation
of
cheese
with
a
high
level
of
accuracy,
provided
a
calibration
is
done
using
samples
spanning
the
expected
ages.
* Cheese
with
moisture
around
37
-
38%
was
the
most
firm.
* Lower
moisture
cheeses,
which
were
more
chewy
at
manufacture,
lost
much
of
their
chewiness
and
became
more
like
higher
moisture
cheeses
during
maturation,
reflecting
protein
degradation.
3
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 4
* NIR
spectra
could
be
used
to
estimate
moisture
in
Cheddar
cheese,
provided
a
calibration
is
first
done
using
samples
spanning
the
expected
moisture
range.
* NIR
spectra
could
be
used
to
estimate
moisture,
fat
and
salt
in
processed
cheese,
provided
a
calibration
is
done
using
samples
prepared
by
the
same
process.
* NIR
spectra
could
be
used
to
estimate
sensory
attributes:
‘crumbly’,
‘rubbery’,
‘chewy’,
‘mouth-coating’
and
‘mass-forming’,
provided
a
calibration
is
done
with
respect
to
a
sensory
panel.
* In
general,
acidity
(lower
pH)
gave
cheeses
a
‘shorter’,
or
less
elastic
texture.
The
study
demonstrated
the
importance
of
control
of
pH
and
moisture
content
for
consistent
cheese
texture.
NIR
spectroscopy
showed
some
promising
results
for
determination
of
moisture
and
maturation
of
natural
cheese.
Main Conclusions and Achievements
Natural Cheese
Changes
in
sensory
and
rheological
texture
parameters
were
not
uniform
throughout
maturation,
i.e.
the
changes
during
the
first
half
of
maturation
were
different
from
changes
during
the
second
half
of
maturation.
During
the
first
half
of
maturation
the
sensory
parameters,
‘crumbly’
and
‘mass-
formation’,
increased
and
‘moist’
decreased,
whereas
during
the
second
half
of
maturation
‘rubbery’
and
‘chewy’
increased
and
‘crumbly’
decreased.
With
regard
to
rheological
parameters,
cheeses
generally
became
less
firm,
chewy
and
springy
during
the
first
half
of
maturation.
There
were
increases
in
adhesiveness
and
decreases
in
fracture
stress
and
strain,
cohesiveness,
chewiness,
firmness
and
springiness
during
the
second
half
of
maturation.
4
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 5
Increases
in
moisture
content
of
Cheddar
cheese
resulted
in
changes
in
sensory
texture,
e.g.
decreases
in
‘firmness’,
‘chewy’,
‘fragmentable’
and
‘rubbery’.
Rheological
texture
parameters
also
showed
changes
with
increasing
moisture
content,
e.g.
decreases
in
chewiness,
firmness
and
springiness.
Reducing
pH
(increasing
acidity)
had
broadly
similar
effects
to
increasing
moisture,
e.g.
increased
sensory
‘firmness’,
‘chewy’,
‘fragmentable’
and
‘rubbery’.
Likewise,
the
effect
of
reducing
pH
on
rheological
texture
was
to
reduce
chewiness,
firmness
and
springiness.
Processed Cheese
Decreasing
moisture
and/or
higher
pH
(towards
neutral)
increased
firmness
of
processed
cheese.
Increasing
fat
at
the
expense
of
moisture
gave
higher
firmness
(due
to
increasing
the
protein-to-moisture
ratio).
pH,
which
increased
linearly
with
emulsifying
salt,
combined
interactively
with
decreasing
moisture
to
increase
firmness.
NIR
techniques
were
developed
for
predicting
moisture,
fat
and
salt
content
in
processed
cheese,
with
better
prediction
accuracies
than
previously
reported
NIR
methods.
Sensory
measurement
of
texture,
such
as
‘fragmentable’,
‘firmness’,
‘rubbery’,
‘creamy’,
‘chewy’,
‘mouth-coating’,
‘greasy/oily’,
‘melting’
and
‘mass-forming’,
were
predicted
successfully.
RESEARCH AND RESULTS
Texture
of
Cheddar
cheese
was
evaluated
using
rheological
and
sensory
techniques
during
maturation
and
to
determine
relationships
between
instrumental
(i.e.
rheological)
and
sensory
(i.e.
by
human
panel)
techniques.
In
parallel
with
this,
NIR
spectroscopy
was
investigated
as
a
technique
for
assessing
the
maturity
and
sensory
attributes
in
Cheddar
cheese
in
the
course
of
ripening.
Chymosin
Rhizomucor
pusillus
Rhizomucor
miehei
Std.
Calf
Cryphonectria
parasitica
Fig.
1.
Firmness
of
Cheddar
cheese
in
the
course
of
maturation
for
five
enzyme
types.
(Std.
Calf
refers
to
standard
calf
rennet,
which
is
a
blend
of
chymosin
and
pepsin).
The
most
rapid
changes
in
texture
were
observed
during
the
first
two
months
of
ripening,
e.g.
firmness,
measured
by
compression
on
a
texture
analyser,
decreased
rapidly
during
the
first
2
months
of
ripening
and
decreased
more
slowly
thereafter,
the
type
of
enzyme
not
having
any
significant
effect
(Fig.
1).
Fracture
stress,
likewise,
fell
rapidly
during
the
first
1
-
2
months
of
ripening
and
the
enzyme
type
had
a
strong
influence
on
fracture
strain
after
two
months
of
storage,
but
this
influence
became
less
significant
as
the
cheeses
matured
(Fig.
2).
Fracture
strain
also
decreased
during
ripening,
but
with
different
effects
from
the
enzymes
used;
the
microbial
enzymes
produced
cheeses
with
lower
fracture
strain
(more
brittle)
than
the
animal
enzymes
(Fig.
3).
Chymosin
R.
pusillus
R.
miehei
Std.
Calf
C.
parasitica
Fig.
2. Fracture
stress
of
Cheddar
cheese
in
the
course
of
maturation
by
enzyme
type.
After
two
months
of
ripening,
the
sensory
panel
described
the
cheeses
as
‘rubbery’,
‘fragmentable’
and
‘greasy/oily’,
while
at
nine
months
the
cheeses
were
described
as
having
‘mouth-coating’,
‘melting’
and
‘mass-formation’
attributes
(Appendix
1).
During
the
9-month
ripening
process,
the
intensity
of
the
‘rubbery’
attribute
decreased,
while
that
for
‘crumbly’
increased.
7
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 8
Chymosin
R.
pusillus
R.
miehei
Std.
Calf
C.
parasitica
Fig. 3. Fracture strain in the course of maturation by enzyme type.
8
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 9
Fig.
5.
Linear
regression
plots
of
predicted
versus
actual
age
of
Cheddar
cheese,
where
prediction
was
done
by
NIR
reflectance.
Influence
of
composition
and
ripening
on
rheology
and
texture
of
cheese
An
experiment
was
undertaken
to
determine
relationships
between
sensory
and
rheological
measurements
of
texture
and
to
determine
the
influence
of
moisture
and
pH
on
texture
development
in
Cheddar
cheese
during
the
course
of
ripening.
Cheddar
cheeses
were
selected
from
commercial
production
with
a
range
of
pH
and
moisture
values,
and
subjected
to
rheological
and
sensory
texture
analysis,
and
to
NIR
analysis,
in
the
course
9
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 10
Fig.
6. Linear
regression
plots
of
predicted
versus
actual
scores
for
the
sensory
attributes
(a)
‘crumbly’
and
(b)
‘rubbery’,
where
prediction
was
done
by
NIR
spectroscopy.
of
maturation.
The
NIR
technique
was
evaluated
for
its
ability
to
predict
sensory
properties
of
commercial
Cheddar
cheese.
❇ Note: pH
varied
from
5.0
to
5.5
and
moisture
from
35.9%
to
40.7%.
The
cheeses
were
vacuum
wrapped
and
stored
at
4°C
for
one
week
and
then
at
7°C
for
the
remainder
of
the
maturing
period,
according
to
normal
commercial
procedure.
10
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 11
Fig.
7. Influence
of
moisture
and
age
of
Cheddar
cheese
on
a
range
of
sensory
attribute
scores
and
rheological
parameters,
namely
(a)
sensory
‘firmness’,
(b)
‘rubbery’,
(c)
‘chewy’,
(d)
‘fragmentable’,
(e)
rheological
firmness,
and
(f)
springiness.
11
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 12
A
45
40 1-2
months
35 2-3
months
30 4-5
months
Chewiness
25 8-9
months
20
15
10
5
0
35 36 37 38 39 40 41
B
35
30
25
20
Chewy
15
10
0
35 36 37 38 39 40 41
Moisture
Fig.
8. Changes
in:
(a)
chewiness
by
texture
profile
analysis,
and
(b)
scores
for
the
sensory
attribute
‘chewy’
for
Cheddar
cheeses
with
respect
to
moisture
content
at
different
stages
of
maturation.
maxima
around
38%
moisture.
Likewise,
a
comparison
of
(rheological)
chewiness
with
(sensory)
‘chewy’
shows
that
the
rheological
measurement
discriminated
the
effects
of
ageing
much
more
effectively,
as
one
would
expect (Fig.
8).
For
some
sensory
texture
attributes,
the
changes
during
early
maturation
reversed
during
later
maturation,
e.g.
scores
for
‘crumbly’
increased
and
‘moist’
decreased
during
the
first
four
months
of
storage
but
these
changes
were
reversed
after
8
months’
storage
(Fig.
9).
Fig.
9.
Effect
of
Cheddar
cheese
maturation
on
scores
for
sensory
parameters
‘moist’
and
‘crumbly’
at
three
stages
of
maturation:
(1)
2
-
3
months
old;
(2)
4
–
5
months
old;
(3)
8
–
9
months
old.
Key
for
Cheddar
cheeses:
MMLP
=
medium
moisture,
low
pH;
LMLP
=
Low
moisture,
low
pH;
HMLP
=
high
moisture,
low
pH;
LMHP
=
low
moisture,
high
pH;
MMHP
=
medium
moisture,
high
pH.
13
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 14
Effect of measuring temperature on texture profile
The
effect
of
measuring
temperature
on
the
rheological
texture
of
Cheddar
cheese
is
illustrated
by
force-time
and
force-displacement
curves
at
refrigeration
(4°C)
and
room
(20°C)
temperature,
respectively.
Firmness
decreased
with
temperature,
as
would
be
expected.
Cohesiveness
increased
with
temperature,
probably
due
to
greater
structural
flexibility
(Table
1).
The
intrinsic
relationship
between
cohesiveness,
firmness
and
chewiness
is
such
that
the
observed
increase
in
cohesiveness,
combined
with
the
decrease
in
firmness,
resulted
in
no
effect
on
chewiness.
The
differing
effects
of
temperature
on
different
texture
profile
analysis
(TPA)
parameters
illustrates
the
importance
of
specifying
the
temperature
at
which
TPA
measurements
are
carried
out
and
the
need
to
work
at
the
same
temperature
when
making
comparisons
between
different
studies
or
different
products.
A
working
temperature
of
4°C
was
used
for
rheological
measurements
throughout
this
study,
unless
stated
otherwise.
Table
1. Effect
of
temperature
on
TPA
parameters
for
mature
Cheddar
cheese
compressed
to
a
strain
of
0.7
without
any
rest
period
between
compression
strokes.
Temperature
Firmness
Fracture
Chewiness
Adhesiveness
Springiness
Cohesiveness
ºC
(N)
stress
(N)
(N)
(Nmm)
NIR spectra were used to estimate moisture and pH in Cheddar cheese:
(a)
NIR
spectroscopy
predicted
moisture,
in
the
range
35
–
40
(%
w/w),
to
±
0.75
accuracy
(%
w/w,
standard
error
of
prediction),
and
(b)
NIR
spectroscopy
predicted
pH,
in
the
range
5.0
-
5.6
to
±
0.15
accuracy.
14
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 15
Processed
Cheese
New
method
for
assessing
thickness
of
molten
cheese
The
thickness,
or
viscosity,
of
molten
cheese,
i.e.
processed
cheese
during
the
cooking
stage,
was
assessed
at
80°C
using
a
spreadability
rig
attached
to
the
texture
analyser
(Fig.
10).
The
blend
became
more
viscous
during
cooking
until
it
reached
a
maximum.
The
influence
of
the
composition
of
processed
cheese
on
its
texture
was
investigated
by
producing
a
series
of
processed
cheese
samples
with
varying
levels
of
fat,
moisture
and
emulsifying
salt
(di-sodium
phosphate,
1
-
3%)
and
sodium
chloride.
Table 2. Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) parameters and physical definitions.
Fracture
stress
Stress
(or
sometimes,
force)
to
fracture
point,
H1 (Fig. 17) Pa,
kPa
Firmnessa Stress
(or
sometimes,
force)
at
a
given
deformation
Pa
or
kPa
Springiness
Percentage
of
deformation
which
is
recovered
-
(or
elasticity) between
the
first
and
second
bites
Cohesiveness
Area
of
second
bite
over
area
of
the
first
bite
-
(A2/A1)
in Fig. 17
Adhesiveness Work
necessary
to
pull
the
plunger
(compression
plate)
away
from
the
sample
(Area
A3 in
Fig. 17) J/m3
15
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 16
Fig.
10. Spreadability
rig
(a),
used
for
measuring
rheology
of
soft
cheeses;
schematic
illustrating
start
(b)
and
end
(c)
of
test.
properties
were
well
established
when
measured
2
weeks
after
manufacture,
and
generally
did
not
change
between
2
weeks
and
4
weeks.
Firmness
was
low
in
reduced
fat
cheese
(26%)
with
a
low
level
of
emulsifying
salt
(1%)
and
increased
when
either
fat
or
emulsifying
salt
level
was
increased
at
the
expense
of
water.
The
low
fat
cheeses
were
softer
and
more
spreadable
with
little
tendency
to
fracture.
When
the
water
content
was
increased
at
the
expense
of
protein
and
fat,
the
processed
cheeses
became
much
less
firm
and
yielded
more
easily.
When
moisture
was
increased
from
42
to
48%
(protein
falling
from
21
-
18%,
fat
content
falling
from
30
to
27%,
and
emulsifying
salt
at
2%)
cheese
firmness
decreased
from
~150
N
to
<
50
N.
16
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 17
Fig.
11. Linear
regression
plots
of
predicted
versus
actual
texture-related
rheological
parameters:
(a)
adhesiveness,
(b)
chewiness,
(c)
cohesiveness,
(d)
springiness,
(e)
hardness
and
(f)
meltability,
based
on
prediction
using
NIR
spectroscopy
in
the
waveband
1100
-
2500
nm.
17
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 18
18
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 19
NIR
spectroscopy
was
used
to
predict
rheological
and
sensory
texture.
Prediction
models
were
developed
for
rheological
texture
measurement
(Fig.
11).
The
accuracy
of
NIR
in
estimating
sensory
texture
parameters
is
illustrated
by
regression
plots
(Fig.
12).
NIR
spectroscopy
was
also
used
to
estimate
moisture,
fat
and
salt
in
processed
cheeses
with
low,
medium
and
high
moisture
contents
as
shown
in
Figure
13.
This
technique
is
based
on
the
peaks
and
variations,
Fig.
13. Linear
regression
plots
of
predicted
versus
actual
values
for:
(a)
fat
(%
w/w),
(b)
moisture
and
(c)
salt,
based
on
prediction
using
NIR
spectroscopy
in
the
waveband
1100
-
2500
nm.
The
2nd
derivative
of
the
raw
spectral
data
was
used.
Accuracy
of
prediction,
as
standard
error
of
cross-validation
(SECV)
=
0.45,
0.50
and
0.26
respectively.
Correlation
coefficients:
R
=
0.98,
0.99
and
0.90,
respectively.
19
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 20
associated
with
moisture
and
fat
in
the
plots
of
visible
/
NIR
reflectance
spectra
of
processed
cheeses
(Fig.
14).
Dissolved
salt
does
not
produce
peaks
in
the
spectrum;
however,
salt
content
affects
the
location
of
moisture
peaks
and
the
location
and
shape
of
fat
peaks.
All
else
being
equal,
NIR
is
preferable
to
visible
light
because
it
avoids
the
confounding
effects
of
colour.
Fig.
14. NIR
reflectance
spectra
of
three
processed
cheese
samples,
differing
in
moisture
and
fat
level,
with
the
same
emulsifying
salt
level
(2%
w/w),
illustrating
the
differences
between
spectra
which
are
the
basis
of
differentiation
between
samples.
The
reflectance
spectra
are
plotted
as
log
(1/Reflectance).
20
5006 28/9/06 13:53 Page 21
Fig. 15. Schematic of compression test apparatus.
21
5006 28/9/06 13:54 Page 22
Appendix 1. Techniques investigated
Quantitative descriptive sensory protocol
A
quantitative
descriptive
sensory
protocol
was
defined
for
cheese
texture
measurement,
according
to
international
standards
(Delahunty
and
Drake,
2004;
ISO
8586,
1993).
Descriptive
sensory
analysis
was
carried
out
in
University
College
Cork
using
a
vocabulary
of
eleven
texture
terms
spanning
the
phases
of
the
chewing
cycle
(Table
3).
Each
assessor
was
provided
with
a
list
of
the
defined
vocabulary.
Each
sample
(a
5
g
cube,
labelled
with
a
random
3-digit
code)
was
equilibrated
to
room
temperature
(21°C).
Cheeses
were
scored
for
attributes
on
unstructured
100
mm
line
scales
labelled
at
both
ends
with
extremes
of
each
attribute.
Cheese
scores
were
averaged
across
assessors
for
each
attribute.
Texture profile analysis (TPA)
The
cheeses
were
cut
into
25
mm
cubes
and
stored
at
4ºC.
Each
sample
was
subjected
to
a
double-bite
compression
to
30%
of
original
height,
using
a
texture
analyser
(model
TA.
HDi Stable
Micro
Systems)
with
a
75
mm
TM
compression plate and a 100 kg load cell (Figs. 15 and 16).
Firmness
was
measured
as
the
force
at
maximum
compression
on
the
first
bite,
i.e.
at
a
strain
of
0.7.
Fracture
stress
was
measured
as
the
force
per
unit
area
at
the
point
of
fracture
on
the
first
bite,
i.e.
the
force
required
to
cause
complete
fracture
of
the
sample,
corresponding
to
breaking
structural
bonds
within
the
sample
(Fig.
17).
Cohesiveness
was
computed
as
the
ratio
of
the
area
of
the
second
bite
to
that
of
the
first
bite.
Springiness
was
calculated
as
the
fraction
of
deformation
that
is
recovered
between
the
first
and
second
bites,
and
generally
depends
on
the
period
of
relaxation.
Chewiness
and
adhesiveness
were
calculated
as
in
Table
2.
22
5006 28/9/06 13:54 Page 23
Table
3. Attributes,
their
definitions
and
phase
of
the
chewing
cycle,
used
to
evaluate
texture
of
the
cheese
samples
during
ripening.
Mouth-coating The
extent
to
which
the
cheese
clings
to
the
inside
of
the
mouth
(roof,
teeth,
tongue,
gums).2
23
5006 28/9/06 13:54 Page 24
Fig.
16. Compression
of
cheese
for
measurement
of
TPA
parameters,
showing,
(a)
cube
of
Cheddar
cheese
before
compression
on
TA.
HDi
,
and
(b)
cheese
TM
sample after compression to 30% of original height (strain = 0.7).
Infrared spectroscopy
The
sample
presentation
technique
was
based
on
reflectance
from
solid
cheese
cylinders.
Spectroscopic
data
were
collected
in
reflectance
mode
between
400
and
2500
nm
using
a
scanning
monochromator
(Model
6500
FOSS
NIR
Systems).
All
samples
were
equilibrated
to
room
temperature
(20
-
24°C)
prior
to
NIR
analysis.
Three
cylinders
(30
mm
height
x
38
mm
diameter)
of
cheese
were
removed
from
each
sample
with
the
aid
of
a
cork
borer.
Each
cylindrical
sample
was
24
5006 28/9/06 13:54 Page 25
Fig.
17. Stress-time
curve
in
double-bite
compression
test,
which
is
used
to
calculate
TPA
parameters
(Table
2).
A1 and
A2 represent
the
areas
under
the
compression
portions
of
the
first
and
second
bites,
respectively,
and
the
ratio
between
them
is
denoted
cohesiveness.
A3 represent
the
areas
under
the
suction
(or
withdrawal)
portion
of
the
first
bite
and
is
denoted
as
adhesiveness.
H1
represents
the
fracture
stress.
then
placed
in
a
standard
circular
reflectance
cup
and
sliced
to
the
cup
depth
(10
mm)
using
a
flexible
cheese
wire.
Each
of
these
three
replicate
sub-samples
was
scanned
in
triplicate
with
rotation
of
the
sample
cup
through
approximately
120°
between
successive
scans
of
each
sub-sample.
The
average
of
all
nine
spectra
of
each
cheese
sample
was
subsequently
used
for
calibration
development
and
evaluation.
25
5006 28/9/06 13:54 Page 26
Selected
Publications
Blazquez,
C.,
Downey,
G.,
O’Donnell,
C.,
O’Callaghan,
D.
and
Howard,
V.
(2004).
Prediction
of
Moisture,
Fat
and
Inorganic
Salts
in
Processed
Cheese
by
Near
Infrared
Reflectance
Spectroscopy
and
Multivariate
Data
Analysis.
Journal
of
Near
Infrared
Spectroscopy, 12:149-158.
Delahunty,
C.M.
and
Drake,
M.A.
(2004).
Sensory
character
of
cheese
and
its
evaluation.
In:
Cheese:
Chemistry,
Physics
and
Microbiology:
General
Aspects.
3rd
Ed.
Vol.1
(Eds.
Fox,
P.F.,
McSweeney,
P.L.H.,
Cogan,
T.M.
and
Guinee,
T.P.).
Elsevier,
London,
455-488.
O’Callaghan,
D.J.
and
Guinee,
T.P.
(2004).
Rheology
and
texture
of
cheese.
In:
Cheese:
Chemistry,
Physics
and
Microbiology, 3rd
Ed.
Vol.1
(Eds.
Fox,
P.F.,
McSweeney,
P.L.H.,
Cogan,
T.M.
and
Guinee,
T.P.).
Elsevier,
London,
511-
540.
Downey,
G.,
Sheehan,
E.,
Delahunty,
C.,
O’Callaghan,
D.,
Guinee,
T.
and
Howard,
V.
(2005).
Prediction
of
maturity
and
sensory
attributes
of
Cheddar
cheese
using
near
infrared
spectroscopy.
International
Dairy
Journal, 15(6-
9):701-709.
Everard,
C.D.,
O’Donnell,
C.P.,
Sheehan,
E.M.,
O’Callaghan,
D.J.,
Delahunty,
C.M.
and
Fagan,
C.C.
(2005).
Correlation
between
process
cheese
meltability
determined
by
sensory
analysis,
computer
vision
method
and
Olson
and
Price
test.
International
Journal
of
Food
Properties, 8:267-275.
Fagan,
C.C.,
Everard,
C.,
O’Donnell,
C.P.,
Downey,
G.
and
O’Callaghan,
D.J.
(2005).
Prediction
of
inorganic
salt
and
moisture
content
of
process
cheese
using
dielectric
spectroscopy.
International
Journal
of
Food
Properties, 8:543–557.
Blazquez,
C.,
Downey,
G.,
O’Callaghan,
D.,
Howard,
V.,
Delahunty,
C.,
Sheehan,
L.
and
O’Donnell,
C.
(2006).
Modelling
of
sensory
and
instrumental
texture
parameters
in
processed
cheese
by
near
infrared
reflectance
spectroscopy.
Journal
of
Dairy
Research, 73(1):58-69.
26
5006 28/9/06 13:54 Page 27
Figures in this Report - Source
Fig.
6: Downey,
G.,
Sheehan,
E.,
Delahunty,
C.,
O’Callaghan,
D.,
Guinee,
T.
and
Howard,
V.
Prediction
of
maturity
and
sensory
attributes
of
Cheddar
cheese
using
near
infrared
spectroscopy.
International
Dairy
Journal
(2005)
15:701–709,
Figs.
6a
and
b.
Figs.
13
a,
b
and
c: Blazquez,
C.,
Downey,
G.,
O’Donnell,
C.,
O’Callaghan,
D.
and
Howard,
V.
(2004).
Prediction
of
Moisture,
Fat
and
Inorganic
Salts
in
Processed
Cheese
by
Near
Infrared
Reflectance
Spectroscopy
and
Multivariate
Data
Analysis.
Journal
of
Near
Infrared
Spectroscopy
(2004)
12:149-158,
Figs.
3,
5
and
7.
For
further
information,
please
contact:
Dr.
D.J.
O´Callaghan
27
5006 28/9/06 13:54 Page 28
D.J. O´Callaghan
MOOREPARK
FOOD
RESEARCH
CENTRE
Moorepark,
Fermoy,
Co.
Cork,
Ireland
Tel:
+353
(0)
25
42222
-
Fax:
+353
(0)
25
42340
E-Mail:
reception@moorepark.teagasc.ie