1
=
c
c
+
c
c
z
V
r
r
V r
r
(1)
Radial Momentum Equation:
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
z
r
V
z r
z
V
z
z
V
r
r
r
V
r
r
V
r r
r
V
r
r r
z
z
V
r
r r r
r
V
r
r r
Da
r
V
r
p
z
V
r
V
r
r
V r
r
3
2
3
2
2
3
4
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
4
1
c
c
c
c
+
c
c
c
c
+
c
c
+
c
c
+
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
+
c
c
=
c
c
+
c
c
(2)
Axial Momentum Equation:
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
z
r
V
r
r r r
z
V
r
r r
r
V r
r z
z
z
V
Da
z
V Gr
p
z
z
V
r
z
V
r
V r
r
r
1
3
2
z 3
4
1
c
c
c
c
+
c
c
c
c
+
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
+ +
c
c
=
c
c
+
c
c
u
(3)
Energy Equation:
| | ( ) ( ) | |
gen
Q
z
T
e
k r
r r r
T
e
k r
r z
T
z
V
r
T
r
V
p
C
+
c
c
c
c
+
c
c
c
c
=
c
c
+
c
c
r
1
Pr
1
(4)
The symbols Gr, Pr and Da indicate the Grashof
number, Prandtl number and Darcy numbers
respectively. Q
gen
refers to the source term
representing volumetric heat generation during
combustion. The species equation, which will be
presented in the latter section, is coupled to the
energy equation through these source terms.
Species Equation:
The combustion model consists of
conservation of species equations. The fuel mixture
contains species namely CH
4
, C
2
H
6
, CO
2
, H
2
, CO,
H
2
O and O
2
, N
2
.
These species are assumed to undergo a
finite rate, single-step irreversible reaction kinetics.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) | |
i
z
i
Y
D
z r
i
Y
D r
r r Le
i
Y V
z
i
Y
r
V r
r r
e
1
Pr
1
1
+
c
c
c
c
+
c
c
c
c
=
c
c
+
c
c
(5)
Le and D refer to the Lewis number and
diffusion coefficient respectively while Y
i
and e
i
represent mass fraction and the rate of generation or
depletion of the i
th
species respectively. The rate of
generation or depletion non-dimensional e
i
for each
individual species mentioned above can be expressed
in terms of Arrhenius equation.
3. BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
- At the fuel inlet:
At fuel inlet the stagnation pressure is taken
equal to the ambient pressure at the same elevation.
Then, neglecting the viscous losses due to
acceleration of the fluid from surroundings to the
stove inlet. Further, the fluid is considered entering
the stove radially thus; axial velocity at the fuel inlet
is taken to be zero. Then, continuity equation dictates
the normal gradient of axial velocity is also zero. The
I nternational J ournal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJ ETT) - Volume4 I ssue7- J uly 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 2753
temperature at the stove inlet can be assumed to the
ambient temperature,
0 , 1 0 for 0 , 0
, 0
,
2
2
1
= < s = =
c
c
= = z r
z
z
V
z V
z
V p u
(6)
- At the axis of symmetry:
Due to assumed axi-symmetry of the flow,
computations may be carried out for only one axi-
symmetric plane of the domain as shown in figure 1.
Symmetry, then, dictates the radial velocity, normal
gradients of the axial-velocity and the temperature
respectively to be zero,
H s z r
T
r
z
V
r
V
0 , 0 for 0
r
, 0
, 0
+ s s = =
c
c
=
c
c
=
(7)
- At the stoves exit:
The exhaust gases leaving the combustion
chamber can be treated as a jet entering a still
medium i.e. static pressure is equal to the local
ambient pressure. Also, assuming that the flow leaves
the exit radially, consequently, axial velocity is zero.
Thus, boundary conditions at the exit can be written
as;
0
, 0
, 0
,
2
0 0
2
1
)
0 0
(
=
c
c
=
c
c
=
=
r
T
r
r
V
z
V
r gz p
p
v
(8)
- At solid walls:
Ceramic liner is a solid wall boundary at all
locations other than the primary and secondary air
slots. At solid walls, the no slip boundary condition
would apply, i.e., both radial and axial velocities are
zero. For temperature, the convective boundary
condition is imposed,
H z T Nu
w
q
r
T
z
V
r
V
0 (z),
max
r r for
, 0
, 0
< s = =
c
c
= =
(9)
- At the air inlets:
The air can be assumed to enter in the
combustor axial direction and stagnation pressure is
taken equal to the ambient pressure. The temperature
at port can be taken as the ambient temperature. Air
will flow due to free convection.
0
, 0
, 0
,
2
2
1
= =
c
c
= = T
r
r
V
r
V
r
V p
(10)
- Equation for Property Variation:
The fluid properties such as viscosity and
thermal conductivity are assumed to be varying
according to the Sutherlands relation as follows
| |
0
56 . 110
,
0
44 . 194
1
2
3
1
2
3
T
S
T
k
S
S
S
T
k
S
k
S
T k = =
+
+
=
+
+
=
(
u
(11)
The variation of specific heat in terms of temperature
is expressed by a cubic polynomial as:
9987 . 0
0691 . 0
2
3408 . 0
3
1291 . 0
+ + = T T T
p
C
4 SOLUTION PROCEDURE
A finite volume method was employed to discretise
the governing equations. The SIMPLER algorithm,
Steady state, & K- c Turbulence model were used.
The discretised sets of algebraic equations were
solved by Ansysfluent 13.0. To predict the effect
near the wall clearly, uniform grids are selected in
such a way that more number of grid points are near
the wall.
5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The variation in Wall temperature and power input
gives different combustion temperature. The species,
temperature profiles and contours are generated of
800 K, 900K, and 1000K for 0.5KW, 1.0KW & 1.2
KW for each case. The temperature profile in the
domain shows that maximum temperature region
away from wall. This region corresponds to the flame
location. This also matches with maximum velocity
region. Maximum combustion temperature obtained
is 1263 K. The maximum combustion temperatures
shown in the table 1.1 for various cases.
Kelvin. in is T ;
1000
T
where
T
=
I nternational J ournal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJ ETT) - Volume4 I ssue7- J uly 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 2754
Figure a, b, & c shows temperature profile for
0.5KW, 1KW, &1.2KW respectively. The effect of
wall temperature and power on combustion
temperature is studied by varying power between 0.5
KW to 1.2 KW and wall temperatures between 800 to
1000 K. the simulations results show in figures (I-IX)
that with increase in wall temperature, by keeping
same power shows increase in combustion
temperature. It is clear that with increase in wall
temperature flame region is increasing and flame is
moving away from the wall and spread in radial
diffuser.
Similar effects are obtained with increase of power
with constant wall temperature. It is clearly indicates
increase in maximum combustion temperature with
increase in power and increase in wall temperature.
The contours below show to temperature variation in
vertical combustor. The contours arranged in the
manner of case id according to Table 1.1.
TABLE 1.1
S.
N
.
Case
ID
Wall
Temperature
(K)
Power
Maximum
Combustion
Temperature
(K)
1 P1T1 800 0.5 KW 1190
2 P2T1 800 1 KW 1200
3 P3T1 800 1.2 KW 1206
4 P1T2 900 0.5 KW 1219
5 P2T2 900 1 KW 1230
6 P3T2 900 1.2 KW 1232
7 P1T3 1000 0.5 KW 1249
8 P2T3 1000 1 KW 1262
9 P3T3 1000 1.2 KW 1263
Fig. (I)
Fig. (II)
I nternational J ournal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJ ETT) - Volume4 I ssue7- J uly 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 2755
Fig. (III)
Fig. (IV)
Fig. (V)
Fig. (VI)
Fig. (VII)
Fig. (VIII)
I nternational J ournal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJ ETT) - Volume4 I ssue7- J uly 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 2756
Fig. (IX)
Fig. (a)
Fig. (b)
Fig. (c)
6 CONCLUSIONS
In present work, the results of the combustion
simulation are summarized as follows:
(1) The velocity, species profiles and
temperature profiles are predicted by the
present combustion model. Results indicate
movement of the flame away from the wall
for higher volatiles flow rates and higher
wall temperatures.
(2) The region of maximum combustion
temperature also corresponds the zone where
the velocities are maximum.
(3) In general, maximum temperature in the
flame region tends to increase with increase
in wall temperature as well as power input.
Maximum flame temperature region tends to
move in radial diffuser.
ACKNOLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my deepest sense of gratitude
and sincere thanks to my highly respected and
esteemed guide Dr. RAJESH GUPTA (Associate
Professor), Department of Mechanical Engineering,
MANIT, Bhopal, for suggesting the subject of the
work and providing constant support, great advice
and supervision during the work of this thesis, which
appointed him as a backbone of this work. His
cooperation and timely suggestions have been
unparalleled stimuli for me to travel eventually
towards the completion of this thesis.
I nternational J ournal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJ ETT) - Volume4 I ssue7- J uly 2013
ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.ijettjournal.org Page 2757
REFRENCES
1. S. Kohli & M.R. Ravi, Biomass stove: A Review, Journal of
Solar Energy Society of India, 6 (1996): 101-145.
2. S. Bhandari, S. Gopi, A.W. Date, Investigation of CTARA
wood burning stove: Part I. experimental investigation,
Sadhana, 13(4) (1988): 271-293.
3. S. Kohli, Buoyancy induced flow and heat transfer in
biomass stoves, PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore.
4. S. Karthikeyan, Development of a combustion model for a
sawdust stove, M.Tech thesis, Department of Mechanical
Engineering, IIT-Delhi, (2000):12-24.
5. G. Kaur, Modelling of carbon monoxide emissions in sawdust
stove, M.Tech thesis, Department of Mechanical
Engineering, IIT-Delhi, (2000):
6. A.F. Roberts, Problems associated with theoretical analysis
of burning wood, Combustion Flames, 14(1971): 261.
7. R. Gupta, Heat transfer & Fluid flow modeling of a single
pan wood stove, PhD thesis Department of Applied
Mechanics MANIT Bhopal (2010): 4312-5088.