ECONOMIC DIGEST
V ol.9 No.1 A joint publication of the Connecticut Department of Labor & the Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development
1650
Unemployment Rate
Forecast
January 2004
THE CONNECTICUT percent for the year to date Employment and unemployment
ECONOMIC DIGEST
The Connecticut Economic Digest is
through July from $29.07 billion
last year to $30.37 billion this
year. This is a sign that Connecti-
Of particular importance to
households and the economy is
overall employment. Jobs mean
published monthly by the Connecticut cut consumers’ increasing confi- income to households and income
Department of Labor, Office of Research and dence is translating into higher means spending for the economy.
the Connecticut Department of Economic and
retail sales. In the twelve months through
Community Development, Compliance Office
and Planning/Program Support. Its purpose is Passenger and freight air traffic October, total nonfarm employ-
to regularly provide users with a are two other indicators of poten- ment decreased by 19,200, largely
comprehensive source for the most current, up- tial visitor spending and produc- the result of manufacturing job
to-date data available on the workforce and tion statewide. Passengers, at losses. Only the education and
economy of the state, within perspectives of
559,920, were down 1.6 percent health services sector saw an
the region and nation.
from October a year ago when they increase in employment from a
The annual subscription is $42. Send
were at 569,203, and also down year ago. The October unemploy-
subscription requests to: The Connecticut
Economic Digest, Connecticut Department of 4.9 percent for the year to date. ment rate, at 4.9 percent, was also
Labor, Office of Research, 200 Folly Brook This has been a persistent weak- higher than a year ago. However,
Boulevard, Wethersfield, CT 06109-1114. ness since September 11, 2001. employment and the unemploy-
Make checks payable to the Connecticut Air cargo increased 3.6 percent ment rate both improved from the
Department of Labor. Back issues are $4 per
from 13,179 tons in October a year previous month, a turn in a posi-
copy. The Digest can be accessed free of
charge from the DOL Web site. Articles from ago to 13,657 tons in October tive direction. The unemployment
The Connecticut Economic Digest may be 2003, but has not kept pace with rate should drop further in 2004,
reprinted if the source is credited. Please send 2002 on a year-to-date basis. This but current strong productivity
copies of the reprinted material to the Managing is another indicator of weakness, means producers can increase
Editor. The views expressed by the authors are
not only for the airline industry, output even without job growth.
theirs alone and may not reflect those of the
DOL or DECD. but also of the State’s economy. The dropping unemployment rate
Contributing DOL Staff: Salvatore DiPillo,
This factors negatively in the is a plus for the forecast.
Lincoln S. Dyer, Arthur Famiglietti, Daniel W. forecast.
Kennedy, Ph.D., David F. Post, Joseph Slepski Inflation and inter est rates
interest
and Mark Stankiewicz. Managing Editor: Construction and housing Much has been made of the low
Jungmin Charles Joo. Contributing DECD Construction and housing interest rates that have prevailed
Staff: Kolie Sun, Robert Damroth and Mark
Prisloe. We would also like to thank our
permits have large influences on all year. This has resulted from a
associates at the Connecticut Center for the economy and enter into invest- Federal Reserve policy that has
Economic Analysis, University of Connecticut, ment as a contribution to GSP. kept the key federal funds rate low
for their contributions to the Digest. Housing also is associated with to maintain the positive economic
new spending on furnishings, momentum gained in the last year.
appliances, or other “big ticket” One reason the Fed can continue
Connecticut items. The construction contracts this policy is that inflation, as
Department of Labor index (1980=100) in October was measured by the rate of change in
Shaun B. Cashman, Commissioner 367.8, down 9.2 percent from last the Consumer Price Index (CPI),
Thomas E. Hutton, Deputy Commissioner October, but it has seesawed all has been low. At a mere 2.0
Roger F. Therrien, Director year making it a difficult indicator percent in October, both purchas-
Office of Research to interpret. However, it flirted into ing power and the ability to borrow
200 Folly Brook Boulevard the 400+ level in August and cheaply to finance business invest-
Wethersfield, CT 06109-1114 reached 565 in June, the highest ment will work in favor of the
Phone: (860) 263-6275
Fax: (860) 263-6263 level seen in any month since recovery, helping both the U.S. and
E-Mail: dol.econdigest@po.state.ct.us February 2000, definitely a plus. Connecticut.
Website: http://www.ctdol.state.ct.us/lmi Likewise, housing permits, which
are reported monthly by DECD, Coincident and leading
Connecticut Department soared 21.3 percent in October, indicators
of Economic and boosted by strength in consumer The Conference Board’s Busi-
Community Development income and low interest rates, to ness Cycle Indicators move ahead
James F. Abromaitis, Commissioner
push year-to-date permits above of, coincide with, or lag behind the
Rita Zangari, Deputy Commissioner last year’s level at 8,390 units overall economy. A composite
compared with October 2002’s leading index (10 indicators) in
8,231 units, a 1.9 percent gain. October, increased 0.4 percent to
Compliance Office and Planning/Program
Support Taken together these are positive 113.6 (1996=100) and “suggests
505 Hudson Street signs for Connecticut’s economy that strong economic growth
DECD
Hartford, CT 06106-2502 because they mean growth in GSP. should continue in the near term.”
Phone: (860) 270-8000 RESEARCH Likewise, the Connecticut series of
Fax: (860) 270-8188
E-Mail: decd@po.state.ct.us indicators, which are reported in
Website: http://www.decd.org --Continued on page 5--
●
2 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST January 2004
TOWN/CITY PROFILE WETHERSFIELD
By Jungmin Charles Joo, Research Analyst, DOL
Introduction all industries also rose slightly over the have been rising, increasing by 33
For nearly 370 years, Wethersfield has year to $39,858. Sectors with increased percent over the decade.
been a thriving community, a desirable wages include information and financial
place to live, work, run a business, go to activities, while manufacturing and Outlook
school, and raise a family. Centrally professional and business services The town is in the midst of creating a
located on the Connecticut River, wages fell from a year earlier. Informa- series of new economic development
Wethersfield has its niche in history, tion sector employees working in programs, which are based upon the
being “Ye Most Auncient Towne” in Wethersfield were paid the highest implementation of “The Economic
Connecticut, as set out by the Code of average annual wage at $62,375 in Development Strategic Plan” created in
1650 - “Colonial Records of Connecticut.” 2002. On the other hand, those in leisure late 2001. It has just recently re-invented
Here in May 1781, at the Webb House on and hospitality, with many working part- its Economic Development and Improve-
Main Street, Washington and time, were paid $14,408. ment Commission (EDIC) to spearhead
Rochambeau planned the battle of As the table also shows, this effort. The EDIC has prepared a
Yorktown, which culminated in the Wethersfield’s population had been Business Tax Incentive Policy for Town
independence of the then rebellious declining until 1997, but then climbed to Council approval and is working with
colonies. In “Olde Wethersfield” over one 26,390 in 2002, a 2.7 percent increase local financial institutions on a Business
hundred fifty beautiful and distinctive from ten years earlier. The number of Loan Program and other financial
Colonial homes stand as a symbol of the town residents who were employed incentive possibilities.
rich New England heritage. declined from 1992 to 1998, then rose The principal focus of the Plan is the
the next two years before dropping again improved development of Wethersfield’s
Economy in 2001 and 2002, remaining at a level primary business corridors, which are the
The latest annual average data showed below that of 1992. However, even Silas Deane Highway and the Berlin
that there were 10,198 jobs in the town, sharper declines in the number of Turnpike, through adaptive reuse. The
down slightly from the prior two years unemployed persons in the town caused town is comprehensively revising its
(table). The information industry sector is the jobless rate to fall significantly, to 3.4 zoning regulations and map to encour-
where most of the job losses occurred, percent in 2002, nearly a 50 percent age economic development. Additionally,
but they were partly offset by strong drop from a decade earlier. In fact, it recently created a Tourism Commission
gains in the manufacturing and construc- Wethersfield’s 3.4 percent was lower to actively promote and market the
tion sectors. The total number of busi- than the rates of the Hartford LMA (4.5 variety of historic attractions that the
nesses in Wethersfield increased in percent), Connecticut (4.3 percent), and town has to offer. This will assist in
2002, primarily from growth in the the United States (5.8 percent). And, achieving the town’s goal to create more
professional and business services and while the number of new housing permits diversity in its economic base. Come,
education and health services sectors. authorized has been falling since 1998, Wethersfield is open for business. n
The average annual wage for workers in retail sales of Wethersfield businesses
80 70 Trough
Trough 11/75
10/71
70 60
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
The distance from peak to trough, indicated by the shaded areas, measures the duration of an employment cycle recession. The vertical scale in both
charts is an index with 1992=100.
Francis W. Ahking, Department of Economics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269. Phone: (860) 486-3026. Stan McMillen
[(860) 486-0485, Storrs Campus], Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis, University of Connecticut, provided research support.
Leading and coincident employment indexes were developed by Pami Dua and Stephen M. Miller, in cooperation with Anirvan Banerji
at the Economic Cycle Research Institute. Components of the indexes are described in the Technical Notes on page 23.
●
4 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST January 2004
--Continued from page 2--
each issue of the Digest (at page 4), two-year lag, and the currently positive and encouraging. It is
“paint an encouraging picture for available estimate for 2001 is $166 true, not all economic indicators
the State economy.” Moreover, the billion. The trend in the GSP has are up to par and weak job growth
rise in the State’s leading index been upward. In fact, the GSP is a major drawback to a stronger
from 113.3 in September 2002 to growth rate in the last ten years recovery. But as confidence grows
114.69 in September 2003 fore- has averaged 5 percent. On this that a recovery is real, employment
casts economic growth. basis, GSP can be expected to should pick up. Based on recent
reach $190 billion in 2004. One experience, positive growth can be
Gr oss State Pr
Gross oduct
Product other major contributor to the GSP expected in such important sectors
Finally, the single most compre- is exports that totaled $8.3 billion as transportation and public
hensive indicator of the State’s in 2002 and now exceed defense utilities; finance, insurance, and
economic performance is GSP. contracts as a source of economic real estate; and government.
Similar to the GDP for the nation, fuel. Based on the GSP trend, the Absent any terrorist attack, energy
it is a measure of the total dollar State can expect stronger growth price surprises, or other exogenous
value of all final goods and services in 2004. shocks such as higher federal and
produced in the State. The Bureau state budget deficits or statewide
of Economic Analysis releases the Conclusion mergers, there is much reason for
Connecticut’s GSP with a roughly Overall, the outlook for 2004 is optimism.n
HOUSING UPDATE
November permits keep pace
C
Commissioner James F. Abromaitis The Department further indicated Only Bridgeport and Danielson
of the Connecticut Department of that the 766 units permitted in Labor Market Areas showed the
Economic and Community Devel- November 2003 represent a 31.7 net gain of 83 and 7 units respec-
opment (DECD) announced that percent decrease from the 1,121 tively compared to a year ago.
Connecticut communities autho- units permitted in October 2003. The Milford led all municipalities with 69
rized 766 new housing units in year-to-date permits are up 1.7 new units, followed by Trumbull with
November 2003, a 0.6 percent percent, from 9,002 through Novem- 34 and Winchester with 30. From a
decrease compared to November ber 2002, to 9,156 through Novem- county perspective, New Haven
of 2002 when 771 units were ber 2003. had the largest number of units
authorized. authorized (178).
See data tables on pages 19 and 22.
Sources: *The Connecticut Economy, Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis, University of Connecticut
**People’s Bank
The Connecticut Economy's General Drift Indicators are composite measures of the four-quarter change in three coincident (Connecticut Manufac-
turing Production Index, nonfarm employment, and real personal income) and four leading (housing permits, manufacturing average weekly hours,
Hartford help-wanted advertising, and initial unemployment claims) economic variables, and are indexed so 1986 = 100.
The People’s Bank Business Barometer is a measure of overall economic growth in the state of Connecticut that is derived from non-manufacturing
employment, real disposable personal income, and manufacturing production. The index is calculated by DataCore Partners, Inc for People’s Bank.
●
6 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST January 2004
ECONOMIC INDICATORS STATE
●
8 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST January 2004
COMPARATIVE REGIONAL DATA STATE
AVERAGE WEEKLY INITIAL CLAIMS (Seasonally adjusted) Month 2001 2002 2003
Jan 3,980 5,406 4,931
9,000
Feb 4,419 4,988 5,594
8,000 Mar 4,967 5,004 5,006
7,000 Apr 4,673 5,850 5,384
6,000 May 5,045 6,058 4,625
Jun 4,547 5,374 4,557
5,000
Jul 5,267 5,128 4,967
4,000 Aug 5,298 5,072 4,902
3,000 Sep 5,688 5,263 4,768
Oct 5,916 5,452 4,483
2,000
Nov 5,889 5,148 4,517
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03
Dec 4,939 5,678
●
10 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST January 2004
ECONOMIC INDICATOR TRENDS STATE
REAL AVG MANUFACTURING HOURLY EARNINGS (Not seasonally adjusted)* Month 2001 2002 2003
Jan $9.35 $9.81 $9.71
10.2
Feb 9.37 9.74 9.72
10.0
Mar 9.45 9.81 9.83
1982-84 Dollars
AVG MANUFACTURING WEEKLY HOURS (Not seasonally adjusted) Month 2001 2002 2003
Jan 42.1 41.8 41.6
45
Feb 41.6 41.3 41.1
44 Mar 42.0 41.5 41.3
43 Apr 40.9 41.5 41.3
42 May 41.7 41.4 41.2
Jun 41.7 42.1 41.1
41
Jul 41.5 41.0 40.4
40 Aug 41.5 41.4 40.9
39 Sep 42.1 42.0 41.9
Oct 42.3 41.8 41.9
38
Nov 41.9 41.9 42.3
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03
Dec 40.9 41.9
HARTFORD HELP WANTED INDEX (Seasonally adjusted) Month 2001 2002 2003
Jan 36 23 17
80
Feb 27 18 12
70
Mar 20 12 9
60 Apr 24 17 11
1987=100
50 May 25 17 12
40 Jun 21 21 15
30 Jul 26 21 11
20 Aug 19 13 11
10 Sep 15 11 11
Oct 17 12 9
0
Nov 18 13 13
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03
Dec 17 11
DOL NET BUSINESS STARTS (12-month moving average)** Month 2001 2002 2003
Jan 73 -7 28
300
Feb 77 -35 26
200
Mar 76 -31 27
100
Apr 59 -33 44
0
May 53 -32 52
-100
Jun 46 -32 60
-200
Jul 36 -33
-300
Aug 24 -24
-400
Sep 22 -26
-500
Oct 15 -16
-600
Nov 2 -8
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03
Dec -8 -2
*New series began in 2001; prior years are not directly comparable
**New series began in 1996; prior years are not directly comparable
Current month’s data are preliminary. Prior months’ data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2002.
*Total excludes workers idled due to labor-management disputes. **Includes Indian tribal government employment.
●
12 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST January 2004
NONFARM EMPLOYMENT ESTIMATES LMA
For further information on the Bridgeport Labor Market Area contact Arthur Famiglietti at (860) 263-6297.
For further information on the Danbury Labor Market Area contact Arthur Famiglietti at (860) 263-6297.
Current month’s data are preliminary. Prior months’ data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2002.
*Total excludes workers idled due to labor-management disputes.
Due to staff cuts, data for this labor market area are no longer being
developed for publication.
For further information on the Hartford Labor Market Area contact Arthur Famiglietti at (860) 263-6297.
Current month’s data are preliminary. Prior months’ data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2002.
*Total excludes workers idled due to labor-management disputes.
●
14 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST January 2004
NONFARM EMPLOYMENT ESTIMATES LMA
Due to staff cuts, data for this labor market area are no longer being
developed for publication.
For further information on the New Haven Labor Market Area contact Joseph Slepski at (860) 263-6278.
Current month’s data are preliminary. Prior months’ data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2002.
*Total excludes workers idled due to labor-management disputes. **Value less than 50
●
16 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST January 2004
NONFARM EMPLOYMENT ESTIMATES LMA
TORRINGTON LMA
Due to staff cuts, data for this labor market area are no longer being
developed for publication.
For further information on the Waterbury Labor Market Area contact Joseph Slepski at (860) 263-6278.
Current month’s data are preliminary. Prior months’ data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2002.
*Total excludes workers idled due to labor-management disputes.
BRIDGEPORT LMA Civilian Labor Force 227,700 225,800 1,900 0.8 228,100
Employed 214,900 214,500 400 0.2 215,400
Unemployed 12,800 11,200 1,600 14.3 12,800
Unemployment Rate 5.6 5.0 0.6 --- 5.6
DANBURY LMA Civilian Labor Force 119,100 116,600 2,500 2.1 119,200
Employed 115,500 113,300 2,200 1.9 115,600
Unemployed 3,600 3,300 300 9.1 3,600
Unemployment Rate 3.0 2.8 0.2 --- 3.0
DANIELSON LMA Civilian Labor Force 36,400 36,900 -500 -1.4 36,800
Employed 34,700 35,200 -500 -1.4 35,100
Unemployed 1,700 1,600 100 6.3 1,700
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.4 0.3 --- 4.7
HARTFORD LMA Civilian Labor Force 601,200 606,600 -5,400 -0.9 600,400
Employed 572,200 579,700 -7,500 -1.3 571,700
Unemployed 29,000 26,900 2,100 7.8 28,700
Unemployment Rate 4.8 4.4 0.4 --- 4.8
LOWER RIVER LMA Civilian Labor Force 12,900 12,700 200 1.6 12,800
Employed 12,500 12,300 200 1.6 12,400
Unemployed 400 400 0 0.0 400
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.1 -0.1 --- 2.9
NEW HAVEN LMA Civilian Labor Force 290,200 287,000 3,200 1.1 290,400
Employed 277,200 275,700 1,500 0.5 277,400
Unemployed 12,900 11,400 1,500 13.2 13,000
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.0 0.5 --- 4.5
NEW LONDON LMA Civilian Labor Force 167,300 165,300 2,000 1.2 168,500
Employed 160,600 159,000 1,600 1.0 161,900
Unemployed 6,700 6,300 400 6.3 6,600
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.8 0.2 --- 3.9
STAMFORD LMA Civilian Labor Force 188,400 189,600 -1,200 -0.6 188,400
Employed 182,700 184,000 -1,300 -0.7 182,700
Unemployed 5,700 5,600 100 1.8 5,700
Unemployment Rate 3.0 2.9 0.1 --- 3.0
TORRINGTON LMA Civilian Labor Force 38,500 37,900 600 1.6 38,800
Employed 37,100 36,400 700 1.9 37,500
Unemployed 1,400 1,400 0 0.0 1,300
Unemployment Rate 3.7 3.8 -0.1 --- 3.4
WATERBURY LMA Civilian Labor Force 116,400 116,700 -300 -0.3 116,700
Employed 109,400 110,300 -900 -0.8 109,600
Unemployed 7,100 6,400 700 10.9 7,100
Unemployment Rate 6.1 5.5 0.6 --- 6.1
UNITED STATES Civilian Labor Force 146,969,000 144,854,000 2,115,000 1.5 146,787,000
Employed 138,700,000 136,684,000 2,016,000 1.5 138,619,000
Unemployed 8,269,000 8,170,000 99,000 1.2 8,169,000
Unemployment Rate 5.6 5.6 0.0 --- 5.6
Current month’s data are preliminary. Prior months’ data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2002.
●
18 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST January 2004
MANUFACTURING HOURS AND EARNINGS LMA
CONNECTICUT AVG WEEKLY EARNINGS AVG WEEKLY HOURS AVG HOURLY EARNINGS
NOV CHG OCT NOV CHG OCT NOV CHG OCT
(Not seasonally adjusted) 2003 2002 Y/Y 2003 2003 2002 Y/Y 2003 2003 2002 Y/Y 2003
MANUFACTURING $755.06 $727.80 $27.25 $748.75 42.3 41.9 0.4 41.9 $17.85 $17.37 $0.48 $17.87
DURABLE GOODS 780.58 745.40 35.18 778.17 42.4 41.9 0.5 42.2 18.41 17.79 0.62 18.44
Fabricated Metal 702.19 662.11 40.08 695.84 43.0 41.8 1.2 42.9 16.33 15.84 0.49 16.22
Machinery 770.54 739.09 31.45 785.21 40.3 39.8 0.5 41.9 19.12 18.57 0.55 18.74
Computer & Electronic 613.21 583.80 29.40 621.40 41.8 41.2 0.6 42.1 14.67 14.17 0.50 14.76
Transport. Equipment 950.14 928.29 21.85 955.74 41.6 43.5 -1.9 41.9 22.84 21.34 1.50 22.81
NON-DUR. GOODS 690.06 684.23 5.83 675.68 42.0 41.9 0.1 41.2 16.43 16.33 0.10 16.40
CONSTRUCTION 926.15 871.02 55.12 930.97 39.8 39.2 0.6 39.7 23.27 22.22 1.05 23.45
LMAs AVG WEEKLY EARNINGS AVG WEEKLY HOURS AVG HOURLY EARNINGS
NOV CHG OCT NOV CHG OCT NOV CHG OCT
MANUFACTURING 2003 2002 Y/Y 2003 2003 2002 Y/Y 2003 2003 2002 Y/Y 2003
Bridgeport $781.46 $774.37 $7.09 $765.20 41.0 42.2 -1.2 40.0 $19.06 $18.35 $0.71 $19.13
Danbury 746.85 735.26 11.59 700.15 41.7 40.2 1.5 40.1 17.91 18.29 -0.38 17.46
Danielson*
Hartford 799.24 768.08 31.16 798.85 42.4 42.6 -0.2 42.2 18.85 18.03 0.82 18.93
Lower River*
New Haven 752.08 732.77 19.31 716.14 44.9 43.8 1.1 42.4 16.75 16.73 0.02 16.89
New London 763.09 741.34 21.75 768.71 42.3 41.3 1.0 42.4 18.04 17.95 0.09 18.13
Stamford*
Torrington*
Waterbury 726.52 610.44 116.08 685.08 41.0 38.2 2.8 39.6 17.72 15.98 1.74 17.30
Current month’s data are preliminary. Prior months’ data have been revised. All data are benchmarked to March 2002.
*Due to staff cuts, data for the Danielson, Lower River and Torrington labor market areas are no longer being prepared for publication. Manufacturing
hours and earnings estimates for the Stamford labor market area will no longer be published due to their not meeting sample reliability tests.
NOVEMBER 2003
LMA/TOWNS LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED % LMA/TOWNS LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED %
BRIDGEPORT 227,727 214,938 12,789 5.6 HARTFORD cont....
Ansonia 8,921 8,321 600 6.7 Burlington 4,477 4,294 183 4.1
Beacon Falls 2,959 2,808 151 5.1 Canton 4,666 4,520 146 3.1
BRIDGEPORT 63,868 58,528 5,340 8.4 Chaplin 1,216 1,164 52 4.3
Derby 6,551 6,178 373 5.7 Colchester 6,803 6,488 315 4.6
Easton 3,413 3,312 101 3.0 Columbia 2,701 2,606 95 3.5
Fairfield 27,608 26,594 1,014 3.7 Coventry 6,201 5,982 219 3.5
Milford 27,225 25,950 1,275 4.7 Cromwell 6,968 6,678 290 4.2
Monroe 10,298 9,915 383 3.7 Durham 3,586 3,460 126 3.5
Oxford 5,030 4,776 254 5.0 East Granby 2,474 2,391 83 3.4
Seymour 8,016 7,632 384 4.8 East Haddam 4,170 4,006 164 3.9
Shelton 20,885 19,978 907 4.3 East Hampton 6,299 6,015 284 4.5
Stratford 25,629 24,245 1,384 5.4 East Hartford 25,766 24,246 1,520 5.9
Trumbull 17,323 16,700 623 3.6 East Windsor 5,653 5,384 269 4.8
Ellington 6,957 6,718 239 3.4
DANBURY 119,062 115,471 3,591 3.0 Enfield 23,071 22,031 1,040 4.5
Bethel 10,511 10,162 349 3.3 Farmington 11,384 10,945 439 3.9
Bridgewater 1,035 1,008 27 2.6 Glastonbury 15,851 15,373 478 3.0
Brookfield 8,815 8,589 226 2.6 Granby 5,358 5,166 192 3.6
DANBURY 39,323 37,838 1,485 3.8 Haddam 4,245 4,096 149 3.5
New Fairfield 7,589 7,387 202 2.7 HARTFORD 54,166 49,360 4,806 8.9
New Milford 15,110 14,666 444 2.9 Harwinton 2,966 2,879 87 2.9
Newtown 13,455 13,085 370 2.7 Hebron 4,430 4,275 155 3.5
Redding 4,821 4,696 125 2.6 Lebanon 3,379 3,235 144 4.3
Ridgefield 13,225 12,967 258 2.0 Manchester 28,759 27,410 1,349 4.7
Roxbury 1,129 1,113 16 1.4 Mansfield 9,161 8,960 201 2.2
Sherman 1,822 1,784 38 2.1 Marlborough 3,115 2,996 119 3.8
Washington 2,228 2,178 50 2.2 Middlefield 2,276 2,184 92 4.0
Middletown 24,452 23,258 1,194 4.9
DANIELSON 36,413 34,711 1,702 4.7 New Britain 34,602 32,141 2,461 7.1
Brooklyn 4,207 4,068 139 3.3 New Hartford 3,667 3,558 109 3.0
Eastford 951 923 28 2.9 Newington 15,623 15,053 570 3.6
Hampton 1,215 1,159 56 4.6 Plainville 9,422 8,951 471 5.0
KILLINGLY 9,249 8,652 597 6.5 Plymouth 6,497 6,152 345 5.3
Pomfret 2,307 2,235 72 3.1 Portland 4,734 4,484 250 5.3
Putnam 5,109 4,887 222 4.3 Rocky Hill 9,826 9,422 404 4.1
Scotland 933 916 17 1.8 Simsbury 11,613 11,323 290 2.5
Sterling 1,751 1,665 86 4.9 Somers 4,119 3,975 144 3.5
Thompson 4,534 4,292 242 5.3 Southington 21,400 20,468 932 4.4
Union 428 416 12 2.8 South Windsor 13,490 13,040 450 3.3
Voluntown 1,470 1,397 73 5.0 Stafford 5,987 5,674 313 5.2
Woodstock 4,258 4,100 158 3.7 Suffield 5,907 5,714 193 3.3
Tolland 7,205 6,982 223 3.1
HARTFORD 601,240 572,220 29,020 4.8 Vernon 16,667 16,002 665 4.0
Andover 1,673 1,596 77 4.6 West Hartford 28,649 27,662 987 3.4
Ashford 2,178 2,104 74 3.4 Wethersfield 12,342 11,839 503 4.1
Avon 7,575 7,337 238 3.1 Willington 3,473 3,371 102 2.9
Barkhamsted 2,114 2,014 100 4.7 Winchester 5,943 5,613 330 5.6
Berlin 9,160 8,777 383 4.2 Windham 10,225 9,624 601 5.9
Bloomfield 10,110 9,581 529 5.2 Windsor 14,780 14,024 756 5.1
Bolton 2,749 2,659 90 3.3 Windsor Locks 6,712 6,447 265 3.9
Bristol 32,249 30,514 1,735 5.4
●
20 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST January 2004
LABOR FORCE ESTIMATES BY TOWN Town
(By Place of Residence - Not Seasonally Adjusted)
NOVEMBER 2003
LMA/TOWNS LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED % LMA/TOWNS LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED %
LOWER RIVER 12,879 12,498 381 3.0 STAMFORD 188,385 182,725 5,660 3.0
Chester 2,237 2,177 60 2.7 Darien 9,332 9,111 221 2.4
Deep River 2,782 2,712 70 2.5 Greenwich 30,562 29,876 686 2.2
Essex 3,431 3,326 105 3.1 New Canaan 9,218 9,051 167 1.8
Lyme 1,133 1,098 35 3.1 NORWALK 47,552 45,713 1,839 3.9
Westbrook 3,297 3,186 111 3.4 STAMFORD 64,369 62,211 2,158 3.4
Weston 4,682 4,579 103 2.2
NEW HAVEN 290,159 277,245 12,914 4.5 Westport 13,850 13,577 273 2.0
Bethany 2,730 2,642 88 3.2 Wilton 8,821 8,607 214 2.4
Branford 16,631 16,044 587 3.5
Cheshire 14,329 13,857 472 3.3 TORRINGTON 38,512 37,076 1,436 3.7
Clinton 7,802 7,553 249 3.2 Canaan** 674 658 16 2.4
East Haven 15,602 14,858 744 4.8 Colebrook 782 772 10 1.3
Guilford 12,116 11,778 338 2.8 Cornwall 794 775 19 2.4
Hamden 30,585 29,421 1,164 3.8 Goshen 1,360 1,308 52 3.8
Killingworth 3,111 3,013 98 3.2 Hartland 1,005 966 39 3.9
Madison 8,715 8,494 221 2.5 Kent** 1,967 1,923 44 2.2
MERIDEN 31,632 29,837 1,795 5.7 Litchfield 4,344 4,244 100 2.3
NEW HAVEN 60,298 56,530 3,768 6.2 Morris 1,122 1,087 35 3.1
North Branford 8,555 8,268 287 3.4 Norfolk 1,066 1,039 27 2.5
North Haven 12,970 12,551 419 3.2 North Canaan** 2,050 2,022 28 1.4
Orange 6,840 6,647 193 2.8 Salisbury** 2,251 2,223 28 1.2
Wallingford 23,964 23,051 913 3.8 Sharon** 1,878 1,864 14 0.7
West Haven 29,751 28,283 1,468 4.9 TORRINGTON 18,538 17,531 1,007 5.4
Woodbridge 4,529 4,419 110 2.4 Warren 678 662 16 2.4
*NEW LONDON 147,825 141,781 6,044 4.1 WATERBURY 116,417 109,366 7,051 6.1
Bozrah 1,562 1,507 55 3.5 Bethlehem 1,935 1,865 70 3.6
Canterbury 2,969 2,861 108 3.6 Middlebury 3,364 3,225 139 4.1
East Lyme 9,992 9,709 283 2.8 Naugatuck 16,575 15,685 890 5.4
Franklin 1,178 1,141 37 3.1 Prospect 4,744 4,539 205 4.3
Griswold 6,260 5,966 294 4.7 Southbury 6,909 6,592 317 4.6
Groton 18,706 17,904 802 4.3 Thomaston 4,182 3,938 244 5.8
Ledyard 8,660 8,365 295 3.4 WATERBURY 52,647 48,543 4,104 7.8
Lisbon 2,422 2,317 105 4.3 Watertown 12,211 11,686 525 4.3
Montville 10,469 10,071 398 3.8 Wolcott 8,760 8,352 408 4.7
NEW LONDON 14,117 13,368 749 5.3 Woodbury 5,091 4,940 151 3.0
No. Stonington 3,123 3,031 92 2.9
NORWICH 20,378 19,251 1,127 5.5
Old Lyme 4,079 3,975 104 2.5 Not Seasonally Adjusted:
Old Saybrook 6,227 6,066 161 2.6 CONNECTICUT 1,778,600 1,698,000 80,600 4.5
Plainfield 9,376 8,858 518 5.5 UNITED STATES 146,969,000 138,700,000 8,269,000 5.6
Preston 2,748 2,654 94 3.4
Salem 2,204 2,120 84 3.8 Seasonally Adjusted:
Sprague 1,798 1,700 98 5.5 CONNECTICUT 1,783,700 1,694,600 89,100 5.0
Stonington 10,460 10,179 281 2.7 UNITED STATES 147,277,000 138,603,000 8,674,000 5.9
Waterford 11,097 10,739 358 3.2
*Connecticut portion only. For whole MSA, including Rhode Island towns, see below. **The Bureau of Labor Statistics has identified these five towns as a separate area to
NEW LONDON 167,298 160,613 6,685 4.0 report labor force data. For the convenience of our data users, data for these towns are
Hopkinton, RI 4,980 4,825 155 3.1 included in the Torrington LMA. For the same purpose, data for the town of Thompson,
Westerly, RI 14,493 14,007 486 3.4 which is officially part of the Worcester, MA MSA, is included in the Danielson LMA.
For further information on the housing permit data, contact Kolie Sun of DECD at (860) 270-8167.
●
22 THE CONNECTICUT ECONOMIC DIGEST January 2004
TECHNICAL NOTES
BUSINESS ST AR TS AND TERMINA
STAR TIONS
TERMINATIONS
Registrations and terminations of business entities as recorded with the Secretary of the State and the Connecticut Department of Labor (DOL)
are an indication of new business formation and activity. DOL business starts include new employers which have become liable for unemploy-
ment insurance taxes during the quarter, as well as new establishments opened by existing employers. DOL business terminations are those
accounts discontinued due to inactivity (no employees) or business closure, and accounts for individual business establishments that are closed
by still active employers. The Secretary of the State registrations include limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships, and foreign-
owned (out-of-state) and domestic-owned (in-state) corporations.
INITIAL CLAIMS
Average weekly initial claims are calculated by dividing the total number of new claims for unemployment insurance received in the month by
the number of weeks in the month. A minor change in methodology took effect with data published in the March 1997 issue of the DIGEST.
Data have been revised back to January 1980.
INSURED UNEMPLOYMENT RA TE
RATE
Primarily a measure of unemployment insurance program activity, the insured unemployment rate is the 13-week average of the number of
people claiming unemployment benefits divided by the number of workers covered by the unemployment insurance system.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics has identified the five towns of Canaan, Kent, North Canaan, Salisbury and Sharon as a separate area for
reporting labor force data. For the convenience of our data users, data for these towns are included in the Torrington Labor Market Area. For the
same purpose, data for the town of Thompson, which is officially part of the Worcester Metropolitan Statistical Area, are included in the
Danielson Labor Market Area. Also, data for Hopkinton and Westerly, Rhode Island are included in the New London Labor Market Area.
UI COVERED W AGES
WAGES
UI covered wages is the total amount paid to those employees who are covered under the Connecticut’s Unemployment Insurance (UI) law for
services performed during the quarter. The fluctuations in the 1992-93 period reflect the effect of the changes in the tax law and the massive
restructuring in the state’s economy.
Leading Employment Index ........... +1.9 Business Activity Tourism and Travel
Coincident Employment Index ....... -1.2 New Housing Permits ...................... -0.6 Info Center Visitors .......................... -7.2
Leading General Drift Indicator ..... +1.0 Electricity Sales ............................... -0.2 Attraction Visitors ............................ +0.1
Coincident General Drift Indicator . -4.6 Retail Sales ..................................... -0.6 Air Passenger Count ...................... +2.3
Business Barometer ....................... -1.0 Construction Contracts Index ..... +113.6 Indian Gaming Slots ....................... +6.2
New Auto Registrations ................ +41.3 Travel and Tourism Index ................. -1.1
Total Nonfarm Employment ............ -1.0 Air Cargo Tons ................................. -2.4
Exports ............................................ -9.0 Employment Cost Index (U.S.)
Unemployment .............................. +0.4* Total ................................................ +4.0
Labor Force .................................... +0.1 Wages & Salaries ........................... +3.0
Employed ........................................ -0.3 Business Starts Benefit Costs .................................. +6.5
Unemployed ................................... +8.4 Secretary of the State ...................... -1.4
Dept. of Labor .................................. -3.8 Consumer Prices
Average Weekly Initial Claims ...... -12.3 Connecticut .................................... +1.9
Help Wanted Index -- Hartford ......... 0.0 Business Terminations U.S. City Average ........................... +1.8
Average Ins. Unempl. Rate .......... -0.11* Secretary of the State ................... +49.3 Northeast Region ........................... +2.6
Dept. of Labor ................................ -39.4 NY-NJ-Long Island ......................... +3.1
Average Weekly Hours, Mfg ........... +1.0 Boston-Brockton-Nashua ............... +3.9
Average Hourly Earnings, Mfg ...... +2.8 Consumer Confidence
Average Weekly Earnings, Mfg ...... +3.7 State Revenues .............................. +4.5 Connecticut .................................... +3.7
CT Mfg. Production Index .............. +0.7 Corporate Tax ................................. -28.7 New England ................................ +26.2
Production Worker Hours ............... +3.3 Personal Income Tax ..................... +17.1 U.S. ................................................ +8.0
Industrial Electricity Sales ............... -3.8 Real Estate Conveyance Tax ......... +19.0
Sales & Use Tax ............................... -6.0 Interest Rates
Personal Income ............................ +2.9 Indian Gaming Payments ................ +5.5 Prime ............................................ -0.75*
UI Covered Wages .......................... +0.5 *Percentage point change; **Less than 0.05 percent;
Conventional Mortgage ................ -0.18*
NA = Not Available
THE CONNECTICUT
We would appreciate your input:
ECONOMIC DIGEST o What article topics would you like to see covered in future issues?
o What additional data would you like to see included in the Digest?
A joint publication of
The Connecticut Departments of Labor and
Please send your comments, questions, and suggestions regarding
Economic and Community Development
the Digest to dol.econdigest@po.state.ct.us. Thank you!
❑ If you wish to have your name removed from our mailing list, please
check here and return this page (or a photocopy) to the address at left.
❑ If your address has changed, please check here, make the necessary
changes to your address label and return this page to the address at left.
Mailing address: ❑ If you receive more than one copy of this publication, please check here
and return this page from the duplicate copy to the address at left.
Connecticut Economic Digest
Connecticut Department of Labor
Office of Research First Class Mail
200 Folly Brook Boulevard U.S. Postage
Wethersfield, CT 06109-1114
PAID
PERMIT # 5
The Connecticut Economic Digest BLOOMFIELD, CT
is available on the internet at:
http://www.ctdol.state.ct.us/lmi