There are many documents available from the Internet which discuss road hierarchy and classification- where classification refers to functional classification, for example whether the purpose of the road is to serve as an access road or as a long-distance primary road. However roads can be classed in many other ways as well. This discussion paper presents a list of such other ways to classify roads. The list is a work in progress. It does not claim to include all the ways in which roads are classified. Indeed, there are so many classifications in the list that it is worth quoting Ray Brindle: Road classification is a means to an end, not an end in itself. Successfully allocating agreed labels to each element in the road system involves so much effort and controversy that it is pointless and best avoided unless the labels are going to have some application.
(ref. 334, quoting Brindle, 1989, Road Hierarchy and Functional Classification)
gta-304.01
August 2013
Page 1
No. 21 22 23 24
Classifier district role environment form form and function of adjoining buildings height of buildings ratio between height of building, width of street height restriction
Country Europe Europe Europe Europe Portugal Portugal Australia New Zealand New Zealand Europe Europe Australia Europe Australia Portugal New Zealand England Australia Europe Europe Australia USA Wikipedia Europe Europe Europe Europe Europe Europe S. Africa England Australia Europe Europe
Year 2004 2004 2004 2004 2012 2012 2006 2011 2011 2004 2004 2011 2006 2006 2012 2011 2002 2006 2004 2004 2006 2013 2013 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2001? 2012 2011 2004 2004
Ref. No. 388 388 388 388 446 446 334 267 267 388 388 248
quoted as example of possible classifier see table page 4 see table page 4 appendix 2 page 58 page 32 Class 1: Those roads that are, or will be, the principal route between capital cities. EuroRoads
25 26 27 28
freight highway volumes freight tonnes and value at ports etc frontage form function functional functional
29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
gradient geometric international tourist flows journey distance land access land use or frontage function living space load bearing mobility movement neighbourliness network role non-transport use of street space other urban users pedestrian use of streets planting population - size and type of population centre served primary destinations property access public transport traffic volume
see table page 4 for example, class "long distance strategic routes"
appendix 2 page 58 appendix 2 page 58 quoted as example of possible classifier see link see link
388 388 388 388 388 388 148 304 248 388 388
appendix 2 page 58 eg forming strategic network or local network see page 13 presence of/ provision for vehicles, PT, pedestrians, etc. appendix 2 page 58 appendix 2 page 58
gta-304.01
August 2013
Page 2
No. 49 50 51 52 53
Classifier ratio between the movement of people and motorized traffic quality of road (road surface) public transport and locale road purpose - class for routes to recreation areas road design road cross-section sight distance road width road width
Notes
classed as sealed, gravelled and unsealed roads; source Nepal Investment Board two-dimensional classification / page 42
USA USA Australia Europe Europe USA Australia Iraq UK Europe Portugal USA Wikipedia Australia Europe Iraq Europe Kenya Europe Europe Europe Europe Europe Australia Poland Europe Nepal Europe Wikipedia Australia
1940 1940 2006 2004 2004 2013 2011 2011 2004 2004 2012 1940 2013 2006 2004 2011 2004 2013 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2006 2011 2004 2012 2004 2013 1995
92 92 334 388 388 Internet 248 387 800 388 446 92 see link 334 388 387 388 appendix 2 page 58 see link 388 388 388 388 388 334 379 388 460 388 see page 13 see link 358.7 appendix 1 page 52 appendix 2 page 58 appendix 2 page 58 appendix 2 page 58 appendix 2 page 58 quoted as example of possible classifier hard surfaced / unsurfaced appendix 2 page 58 quoting Canada TAC appendix 1 page 52 see page 79, table 19, (taken from Viner et al 2004) appendix 2 page 58 quoted as example of possible classifier appendix 2 page 58 appendix 1 page 52
54 55 56 57 58 59 60
road standard roads of military importance (e.g. the USA's STRAHNET) route capacity scale site classification category for friction space syntax "spatial integration" speed - travel speed (V85) design speed speed design speed traffic speed
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69
spatial dimension spatial shape or character special purpose roads strategic role street character street in cross-section street name structural role surface type surface type
70 71 72 73 74
sustainability topography the wider urban / network context through traffic traffic function
gta-304.01
August 2013
Page 3
No. 75 76 77
Country Australia Australia Australia Europe Europe Australia Europe S. Africa England Portugal Europe Iraq Poland Europe Europe Europe Australia USA
Year 2006 2011 2006 2004 2004 2006 2004 2001? 2002 2012 2004 2011 2011 2004 2004 2004 2006 2013
Ref. No. 334 248 334 388 388 334 388 148 306 516 388 387 379 388 388 388 334 Internet
Notes
AADT appendix 1 page 52 appendix 1 page 52 quoting the USA FHWA appendix 1 page 52
78 79 80
81
82
appendix 2 page 58
83 84 85 86 87
urban environment urban morphology urban use and users visual axis weather - wet weather condition weather - snow emergency classifications
urban / non-urban appendix 2 page 58 appendix 2 page 58 appendix 2 page 58 quoted as example of possible classifier see link
References
92 148 248 267 304 306 334 335 358.7 379 387 388 446 460 516 800 USA, "Using GIS to determine street, road and highway functional classification accuracy" (2008) South Africa, National roads agency, "Geometric design guidelines" W. Australia, "Guidelines for Determining and Assigning Responsibility for roads in Western Australia / Part 2: classification assessment criteria" (2011) NZTA, State highway classification (consultation draft) (2011) DfT, "Guidance on Road Classification and Primary Route Network" (2012) Lancashire CC "Functional road hierarchy strategy" (2002 but still downloadable from county website) ICSM, "Assessing the feasibility of a national road classification" (2006) NTC, "Performance-based standards scheme, network classification guidelines" (2007) Brindle, Ray "Living with traffic: (7) road hierarchy and functional classification" (1989) re-published Australia, ARRB special report 53, 1995 Poland, Central Statistical Office, "CSO - Statistics, road transport 2005-2009" (2011) Iraq, A. J. Al-Akkam, "Urban characteristics, the classification of commercial streets in Baghdad city" (2011) Europe, Stephen Marshall "Artists: a first theoretical approach to classification of urban streets" (2004) Paolo Ribiero, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minho, "A new perspective on street classification towards sustainability" (WSEAS 2012) Nepal rural road standard 2055 Annex II-2 CCDR-N, "PRINCPIOS BSICOS DE ORGANIZAO DE REDES VIRIAS" (Portugal 2008) Hall, JW et al "NCHRP Guide for pavement friction", TRB, USA 2009
gta-304.01
August 2013
Page 4
GTA documents series Global Transport Atlas is a project with two aims. One is
to encourage people around the world to share examples of how they actually use transport in their daily lives. The other is to compare and improve the design of transport infrastructure. There are the following GTA document series: Series 1 - global transport notes A collection of papers on transport infrastructure and vehicles from various countries, prepared by various authors and contributors. Typical size 2 to 3 pages. Series 3 - discussion papers Papers with arguments and ideas on different aspects of modern transport and transport infrastructure. Series 4 - comparative geometrics Working papers which look at different aspects of highway infrastructure design and compare values from different countries. Series 7 - Dimensions of vehicles Transport infrastructure has to be defined with an idea of the size and types of vehicle which will use it. This series looks into the dimensions of different types of vehicle at different periods of time. Papers include technical discussion notes and example dimensions. Typical size 20 pages and more.
Contact
We welcome comments on this paper, and also on new developments in other countries in this field. Email: global.transport.atlas@gmail.com Web: http://globaltransportatlas.weebly.com/index.html
gta-304.01
August 2013
Page 5