8/29/13

Why is rate-based distillation better than using equilibrium stages with efficiencies?

Requested Technical Tip

Why is rate-based distillation better than using equilibrium stages with efficiencies?
Solution ID: Product(s): Version(s): Primary subject: Last Modified: Training Classes: 128551 Aspen Plus 2006.5, V7.0, V7.1, V7.2, V7.3 Columns, RADFRAC, RateSep 01-Sep-2011 Click here to see the training options for this product

Problem Statement
Why is Aspen Rate Based Distillation (RateSep) better than using equilibrium stages with efficiencies? There seem to be a lot of fudge factors in rate-based distillation also?

Solution
Equilibrium stage efficiencies are a function of all column conditions (flow, temperature, pressure). This means that they generally do not extrapolate well to other conditions. A rate-based distillation model has more basis in reality using mass- and heat transfer correlations based on transfer properties and tray/packing geometry to predict column performance, without the need of efficiency factors and the fudge factors have more physical meaning. Once the column is calibrated to one set of conditions, it does generally extrapolate to other conditions. We have customers who have had success using RateSep and being able to predict new scenarios after tuning the column to an initial set of conditions. This added degree of rigor is especially critical for modeling gas scrubbers, sour water strippers, azeotropic systems, reactive distillations, nitric acid absorption columns, narrow-boiling separations, and other highly non-ideal separation processes. The rate-based modeling approach has many advantages over the equilibrium-stage modeling approach. The rate-based models represent a higher fidelity, more realistic modeling approach and the simulation results are more accurate than those attainable from the equilibriumstage models. The rate-based modeling approach can reduce the risk of inadequate designs or off-spec operation because the rate-based models explicitly account for the actual column configuration which affects column performance. Designed to model reactive multistage separation problems rigorously and accurately, Aspen RateSep balances gas and liquid phase separately and considers mass and heat transfer resistances according to the film theory by explicit calculation of interfacial fluxes and film discretization. The film model equations are combined with relevant diffusion and reaction kinetics and include the specific features of electrolyte solution chemistry, electrolyte thermodynamics, and electroneutrality where appropriate. The hydrodynamics of the column is accounted for via correlations for interfacial area, hold-up, pressure drop, and mass transfer coefficients. Fast reactions for processes such as CO2 removal with MEA do need to use the discretization film model available in the current rate-based distillation model not available previously in the older RateFrac.

RateSep uses a rate-based modeling approach, which is much more rigorous than the equilibrium stage modeling approach employed by the original RadFrac module. The rate-based model assumes that the separation is caused by mass transfer between the contacting phases, and uses the Maxwell-Stefan theory to calculate the mass transfer rates [1]. The equilibrium modeling approach assumes that the contacting phases are in equilibrium with each other, which is inherently flawed because the contacting phases are never in equilibrium in a real column. The rate-based (or nonequilibrium) modeling approach has a lot of advantages over the equilibrium modeling approach, and is becoming more and more popular in both the academia and the industry. The rate-based model is more reliable and accurate than the equilibrium model, and therefore can reduce the risk of inadequate designs or off-spec operation. The rate-based model gives more realistic simulation results than the equilibrium model, because the column configuration is included in the rate-based model and will affect the simulation results as it should. Engineers can use the rate-based model to do more realistic what-if studies and improve the operations of existing columns. The rate-based model can also predicts the behavior of a column more accurately, and can help the process control engineers develop better control strategies. It is generally accepted in the literature that the rate-based model is more accurate than the equilibrium model. In some cases the ratebased model gives accurate results while the equilibrium model gives wrong results. Taylor et al. [2] reviewed the modeling of distillation and concluded that the rate-based simulations "are not only feasible, but in some circumstances they should be regarded as mandatory". For a bubble cap distillation column used to separate water, ethanol and acetone, the composition trajectory predicted by the rate-based model agrees with the experimental data very well, while the equilibrium model gives

support.aspentech.com/webteamcgi/SolutionDisplay_view.cgi?key=128551

1/5

8/29/13

the composition trajectory predicted by the rate-based model agrees with the experimental data very well, while the equilibrium model gives very different results. The rate-based model also accurately predicts that the distillation boundary is crossed, while the equilibrium model wrongly predicts that the distillation boundary can never be crossed. Taylor et al.[2] also used experimental data from Springer et al.[3] for the water-cyclohexane-ethanol system to demonstrate that the rate-based model can predict the composition trajectory accurately, while the equilibrium model cannot. Kucka et al.[4] used the rate-based model to simulate the sour gas absorption by aqueous amine solutions. They compared the simulation results with experimental data from a pilot plant column and an industrial scale column and found that the rate-based model can accurately predict the temperature and composition profiles. Springer et al.[5] used the rate-based model to simulate ternary azeotropic distillation and compare the simulation results with experimental data from a bubble cap distillation column with the water-ethanol-methylacetate system. They found that the rate-based model is in excellent agreement with a series of experiments carried out in different composition regions. In sharp contntrast, an equilibrium (EQ) stage model fails even at the qualitative level to model the experiments. They concluded that "for reliable simulation of distillation of azeotropic systems exhibiting a distillation boundary, we must adopt a rigorous NEQ (or rate-based) stage model."

Why is rate-based distillation better than using equilibrium stages with efficiencies?

Eckert and Vanek [6] studied three-phase distillation columns with the rate-based modeling approach. Extensive experimental work for the ethanol-water-cyclohexane system[7-9] was used to compare the rate-based approach and the equilibrium approach. They found that the rate-based model can predict the composition profiles much better than the equilibrium model, especially in the middle of the column. The rate-based model also predicts the disappearance and reappearance of the second liquid phase very well. Kreul et al.[10] studied the modeling of reactive separation processes in packed columns and found that the concentration profiles calculated by the rate-based and equilibrium models can be very different, and the rate-based model should be preferred for reactive separation processes. Kenig et al.[11] studied reactive absorption using models with different complexities. Both the steady state and dynamic models were used. They found that for a H2S scrubber, the rate-based modeling approach can predict the concentration profiles very well, while the equilibrium model may yield results completely inconsistent with the experimental studies. Sundmacher and Hoffmann[12] used a rate-based model to simulate reactive distillation of the MTBE system in a packed column. The simulation results were validated with experimental data from a laboratory scale column with excellent agreement. Frey and Stichlmair[13] mentioned in their review paper on reactive distillation that rate-based model has been used to accurately predict the performance of commercial reactive distillation processes in Germany and Texas, and that the model has been validated for the design of TAME, ETBE and TAEE units with data from semi-commercial operations. Pinjala et al.[14] used a rate-based model for reactive distillation of the MTBE and TAME processes in columns filled with Koch Katamax packing. The simulation results were compared to some pilot-plant data with good agreement. Most recently, Kloker et al.[15] compared the rate-based model with the equilibrium model for two reactive separation processes, the synthesis of ethyl acetate from ethanol and acetic acid via reactive distillation and the synthesis of octyle hexanoate from octanol and hexanoic acid via reactive stripping. They found that the rate-based model with a fine discretization is able to match the column temperature profile and the bottom concentration better than the equilibrium stage model. The rate-based modeling approach has been used successfully to model many industrial separation processes. It has been adopted by many researchers to model reactive distillation of MTBE[12, 14, 16], TAME[13, 14], ETBE[13], TAEE[13], ethyl acetate[15], propylene glycol[17], ethylene glycol[17], propyl acetate[18], diacetone alcohol[19, 20] etc. It is also used to model other reactive separation processes such as reactive absorption[4, 11, 15, 21] and reactive stripping[15]. The rate-based model has also found successful application in azeotropic distillation[5] and three-phase distillation[6, 22, 23]. The rate-based model is especially preferred over the equilibrium model in the following situations: (1) Packed columns. The rate-based model does not need the HETP (Height Equivalent to a Theoretical Plate) of the packing, while the equilibrium model does. The HETP can vary widely from component to component and from packing to packing, and cannot be estimated accurately in most cases. (2) Absorption and desorption. The absorption and desorption processes are normally operated in conditions far away from phase equilibrium, and are mass transfer and heat transfer limited. The tray efficiency for a absorption/desorption column can be as low as 5% [2]. Therefore, the rate-based model is more appropriate than the equilibrium model. (3) Reactive separation such as reactive distillation and reactive absorption. The rate-based model can model reaction rates much more accurately than the equilibrium model. The efficiencies are not meaningful for reactive separation processes. (4) Strongly nonideal systems. The efficiencies are highly uncertain and can vary widely from tray to tray and component to component. It is very difficult to determine the efficiencies for the equilibrium model. Therefore, the rate-based model should be preferred. (5) Columns with a complicated configuration (pump-around, side streams). It is very difficult to determine the theoretical stage locations for pump-around and side streams, which are necessary for the equilibrium model. The rate-based model does not need any information about theoretical stages, and should be preferred.

support.aspentech.com/webteamcgi/SolutionDisplay_view.cgi?key=128551

2/5

8/29/13

Why is rate-based distillation better than using equilibrium stages with efficiencies?

any information about theoretical stages, and should be preferred. (6) Columns with mixed trays and packing. It is very difficult to determine the number of theoretical stages for each tray/packing section. The rate-based model does not need any information about theoretical stages, and should be preferred. The major drawback of the rate-based model is that it is much more complicated than the equilibrium model. Previously, the rate-based model was considered as impractical due to its complexity. Right now, the rate-based model can be solved readily on any mainstream PC, thanks to the ever-increasing computing power. p; There are some special advantages for RateSep: (1) RateSep is seamlessly embedded in RadFrac. It is very easy to configuration a RateSep simulation for someone who does not know very much about the rate-based model. The complexity of the rate-based model is in the background and not noticeable to the user. (2) RateSep has many built-in correlations for mass transfer and holdup. There are default correlations for each tray/packing type. The user does not need to worry abut the correlation unless he/she wants to choose other correlations. (3) RateSep has detailed examples for user subroutines. The user can easily modify the examples to create his/her own user subroutines for mass transfer, heat transfer and holdup. (4) A continuation method has been implemented in RateSep to improve the convergence for problems that are difficult to converge. The user only needs to choose two continuation parameters to use the continuation method. (5) Several tuning parameters have been defined to help the advanced users to model a column more accurately. The user also has control on how he/she wants to calculate the fluxes, how to average the diffusivities and mass transfer coefficients. (6) It is very easy to switch between the equilibrium mode and the rate-based mode. For a large flowsheet, if the block with RateSep fails to converge, the user can easily switch back to the equilibrium mode and make the flowsheet converge. After that, he/she can switch to the rate-based mode and try to make the whole flowsheet converge. (7) RateSep supports film reactions and film discretization. Therefore, it is capable of solving reactive separation problems accurately. It is necessary to have accurate properties, kinetic and equilibrium constants if needed, and then tune the factors such as the interfacial area factor and the heat transfer factor for the rate-based column. But, because the model has more physical meaning, it can then be used to model new situations more accurately. A number of our customers have used the Rate Based Distillation model successfully. References [1] Taylor, R. and Krishna, R. (1993). Multicomponent mass transfer. New York: Wiley. [2] Taylor, R. , Krishna, R. and Kooijman, H. (2003). Real-World modeling of distillation. Chemical Engineering Progress , 98(7), 28-39. [3] Springer, P.A.M., et al. (2002). Crossing of the distillation boundary in homogeneous azeotropic distillation: influence of interphase mass transfer. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 41, 1621-1631. [4] Kucka, L. et al. (2003). On the modeling and simulation of sour gas absorption by aqueous amine solutions. Chemical Engineering Science, 58, 3571-3578. [5] Springer, P.A.M., van der Molen, S. And Krishna, R. (2002). The need for using rigorous rate-based models for simulations of ternary azeotropic distillation. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 26, 1265-1279. [6] Eckert, E. and Vanek, T. (2001). Some aspects of rate-based modeling and simulation of three-phase distillation columns. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 25, 603-612. [7] Muller, D. et al. (1997). Experimental validation of an equilibrium stage model for three-phase distillation. IChemE Symposium Series , 142, 149-159. [8] Klein, W. (1996). Experimental investigation of the stationary and dynamic behavior of heteroazeotropic distillation. Diploma project. RWTH Aachen (in German). [9] Dux, A. (19996). Verification of an equilibrium model in dynamic simulation of three-phase distillation. Diploma project. RWTH Aachen (in German). [10] Kreul, L.U., Gorak, A. and Barton, P.I. (1999). Modeling of homogeneous reactive separation processes in packed columns. Chemical Engineering Science, 54, 19-34. [11] Kenig, E.Y., Schneider, R. and Gorak, A. (2001). Reactive absorption: optimal process design via optimal modeling. Chemical Engineering Science, 56, 343-350. [12] Sundmacher, K. and Foffmann, U. (1996). Development of a new catalytic distillation process for fuel ethers via a detailed nonequilibrium model. Chemical Engineering Science, 51, 2359-2368. [13] Frey, T. and Stichlmair, J. (1999). Thermodynamic fundamentals of reactive distillation, Chemical and Engineering Technology, 22, 1118. [14] Pinjala, V. et al. (1992) Rate based modeling of reactive distillation operations, AIChE annual meeting, Session 3, Distillation with reaction. [15] Kloker, M. et al. (2004) Rate-based modeling and simulation of reactive separations in gas/vapor-liquid systems. Chemical Engineering and Processing, to be published. [16] Pyhalahti, A. and Jakobsson, K. (2003). Rate-based mixed-pool model for a reactive distillation column. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 42, 6188-6195. [17] Dhale, A.D. et al. (2004) Propylene glycol and ethylene glycol recovery from aqueous solution via reactive distillation. Chemical Engineering Science, 59, 2881-2890. [18] Bart, H.-J. and Landschutzer, H. (1996). Heterogene Reaktivdestillation mit axialer Rckvermischung, Chem. Ing. Tech., 68, 944-946. [19] Huang, C.C. et al. (1998). A study of mass transfer behavior in a catalytic distillation column. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 76, 323-330. [20] Huang, C.C. et al. (1998). Application of catalytic distillation for the aldol condensation of acetone: a rate based model in simulating the catalytic distillation performance under steady state conditions. Chemical Engineering Science, 53, 3489-3499. [21] Bolhar-Nordenkampf, M. et al. (2004). Modeling selective H2S absorption and desorption in an aqueous MDEA-solution using a ratesupport.aspentech.com/webteamcgi/SolutionDisplay_view.cgi?key=128551

based non-equilibrium approach. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 43, 701-715. [22] Repke, J., Villain, O. and Wozny, G. (2004). A nonequilibrium model for three-phase distillation in a packed column: modeling and

3/5

8/29/13

[22] Repke, J., Villain, O. and Wozny, G. (2004). A nonequilibrium model for three-phase distillation in a packed column: modeling and experiments. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 28, 775-780. [23] Higler, A. et al. (2004). Nonequilibrium modeling of three-phase distillation. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 28, 2021-2036.

Why is rate-based distillation better than using equilibrium stages with efficiencies?

We would like to get your feedback:

Click here to rate this solution and provide your com m ents

Upcoming Training for this Product in your Region Start Date

30-Sep2013 03-Oct2013 07-Oct2013 07-Oct2013 09-Oct2013 10-Oct2013 14-Oct2013 15-Oct2013 28-Oct2013 29-Oct2013 06-Nov2013 12-Nov2013 13-Nov2013 18-Nov2013 21-Nov2013 25-Nov2013 25-Nov2013

Course Name
EAP101 Aspen Plus: Process Modeling EAP250 Aspen Plus: Distillation Modeling EAP101 Aspen Plus: Process Modeling EAP201 Aspen Plus: Physical Properties for Process Engineers EAP2510 CO2 Removal Processes Using Aspen Plus EAP250 Aspen Plus: Distillation Modeling EAP201 Aspen Plus: Physical Properties for Process Engineers EAP101 Aspen Plus: Process Modeling EAP2611 Heat Transfer Modeling Using Aspen Plus EAP301 Aspen Plus: Real Time Modeling and Optimization EAP208 Aspen Plus: Migration to V8 EAP2121 Process Flow sheet Convergence in Aspen Plus EAP2510 CO2 Removal Processes Using Aspen Plus EAP101 Aspen Plus: Process Modeling EAP250 Aspen Plus: Distillation Modeling EAP201 Aspen Plus: Physical Properties for Process Engineers EAP201 Aspen Plus: Physical Properties for Process Engineers

End Date
02-Oct2013 04-Oct2013 09-Oct2013 08-Oct2013 11-Oct2013 11-Oct2013 15-Oct2013 17-Oct2013 28-Oct2013 01-Nov2013 06-Nov2013 12-Nov2013 15-Nov2013 20-Nov2013 22-Nov2013 26-Nov2013 26-Nov2013

Location
Singapore Singapore Pune, India Singapore Seoul, Korea Pune, India Pune, India Seoul, Korea Singapore Singapore Singapore Singapore Singapore Perth, Australia Perth, Australia Perth, Australia Seoul, Korea

Price
SGD 2460 SGD 1640 INR 36000 SGD 1640 KRW 1020000 INR 24000 INR 24000 KRW 1020000 SGD 820 SGD 3280 SGD 820 SGD 820 SGD 2460 AUD 2400 AUD 1600 AUD 1600

Registration
Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now Register Now

TimeAddress
Logistics

Language English English English English English English English Korean English English English English English English English English English

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

Logistics

KRW 680000 Register Now

Logistics

How do you rate this solution?

(Not Helpful)

(Very Helpful)

Please add any additional comments regarding how this solution could be improved:

support.aspentech.com/webteamcgi/SolutionDisplay_view.cgi?key=128551

Submit

4/5

8/29/13

Why is rate-based distillation better than using equilibrium stages with efficiencies?

Submit

This document contains proprietary information of Aspen Technology, Inc. and is tendered subject to the condition that no copy or other reproduction be made in whole or in part for use other than customer's internal use. Access to this document is strictly limited to customers of Aspen Technology, Inc. who are registered users of the support web site; no access or further distribution to any third party, including contractors or other agents of customer, is permitted. No use may be made of information herein except for which it is transmitted, without the express prior written consent of Aspen Technology, Inc. Aspen Technology may provide information regarding possible future product developments including new products, product features, product interfaces, integration, design, architecture, etc. that may be represented as "product roadmaps." Any such information is for discussion purposes only and does not constitute a commitment by Aspen Technology to do or deliver anything in these product roadmaps or otherwise. Any such commitment must be explicitly set forth in a written contract between the customer and Aspen Technology, executed by an authorized officer of each company.

support.aspentech.com/webteamcgi/SolutionDisplay_view.cgi?key=128551

5/5