Anda di halaman 1dari 12

Unity (user interface)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unity is a shell interface for the GNOME desktop environment developed by Canonical Ltd. for its Ubuntu operating system. Unity debuted in the netbook edition of Ubuntu 10.10. It was initially designed to make more efficient use of space given the limited screen size of netbooks, including, for example, a vertical application switcher[4] called the launcher.[5] Unlike GNOME, KDE Software Compilation, Xfce, or LXDE, Unity is not a collection of applications but is designed to use existing programs.[6] Unity is part of the Ayatana project, an initiative to improve the user experience within Ubuntu.[7] In addition to Unity, there are Application Indicators and other projects such as MeMenu, the notification system and the application NotifyOSD gathered.


1 User interface 2 Features 3 Variants 3.1 Unity TV 3.2 Unity for touchscreen devices 3.3 Unity 2D 4 Availability 5 Development 6 Reception 6.1 Reviews 6.1.1 2010 6.1.2 2011 6.1.3 2012 6.2 Amazon privacy controversy 7 See also 8 External links 9 References

Unity 7, with the launcher and the dash displayed, running on Ubuntu 13.04. Developer(s) Initial release Stable release Canonical Ltd., The Ayatana Project[1] contributors June 9, 2010[2] 7.0.0[2] / April 3, 2013[2]

Development status Current Written in Unity 2D: C++, QML, JavaScript 2.07.1: C, C++, Vala[3] Python 8: C++ and QML Operating system Ubuntu Ubuntu TV Ubuntu Touch Shell GPL v3, LGPL v3 ( (

Type License Website

User interface
The Unity user interface consists of several components:[8]

Launcher a dock that also serves as a window switcher. Multiple instances of an application are grouped under the same dock icon, with a number of indicators to the side of the icon showing how many

instances are open.[9] Quicklist the accessible menu of launcher items. Dash an overlay that allows the user to search quickly for information both locally (installed applications, recent files, bookmarks, etc.) and remotely (Twitter, Google Docs, etc.) and displays previews of results.[10] The Dash search feature was the subject of the Amazon privacy controversy. Head-up display (HUD) introduced with Ubuntu 12.04. It allows hotkey searching for top menu bar items from the keyboard, without the need for using the mouse, by pressing and releasing the Alt key.[11] Top menu bar a menu bar where the menus of the active applications and notification indicators are displayed.[8] Indicators a notification area (similar to an OS X menu extra), containing displays for the clock, network and battery status, sound volume etc.

Dash The Unity Dash is desktop search utility in Unity. Unity Preview a function that preview an item in the search results. Lens a channel to throw the search query to the scope and showing the search result. Scope a search engine of the dash. The search query is thrown by the lens. The following lenses and scopes are installed by default. Home lens Application lens a lens to find applications to launching or installing. The search source of installable applications is Ubuntu Software Center. File lens a lens for that showing files from local (via Zeitgeist) and remote (using Unity's online account function). Google Docs scope which searches files from Google Drive. Music lens a lens to search the user's music library. Music Stores scope a scope to search from online music stores, such as Ubuntu One Music Store. Video lens a lens to search videos from the user's video library and online video services such as YouTube. Social lens a lens to find the user's SNS activities such as Twitter, Facebook and Google+ (via Unity online account function). Shopping lens a lens for online shopping. Which showing Amazon search result to the dash home lens. However, this lens taken a search query from all lenses. See Amazon privacy controversy.

Unity TV
Ubuntu TV, running a Unity variant, was introduced at the 2012 Consumer Electronics Show.[12] Created for SmartTVs, Ubuntu TV provides access to popular Internet services and stream content to mobile devices running Android, iOS and Ubuntu.[13]

Unity for touchscreen devices

Main article: Ubuntu Touch

On January 2, 2013 Canonical announced a smartphone variant of Unity.[14]

Unity 2D
Canonical maintained two discrete versions of Unity, which are visually almost indistinguishable but technically different. Unity is written as a plugin for Compiz[15] and is written in the programming languages C++ and Vala, and uses an uncommon OpenGL toolkit called Nux. Being a plugin for Compiz gives Unity GPU-accelerated performance on compatible systems. Unity 2D is a set of individual applications[16] developed for environments that Compiz does not run on, such as when graphics card does not support OpenGL. They are written in the GUI building language QML from the widespread Qt framework.[17] By default Unity 2D uses the Metacity window manager[16] but can also use accelerated window managers like Compiz or KWin. In Ubuntu 11.10, Unity 2D uses Metacity's XRender-based compositor to achieve transparency effects.[citation needed ] Starting with Ubuntu 11.10, Unity 2D replaced the classic GNOME Panel as the fall-back for users whose hardware cannot run the Compiz version of Unity.[18]
Ubuntu TV

Unity 2D showing the ability to run alongside different window managers and desktop environments

Unity 2D was discontinued for the release of Ubuntu 12.10 in October 2012, as the 3D version became more capable of running on lower-powered hardware.[19]

As Unity and the supporting Ayatana projects[20] are developed primarily for Ubuntu, Ubuntu is the first to offer new versions. Outside of Ubuntu, other Linux distributors have tried to pick up Ayatana, with varying success. The Ayatana components require modification of other applications, which increases the complexity for adoption by others. Arch Linux offers many Ayatana components, including Unity and Unity 2D, via an unofficial repository or through the AUR[21] Fedora does not offer Unity in its default repositories because Unity requires unsupported patches to GTK.[22] However Unity has been ported to Fedora 17 and can be installed through a branch in the openSUSE repositories where the patches are applied.[23][24] Frugalware had adopted Ayatana, including Unity and Unity 2D, as part of the development branch for an upcoming Frugalware release but the project is no longer maintained.[25] openSUSE offers many Ayatana components for GNOME.[26] After the packager abandoned the project because of problems with the then-current version of Compiz,[27] new developers picked up the task and provide packages for openSUSE 12.2 (along with versions for Arch Linux and Fedora 17).[24] Leeenux Linux has editions with Unity 2D, in v5 and v6.[28]

Ubuntu originally used the full GNOME desktop environment; Ubuntu founder Mark Shuttleworth cited philosophical differences with the GNOME team over the user experience to explain why Ubuntu would use Unity as the default user interface instead of GNOME Shell, beginning April 2011, with Ubuntu 11.04 (Natty Narwhal).[29] In November 2010, Ubuntu Community Manager Jono Bacon explained that Ubuntu will continue to ship the GNOME stack, GNOME applications, and optimize Ubuntu for GNOME. The only difference, he wrote, would be that Unity is a different shell for GNOME.[30] Canonical announced it had engineered Unity for desktop computers as well and would make Unity the default shell for Ubuntu in version 11.04.[31] GNOME Shell was not included in Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal because work on it was not completed at the time 11.04 was frozen, but is available from a PPA,[32] and is available in Ubuntu 11.10 and later releases, through the official repositories.[33] In November 2010, Mark Shuttleworth announced the intention to eventually run Unity on Wayland instead of the currently used X window system,[34] although this plan has since been dropped, replacing Wayland with Mir for UnityNext .[35] In December 2010, some users requested that the Unity launcher (or dock) be movable from the left to other sides of the screen, but Mark Shuttleworth stated in reply, I'm afraid that won't work with our broader design goals, so we won't implement that. We want the launcher always close to the Ubuntu button.[36] However, with Ubuntu 11.10, the Ubuntu button has been moved into the launcher, rendering this argument invalid. A thirdparty plugin that moves Unity 3D's launcher to the bottom is available.[37] As of 2010 the Unity shell interface developers use a toolkit called Nux instead of Clutter.[38] Unity is a plugin of the Compiz window manager,[15] which Canonical states is faster than Mutter,[39] the window manager for which GNOME Shell is a plugin. On 14 January 2011 Canonical also released a technical preview of a 2D version of Unity based on Qt and written in QML.[17] Unity-2D was not shipped on the Ubuntu 11.04 CD, instead the classic GNOME desktop was the fall-back for hardware that could not run Unity.[40][41] In March 2011 public indications emerged of friction between Canonical (and its development of Unity) and the GNOME developers. As part of Unity development Ubuntu developers had submitted API coding for inclusion in Gnome as an external dependency. According to Dave Neary, ... an external dependency is a non-GNOME module which is a dependency of a package contained in one of the GNOME module sets, and the reasons why libappindicator was not accepted as an external dependency are that ... it does not fit that definition, it has ... duplicate functionality with libnotify, (the current Gnome Shell default) and its CLA does not meet current GNOME policy.[42] Mark Shuttleworth responded,

This is a critical juncture for the leadership of Gnome. I'll state plainly that I feel the long tail of good-hearted contributors to Gnome and Gnome applications are being let down by a decision-making process that has let competitive dynamics diminish the scope of Gnome itself. Ideas that are not generated 'at the core' have to fight incredibly and unnecessarily hard to get oxygen... getting room for ideas to be explored should not feel like a frontal assault on a machine gun post. This is no way to lead a project. This is a recipe for a project that loses great

people to environments that are more open to different ways of seeing the world ... Embracing those other ideas and allowing them to compete happily and healthily is the only way to keep the innovation they bring inside your brand. Otherwise, you're doomed to watching them innovate and then having to relayout your own efforts to keep up, badmouthing them in the process. We started this with a strong, clear statement: Unity is a shell for Gnome. Now Gnome leadership have to decide if they want the fruit of that competition to be an asset to Gnome, or not.[43][44][45]

In April 2011 Mark Shuttleworth announced that Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot would not include the classic GNOME desktop as a fall-back to Unity, unlike Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal. Instead Ubuntu 11.10 used the Qt-based Unity 2D for users whose hardware cannot support the 3D version.[18][46] However, the classic GNOME desktop (GNOME Panel) can be installed separately in Ubuntu 11.10 and 12.04 through gnomepanel, a package in the Ubuntu repositories.[47] At the November 2011 Ubuntu Developer Summit it was announced that Unity for Ubuntu 12.04 would include non-re-enabling the systray, better application integration, and the ability to drag lenses onto the launcher and that the 2D version of Unity would use the same decoration buttons as the 3D version.[48] During the planning conference for Ubuntu 12.10 it was announced that Unity 2D will likely be dropped in favour of making Unity 3D run better on lower end hardware.[19]

In July 2012 at OSCON, Shuttleworth explained some of the historical reasoning behind Unity's development. The initial decision to develop a new interface in 2008 was driven by a desire to innovate and to pass Microsoft and Apple in user experience. This meant a family of unified interfaces that could be used across many device form factors, including desktop, laptop, tablet, smart phones and TV. Shuttleworth said "The old desktop would force your tablet or your phone into all kinds of crazy of funny postures. So we said: Screw it. Were going to move the desktop to where it needs to be for the future. [This] turned out to be a deeply unpopular process.[49] Initial testing of Unity during development was done in a laboratory setting and showed the success of the interface, despite public opposition. Real world shipping return rates also indicated acceptance. Shuttleworth explained, ASUS ran an experiment where they shipped half a million [Unity netbooks and laptops] to Germany. Not an easy market. And the return rates on Ubuntu were exactly the same as the return rates on Windows. Which is the key indicator for OEMs who are looking to do this.[49] Microsoft's development of Windows 8 and its Metro interface became an additional incentive for Unity development, as Shuttleworth explained, we [had to move] our desktop because if we didnt wed end up where Windows 8 is. [In Windows 8] you have this shiny tablet interface, and you sit and you use then you press the wrong button then it slaps you in the face and Windows 7 is back. And then you think OK, this is familiar, so youre kind of getting into it and whack [Windows 8 is back].[49] In March 2013, the plan to use the Mir display server was announced for future development of Unity, in place of the previously announced Wayland/Weston.[35]

Keyboard shortcuts of Unity in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS


Unity has received mixed reviews. Its design and deployment has been controversial with some software reviewers finding fault with its implementation and limitations, while other reviewers have found Unity an improvement over GNOME 2 with the potential to improve over time.[50][51][52][53][54] With the release of Ubuntu 12.04 on 26 April 2012 reviewers seemed more positive about Unity as the interface matured. 2010 In reviewing an alpha version of Unity shortly after it was unveiled in the summer of 2010, Ryan Paul of Ars Technica noted problems figuring out how to launch additional applications that are not on the dock bar. He also mentioned a number of bugs, including the inability to track which applications are open and other window management difficulties. He remarked that many of these were probably due to the early stage in the development process and expected them to be resolved with time. Paul concluded positively, Our test of the Unity prototype leads us to believe that the project has considerable potential and could bring a lot of value to the Ubuntu Netbook Edition. Its unique visual style melds beautifully with Ubuntu's new default theme and its underlying interaction model seems compelling and well-suited for small screens.[50][51] In an extensive review of Ubuntu 10.10 shortly after its release in October 2010, Ryan Paul of Ars Technica made further observations on Unity, noting that "Unity is highly ambitious and offers a substantially different computing experience than the conventional Ubuntu desktop. He concluded that "The [application] selectors are visually appealing, but they are easily the weakest part of the Unity user experience. The poor performance significantly detracts from their value in day-to-day use and the lack of actual file management functionality largely renders the file selector useless. The underlying concepts behind their design are good, however, and they have the potential to be much more valuable in the future as unity matures.[52][53] 2011 In March 2011 writer Benjamin Humphrey of OMG Ubuntu criticized the development version of Unity then being tested for Ubuntu 11.04 on a number of grounds, including a development process that is divorced from user experiences, the lack of response to user feedback, ... the seemingly unbelievable lack of communication the design team has, and a user interface he described as ... cluttered and inconsistent. Overall, however, he concluded that ... Unity is not all bad ... While a number of the concepts in Unity may be flawed from a design point of view, the actual idea itself is not, and Canonical deserve applause for trying to jump start the stagnant open source desktop with Unity when the alternatives do not evoke confidence.[51] On 14 April 2011 Ryan Paul of Ars Technica reviewed Unity as implemented in Ubuntu 11.04 beta, just two weeks before its stable release. At that time he reported that Unity was on track for inclusion in Natty Narwhal, despite the ambitious development schedule. He indicated, ... close attention to detail shines through in many aspects of Unity. The menubar is clean and highly functional. The sidebar dock is visually appealing and has excellent default behaviors for automatic hiding. He did note that the interface still has some weak points, especially difficulties browsing for applications not on the dock, as well as switching between application categories. He singled out ... random packages from the repositories, which are presented as applications that are available for installation in the launcher, are distracting and largely superfluous. Paul concluded, There is still a lot of room for improvement, but Unity is arguably a strong improvement over the conventional GNOME 2.x environment for day-to-day use. The breadth of the changes may be disorienting for some users, but most will like what they see when Unity lands on their desktop at the end of the month.[53] Two weeks later he added the lack of configurability to his criticisms.[55] In a very detailed assessment of Ubuntu 11.04 and Unity published on 12 May 2011, Ryan Paul further concluded Unity was a positive development for Ubuntu, but that more development must be invested to make it work right. He wrote, They have done some incredibly impressive work so far and have delivered a desktop that is suitable for day-to-day use, but it is still very far from fulfilling its full potential.[56]

On 25 April 2011, the eve of the release of Ubuntu 11.04, reviewer Matt Hartley of IT Management criticized Unity, saying that the "dumbing down of the Linux desktop environment is bordering on insane.[57] Reviewer Joey Sneddon of OMG Ubuntu was more positive about Unity in his review of Ubuntu 11.04, encouraging users, Sure it's different but different doesn't mean bad; the best thing to do is to give it a chance. He concluded that Unity on the desktop makes "better use of screen space, intuitive interface layouts and, most importantly, making a desktop that works for the user and not in spite of them.[58] Following the release of Ubuntu 11.04 Canonical Ltd. founder Mark Shuttleworth indicated that while he was generally happy with the implementation of Unity, he felt that there was room for improvement. Shuttleworth said, I recognise there are issues, and I would not be satisfied unless we fixed many of them in 11.10 ... Unity was the best option for the average user upgrading or installing. There are LOTS of people for whom it isn't the best, but we had to choose a default position ... It's by no means perfect, and it would be egotistical to suggest otherwise... I think the bulk of it has worked out fantastically both at an engineering level (Compiz, Nux) and in the user experience.[59] In reviewing Unity in Ubuntu 11.04 on 9 May 2011, Jesse Smith of Distrowatch criticized its lack of customization, menu handling and Unity hardware requirements, saying, There's really nothing here which should demand 3D acceleration. He also noted that The layout doesn't translate well to large screens or multiple-screen systems.[60] Jack M. Germain of Linux Insider reviewed Unity on 11 May 2011, indicating strong dislike for it, saying, Put me in the Hate It category and indicating that as development has proceeded he likes it less and less.[61] More criticism appeared after the release of Ubuntu 11.10. In November 2011 Robert Storey writing in DistroWatch noted that developer work on Unity is now taking up so much time that little is getting done on outstanding Ubuntu bugs, resulting in a distribution that is not as stable or as fast as it should be. Storey concluded "Perhaps it would be worth putting up with the bugs if Unity was the greatest thing since sliced bread something wonderful that is going to revolutionize desktop computing. But it's not. I tried Unity, and it's kind of cute, but nothing to write home about.[62] In November 2011 OMG! Ubuntu! conducted a non-scientific poll that asked its readers "which Desktop Environment Are You Using in Ubuntu 11.10?". Of the 15,988 votes cast 46.78% indicated that they were using Unity over GNOME Shell (28.42%), Xfce (7.58%), KDE (6.92%) and LXDE (2.7%).[63] Developers of Linux distributions based upon Ubuntu have also weighed in on the introduction of Unity in early 2011, when Unity was in its infancy. Some have been critical, including two distributions who base their criticism on usability testing. Marco Ghirlanda, the lead developer of the audio- and video-centric ArtistX, stated, When I tried Unity on computer illiterates, they were less productive and took ages to understand the concepts behind it. When I show them how to use it, they said that it is pretty to see but hard to use. Stephen Ewen, the lead developer for UberStudent, an Ubuntu-based Linux distribution for higher education and college-bound high school students, stated, Unity's design decreases both visual and functional accessibility, which tabulates to decreased productivity. Ewen also criticized Unity's menu scheme as much less accessible than on GNOME 2, which he said, means that the brain cannot map as quickly to program categories and subcategories, which again means further decreased productivity.[64] 2012 With the release of Ubuntu 12.04 on 26 April 2012 reviewers seemed more positive about Unity as the interface matured. Writing about Ubuntu 12.04 after its release, Jesse Smith of DistroWatch said Over the past two years many people, myself included, have questioned Ubuntu's direction. The developers have tackled a number of projects, some of which seemed misguided at the time, Unity being chief amongst them. However,

with the release of 12.04 LTS I feel that the various puzzle pieces, which may have been underwhelming individually, have come together to form a whole, clear picture. However he also concluded While I think Unity has grown to maturity, I found that its lack of flexibility bothered me.[65] In June 2012 TechRepublic writer Jack Wallen, who had been very critical of early versions of Unity said Ive noticed something lately. Since Ubuntu 12.04 was released, and I migrated over from Linux Mint, Im working much more efficiently. This isnt really so much a surprise to me, but to many of the detractors who assume Unity a very unproductive desktop... well, I can officially say they are wrong... I realize that many people out there have spurned Unity (I was one of them for a long time), but the more I use it, the more I realize that Canonical really did their homework on how to help end users more efficiently interact with their computers. Change is hard period. For many, the idea of change is such a painful notion they wind up missing out on some incredible advancements. Unity is one such advancement.[66] Ryan Paul of Ars Technica was more negative in his review of Ubuntu 12.04. While he praised Unity's maturity in this release he also wrote: Although Unity's quality has grown to the point where it fulfills our expectations, the user experience still falls short in a number of ways. We identified several key weaknesses in our last two Ubuntu reviews, some of which still haven't been addressed yet. These issues still detract from Unity's predictability and ease of use.[67]

Amazon privacy controversy

Ubuntu 12.10 brought numerous aesthetic changes to Unity, adding animations and a new previews feature. Much criticism, however, was directed towards the new shopping lens feature, which integrates Amazon search into the dash's home lens.[68] As the previous home lens is used primarily to search for programs and files and musics on a user's machine, not online, users were concerned about Unity sending search queries to Amazon which were intended only for local content, citing an invasion of privacy. The constant returning of unwanted (and often unrelated) product suggestions that translates into monetary gain for Canonical was compared to be a form of built-in advertising. Mark Shuttleworth defended the feature, posting that "the Home Lens of the Dash should let you find *anything* anywhere"[69] and noting that there was an option to disable the Dash's online features in Ubuntu's settings app. He also stated that Canonical would anonymize all data before sending it to Amazon, though Canonical themselves would be able to determine its true origin. This was insufficient to alleviate the worries of many users, who complained that having the feature activated by default (as opposed to an opt-in mechanism) could result in many being unaware of the implications of searching in the dash.[70] Shuttleworth also announced that Canonical would gain affiliate revenue from Amazon for any purchases made based on Unity search suggestions; many users considered this evidence that Canonical were simply using the feature as a way to make money without consideration for the privacy of users.[71] Canonical was required by EU Law to introduce a legal notice into the dash, informing users of the sharing of their data. This was added before the final release of Ubuntu 12.10.[72] None of Ubuntu's official derivatives (Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Lubuntu, etc.) include the feature or any variation of it. In reviewing Ubuntu 12.10 at the end of October 2012 for DistroWatch, Jesse Smith raised concerns about the Amazon shopping lens, saying, it has raised a number of privacy concerns in the community and, looking over Ubuntu's legal notice about privacy does not provide any reassurance. The notice informs us Canonical reserves the right to share our keystrokes, search terms and IP address with a number of third parties, including Facebook, Twitter, Amazon and the BBC. This feature is enabled by default, but can be turned off through the distribution's settings panel.[73]

In early November 2012 the Electronic Frontier Foundation made a statement on the shopping lens issue, Technically, when you search for something in Dash, your computer makes a secure HTTPS connection to, sending along your search query and your IP address. If it returns Amazon products to display, your computer then insecurely loads the product images from Amazon's server over HTTP. This means that a passive eavesdropper, such as someone sharing a wireless network with you, will be able to get a good idea of what you're searching for on your own computer based on Amazon product images. It's a major privacy problem if you can't find things on your own computer without broadcasting what you're looking for to the world.[74]

See also
Comparison of X Window System desktop environments Comparison of X window managers Controversy over GNOME 3

External links
Official website ( Official Wiki ( Official Unity hardware requirements (

1. ^ "The Ayatana Project in Launchpad" ( Retrieved 2013-06-20. 2. ^ a b c Canonical Ltd. (December 2010). "Publishing history of "unity" package in Ubuntu" ( Retrieved 9 December 2010. 3. ^ Jagdish Patel, Neil (November 2010). "~unity-team/unity/trunk: 573" ( Retrieved 13 December 2010. 4. ^ Proffitt, Brian (2010-05-10). "Ubuntu Unity Interface Tailored for Netbook Screens" ( tk=mod_rel). ITWorld. Retrieved 28 October 2010. 5. ^ "Welcome to Ubuntu 11.04" ( Ubuntu Official Documentation. Ubuntu documentation team. Retrieved 2011-06-13. 6. ^ Jackson, Joab (2010-10-25). "Software / Services Oct 25, 2010 1:20 pm Canonical Ubuntu Splits From GNOME Over Design Issues" ( sues.html). PC World Business Center. Retrieved 28 October 2010. 7. ^ "Ayatana Ubuntu Wiki" ( Retrieved 2012-10-11. 8. ^ a b "Terminology for Unity UI elements as of Ubuntu 11.04" ( this is the official terminology, linked form 9. ^ "Unity's launcher groups windows belonging to one application in the same icon." ( Ask Ubuntu. 10. ^ "Unity lenses and scopes" ( 11. ^ "Unity/HUD" ( Ubuntu Wiki. Ubuntu. 12. ^ "Ubuntu TV readies for battle with Google and Apple" ( Retrieved 11 February 2012. 13. ^ "Features and Specs" ( Canonical Ltd. Retrieved 21 August 2012. 14. ^ Vlad Savov (2012-11-16). "Ubuntu phone OS announced, first devices shipping in early 2014"

14. ^ Vlad Savov (2012-11-16). "Ubuntu phone OS announced, first devices shipping in early 2014" ( The Verge. Retrieved 201301-02. 15. ^ a b fluteflute (2010-11-13). "Is unity just a plugin of compiz" ( "The version of Unity that will be released in 11.04 is definitely implemented as plugin(s) in Compiz." 16. ^ a b File:Unity-2D Natty.png 17. ^ a b "Canonical building Unity 2D on QML and Qt | Qt DevNet forums | Qt Developer Network" ( 18. ^ a b Sneddon, Joey (May 2011). "Unity 2D lands in Oneiric daily build" ( OMG Ubuntu!. Retrieved 27 May 2011. 19. ^ a b "UDS-Q Summary: Bye-Bye Unity 2D, Hello GNOME-Shell Spin" ( 2012-05-12. Retrieved 2012-07-07. 20. ^ "The Ayatana Project" ( Canonical Ltd. 2011. Retrieved 2011-10-31. "The Ayatana Project is the collective project that houses user interface, design and interaction projects started by Canonical." 21. ^ "Ayatana" ( Arch Linux Wiki. 22. ^ "Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)" ( 2012-01-26. Retrieved 2012-09-22. 23. ^ "Unity Desktop Available for Fedora" ( OMG! Ubuntu!. 24. ^ a b "Ayatana Project for openSUSE" ( Archived ( from the original on 21 September 2012. 25. ^ "Ayatana Project Portage" ( Frugalware Linux Wiki. 26. ^ "GNOME Ayatana" ( openSUSE Wiki. 27. ^ Nelson Marques. "GNOME Ayatana" ( openSUSE. 28. ^ "Leeenux version information" ( 29. ^ "Canonical Ubuntu Splits From GNOME Over Design Issues" ( sues.html). 30. ^ Jono Bacon (2010-10-25). "Ubuntu 11.04 to ship unity" ( 31. ^ Noyes, Katherine (2010-10-26). "Is Unity the Right Interface for Desktop Ubuntu?" ( PC World. Retrieved 28 October 2010. 32. ^ "Ubuntu GNOME 3 Team" ( Retrieved 2011-03-02. 33. ^ Andrew (13 October 2011). "Things To Tweak After Installing Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot Web Upd8: Ubuntu / Linux blog" ( Retrieved 13 October 2011. 34. ^ Mark Shuttleworth (2010-11-04). "Unity on Wayland" ( "The next major transition for Unity will be to deliver it on Wayland ..." 35. ^ a b "MirSpec" ( Retrieved 2013-03-06. (2013) 36. ^ Mark Shuttleworth (2010-10-30). "Movement of Unity launcher" ( 37. ^ Andrew (29 November 2011). "Install Ubuntu Unity Bottom Launcher Via PPA Web Upd8: Ubuntu / Linux blog" ( Retrieved 13 October 2011. 38. ^ Jay Taoko (2010-12-08). "Nux and Unity" ( 39. ^ "Unity To Use Compiz instead of Mutter [Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal News] ~ Web Upd8: Ubuntu / Linux blog" ( 40. ^ "Canonical Says Unity 2D Not Part Of The Ubuntu 11.04 Plan" (

natty/). 41. ^ "Comment 8 for bug 730588" ( 42. ^ Waugh, Jeff (March 2011). "Timeline: The Greatest Show on Earth Dave Neary comment" ( Retrieved 1 April 2011. 43. ^ Graner, Amber (March 2011). "Has GNOME Rejected Canonical help? Shuttleworth Responds" ( Ubuntu User. Retrieved 19 March 2011. 44. ^ Shuttlewort h, Mark (March 2011). "Internal competition is healthy, but depends on strong and mature leadership" ( Retrieved 19 March 2011. 45. ^ Shuttleworth, Mark (March 2011). "All the other guys are not wrong" ( Retrieved 19 March 2011. 46. ^ Sneddon, Joey (April 2011). "Ubuntu 11.10 will not ship with 'classic' GNOME desktop" ( OMG Ubuntu!. Retrieved 6 April 2011. 47. ^ Andrew (2011-08-24). "Installing / Using Classic GNOME Desktop In Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot ~ Web Upd8: Ubuntu / Linux blog" ( Retrieved 2012-04-22. 48. ^ "Expected Changes In Ubuntu 12.04 Precise Pangolin" ( Web Upd8. 15 November 2011. Retrieved 8 November 2011. 49. ^ a b c Sneddon, Joey (20 July 2012). "Mark Shuttleworth: We Didnt Want Ubuntu To End up Like Windows 8" ( OMG Ubuntu. Retrieved 21 July 2012. 50. ^ a b Paul, Ryan (July 2010). "Hands-on with Ubuntu's new Unity netbook shell" ( Ars Technica. Retrieved 1 April 2011. 51. ^ a b c Humphrey, Benjamin (March 2011). "What's wrong with Unity & how we can fix it" ( OMG Ubuntu. Retrieved 14 March 2011. 52. ^ a b Paul, Ryan (November 2010). "Blessed Unity: Ars reviews Ubuntu 10.10" ( Ars Technica. Retrieved 1 April 2011. 53. ^ a b c Paul, Ryan (April 2011). "Unity environment in good shape, on track for Ubuntu 11.04" ( Ars Technica. Retrieved 19 April 2011. 54. ^ Lynch, Jim (May 2011). "Ubuntu 11.04" ( Desktop Linux Reviews. Retrieved 2 May 2011. 55. ^ Paul, Ryan (April 2011). "Ubuntu 11.04 released, a Natty Narwhal rises from the depths" ( Ars Technica. Retrieved 30 April 2011. 56. ^ Paul, Ryan (May 2011). "Riding the Narwhal: Ars reviews Unity in Ubuntu 11.04" ( Ars Technica. Retrieved 12 May 2011. 57. ^ Hartley, Matt (April 2011). "Why Is Ubuntu's Unity Squeezing out GNOME 3?" ( IT Management. Retrieved 29 April 2011. 58. ^ Sneddon, Joey (May 2011). "Ubuntu 11.04 released, reviewed" ( OMG Ubuntu. Retrieved 3 May 2011. 59. ^ Sneddon, Joey (May 2011). "Mark Shuttleworth talks Windicators, changes for Unity in Oneiric, and whole lot more..." ( OMG Ubuntu. Retrieved 5 May 2011. 60. ^ Smith, Jesse (May 2011). "A look at Ubuntu 11.04" ( issue=20110509#feature). Distrowatch. Retrieved 10 May 2011. 61. ^ Germain, Jack M. (May 2011). "Natty Narwhal Offers Unity but No Clarity" ( Linux News. Retrieved 12 May 2011. 62. ^ Storey, Robert (7 November 2011). "Disunity" ( issue=20111107#opinion). DistroWatch. Retrieved 8 November 2011.

issue=20111107#opinion). DistroWatch. Retrieved 8 November 2011. 63. ^ Sneddon, Joey (20 November 2011). "Poll Result: 15,900 votes Cast; Unity Named Most Popular Desktop" ( OMG! Ubuntu!. Retrieved 18 December 2011. 64. ^ Byfield, Bruce. "Other Linux Distros' View of Ubuntu's Unity: It Ain't Pretty. Datamation, 17 May 2011. Available at 65. ^ Smith, Jesse (7 May 2012). "Review of Ubuntu 12.04" ( issue=20120507#feature). DistroWatch. Retrieved 9 May 2012. 66. ^ Wallen, Jack (25 June 2012). "Ubuntu Unity: Making the desktop seriously efficient again" ( TechRepublic. Retrieved 26 June 2012. 67. ^ Paul, Ryan (28 May 2012). "Precision and purpose: Ubuntu 12.04 and the Unity HUD reviewed" ( Ars Technica. Retrieved 12 August 2012. 68. ^ Lee, Micah (October 29, 2012). "Privacy in Ubuntu 12.10: Amazon Ads and Data Leaks" ( Electronic Frontier Foundation. 69. ^ "Amazon search results in the Dash" ( Mark Shuttleworth's blog. September 23, 2012. 70. ^ Raghavendra S. (November 5, 2012). "Ubuntu drifts away from the FOSS community" ( 71. ^ Gilbertson, Scott (18 October 2012). "Ay caramba, Ubuntu 12.10: Get it right on Amazon!" ( The Register. 72. ^ Joey-Elijah Sneddon, "Ubuntu Add Legal Disclaimer to Unity Dash" (, OMG! UBUNTU!, date=12 October 2012 73. ^ Smith, Jesse (29 October 2012). "Ubuntu 12.10 Desktop" ( issue=20121029#feature). DistroWatch. Retrieved 3 November 2012. 74. ^ DistroWatch staff (5 November 2012). "DistroWatch Weekly, Issue 481, 5 November 2012" ( DistroWatch. Retrieved 6 November 2012.

Retrieved from "" Categories: Canonical Ltd. Free desktop environments Graphical user interfaces Touch user interfaces Ubuntu (operating system) This page was last modified on 30 August 2013 at 15:00. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.