Washington, DC
December 30, 2003
This document is confidential and is intended solely for the use and
information of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
I Table of Contents
> Introduction
> Organization Options
> Organization Details
> Process Details and Performance Measures
> Technology Requirements
> Staffing and Training Requirements
> Facilities Requirements
> Financial Requirements
> Current Initiatives and Next Steps
"Develop guidance for INS...to use in deciding which benefit Develop joint CIS/ICE benefit fraud strategy and case
application fraud cases to pursue" referral criteria
"Use [a system], to track and manage benefit fraud Develop and engage a case tracking system to track all
investigations..." fraud cases from referral to completion
Source: Immigration Benefit Fraud. Focused Approach is Needed to Address Problems". General Accounting Office. January 2002. GAO-02-66
FDNS Mission
Enhance the integrity of the legal immigration system by:
- Identifying aliens who pose a threat to national security and/or public safety
- Combating immigration benefit fraud
- Identifying and removing systemic vulnerabilities of statutes, policies, procedures, forms,
other documents, and guidelines that compromise the integrity of the legal immigration
system
FDNS Objectives
> Serve as CIS' lead and primary conduit on fraud detection and law enforcement (background)
check-related efforts
> Ensure benefits are not granted to individuals who pose a threat to national security and/or
public safety
> Ensure benefits are not granted as a result of fraud-based applications or petitions
> Provide a new capability for proactive fraud detection and enhance current reactive operation
> Some individuals seeking benefits pose a threat to national security and public safety
> Lack of commitment to combating fraud demoralizes staff and negatively impacts productivity
> Law enforcement community support remains inadequate, particularly as it relates to information sharing and providing
documents to informants and other cooperatives
> No centralized group is responsible for identifying and correcting weaknesses and other vulnerabilities in policies, procedures,
and other activities
Fraud Detection 1 CIS Fraud Detection and National Security 1 Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Checks 1 >^\t
' • Cases needing enforcement / 1 \ for serious
Referred
actions are sent to ICE / \ background
IBIS Hits
J \ check hits
b;
SACs II SACs I
.^_ CAr |_J \ Performs field
CIS bAOs | \s
Adjudications IBIS Hits FDNS Background
w — " and
(Districts and Check Branch SACs SACs enforcement
Service Centers) beare
\ IBIS Tier 2 handed in atocentralized
proposed for fraud cases
IBIS Name Submission location
(Tier 1) performed in each • Majority of the staff are (Special Agents In-Charge)
office contractors
> Processes associated with identifying fraud, criminal aliens, and aliens of national interest are enhanced
> Productivity, quality, and efficiency are improved through a combination of centralization, standardization, and prioritization
> Quality of background checks is enhanced as national security/public safety-related hits are resolved by specialized staff
> Backlog reduction effort is supported by enabling adjudicators to concentrate on adjudication, instead of performing IBIS
resolution and verifying fraud
* ICE is able to use their limited resources more effectively and efficiently
> Fraud-based applications are denied and violators are placed in removal proceedings
Director
Fraud Branch Operation* Branch Background Check (BC) Branch Support Services Branch
Planning and Development Untt Law Enforcement Liaison Untt Planning and Development Untt Technology Support Untt
D Denotes HQ Positions
'Not in FDNS chain of command, but follows FDNS established guidelines D Denotes Field Positions
Branch Mission:
Enhance the integrity of the legal immigration system by developing policies and procedures to detect, pursue, and deter benefit fraud.
Branch Functions
Fraud Branch
• Develop fraud detection policies and procedures
Proactive Fraud Detection Section V Perform proactive fraud detection and document significant
findings in reports
Denotes HQ Positions
I Denotes Field Positions
Provide direction and oversight to FDNS field staff. Implement and perform activities to detect, pursue, and deter benefit fraud,
and resolve national security and public safety related background check hits.
Operations Branch
Branch Functions
Aides/Assistants
Lead-Generated Fraud Section > Review applications/petitions for fraud and identify fraud
trends
> Write intelligence reports and assist the Fraud Branch
FfeW Office Anti-Fraud Units
with proactive analysis
Denotes HQ Positions > Support ICE in prosecuting cases
I Denotes Field Positions
Conduct law enforcement checks to identify derogatory information on persons seeking benefits who may pose a threat to national
security or public safety.
Branch Functions
Background Check (BC) Branch
Planning and Development Unit Provide system requirements for the Background Check
System
Contractors
Denotes HQ Positions
I Denotes Field Positions
Provide the coordination, communication, and operational support needed to facilitate the achievement of the FDNS mission.
Branch Functions
Support Services Branch
**-
Administration Unit > Perform human and capital resource related functions for
FDNS including budget development and facilities/inventory
management
Training Section
> Recruit and train staff
Contract Support Section > Oversee contract management, technology resources, and
" communications
Denotes HQ Positions
I Denotes Field Positions
Proactive Fraud Detection - > IBIS Tier 1 - entering Integrity-Based Processing- > Special/Undercover
using systems, data mining, applicant/petitioner data for analytically review CIS Documents - generating
and fraud indicators to actively submission to IBIS systems, regulations, policies, immigration benefit documents
identify fraud forms, and processes to to be used by individuals
> IBIS Tier 2 - evaluating
minimize the opportunity for assisting investigations
Reactive Fraud Detection - positive IBIS "hits" to confirm
fraud or abuse of the legal
responding to possible fraud identity and resolving hits that > Intelligence Reporting -
immigration system
leads are not national security/public coordinating, developing, and
safety (NS/PS) related disseminating fraud and
Fraud Verification -
background check related
confirming a fraud lead is > IBIS Tier 3 - resolving NS/PS
information and intelligence
actual fraud related hits and referring hits to
ICE
Case Development -
packaging verified fraud leads > CIA Name Trace - resolving
for referral to ICE CIA Name Trace results that
have derogatory information
Fraud Processes
Proactive Fraud Detection
• • • •
Reactive Fraud Detection •
• • •
Fraud Verification • •
Case Development • • •
Post Investigative/ Prosecution • •
Analysis •
Background Check Processes •
IBIS Tier 1 •
IBIS Tier 2 •
IBIS Tier 3 •
•
CIA Name Trace • •
•
integrity Process
Integrity-Based Processing • •
Other Processes
Intelligence Reporting •
• •
Special/Undercover Documents •
•
Law Enforcement
Community
Other Government
Agencies
Fraud
Priorities' Proactive Enforcement Results
Fraud Fraud Referrals
Leads Enforcement
Detection
Fraud (FDNS HQ)
Evaluations Enforcement
Results
External Reactive
Leads Case With No Fraud Found
Fraud Adjudication
Suspicious-
Detection Fraud Leads
(FDU/DO) Additional Files To Adjudicate
Applications/ and Files
Petitions
Applications/
Petitions
Adjudicative
Positive IBIS IBIS Tier 2 - Decisions
IBIS Tier 1 - Results Resolved Hits
Name Vetting and
Documents Name Adjudication
In Files Non-NS/PS
Submission
Resolution*
Resolved
Hits Investigations And
IBIS Tier 3 - Subsequent*
NS/PS Cases Needing Enforcement H
Resolution* Enforcement Action
| Enforcement Results
* Initial resolution (Tier 2) and resolution of serious hits (Tier 3) is performed at each FDU and in DOs for forms not handled by the NBC. Each Service Center(SC) Triage (Tier 2) NS/PS hit resolved
by FDU.
Applications/
Petitions
Adjudicative
Positive IBIS IBIS Tier 2 - Decisions
IBIS Tier 1 - Results Resolved Hits
Name Vetting and
Documents Name Adjudication
In Files Non-NS/PS
Submission
Resolution*
Resolved
Hits Investigations And
IBIS Tier 3 - Subsequent/
NS/PS Cases Needing
Resolution* Enforcement Action
Enforcement Results
' FDNS is evaluating the feasibility of centralizing aspects of the Background Check Resolution process. Under a Centralized concept: initial resolution (Tier 2) is performed in a central location for all
offices and resolution of serious hits (Tier 3) fe performed at each FDU and in DOs for forms not handled by the NBC. In a decentralized model, each Service CenterfSC) Triage (Tier 2) NS/PS hit
resolved by FDU.
Derog or No Derog
Adjudicative
Resolved
Decisions
Hits
FDNS Resolves Hit Adjudications
> FDNS HQ personnel actively participate in DHS > Patriot Act Section 403 A and B
and other working groups
> Terrorist Screening Center Working Group
FDNS Processes
Proactive
_ . Reactive
_ . c„ .
Fraud /•»„«.„
Case . Post
.. .. CIA Name
System Fraud Fraud verification Develooment lnvest'9ative Trace
Detection Detection Venficatlon Development Analysjs Tierl Tier 2 Tier 3
ChoicePoint
• • • •
Other Government
Agency System •
IBIS
• • •
Intelink TBD TBD TBD
> Consolidated CIS Data System and Proactive Data Mining System:
- Continue to use Consolidated C3 LAN for data mining
- Consider adding additional data to system
- Use existing data mining tools as a test bed for long term data mining solution
- Evaluate additional software to increase capability of data mining
(SES)
(SES)
Fraud Branch Operations Branch Background Check (BC) Branch Support Services Branch
1 Chief 1 Chief 1 Chief 1 Chief
(GS-14/15) (GS-14/15) (GS-14/15) (GS-14/15)
Planning and Development Unit Law Enforcement Liaison Unit Planning and Development Unit Technology Support Unit
2 Officers 2 Officers, 1 Officer 1 Officer 1 Officer
(GS-13/14) (GS-13/14) (GS-13/14) (GS-13/14)
Intelligence Unit Service Center Fraud Detection Unit CIA Name Trace Unit FDU Systems Support Section
2 Officers 5 Chiefs TBD 1 Specialist
(GS-13/14) (GS-13/14) (GS-13/14) (GS-12/13)
• New Staff
• Existing Staff D Denotes HQ Positions
• Contractors D Denotes Field Positions
Program Analyst (GS-12/13) Assist in developing and assessing systems used by FDNS
HQ, Computer
Contractor (GS-12/13 equivalents) Assist in developing and assessing systems used by FDNS
Support Section
Serve as FDU Chief overseeing FDU operations
FDU Chief (GS-13/14)
Coordinate Immigration Officers in the Field Office Anti-Fraud Units
Perform fraud-related work verifying fraud leads for referral to ICE
IRS(GS-5/7/9/11/12)
Perform IBIS Tier 3 activities such as contacting law enforcement agencies to
FDU Senior IRS (GS-13)
obtain hit information and resolving IBIS hits
Program Analyst (GS-12/13) Assist in developing and assessing systems used by FDNS
Immigration Process S S S
Immigration Law
^ ^
Intel Analysis School - FLETC
^ ^
Investigative Analysis
^
1 The co-location of FDUs and SCs is not an absolute requirement. Should it become viable financially, we may want to consider co-locating the FDUs with Regional CIS offices, as they are also
responsible for supporting centers and field offices within their respective geographic areas. This would also be consistent with ICE's Benefit Fraud Unit structure, albeit their legacy INS Regional
Investigations Offices are now referred to as "areas".
* Cost reduction due to 45 new staff hired in 2004 being fully on-board
> Development of proactive fraud capability could result in highly variable IT development costs
> Decision regarding IBIS Check centralization could result in the hiring of a sizable contract staff
> Decision regarding ICE's ownership stake in the background check process could greatly reduce FDNS financial requirements
> Develop joint CIS/ICE Anti-Fraud Strategy, case referral criteria, process, and MOU
> Develop MOU containing respective CIS and ICE guidelines regarding referral of NS/PS cases
> Enhance current reactive (leads-based) data mining and pattern analysis efforts
> Develop case management tracking system that will track referrals and case progress
> Review the integrity of CIS policies, procedures, operations, and other activities to identify and remove systemic vulnerabilities
> Develop standardized IBIS triage process at each SC and field office
> Develop training modules for fraud detection and background check resolution activities
> Serve as primary conduit to/from ICE and other LEAs emphasizing the importance of info sharing between agencies
> Develop centralized/controlled policy and process to provide immigration documents and other benefits to informants and other
LEA cooperatives
> Participate in DHS intelligence, LEA information sharing, and Terrorist Support Center working groups
Develop proactive data mining capability (auto check of new receipts to fraud indicators)
Develop MOUs with all organizations owning systems/data needed for proactive data mining (RAPS, SEVIS, etc.)
Ensure Background Check System includes FDNS functional requirements
Finalize requirements for Case Tracking System
Obtain server for FDNS
Implement To-Be processes from Operational Design & Business Plan document
Finalize CIA name trace process