cholesterol synthesis
Bernhard Lindenthal,* Abraham Simatupang,* Maria Teresa Dotti,?Antonio Federico,t
Dieter Liitjohann,* and Klaus von Bergma".*
Department of Clinical Pharmacology,* University of Bonn, Sigmund-FreudStrasse25, 53 105 Bonn,
Germany, and Istituto di Scienze Neurologiche,+Universita di Siena, Siena, Italy
Abstract Urinary excretion of mevalonic acid was investi- this diurnal variation in serum concentrations of
gated as an indicator of cholesterol synthesis. In normoli- mevalonic acid, a significant correlation between
pemic volunteers, excretion of mevalonic acid averaged 3.51
f 0.59 (SD) pg,/kg x day'; (n = 24) and was not different from mevalonic acid in fasting serum and total cholesterol
patients with hypercholesterolemia(3.30 f 0.92 pdkg x day'; synthesis measured by the fecal balance method has
n = 24). In patients with cerebrotendineous xanthomatosis, been observed under metabolic ward conditions (3).
the excretion was significantly higher (8.55 f 1.92 pg/kg x Under outpatient conditions, however, Popjak et al. (4)
mevalonic acid between normolipemic volunteers and muday) and is independent of hypercholesterolemia
patients with hypercholesterolemia. Although dietary and gender.
cholesterol intake was significantly higher in volunteers
Reproducibility of daily excretion of mevalonic acid
(291 k 70 muday) than in patients with hypercholeste-
rolemia (179 k 89 muday; P < 0.05) this difference did To investigate the reproducibility of the daily excre-
not affect mevalonic acid excretion. In contrast, the tion of mevalonic acid, the day to day variation in
(0.011 f 0.002%), and female patients with hyper- 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
cholesterolemia (0.010 f0.001%). The data indicate that Cholesterol Synthesis (mg/day)
the percentage of mevalonic acid that escapes choles-
Fig. 1. Comparison of cholesterol synthesis measured by fecal bal-
terol synthesis is extremely constant over the whole ance and 24h urinary excretionof mevalonic acid in 12 normolipemic
range of total cholesterol synthesis (560 m u d a y to 1790 healthy volunteers and 23 patients with hypercholesterolemia.
None 18 169 f 40
Simvastatin 1 x 10
or 6 108 f 1 7 O
Lovastatin 2x10
Simvastatin 1x 2 0
or 19 98 f 7.
Lovastatin 2x20
Simvastatin 1x 4 0
or 9 84 f 1 P
Lovastatin 2x40
Values are given as means f SEM;n, number of patients.
“Significantlydifferent from no treatment, P < 0.01.
Effect of pravastatin and cholestyramine on resulted only in a marginally greater reduction in the
excretion of mevalonic acid