In the lecture the professor make several point about The professor argues about Howver the reading

states about

The first point that the professor use to contrast the reading is According to the professor However the reading point differs because

The second point that the professor use to contrast the reading is The professor claims However the reading states

In conclusion the point made by professor contrast with the reading

I agree student should take standardized test to prove that they are learning, because I think its the only prove that. The first reason is because not all of student have the will to study. Many student especially child with young age doesnt recognize the importance of study. They only study because there is a test, not because they want to study.

The second reason is because standardized test imporve the quality of student. With test student are required to learn, even if they dont like it. By learning their knowledge become better, and also they train their brain too. By learning , they become smarter not only in the knowledge but also in life skill like problem solving skill, hard work skill, responsibility

Finally the third reason is because standard test make the teacher become responsible for their student. With standard test teavher must make the student understand the material he teach, If the student doesnt understand their score will be very bad. Also if the teacher doesnt teach good enough , the National test will reflect that.

In conclusion I agree student should take standardized test to prove that they are learning because all of that reason. I think by taking test student will be forced to study and by study their quality will increased.

The reading make several point about bread as the first grain based food. The professor cast doubt on the reading by claiming that bread was not the first but bear.

The first point that professor cast doubt on the reading is bear is easier to make. The professor stated that bear is just made from natural fermentation process without human effort. However bread different because to make it, human has to grind the wheat first. The professor think that idea to grind it first is difficult to get.

The second point that professor argue is bear fermentation process caused bubble thai si obvious to be seen. And also it is light texture and human can taste it. However, bread is made from the wheat that has to baked in fire first. Early human didnt bake food in fire;

In conclusion the professor cast doubt on the reading because she think bear is the first grain food. Bear is easier to found from fermentation process and its bubble is obvious to be seen. That is different from bread that must be grind the wheat first and then bake it in fire.

I agree teacher should encourage student to question because I think teacher job is not just give knowledge but teach how to learn.

The first reason teacher should push the student to question is because student will love to study. From my opinion good teacher should not only teach student knowledge, but also teach life skill. By pushing the student to question student will be more creative, not passive accepted what the teacher said. The second reason teacher should push the student to question is student will be more interested in lesson. Teacher will know what the student opinion about the lesson. Teacher can give answer about what the student doesnt understand. In a group discussion student will be more active and will try to understand.

In conclusion , I think it is better for the teacher to make the student active questioning because the student will be more creative and more interested in the lesson.

I agree country should not isolated themselves, A country has to work together with other country in order to develop the country. First, a country cant fulfill all of the countrs need just by itself. For example Indonesia need technology from the advanced country, on the other hand the advanced country need natural resources from Indonesia. So the relation give advantage to both country.

Second, with cooperating with other country make the country more stronger. Usually a country cooperate with country in same region and then together make organisasation like Asean. Inside the asean organisastion each country will help the other member. For example if one country is in financial crisis, other country will give help in the form of loan.

In conclusion I think there are so many advantage if a country work together with other country like the point I have stated. The cooperation can be in the form of trade.