Anda di halaman 1dari 7

# IJBSTR RESEARCH PAPER VOL 1 [ISSUE 8] AUGUST 2013

## ISSN 2320 6020

Comparison of Traffic Noise Prediction Using FHWA and ERTC Models in Gorakhpur City
Swati Tiwari and R. K. Shukla*

77 ijbstr.org

IJBSTR RESEARCH PAPER VOL 1 [ISSUE 8] AUGUST 2013 level at a distance of 180 m, and at a height of 112 m from the ground [7]. In the present paper modified FHWA model[8] and ERTC model of Thailand [7] are being used for the traffic noise prediction and also a comparative study is being done to check for the suitability for the assessment of traffic noise in the Gorakhpur City. 2 TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODELS For the prediction of traffic noise in Gorakhpur City following two models, FHWA and ERTC model of Thailand have been used. 2.1 The modified FHWA model in Indian Context [8] Seven categories has been made for the classification of vehicles and the detailed method has been described here. For each category of vehicle the hourly Leq value is calculated using following formula: Leqi = L0 + Avs + AD + As.eqn 1 Where, Leqi = Hourly equivalent noise level for each vehicle type L0 = The reference energy mean emission level AD = Distance correction As = Ground cover correction Avs = Volume and speed correction for subscribe Formulas for prediction of the noise The individual noise emission equations used in the calculation for the prediction of noise levels is given in Table 2[5],S denotes speed of the vehicles in kmph.

## ISSN 2320 6020

Leq=10 log [

/10 ]..eqn 2 =1 10

2.2 The ERTC model of Thailand The Environmental Research and Training Centre (ERTC) of Thailand for environmental impact assessment have developed this model [7]. Vehicles were classified into two groups and the average stationary noise level of each group was then determined by measurement of many vehicles. The power level of each group was determined by measuring the noise level of running vehicles. The equivalent sound level Leq observed at a certain receiving point is given by, Leq = PWL 10 log 2ld + Ld + Lg,eqn 3 [10] Where PWL is A-weighted energy average power level of vehicle, dB(A), l is the distance from a traffic line to receiving point, m, Ld and Lg are the correction value for distance and diffraction attenuation, dB(A), and d is the average distance between front of vehicles, m. d = 1000 V/Q eqn 4[11] Where V is the average speed of vehicles, km/h and Q is the traffic volume, Vehicles/h. The energy power level of vehicles is given by: For large vehicle group: PWL = 75.1 + 20.4 log V. eqn 5[12] For small vehicle group: PWL = 67.8 + 20.4 log V. eqn 6[13] For a number of vehiclesthe average power level of mixed type is given as follows: PWL = 67.8 + 20.4 log V + 10 log [(1a) + 5.37 a] 10 log 2ld + Ld + Lg, .eqn 7[14] Where a is the ratio of the large number of vehicles to the total number vehicles. . 2.3 Need of Traffic Noise Prediction in India There are many different noise prediction models which have been developed by many western countries. Most of the models are based on L10 [15], Leq and other characteristics [16]. In India, the transportation sector is growing at a very fast rate as a result there is enormous increase in the vehicular traffic noise. As a result many problems due to heavy traffic noise is being identified. In India, the traffic noise generated generally exceeds the prescribed levels [17]. Hence, to assess noise levels set by government authorities and in planning and

Table 2.Individual Noise Emission Equations [9] Calculation of equivalent noise level For each vehicle type (Leqi) is calculated using eqn 1 and then the total hourly Leqvalue and the combined hourly Leq value is calculated by logarithmic summation of hourly Leq value of each category.

78 ijbstr.org

IJBSTR RESEARCH PAPER VOL 1 [ISSUE 8] AUGUST 2013 designing of city road networks traffic noise prediction models are needed. 3 STUDY AREAS 3.1 Site Selection In the present work the study is mainly intended to measure the noise levels at major traffic locations in Gorakhpur City, India. Eleven sites have been selected for this study which is depicted in Fig3.1.

ISSN 2320 6020 4 EVALUATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE For the evaluation of traffic noise in Gorakhpur City following materials and methodology has been used. 4.1 Materials and Methodology Methodology of noise level and traffic data collection The methodology of noise level measurement included measurement of ambient noise, traffic volume and speed at all sampling sites. Measurement of ambient noise level The collection of noise level in dB (A) for 10 hours duration starting from 8.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon and then 2.00 p.m. to 8.00 p.m. has been done at those sampling stations mentioned in the Table 1. At 15 second interval the noise levels have been recorded and hence for 10 minute duration, 40 data was recorded with the help of precision noise level meter of make, Bruel and Kjaer, Denmark (2232) and in dB (A) weighting network. The distance from centerline of the road was 10 meters during the sampling process. Traffic volume Manual calculation of traffic volume was done at the selected observation sites. The recording of total number of vehicles passed in each type, passing in one hour in a single direction has been done in terms of vehicles/hour. Spot speed measurement The traffic spot speed is generally measured with the help of Doppler Radar Speedometer (DRS).But due to the nonavailability of Doppler Radar Speedometer, manual method of spot speed measurement was done to the present study. Two points are marked with a known distance (75 meters) on the road at the sampling site. Stop watch was used to measure and recording of the time taken by the vehicle to cross that distance. The distance was divided with the time taken in crossing the distance and the speed in Km/h for each type of vehicle is calculated and recorded for each hour of study. 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Based on the calculation of Leq by Observed data and the predicted noise levels by FHWA and ERTC models using above equations (1 to 7) following graphical presentation is presented for the study of suitability of models in Indian context.

Fig 3.1: Plan showing the sampling stations selected in Gorakhpur City 3.2 Schedule of Observation The detailed schedule of observation at various sampling stations is given in Table 1

## Table 1.Schedule of Observation

79 ijbstr.org

IJBSTR RESEARCH PAPER VOL 1 [ISSUE 8] AUGUST 2013 5.1 Comparison of Observed Noise level with Predicted Noise Levels using FHWA and ERTC models A graphical presentation in the form of bar charts indicating observed and predicted noise level values at various sampling stations is shown in Fig 5.1 to Fig 5.11, which shows that the predicted values by FHWA and ERTC models are mostly in close proximity with the observed vehicular traffic noise.

80 ijbstr.org

## IJBSTR RESEARCH PAPER VOL 1 [ISSUE 8] AUGUST 2013

ISSN 2320 6020 5.2 Analysis of observed data and discussions The flow of mixed traffic is observed at all the sampling stations. The sampling stations like Kunraghat, Mohaddipur, Deoria Bypass and Transport Nagar are the locations that facilitate the entry and exit of the population from Gorakhpur city, India towards the residential colonies, semi-urban settlements and rural areas around the city. This is the reason that the number of scooters, motorbikes, cars, jeeps, vans etc. passing through these sampling stations are found to be higher than at other locations. The operative routes of the buses, are Transport Nagar and Rustampur, therefore, the number of buses here are high. Similarly, because of no entry regulations, the number of trucks at Transport Nagar, Rustampur, and Deoria bypass turn is high as compared to other sampling stations. The operative routes of auto rickshaws are Kunraghat, Transport Nagar, Rustampur and Nausarh. Through Transport Nagar, Deoria Bypass turn and Rustampur, the Light Commercial Vehicles (LCVs) and minibuses are also plying in large numbers due to the specified entry and operative routes through these points. The tractor/trailers are mostly coming from rural areas; the entries at Rustampur, Transport Nagar and Deoria Bypassturn face the largest number of these vehicles. Generally, the typical Traffic Noise Levels [11] is summarized in Table 3.

## Fig 5.10.Gorakhnath Sampling Station

Table 3.Typical Traffic Noise Levels The observed noise level is lying within the range in some cases like, Kunraghat, Paidlegunj, Deoria Bypass and Kasia Road but out of range in the sites like Mohaddipur, Buxipur, Golghar, Gorakhnath and Transport Nagar .Hence noise regulations should be maintained strictly here for the control of traffic noise. Fig 5.11.Buxipur Sampling Station

81 ijbstr.org

IJBSTR RESEARCH PAPER VOL 1 [ISSUE 8] AUGUST 2013 The complete analysis of data is summarized in Table 4

ISSN 2320 6020 felt that both of these models will prove to be an immense help in regulation of rules in traffic noise assessment. 7 REFERENCES 1. [1] Nirjar, R. S., Jain, S. S., Parida, M. & Katiyar, V. S., Study of transport related noise pollution in Delhi. J. Institution of Engineers (India), Environmental Engineering Division, 84, pp. 615, 2003. Rathe, E. J., Note on two common problems of sound propagation. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 10, pp. 472479, 1969. Anon., Acoustics Attenuation of Sound during Propagation Outdoors. Part 2: General Method of Calculation, ISO 9613-2, 1996. H. N. Rajakumara & R. M. Mahalinge Gowda, Road Traffic Noise Prediction Models: A Review Int. J. Sus. Dev. Plann. Vol. 3, No. 3 (2008) 25727 Anon., Highway Noise Measurements for Verification of Prediction Models (DOT-TSCOST78-2/DOT-TSC-FHWA-78-1), Federal Highway Administration: Washington, 1978. Campbell, S., A critical review of some traffic noise prediction models. Journal of Applied Acoustics, 62, pp. 271287, 2001. Suksaard, T. & Sukasem, P., Road traffic noise prediction model in Thailand. Applied Acoustics, 58(2), pp. 123130, 1999. Pandey Govind, Dubey Soni, Traffic Noise Prediction Using FHWA Model On National Highway - 28 In India, J. Environ. Res. Develop. Vol. 7 No. 1, July-September 2012 Pattnaik G. B., Traffic Noise Prediction of Gorakhpur City, M.Tech Disser., submitted to Department of Civil Engineering, M.M.M.E.C. Gorakhpur (Unpublished), (2006). Cammarata, G., Cavalieri, S. & Fichera, A. A neural network architecture for noise prediction. Neura Networks, 8(6), 1995. Burgess, M. A., Noise prediction for urban traffic conditions related to measurements in the Sydney Metropolitan Area. Applied Acoustics, 10, pp. 17, 1977. Josse, R., Notions dacoustique, ed. Eyrolles, Paris, France, 1972. Bertoni, D., Franchini, A. & Magnoni, M., Centre Scientifique et Technique des Batiments, 1987. Samuels, S. E., The generation of tire/road noise. Australian Road Research Board Research Report ARR 12, 1982.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8. Table 4.Comparison between FHWA and ERTC models at various Sampling Stations 6 CONCLUSIONS A steep increase in noise levels has been rendered due to large number of high speed vehicles playing on roads which has been possible due to increased traffic volume and congestion near cities and urban dwellings,. The analysis of data has shown that the observed noise levels at the selected sampling stations in Gorakhpur City is alarmingly high and the steps need to be taken for the control of noise by the prescribed authority. Also by comparing the observed noise levels with the predicted noise levels by FHWA and ERTC models it has been analyzed and concluded that both the models have predicted the traffic noise in Gorakhpur City with a fair degree of accuracy and in future both the models can be implemented in Indian scenario. To control the traffic noise, there striction on traffic flow and speed can be planned especially along the traffic points of cities and urban areas, using the outcome of this study. It is 9.

10.

11.

## 12. 13. 14.

82 ijbstr.org

IJBSTR RESEARCH PAPER VOL 1 [ISSUE 8] AUGUST 2013 15. Anon., Predicting Road Traffi c Noise, United Kingdom Department of the Environment/HMSO: London. 16. Mishra M. K., Study And Development Of Road Traffic Noise Model, M. E. Thesis, submitted to Department of Mechanical Engineering Thapar University,(2010) 17. Jain, S. S., Parida, M. & Bhattacharya, C. C., Development of comprehensive highway noise model for Indian conditions. J. Indian Road Congress, 62(3), pp. 453488, 2000.

83 ijbstr.org