50
countries
represented
Algeria
Estonia
Argen>na
Finland
Austria
France
Belgium
Gambia
Brazil
Germany
Bulgaria
Ghana
Canada
India
Chile
Indonesia
China
Ireland
Colombia
Italy
Croa>a
Japan
Czech
Republic
Jordan
Denmark
Libya
Lithuania
Mali
Malta
Netherlands
Nigeria
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russian
Fed.
Slovakia
Slovenia
South
Africa
Spain
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
UK
Uruguay
USA
Yemen
Zimbabwe
What could explain survival differences ? Longer delays, more advanced stage Availability and uptake of screening Access to treatment Differences in co-morbidity Quality of treatment Organisation of treatment services Human and financial resources
after Richards, 2009
20
40
60
80
100
1.0 5.6
* CUBA USA
CANADA SWEDEN JAPAN AUSTRALIA FINLAND FRANCE ITALY ICELAND SPAIN NETHERLANDS NORWAY SWITZERLAND GERMANY AUSTRIA DENMARK MALTA PORTUGAL N IRELAND SCOTLAND ENGLAND IRELAND WALES SLOVENIA POLAND CZECH REP. ESTONIA BRAZIL SLOVAKIA ALGERIA
41.7
50.7
BREAST (F)
1 2 2 1 24 1 31
8 7 2 14 27 2 60
1 2 2 1 24 1 31
8 7 2 14 27 2 60
11 24 24 30 87 4 180
Additional analyses
Timely, high-quality estimates: Geographic variation Survival trends from 1995 to 2010 ... Short-term predictions Estimates by race/ethnic group Prevalence by time since diagnosis Population cure Avoidable premature deaths (cancer, race)
Wider programme
Survival analyses, plus Analytic tools Training in survival methodology
Short courses in London (8th course in 2013) Bursaries for low-income countries Field courses
Doctoral and post-doc fellowships Methodological development network Health policy applications Involvement of patients
Time-line
Protocol [final amendments ...] Ethical and statutory approval Peer review Funding decisions [also in progress]
Data submission from October 2012 Quality control by June 2013 Analyses completed from June 2013 Cancer survival course 24-28 June 2013 First publications from Oct 2013